/linux.html
http://www.systrace.org
Can i request it as feature? Or what?
bye,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can i see differences between 'rpm -qa' of
two machines ? Yes, i can and i see.
Is it normal? Why? If it isn't normal, i can attach the results
and my reports here or publish in the web.
Thanks in advance,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:53, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
How many possibilities of add systrace[1] in the next release in
kernel-secure? It's sounds very good and not impact any system
without a policy configuration.The users that are using
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:56, Pixel wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm doing some tests with replay install of drakx(Mandrake 9.0).
The first install occurs perfectly and in the last step i built
the floppy to replay.In the second machine with the same hardware
(yes
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 17:52, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
Hi,
How many possibilities of add systrace[1] in the next release in
kernel-secure? It's sounds very good and not impact any system
without a policy configuration.The users that are using
kernel-secure without
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 15:41, Pixel wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:56, Pixel wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm doing some tests with replay install of drakx(Mandrake 9.0).
The first install occurs perfectly
, this is useless. But we can try something different.
Right!
Just for fun:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#policy
http://www.debian.org/doc/misc-manuals#history
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
project.
bye,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 18:17, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le Vendredi 7 Février 2003 18:04, Gustavo Franco a écrit :
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 20:28, Michael Scherer wrote:
Well, we could try something like morethan one developper per package.
Actually, in Debian, only the packager can change
is: Why not systrace on the next
kernel-secure? Can any developer clarify to me?
Thanks,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 08:49, Buchan Milne wrote:
On 7 Feb 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
In one months or two you're doing: apt-get update; apt-get -uy
upgrade.I can see :P
We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this in
cron), and it gives me more than Debain does
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 07:47, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 01:13, Gustavo Franco a écrit :
But, I don't think we need to be a carbon copie of Debian.
Debian is not the only volunteers OS project, everybody seems to forget
FreeBSD, and other, or even some smalls os
about your own way and your own choices.
[1] = http://people.debian.org/~blade/XFS-Install/
[2] = http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206
bye,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 15:38, John Goerzen wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mandrake as a new project inside Debian.But it was refused here, many feels
involved.But if you change the original idea, try debian-project ML.The
Debian-Mandrake can receive financial support
can contact
SPI members about your interests using spi-general[1].
[1] = http://lists.spi-inc.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/spi-general
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
installer).
And now, we can stop with this discussion about apt x urpmi !
Please,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/ )
And there is more, but, this should be enough.
So , merging the differences would not be interesting, for all the works it
represent.
Yes, but we can share our experiences.
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 19:28, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely
useless and out of context...
Definitely, i agree.But some people
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 18:09, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But the discussion under this subject is: Why not systrace on the next
kernel-secure? Can any developer clarify to me?
just because it is not a priority at this time, sorry about that but
we
[...]
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 19:51, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 22:28, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely
useless
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 01:21, Han Boetes wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many possibilities of add systrace[1] in the next release in
kernel-secure? It's sounds very good and not impact any system
without a policy configuration.The users that are using
kernel-secure
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
Just a lurker on this thread (since it's really gone awry), but I would
say definitely not. You've been a very good diplomat
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Any person has the same view of my
was sent only the url containing the archive
of cooker ML pointing to this thread (started as the end is
inevitable) and a slashdot article.
And yes, maybe in a week or two the people will damn me about
MandrakeSoft bankruptcy.It's a Debian Project conspiracy!
troll ;)
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:41, Greg Meyer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 February 2003 03:15 am, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Stupid estimation! My name isn't Martin Schulze!!! I was sent a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the url of this thread, if you can
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:34, Guy.Bormann wrote:
On 10 Feb 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox
/specs
gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
I ran apt-get update and upgrade this morning.
Is testing or unstable more up to date?
unstable
For more information, please read: Debian testing distribution [1]
[1] = http://www.debian.org/devel/testing
Bye,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 15:41, Pixel wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:56, Pixel wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm doing some tests with replay install of drakx(Mandrake 9.0).
The first install occurs perfectly
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 12:17, Pixel wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
something must have gone wrong with one of the 2 installs. can you
provide /root/drakx/report.bug.gz on both boxes?
I can't provide the report.bug.gz of the first installation.Other
employee did format
31 matches
Mail list logo
