If you can point us at a couple of example failure reports, maybe
someone here can figure out what's going wrong. In my experience it is
almost always the case that things like this are caused by an error in
the distribution under test.
Here's the most recent example of such failures:
Well, I have tried to get my perl 5.8.1 to install Moose and it fails
early because Moose demands 5.8.3. After that CPAN::Reporter refused to
write a test report because of missing prerequisites. And this is what
we expect. At the moment I have no further ideas which bug or
misconfiguration
with zero at the top of the Makefile.PL or
Build.PL file:
exit 0 if $ENV{AUTOMATED_TESTING};
Please could you set AUTOMATED_TESTING in your smokers? thank you!
Karen Etheridge
et...@cpan.org
? You shouldn't have been able to start
testing this module without satisfying prerequisites (e.g. Dist::Zilla,
Config::MVP).
cheers,
Karen Etheridge
-et...@cpan.org
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 08:09:55AM +0100, Barbie wrote:
I've had a quick look at exim this morning, and the found the config files
had the wrong permissions, and were configured for only local receipt and
delivery. Have reconfigured, so hopefully mail should flow again from
tomorrow morning.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:33:59PM +, Barbie wrote:
Hi Karen,
The problem isn't the CPAN Testers servers, its the develooper server (aka
the cpan.org/perl.org mail server). Unfortunately, the filters have been
blocking the mails, but Robert has now reset the configs today, so all
being
, as otherwise the tests cannot be expected to pass,
and the failing report is useless.
e.g. in the report I reference above, all the tests fail because there is
an additional module loaded when AUTHOR_TESTING=1, which is in develop
prereqs but you have failed to install it.
thanks,
Karen Etheridge
et
Anyone know what's up with deps.cpantesters.org? For quite a while now it
has been failing to properly fetch and process test reports, so as to show
the pass/fail rate of various dependencies, e.g.:
http://deps.cpantesters.org/?module=Moo;perl=latest
::RecDescent 1.967009.
https://metacpan.org/source/DOMM/Module-ExtractUse-0.30/META.json#L31
Is your CPAN client properly detecting and processing distribution dependency
information?
cheers,
Karen Etheridge
et...@cpan.org
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:30:45PM +1000, sisyph...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
Uploading 0.54_03 has revealed that the problem in detecting the
pre-requisites does, in fact, pertain to *my* release.
Reini’s 0.54_02 doesn’t suffer these failures – so let’s do a diff on his
Makefile.PL files
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:16:58PM -0700, Karen Etheridge wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:30:45PM +1000, sisyph...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
Uploading 0.54_03 has revealed that the problem in detecting the
pre-requisites does, in fact, pertain to *my* release.
Reini’s 0.54_02 doesn’t
are
guaranteed to produce bad results? I've thought about adding a check right
in Makefile.PL for the version of the cpan client (for information purposes
only - that wouldn't affect the outcome of the build) -- what versions
should I be looking for?)
Karen Etheridge
et...@cpan.org
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:51:02PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
A 'FAIL' result doesn't mean this code is broken. It doesn't even mean
this code is broken on this version of perl and this OS. It means it
didn't pass its tests on this particular setup.
That's why in cpXXXan I don't pay any
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 04:50:03PM +0300, Alexandr Ciornii wrote:
I've investigated this problem (checking perllocal.pod helped) and
caught Task-Git-LongList1 doing installation by itself, so even test
of this module installs some modules.
Ugh, those Task-Git-LongList* modules look like
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:31:20AM -0300, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior
wrote:
Greetings,
I'm receiving FAIL reports from one of my distributions and I'm
wondering if is a problem with the distribution itself or the smoker
configuration.
...
Maybe is due old versions of
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:11:22AM -0500, Reini Urban wrote:
looks like a broken test machine to me, I don't think this is fixable at my
end.
What do you think?
It is fixable.
You just need to install libcrypt-dev and probably more -dev packages then.
There's only libcrypt0 in the
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 08:40:15AM -0400, Nigel Horne wrote:
I'm calling prelbrew with -Acc=cc on MacOS to ensure cc (aka gcc) is
used rather than clang. I don't set any spaces, either Perlbrew is
doing it or part of the Perl build. I'm not sure how to progress
from here.
Nigel, can you
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:35:36PM +0200, Christian Walde wrote:
The specific issue is that many authors are not aware they can
change the settings at all, and default to using the websites
because the emails are just daily spam. That is what they told me.
While the footers on every email
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 08:21:05PM +0200, Slaven Rezic wrote:
you can see in @INC that the system perl is used (/etc/perl is listed
here, which is only in Debian's perl; in FreeBSD's system perl you would
see a directory with a BSDPAN component). Probably you should use $^X
instead of perl in
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:35:18PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
The problem is that the interesting platforms that aren't getting tested
are those for which you can't just spin up another VM. In particular I'm
thinking of Solaris on Sparc, and Irix.
There's also other dimensions of testing
Is admin.cpantesters.org expected to be functional now? I have so far been
unable to log in with my PAUSE credentials in Author Login - I just get
That username/password failed to be authenticated by PAUSE in response.
-et...@cpan.org
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:13:36AM +0100, Barbie wrote:
Hi Karen,
Fixed. Sorry I started to work on it and got distracted, and left it part
finished. It seems not all SSL communications are equal :(
Awesome, I can log in now, thank you!
On to the next issue :D --
I'd like to mark a test
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:39:42AM +0200, Andreas Koenig wrote:
Something's going wrong here, I see 21 reports that seem to differ just by
date:
http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Test-Class%200.47;os=darwin;perl=5.21.4;reports=1
So far I have only encountered it on Test::Class. What's up?
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 09:51:55AM -0700, Buddy Burden wrote:
I guess more important than why is can it be fixed? It's
happened several times now that I see several fail reports on my
author page, so I go to the distro page where I can narrow down the
view, perhaps limit by OS and see if all
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:34:27AM +, Subramanian Karunanithi (sukaruna)
wrote:
I am hitting an issue while using perl5.14.3, and while searching for help
got the below link. Can you please help if there is any fix available (Mostly
I need use the current version only, but I can update
In doubt (no answer from a tester), one can easily add a test showing
config.log on fail of module load ...
Where can this file be found? I'll happily write a Dist::Zilla plugin that
adds such a test, and add it to all XS-based distributions I help maintain,
if I know what the test should look
It looks pretty fishy that this code is trying to run sudo at all. Surely
that should be done by a deployment script, rather than by a CPAN module.
Everyone should update their /etc/sudoers to avoid the all-too-common
security hole that allows sudo to be run by any process and without
I have been told that access to example.com has been deliberately
blocked, this is not a misconfiguration. I am not at liberty to say why.
You may start to find others having problems accessing it.
UGH! This is a legitimate testing site, one we can always count on being
up and returning a
.)
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:17 PM, David Golden x...@xdg.me wrote:
I had always understood example.com to be reserved for documentation and
that it should not be relied upon to exist.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6761
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Karen Etheridge p...@froods.org wrote
Hi David,
I've been continuing to receive reports (several a day, on average) like
this:
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/5421bfb0-1e88-11e5-b327-3e6ce14af301
...where the test failures were clearly caused by unsatisfied
prerequisites. It is my understanding that this should not result in
.
Please could you ensure that prerequisites are satisfied before moving on
to test other things? And please install the things that are missing from
these reports, before turning your smoker back on.
thank you!
Karen Etheridge
et...@cpan.org
I've contacted the Test::Stream author and asked him to put together
something for the list so we know what happened, and what can be done on
the tester's system to fix this.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Ben Bullock
wrote:
> I've just received an email containing
> X-Died: Can't locate HTML/HeadParser.pm in @INC (you may need to install
the HTML::HeadParser module) (@INC contains:
[snip]
> Does anyone know where HTML::HeadParser is used? How should we fix?
What's in the X-Died that you snipped? It should give a file/line
indicating what was trying to use
https://github.com/cpants/Module-CPANTS-Analyse/commit/c3dea59f184983505458b74369b76dce7793f069
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-06-07 1:20 GMT+09:00 Karen Etheridge <p...@froods.org>:
> >> Yes, BUT -- for the purposes of kwalitee checks it might be reasonable
&g
Yes, BUT -- for the purposes of kwalitee checks it might be reasonable to
make the prereq_matches_use test more harsh if the flag is omitted
entirely. Otherwise, this kwalitee test will not get to scan many
distributions at all.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:16 AM, David Golden wrote:
I see nothing unsafe about either patch, so long as the meta-spec is
specified as version 2. Can you clarify your concerns?
Perhaps reading the section in prerequisite phases in the meta spec might
clarify things a bit:
https://metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Meta::Spec#PREREQUISITES
(PS. I found the
I have been running the previous release of App::cpanminus::reporter (0.12)
for quite some time because of this issue:
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=103866
I have not run into the situation (as far as I know) where UNKNOWN reports
are reported as FAIL, either as a tester or an
More bad reports continue to roll in (e.g.
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a58b7266-4302-11e6-9fc5-14bfbd15da07)
-- Nigel, can you disable uploading of your reports until this issue is
solved?
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:17 PM, David Golden wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at
Hi Nigel,
I want to bring to your attention some serious issues with your smoker
systems that you have been using to submit CPAN Testers reports:
1. there are a very large number of reports (I've received hundreds from
you to my distributions alone, and others have received a large quantity as
Yes, I've received similar problematic reports from you, for example:
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/f06f0a70-7095-11e6-b0d4-db1a5d222160
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/f066dbca-7095-11e6-b0d4-db1a5d222160
I believe some testers check over all their reports before sending them;
e interpreter shipped with OpenBSD or the standard perl?
>
> --
> *De:* Slaven Rezic <sla...@rezic.de>
> *Para:* Alceu R. de Freitas Jr. via cpan-testers-discuss <
> cpan-testers-discuss@perl.org>
> *Cc:* Karen Etheridge <p...@froods.org&g
-a514-8183992ad5f0
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Karen Etheridge <p...@froods.org> wrote:
> Yes, I've received similar problematic reports from you, for example:
>
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/f06f0a70-7095-
> 11e6-b0d4-db1a5d222160
> http://www.cpantesters.org
ters-discuss@perl.org> wrote:
> Em 09-09-2016 13:04, Karen Etheridge escreveu:
>
>> Alceu, would it be possible for you to test the patch in
>> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=117072 ? (You don't have to
>> do anything with git; just applying the patch to the
il after the exact same test, or is it intermittent/variable?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Karen Etheridge <p...@froods.org> wrote:
>
> Here is that Sub-Name report: http://www.cpantesters.org/
> cpan/report/3a995cce-760c- 11e6-a32c-cd9de3776ab1
> <ht
ot; and repeat all the process for test it again... and it
> passed all tests and got installed.
>
> Went back again to install Moose... I couldn't even pass the Makefile.PL
> step. It fails and generates a large core dump on the VM.
>
> So, my guess is that we have somet
If those prereqs are needed at runtime, they belong in PREREQ_PM.
BUILD_REQUIRES is only for things needed at the "make" or "./Build" step.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
> Hi David
>
> On 28/09/16 21:43, David Cantrell wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at
There's no META.* files, which probably doesn't help... if the smoker is
taking shortcuts and expecting to find a META.* (which it shouldn't)
without running Makefile.PL, then that would explain why the smoke report
is reporting no prereqs at all.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Ron Savage
META.json and META.yml are supposed to be included in the uploaded tarball.
They would be produced via 'perl Makefile.PL && make && make test && make
manifest && make dist'.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Ron Savage <r...@savage.net.au> wrote:
> Hi Kar
Add Devel::CheckBin to your configure prereqs, and then at the top of
Makefile.PL:
use Devel::CheckBin;
check_bin('git');
Or, if you're using Dist::Zilla, just add this to dist.ini:
[CheckBin]
command = git
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:22 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
> My latest
I think Sinan's advice was correct.
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers.discuss/2016/12/msg3970.html
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Felipe Gasper
wrote:
> I’ve got a new module up on CPAN that seems to trip up some issue on
> cpantesters:
>
>
, Ron Savage <r...@savage.net.au> wrote:
> Hi Karen
>
> I paused over that statement, but I'm sure there are persons with the Perl
> 5 porters group, for example, who may be able to specify same, in a way I'm
> not qualified to do :-).
>
> On 06/07/17 11:50, Karen E
er, rather, 5.12. And a ticket has already been reported for it --
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=122021
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Karen Etheridge <p...@froods.org> wrote:
> package is syntax that was introduced in perl
> 5.14. That distribution should have the
package is syntax that was introduced in perl 5.14.
That distribution should have the minimum perl declared in its metadata, so
you don't get it pulled into your 5.10.1 smoker.
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Scott Guthridge via cpan-testers-discuss <
cpan-testers-discuss@perl.org> wrote:
>
A BEGIN block around the checks should work, if it was constructed properly.
But you can also use Test::Needs to do this check for you, with much less
fuss.
use strict;
use warnings;
use Test::More;
use Test::Needs qw(Regexp::Common Image::Info);
use Graphics::Fig;
...
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at
The topic has come up at previous Toolchain hackathons but as far as I
know, no list has been compiled yet, or even a comprehensive list of what
criteria would be used to find such distributions.
I don't have a smoker network of my own, but if I did, I'd want to set up
testing in a chrooted jail
I would *love* a way for the cpanminus (cpanm) client to be able to use
distroprefs. The #1 perl issue plaguing me at work right now is being able
to control how each module in our dependency chain gets installed -- e.g.
some of them need to skip tests (because of various failures), some of them
Two notes:
- yes, things used by Makefile.PL itself go into CONFIGURE_REQUIRES,
but everyone has Module::Metadata, as it is in core (it was split off
from Module::Build a long time ago, and has remained in core even
after MB left).
- Dist::Zilla is capable of generating distributions for any perl
Alceu,
I don't understand what you're asking. `$^O` returns 'darwin' on MacOS
systems. Are you suggesting that *that* be changed?
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 7:08 AM Alceu R. de Freitas Jr. via
cpan-testers-discuss wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I was having a little chat with David
>
erpreter or to update the
> matrix at matrix.cpantesters.org. I think the later should be easier since
> "darwin" => "macosx" anyway.
>
> Em quarta-feira, 27 de março de 2019 14:31:24 BRT, Karen Etheridge
> escreveu:
>
>
> Alceu,
> I don't underst
n 2019-03-27 17:31, Karen Etheridge wrote:
> > Alceu,
> > I don't understand what you're asking. `$^O` returns 'darwin' on MacOS
> > systems. Are you suggesting that *that* be changed?
>
> He's saying that the CPAN-testers website should say "Mac OS X" inste
Is there any documentation on that? `perldoc -f system` only describes
the different handling of "system LIST" vs "system PROGRAM LIST" on
windows, not any differences between different types of quote
characters.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:28 PM Serguei Trouchelle wrote:
>
> On 2019-02-25 05:11,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:21 AM L A Walsh wrote:
> This is very worrisome as it indicates old modules that used to
> work may no longer work even though nothing changed. AFAIK, this
> shouldn't be possible.
Of course it's possible. Your code might not have changed, but other
things change all
Exceptions can be tested safely with Test::Fatal (which is a thin
wrapper around Try::Tiny).
use Test::Fatal;
like(
exception {
Data::ObjectStore->open_store( $source_dir );
fail( "was able to open a store with an old incompatable version" );
},
That error sounds like it's coming from OpenAPI, in which case the format
you need to match is RFC3339: $dt->strftime('%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%N%Z').
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 2:56 PM Robert Ryley wrote:
> I wanted to look into CPAN module build failures on mswin32 for versions
> of Perl >= 5.10
>
> I
I have been getting blasted with these types of failures again too. e.g.:
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a3e7fbf8-2c2b-11ea-9cc5-910b4c49479c
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a8244f3e-2a0d-11ea-bad3-922c4c49479c
Nigel, I'll be honest with you: I automatically ignore every report I
Where/how are you being told about invalid reports? I didn't think that
feature ever worked.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:11 PM Sergiy Trushel wrote:
> Whenever I try to access it, I get this error:
>
> -- cut --
>
>
> Error 503 first byte timeout
>
> first byte timeout
>
>
> Guru
66 matches
Mail list logo