On Sun, 29 May 2022 14:00:20 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> `String.contains` was introduced in Java 5.
> Some code in java.naming still uses old approach with `String.indexOf` to
> check if String contains specified substring.
> I propose to migrate such usages. Makes code shorter and easier to
On Sun, 29 May 2022 14:00:20 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> `String.contains` was introduced in Java 5.
> Some code in java.naming still uses old approach with `String.indexOf` to
> check if String contains specified substring.
> I propose to migrate such usages. Makes code shorter and easier to
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:53:38 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> …d on macOS
>>
>> This patch simply round up the specified stack size to multiple of the
>> system page size.
>>
>> Test is trivial, simply run java with -Xss option against following code. On
>> MacOS, before the fix, running with
On Sun, 29 May 2022 14:00:20 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> `String.contains` was introduced in Java 5.
> Some code in java.naming still uses old approach with `String.indexOf` to
> check if String contains specified substring.
> I propose to migrate such usages. Makes code shorter and easier to
> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with
> smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when
> called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2.
>
> In general replacement of `Arrays.asList()` with `List.of()` is dubious as
> the latter is
StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could be
migrated to `StringBuilder`.
-
Commit messages:
- [PATCH]
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:57:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
> replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
> There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could
> be migrated
This is continuation of PR #4256
The patch simply rounds up the specified stack size to multiple of the system
page size, on systems where necessary.
The patch is based on the original PR/branch, with reflected remaining
recommendations.
Please review.
Thank you,
Adam
-
Commit
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:57:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
> replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
> There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could
> be migrated
On Tue, 31 May 2022 08:37:19 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
> This is continuation of PR #4256
>
> The patch simply rounds up the specified stack size to multiple of the system
> page size, on systems where necessary.
> The patch is based on the original PR/branch, with reflected remaining
>
On Thu, 26 May 2022 18:50:07 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> May I have this test update reviewed?
>
> The ForceGC could be enhanced by using smaller wait/sleep time, and shared
> cleaner.
>
> Thanks,
> Xuelei
LGTM - but it may be good to have an other reviewer (@mlchung ?)
On Tue, 31 May 2022 11:44:27 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> [JDK-8287137](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8287137) added a
>> bunch of tests into problemlist. Those lists basically exclude every test
>> that runs with --enable-preview.
>>
> This is continuation of PR #4256
>
> The patch simply rounds up the specified stack size to multiple of the system
> page size, on systems where necessary.
> The patch is based on the original PR/branch, with reflected remaining
> recommendations.
>
> Please review.
>
> Thank you,
> Adam
On Tue, 31 May 2022 13:28:30 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Updated Java mannpage
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/launcher/resources/launcher.properties line
> 176:
>
>>
On Fri, 27 May 2022 20:21:12 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> With the `AccessFlag` API, what is the role of the `Modifier` API going
> forward? [Value Objects JEP](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/8277163) defines
> the new `identity` and `value` modifiers. [PR
>
> This patch adds an alternative virtual thread implementation where each
> virtual thread is backed by an OS thread. It doesn't scale but it can be used
> by ports that don't have continuations support in the VM. Aside from
> scalability, the lack of continuations support means:
>
> 1. JVM TI
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:57:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
> replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
> There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could
> be migrated
On Wed, 18 May 2022 06:30:34 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> ### Problem description
>> Minimal jdk image created by jlink with the only jdk.compiler module and its
>> dependencies
>> fails to run java source launcher correctly (for example when --source N is
>> specified).
>> Failing source
On Mon, 30 May 2022 13:20:17 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> [JDK-8287137](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8287137) added a bunch
> of tests into problemlist. Those lists basically exclude every test that runs
> with --enable-preview.
>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:40:56 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
>> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with
>> smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when
>> called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2.
>>
>> In general replacement of
On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:40:56 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
>> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with
>> smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when
>> called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2.
>>
>> In general replacement of
On Mon, 30 May 2022 13:20:17 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> [JDK-8287137](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8287137) added a bunch
> of tests into problemlist. Those lists basically exclude every test that runs
> with --enable-preview.
>
On Sun, 29 May 2022 14:46:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> This patch adds an alternative virtual thread implementation where each
> virtual thread is backed by an OS thread. It doesn't scale but it can be used
> by ports that don't have continuations support in the VM. Aside from
> scalability,
This patch adds an alternative virtual thread implementation where each virtual
thread is backed by an OS thread. It doesn't scale but it can be used by ports
that don't have continuations support in the VM. Aside from scalability, the
lack of continuations support means:
1. JVM TI is not
On Sun, 29 May 2022 14:46:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> This patch adds an alternative virtual thread implementation where each
> virtual thread is backed by an OS thread. It doesn't scale but it can be used
> by ports that don't have continuations support in the VM. Aside from
> scalability,
On Wed, 25 May 2022 06:29:23 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Patch adds the planned support for new vector operations and APIs targeted
>> for [JEP 426: Vector API (Fourth
>> Incubator).](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280173)
>>
>> Following is the brief summary of
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:03:48 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Patch adds the planned support for new vector operations and APIs targeted
> for [JEP 426: Vector API (Fourth
> Incubator).](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280173)
>
> Following is the brief summary of changes:-
On Mon, 30 May 2022 15:40:37 GMT, Gaurav Chaudhari
wrote:
>> This fix ensures that when a lookup for a custom TZ code fails, and an
>> attempt is made to find the GMT offset in order to get the current time,
>> Daylight savings rules are applied correctly.
>
> Gaurav Chaudhari has updated the
On Wed, 25 May 2022 00:35:24 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> This is an early review of changes to better model JVM access flags, that is
>> "modifiers" like public, protected, etc. but explicitly at a VM level.
>>
>> Language level modifiers and JVM level access flags are closely related, but
>>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:39:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This patch adds an alternative virtual thread implementation where each
>> virtual thread is backed by an OS thread. It doesn't scale but it can be
>> used by ports that don't have continuations support in the VM. Aside from
>>
> [JDK-8287137](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8287137) added a bunch
> of tests into problemlist. Those lists basically exclude every test that runs
> with --enable-preview.
> [JDK-8287437](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8287437) makes it
> better: it only disables Loom
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:03:54 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> I expected this change to fix the broken ARM32 port, but it doesn't work.
There is work required to get the arm32 port working again, currently tracked
as JDK-828636 but there may be further issues beyond that.
-
PR:
On Wed, 25 May 2022 00:35:24 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> This is an early review of changes to better model JVM access flags, that is
>> "modifiers" like public, protected, etc. but explicitly at a VM level.
>>
>> Language level modifiers and JVM level access flags are closely related, but
>>
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 21:05:08 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Note that the presence or absence of `ACC_SUPER` has no effect since **Java
>> 8**, which always treats it as set regardless of the actual contents of the
>> binary class file.
>
> For completeness, I think including SUPER is reasonable,
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:39:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This patch adds an alternative virtual thread implementation where each
>> virtual thread is backed by an OS thread. It doesn't scale but it can be
>> used by ports that don't have continuations support in the VM. Aside from
>>
On Mon, 30 May 2022 05:37:16 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> I don't think jdk/nullCaller is right location for this. Maybe jni/nullCaller
> could work. You'll probably need to add the location to an appropriate
> group/tier in test/jdk/TEST.groups, otherwise it won't be run.
I also think
On Mon, 30 May 2022 00:10:50 GMT, Tim Prinzing wrote:
>> Created a test at test/jdk/jdk/nullCaller called NullCallerTest that creates
>> a test module with some resources in it for the actual tests that occur at
>> the native level. The native part was switched to c++ instead of c to make
>>
On Fri, 20 May 2022 04:55:37 GMT, liach wrote:
> Simplify opcode handling, use `final` in `PrimitiveTypeInfo`, and replace the
> hash map with a simple lookup, similar to what's done in
> [JDK-8284880](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8284880) (#8242)
This pull request has now been
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:57:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
> replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
> There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could
> be migrated
> Hello,
>
> here's a PR for a patch submitted on March 2020
> [1](https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4511638/webrev.04/) when Mercurial was a
> thing.
>
> The patch has been edited to adhere to OpenJDK code conventions about
> multi-line (block) comments. Nothing in the code proper has
On Tue, 31 May 2022 16:54:41 GMT, Boris Ulasevich
wrote:
> I expected this change to fix the broken ARM32 port, but it doesn't work.
It would not fix ARM32, because the interpreter stubs need to be predicated on
`Continuations::enabled()`. Also, as my ARM32 experiments show
On Wed, 25 May 2022 00:35:24 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> This is an early review of changes to better model JVM access flags, that is
>> "modifiers" like public, protected, etc. but explicitly at a VM level.
>>
>> Language level modifiers and JVM level access flags are closely related, but
>>
On Thu, 26 May 2022 18:50:07 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> May I have this test update reviewed?
>
> The ForceGC could be enhanced by using smaller wait/sleep time, and shared
> cleaner.
>
> Thanks,
> Xuelei
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: d5b6c7bd
Author:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:41:08 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> Hmm... one benefit of Cleaner is the ease of use to avoid the need of
> managing the reference queue. If the performance of the Cleaner API is a
> concern, perhaps we should look into reducing its overhead?
The code using a Cleaner here
On Thu, 26 May 2022 18:50:07 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> May I have this test update reviewed?
>
> The ForceGC could be enhanced by using smaller wait/sleep time, and shared
> cleaner.
>
> Thanks,
> Xuelei
Sorry, I was working on a history webpage while submit the PR and did
On Fri, 20 May 2022 03:50:58 GMT, liach wrote:
> Simplify calls `Class.forName(String, boolean, ClassLoader)` instead of
> `Class.forName(String)`. `make test
> TEST="jtreg:test/jdk/java/lang/reflect/Proxy"` passes, with the new
> `LazyInitializationTest` failing the eager initialization
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:57:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
> replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
> There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could
> be migrated
On Mon, 30 May 2022 01:17:00 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
>> Xiaohong Gong has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Wrap the offset check into a static method
>
> @PaulSandoz, could you please help to check whether the current
On Tue, 31 May 2022 13:26:17 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> May I have this test update reviewed?
>>
>> The ForceGC could be enhanced by using smaller wait/sleep time, and shared
>> cleaner.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Xuelei
>
> test/lib/jdk/test/lib/util/ForceGC.java line 50:
>
>> 48:
On Thu, 26 May 2022 21:40:42 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> > Even using a Cleaner is a more overhead than necessary. I would have
> > skipped the overhead of a cleaner and Atomic classes with something more
> > self contained as a static method:
>
> I agreed that the using of Cleaner is
On Thu, 26 May 2022 18:50:07 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> May I have this test update reviewed?
>
> The ForceGC could be enhanced by using smaller wait/sleep time, and shared
> cleaner.
>
> Thanks,
> Xuelei
Marked as reviewed by mchung (Reviewer).
-
PR:
On Thu, 26 May 2022 21:40:42 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> Even using a Cleaner is a more overhead than necessary.
> I would have skipped the overhead of a cleaner and Atomic classes with
> something more self contained as a static method:
Hmm... one benefit of Cleaner is the ease of use to
Refactoring some old code in locale providers. The test case data have also
been modified due to:
- There's a bug in `LocaleProviderAdapter.toLocaleArray()` where it did not
handle the case for `no-NO-NY`.
- `Locale.toLanguageTag()` won't handle legacy Java locales, e.g., `ja_JP_JP`
and falls
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:46:18 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Refactoring some old code in locale providers. The test case data have also
> been modified due to:
> - There's a bug in `LocaleProviderAdapter.toLocaleArray()` where it did not
> handle the case for `no-NO-NY`.
> - `Locale.toLanguageTag()`
On Tue, 31 May 2022 19:33:49 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> liach has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
>> since the last revision:
>>
>> Fixes suggested by mandy
>
> Looks good. Thanks.
@mlchung Would you mind sponsoring this patch?
-
PR:
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:57:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct
> replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
> There are some code that still uses StringBuffer in java.naming which could
> be migrated
> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with
> smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when
> called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2.
>
> In general replacement of `Arrays.asList()` with `List.of()` is dubious as
> the latter is
On Thu, 26 May 2022 23:20:27 GMT, liach wrote:
>> Currently, in ProxyBuilder::mapToModule and ProxyBuilder::defineProxyClass,
>> the interfaces are iterated twice. The two passes can be merged into one,
>> yielding the whole proxy definition context (module, package, whether
>> there's
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:21:50 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Gaurav Chaudhari has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Merge branch '8285838' of github.com:Deigue/jdk into 8285838
>> - Merge branch '8285838' of github.com:Deigue/jdk
> This fix ensures that when a lookup for a custom TZ code fails, and an
> attempt is made to find the GMT offset in order to get the current time,
> Daylight savings rules are applied correctly.
Gaurav Chaudhari has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:46:18 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Refactoring some old code in locale providers. The test case data have also
> been modified due to:
> - There's a bug in `LocaleProviderAdapter.toLocaleArray()` where it did not
> handle the case for `no-NO-NY`.
> - `Locale.toLanguageTag()`
On Fri, 20 May 2022 00:10:01 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> liach has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
>> a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
>> by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since
>>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 19:30:07 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
>> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with
>> smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when
>> called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2.
>>
>> In general replacement of
> Time to start getting ready for JDK 20...
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by
the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 36 additional commits since the
last revision:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 19:33:15 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional
>>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 19:30:07 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
>> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with
>> smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when
>> called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2.
>>
>> In general replacement of
On Fri, 27 May 2022 18:40:32 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> as title.
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> do it as naotoj said
Reviewers, could I get a review for CSR
On Tue, 31 May 2022 20:32:13 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Time to start getting ready for JDK 20...
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
> by the merge/rebase. The pull
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:07:06 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> here's a PR for a patch submitted on March 2020
>> [1](https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4511638/webrev.04/) when Mercurial was
>> a thing.
>>
>> The patch has been edited to adhere to OpenJDK code conventions about
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:48:00 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Explicitly implement `remove` and `replace` in `IdentityHashMap` to compare
>> values by identity. Updated API documentation of these two methods
>>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:07:06 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> here's a PR for a patch submitted on March 2020
>> [1](https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4511638/webrev.04/) when Mercurial was
>> a thing.
>>
>> The patch has been edited to adhere to OpenJDK code conventions about
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:07:06 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> here's a PR for a patch submitted on March 2020
>> [1](https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4511638/webrev.04/) when Mercurial was
>> a thing.
>>
>> The patch has been edited to adhere to OpenJDK code conventions about
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:07:06 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> here's a PR for a patch submitted on March 2020
>> [1](https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4511638/webrev.04/) when Mercurial was
>> a thing.
>>
>> The patch has been edited to adhere to OpenJDK code conventions about
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:07:06 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> here's a PR for a patch submitted on March 2020
>> [1](https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/4511638/webrev.04/) when Mercurial was
>> a thing.
>>
>> The patch has been edited to adhere to OpenJDK code conventions about
On Tue, 31 May 2022 20:10:44 GMT, Gaurav Chaudhari
wrote:
>> This fix ensures that when a lookup for a custom TZ code fails, and an
>> attempt is made to find the GMT offset in order to get the current time,
>> Daylight savings rules are applied correctly.
>
> Gaurav Chaudhari has updated the
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:39:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This patch adds an alternative virtual thread implementation where each
>> virtual thread is backed by an OS thread. It doesn't scale but it can be
>> used by ports that don't have continuations support in the VM. Aside from
>>
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 00:59:33 GMT, Tim Prinzing wrote:
>> Created a test at test/jdk/jdk/nullCaller called NullCallerTest that creates
>> a test module with some resources in it for the actual tests that occur at
>> the native level. The native part was switched to c++ instead of c to make
>>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:10:38 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is continuation of PR #4256
>>
>> The patch simply rounds up the specified stack size to multiple of the
>> system page size, on systems where necessary.
>> The patch is based on the original PR/branch, with reflected remaining
>>
> Created a test at test/jdk/jdk/nullCaller called NullCallerTest that creates
> a test module with some resources in it for the actual tests that occur at
> the native level. The native part was switched to c++ instead of c to make it
> easier to create helper objects that reduce the redundant
On Wed, 25 May 2022 08:56:27 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 02:05:40 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Generally add apiNote's to map from Java library methods to particular IEEE
>> 754 operations. For now, I only added such notes to java.lang.Math and not
>> java.lang.StrictMath.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target
On Tue, 31 May 2022 15:10:38 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> This is continuation of PR #4256
>>
>> The patch simply rounds up the specified stack size to multiple of the
>> system page size, on systems where necessary.
>> The patch is based on the original PR/branch, with reflected remaining
>>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:26:35 GMT, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 32 additional commits
>> since
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 05:01:33 GMT, ExE Boss wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Member.java line 96:
>>
>>> 94: */
>>> 95: public default Set accessFlags() {
>>> 96: return Set.of();
>>
>> Is is not better to throw a NoSuchMethodError instead of Set.of() if
On Tue, 31 May 2022 20:32:13 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Time to start getting ready for JDK 20...
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
> by the merge/rebase. The pull
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 03:18:44 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Time to start getting ready for JDK 20...
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
> by the merge/rebase. The pull
> Created a test at test/jdk/jdk/nullCaller called NullCallerTest that creates
> a test module with some resources in it for the actual tests that occur at
> the native level. The native part was switched to c++ instead of c to make it
> easier to create helper objects that reduce the redundant
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 02:45:24 GMT, Tim Prinzing wrote:
>> Created a test at test/jdk/jdk/nullCaller called NullCallerTest that creates
>> a test module with some resources in it for the actual tests that occur at
>> the native level. The native part was switched to c++ instead of c to make
>>
> Generally add apiNote's to map from Java library methods to particular IEEE
> 754 operations. For now, I only added such notes to java.lang.Math and not
> java.lang.StrictMath.
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The incremental webrev
> Time to start getting ready for JDK 20...
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by
the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 38 additional commits since the
last revision:
On Tue, 31 May 2022 17:46:18 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Refactoring some old code in locale providers. The test case data have also
> been modified due to:
> - There's a bug in `LocaleProviderAdapter.toLocaleArray()` where it did not
> handle the case for `no-NO-NY`.
> - `Locale.toLanguageTag()`
> Created a test at test/jdk/jdk/nullCaller called NullCallerTest that creates
> a test module with some resources in it for the actual tests that occur at
> the native level. The native part was switched to c++ instead of c to make it
> easier to create helper objects that reduce the redundant
On Mon, 30 May 2022 01:17:00 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
>> Xiaohong Gong has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Wrap the offset check into a static method
>
> @PaulSandoz, could you please help to check whether the current
93 matches
Mail list logo
