On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:34, Guy.Bormann wrote: > On 10 Feb 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote: > [snip] > > [edited for clarity; NO CHANGE IN WORDS] > > Stupid estimation! My name isn't Martin Schulze!!! > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > ?????? troll.
> > > I was sent a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^ > This is at the least ambiguous. You cannot blame people for misreading > your messages if the language is not unambiguous. Did you mean to say > "I was sent a mail FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..." Sorry. > Blame it on bad language first before blaming it on bad intentions! > (And that counts for both sides in this "selective reading competition" > subthread...) Talking about bad language, is the text in DWN unreleased[1] in the bad language? No? So, it's ambiguous too.The errors was associated with me, and my comments here.But the it's in good language.Strange, no? [1] = http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/Writing/DWN/dwn-2003-06.html Bye, -- Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> p.s: You're trolling! You aren't discussing about the subjects covered here.Why?
