On Mon, 16 May 2011 13:08:36 +0200, Alfa21-mobile freerun...@my.is.it
wrote:
Then we need debian packages for FSO stack (anyone know if they
exists and
what is the current status?) and we can start using it.
you can look here:
Radek,
On 2011-05-09 21:08, Radek Polak wrote:
On Saturday 07 May 2011 17:20:50 Joif wrote:
Hi list
In the announcement of QtMoko v33 there were some discussions about the
future of QtMoko.
But to date, I have not a clear vision about the current situation and the
future of QtMoko, so I want
On Monday 16 May 2011 10:47:56 Philip Rhoades wrote:
I try to add QtCreator projects for all new projects and i try to make
sure the apps work also on PC where you can debug them easily. I havent
looked for more integration like automatic deploy and debugging on the
device, but on the
Then we need debian packages for FSO stack (anyone know if they exists and
what is the current status?) and we can start using it.
you can look here:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=fsosearchon=namessuite=allsection=all
___
Openmoko
2011/5/16 Alfa21-mobile freerun...@my.is.it:
Then we need debian packages for FSO stack (anyone know if they exists and
what is the current status?) and we can start using it.
you can look here:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=fsosearchon=namessuite=allsection=all
+ a few newer
Btw, I've been thinking about integrating qtmoko to Debian. Perhaps as a
Debian Pure Blend, or even building single packages. I didn't go deeper yet,
but will try to share this ideia during Debconf. Actually, pabs mentioned it
once to me in some debian irc channel, so strictly speaking
Wow, it would be great! :)
Joif
Btw, I've been thinking about integrating qtmoko to Debian. Perhaps as a
Debian Pure Blend, or even building single packages. I didn't go deeper yet,
but will try to share this ideia during Debconf. Actually, pabs mentioned it
once to me in some debian irc
2011/5/9 Radek Polak pson...@seznam.cz:
qtopia = qt extended = qt extended improved = QtMoko
...
From technical point of view QtMoko is using regular Qt as framework for GUI,
networking and other nice features that Qt supports. Qt is just compiled with
custom configure switches. We can upgrade
Am Mittwoch, den 11.05.2011, 21:06 +0300 schrieb Timo Jyrinki:
2011/5/9 Radek Polak pson...@seznam.cz:
qtopia = qt extended = qt extended improved = QtMoko
...
From technical point of view QtMoko is using regular Qt as framework for
GUI,
networking and other nice features that Qt
On Wed, 11 May 2011 21:06:01 +0300, Timo Jyrinki wrote
2011/5/9 Radek Polak pson...@seznam.cz:
qtopia = qt extended = qt extended improved = QtMoko
...
From technical point of view QtMoko is using regular Qt as framework for
GUI,
networking and other nice features that Qt supports. Qt is
On Saturday 07 May 2011 17:20:50 Joif wrote:
Hi list
In the announcement of QtMoko v33 there were some discussions about the
future of QtMoko.
But to date, I have not a clear vision about the current situation and the
future of QtMoko, so I want to ask some questions to developers.
1)
2011/5/7 Joif fdvj...@vodafone.it:
But to date, I have not a clear vision about the current situation and the
future of QtMoko, so I want to ask some questions to developers.
I'm a Debian developer, but not QtMoko developer. I feel though that I
can answer some of the questions from my
?
Thank you!
Regards
Joif
--
View this message in context:
http://openmoko-public-mailinglists.1958.n2.nabble.com/About-QtMoko-future-tp6340267p6340267.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Openmoko community mailing
13 matches
Mail list logo
