Dear all
I have a problem when installing courier-authlib-0.53
after I configure with :
./
configure --without-authpam --without-authldap --without-authuserdb --withou
t-authcustom --without-authcram --without-authshadow --without-authmysql --w
ithout-authpwd --without-authpgsql
Julian Mehnle said:
Jay Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You will lose mailinglist mail? Huh?? I never had such a problem. Why
would that happen?
After the mailtroubles are restored, I get a notification from the
mailinglist which mails could not be delivered. In that sense you don't
loose
Hello,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:35:45 +, Justin Murdock wrote:
There seems to be known protocol implementation weaknesses in the
Evolution mail reader which makes it unable to display shared folders from
Courier. Has anyone found work-arounds for that problem?
Have you tried setting up an
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005 00:43 schrieb Sam Varshavchik:
Wolfgang Jeltsch writes:
Hello,
I use Courier IMAP 1.4.3 with KMail 1.7.2 (KDE 3.3.2). If I access my
IMAP account via KMail the first time, a folder named Trash is
automatically created. I was told on the KDE PIM Users ML
On Mit 19.01.2005 21:17, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
It's always safe to append more stuff to the control file. Whether it's
safe to rewrite it from scratch is something I need to think about.
Cool, thanx for your great work on courier and i'am looking, very
positive, forward to have these feature in
Hello,
I am using courier with multiple domains and MySQL since 18 months now,
and am very happy with it. So are our users :).
I am using maildrop for delivery, and I do add the variables $SENDER
and $RECIPIENT as X-Env-Sender and X-Env-Recipient in the mail headers
as this can be useful for
A lot of thx for all! It is working.
My observations on my system (debian woody - kernel version
2.4.18.040922.4) are the following:
1. The --with-mailuid and --with-mailgid options are required! Without
it the make procedure drop an error while make courierfilter.
2. I dont understand, but the
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Jay Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Mehnle said:
If it's a cost issue, run just one (i.e. drop the differently
configured secondary MX). That's what I actually do.
Have you ever had issues with downtime or lost mail?
Nothing where a secondary MX would
Jack Stewart writes:
Hi,
I have a few quick questions and will follow with the interesting context.
What is the correct or recommended way to set up, and recommended
settings, for Courier IMAP/POP authentication to redundant LDAP servers?
It seems that the Authorization Daemons for
Wolfgang Jeltsch writes:
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005 00:43 schrieb Sam Varshavchik:
Wolfgang Jeltsch writes:
Hello,
I use Courier IMAP 1.4.3 with KMail 1.7.2 (KDE 3.3.2). If I access my
IMAP account via KMail the first time, a folder named Trash is
automatically created. I was told on
Brger Zoltn writes:
A lot of thx for all! It is working.
My observations on my system (debian woody - kernel version
2.4.18.040922.4) are the following:
1. The --with-mailuid and --with-mailgid options are required! Without
it the make procedure drop an error while make courierfilter.
These
joe_anes writes:
Dear all
I have a problem when installing courier-authlib-0.53
after I configure with :
./
configure --without-authpam --without-authldap --without-authuserdb --withou
t-authcustom --without-authcram --without-authshadow --without-authmysql --w
ithout-authpwd
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
It's always safe to append more stuff to the control file. Whether
it's safe to rewrite it from scratch is something I need to think about.
I thought it was, too. However, when I started actually testing that
theory, I found that it's
Hops! I understand. My authlib configured for the authdb only.
./configure --without-authpam --without-authldap --without-authpwd
--without-authpgsql --without-authshadow --without-authvchkpw
--without-authmysql --with-mailuser=courier, --with-mailgroup=courier
regards,
Hav
Sam Varshavchik rta:
On Thursday 20 January 2005 09:54, Martijn Lievaart wrote:
Julian Mehnle said:
Jay Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You will lose mailinglist mail? Huh?? I never had such a
problem. Why would that happen?
After the mailtroubles are restored, I get a notification from the
mailinglist which
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 16:18, Jay Lee wrote:
So here's my question, would it be risky to drop the backup MX
completely?
There was a long thread on this topic on debian-isp in Nov:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2004/11/msg00080.html
Regards,
Mark
I have a bounce message that is stuck in my mail queue. The message should
be delivered to my address, but it doesn't go through for some reason. My
Exchange server rejects it with 421 Internal error. Connection closing.
The problem is that if I attempt to cancel the message, Courier attempts
From: David Gomillion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a bounce message that is stuck in my mail queue. The
message should be delivered to my address, but it doesn't go
through for some reason. My Exchange server rejects it with 421
Internal error. Connection
Hi,
how would one configure Courier to have multiple esmtpd on one
machine, each one bind to its own ip-address?
I need to set up multiple esmtpd on the same machine, but don´t want
them to share ip addresses, so if one gets blacklisted the other still
is ok.
(No, I am not serving spammers,
Peter Holm wrote:
I need to set up multiple esmtpd on the same machine, but don´t want
them to share ip addresses, so if one gets blacklisted the other still
is ok.
It won't matter. esmtpd accepts incoming connections. Blacklists
affect messages that you're sending.
Outbound connections are
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:35:55 -0800, you wrote:
Outbound connections are created with whatever IP address your OS thinks
is best fit to reach its default router (for addresses not otherwise
routed). Running multiple Courier processes won't change that.
I found something on real virtual hosts
Hello,
Speaking of magic folders (see the Trash folder automatically created
thread:
I would love a system with two special folders such as This is not spam
or This is spam which would allow users to train/correct spam-detection
systems: When a message is dropped to such a folder, it should
This is exactly what I do in my implementation though in my case I
call them Junk and Junk.Not. :-) If by magic you mean is there a way
to get Courier to do this for you, the answer is no. The directories you
want would need to be created when you make new users -- which means
either
Troels Arvin said:
Speaking of magic folders (see the Trash folder automatically created
thread:
I would love a system with two special folders such as This is not spam
or This is spam which would allow users to train/correct spam-detection
systems: When a message is dropped to such a folder,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:38:28 -0500, Jay Lee wrote:
Have a cron job run hourly, scan users Maildir/.This is spam folders
for messages and push them through the training software then remove
them from the folder.
Sounds like something which will work. However - and forgive me for not
being
Peter Holm wrote:
I found something on real virtual hosts that had to do with binding
courier to multiple ip addresses. is that what i am looking for?
Can you be more specific about what you found?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Wolfgang Jeltsch writes:
Would it be possible to let the user configure at least the name of the trash
folder? It is ugly to have a folder named Trash in an otherwise
non-english environment.
Nope. Sorry.
I have to correct myself. There's a TRASHFOLDERNAME setting in
Bowie Bailey writes:
I have a bounce message that is stuck in my mail queue. The message should
be delivered to my address, but it doesn't go through for some reason. My
Exchange server rejects it with 421 Internal error. Connection closing.
The problem is that if I attempt to cancel the
Troels Arvin writes:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:38:28 -0500, Jay Lee wrote:
Have a cron job run hourly, scan users Maildir/.This is spam folders
for messages and push them through the training software then remove
them from the folder.
Sounds like something which will work. However - and forgive
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:19:19 -0800, you wrote:
Can you be more specific about what you found?
a very old msg:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3780089
is this still true?
Thanks!
Peter
---
This SF.Net email is
Peter Holm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3780089
is this still true?
Is _what_ still true?
You could use chroots (or jails if you're on BSD) which only expose a
single IP address of the host system each, so Courier would have no chance
but use
Peter Holm wrote:
a very old msg:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3780089
is this still true?
As far as I know, Courier doesn't support binding to a specific
interface for outbound connections. Exim appears to, as that URL
implies, but only on a per-installation basis, not
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005, Gordon Messmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Holm wrote:
I need to set up multiple esmtpd on the same machine, but don?t want
them to share ip addresses, so if one gets blacklisted the other still
is ok.
It won't matter. esmtpd accepts incoming connections.
33 matches
Mail list logo
