Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad.

2009-03-26 Thread Marcio
I don;t think it is a DOS program, I used it with Windows 98 and ME. Marcio -Original Message- From: Rich Schinnell richnrockvi...@gmail.com Sent: Mar 25, 2009 5:09 PM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad. Marcio, If it is a dos program maybe

Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad.

2009-03-26 Thread Reid Katan
Quoting Marcio m...@ix.netcom.com: Yes I have a password to open the program. All it has are the dates of appointments for new and old patientes and it works very well. I Apparently, it *doesn't* work very well. Not any more. Win 98 and ME did things differently than does XP. I may be

Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad.

2009-03-26 Thread Jeff Wright
-Original Message- I don't know what Microsoft did for backwards compatibility when it moved Win2K and XP, but you might be running into some limitation. Your only hope would be to move to a new program, or set an older computer aside with ME on it and use that just to run Organizer.

Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad.

2009-03-25 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
Marcio I think it is a problem with the program and not computers. I am not sure how old Lotus Organizer 5 is, but it may have internal limitations that you are running up against. Stewart At 09:25 AM 3/25/2009, you wrote: See, now I have this brand new Computer that I put together (with

Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad.

2009-03-25 Thread Chris Dunford
Frequently it told me You have insufficient internal resources. Save your file and close Organizer. Yes, I still use Lotus Organizer 5 for my appointments. This really sounds like a bug in Organizer more than any real lack of resources in your PC. Might be time to find something new. There's

Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad.

2009-03-25 Thread Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)
Marcio, It appears that version 5 is old; version 6.1 was released to be compatible with windows 2000 and XP (see http://www-01.ibm.com/software/lotus/products/organizer). So, I would guess that version 5 is somewhere around 10 years old. If you can replace it with another suite of programs,

Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad.

2009-03-25 Thread mike
5 came out ten years ago...good guess. On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS) mark.sny...@ngc.com wrote: Marcio, It appears that version 5 is old; version 6.1 was released to be compatible with windows 2000 and XP (see

Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad.

2009-03-25 Thread Marcio
not sure I want to pay 68.50 to have version 6.1 and no support. Open to suggestions. Many, many thanks! Marcio -Original Message- From: mike xha...@gmail.com Sent: Mar 25, 2009 12:53 PM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad. 5 came out ten years

Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad.

2009-03-25 Thread db
version 6.1 and no support. Open to suggestions. Many, many thanks! Marcio -Original Message- From: mike xha...@gmail.com Sent: Mar 25, 2009 12:53 PM To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad. 5 came out ten years ago...good guess. On Wed, Mar

Re: [CGUYS] What a pain... Sad.

2009-03-25 Thread Rich Schinnell
Marcio, If it is a dos program maybe the file is in some kind of format that can be exported or brought into some other newer program. I see your using windows XP home edition. You might want to try changing some of the options for the program to see if that helps. I am assuming that it is