Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With all the complaining about missing packages (i.e. kernel-source package)
and the debate about what should have been left out instead (i.e. emacs or
alternate kernels, etc.) I had a thought that might be helpful.
Obviously, in order to make everybody
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 10:22, Warly wrote:
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snipped]
So I see 5 images, and maybe one or two are not completely full, but at
least everything will be included. WDYT?
I am convinced that this is the good way, giving more to people so
that they
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:22, Warly wrote:
A compromise would be to give those 2 base ISOs for free and let club
members have access to 3 more specific complementary ISOs.
Only 3? (-:
Cheers; Leon
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 05:22 am, Warly wrote:
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With all the complaining about missing packages (i.e. kernel-source
package) and the debate about what should have been left out instead
(i.e. emacs or alternate kernels, etc.) I had a thought that
John Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If mandrake moved more strongly to a subscription service, then
maybe releases could be made when they are ready, rather than at a
specific date. This could ensure that we don't have some of the
silly problems that are plaguing 9.2
whatever time you put
With all the complaining about missing packages (i.e. kernel-source package)
and the debate about what should have been left out instead (i.e. emacs or
alternate kernels, etc.) I had a thought that might be helpful.
Obviously, in order to make everybody happy, the number of images needs to be
, 21 2003, 15:45,Greg Meyer:
With all the complaining about missing packages (i.e. kernel-source
package) and the debate about what should have been left out instead (i.e.
emacs or alternate kernels, etc.) I had a thought that might be helpful.
Obviously, in order to make everybody
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 01:30 pm, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
, 21 2003, 15:45,Greg Meyer:
With all the complaining about missing packages (i.e. kernel-source
package) and the debate about what should have been left out instead
(i.e. emacs or alternate kernels, etc.) I had a thought