On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Ranbo ran...@gmail.com wrote:
H'.if there reason for the higher death rate is correct wouldn't
this also apply to people who sit for prolonged periods in front of computer
screens?
Sure, if those people did nothing to offset the deleterious effects
I have several DVD's, copies of a locally produced show that we now have the
rights to reproduce, that I'm trying to put on one DVD. The episodes are
only about 20 minutes/DVD. Nero 6 had an option for this, but I kept getting
an error message. I have a copy of Nero 7, this option seems to
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:23 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:
On Jan 20, 2010, at 2:32 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:
Huh? Is this a peecee thing? What's the replacement? Chrome is not ready
for prime time, and IE sucks.
The author is just bitching and moaning about the slowing of their upgrade
cycle.
I have a customer with an unusual problem... Her Dell Latitude D610 (5 yrs
old) has both an Ethernet port and Wireless G. Her wireless did not work until
she discovered by accident that it would start working when she disabled the
Broadcom drivers for the Ethernet port.I have upgraded her
Sorry, but this makes no sense as written. Don't we all have a 100%
chance of death? How can someone have a 101% chance of death? As
professional reporters are replaced with amateurs, I'm afraid we're
going to be seeing lots more of this type of nonsense in the years to
come.
In a provocative
Maybe the wording wasn't tight enough for you, Tony. My chances of
death are 100% given enough time. However, I know I should not take
risks that are likely to hasten it. Reducing risks reduce the odds of
dying sooner. Is that clear enough?
Thank you,
Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
I've received a few emails stating that starting next month cell phone
companies will be given access to personal cell phone numbers and that one
must call a special number to request that your number not be given out.
Can anyone verify whether this is correct or just another rumor? If the
I've received a few emails stating that starting next month cell phone
companies will be given access to personal cell phone numbers and that one
must call a special number to request that your number not be given out.
Can anyone verify whether this is correct or just another rumor? If the
Your belief that cell phone numbers are now, or have ever been,
private, is mistaken.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/cell411.asp
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ranbo ran...@gmail.com wrote:
I've received a few emails stating that starting next month cell phone
companies will be
I've received a few emails stating that starting next month cell phone
companies will be given access to personal cell phone numbers and that one
must call a special number to request that your number not be given out.
Can anyone verify whether this is correct or just another rumor? If the
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Stewart Marshall
revsamarsh...@earthlink.net wrote:
A lot of work is being done on fuel cells and better batteries. I really
think the answers lie in that. Then no need to transport anything you have
the power generation pack on board.
You still need to
IMHO, there is no way in hell you're going to fix a wireless issue
with WinXP by remote control. In fact, even if you had it I wouldn't
recommend wasting a lot of time with it and instead would just
reinstall WinXP clean in an afternoon and be done with it (hopefully).
An even better solution
On Jan 21, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Tony B wrote:
Sorry, but this makes no sense as written. Don't we all have a 100%
chance of death? How can someone have a 101% chance of death? As
professional reporters are replaced with amateurs, I'm afraid we're
going to be seeing lots more of this type of
On Jan 21, 2010, at 9:18 AM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
Another interpretation of this slowing of the cycle indicate that the
program is getting to be finished.
That will never happen.
*
** List info, subscription
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/technology/personaltech/21basics.html?8ciremc=cir
Points out where to find different tests that test different kinds of
things.
Also notes that some ISPs will throttle you back after a few seconds
of file transfer. That favors loading web pages over file
http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/
Great rant from Pogue about manufacturers who publish false product
specs.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ranbo ran...@gmail.com wrote:
I've received a few emails stating that starting next month cell phone
companies will be given access to personal cell phone numbers and that one
must call a special number to request that your number not be given out.
Can anyone
I found out two days ago my ISP...Qwest...has an excessive use policy. I
apparently hit it but they will not tell me what the bandwith was. They
won't even hint. They claim on their website that anyone doing for example
340 gigs of hulu watching is 'excessive'. Yeah, I think so too...I also
On 1/20/10, Marcio m...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Back thereI received several prizes in photo contests with the Argus C3.
Marcio
-Original Message-
From: b_s-wilk b1sun...@yahoo.es
Sent: Jan 20, 2010 5:39 PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@listserv.aol.com
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] digital camera shutter
Not unless you want yours to be public.
I wouldn't mind so much if I didn't have to pay for incoming calls, as
in other countries. We get too many spam calls as it is--and have to pay
for some of them too! Had to change phone numbers twice to stop getting
junk calls.
20 matches
Mail list logo
