Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 580: CRMsoc redefinition of scope

2022-02-10 Thread George Bruseker via Crm-sig
Hi All, Here is a link to the folder in the SIG CIDOC CRM Drive for issue 580 containing all the pertinent homework which is: Scope of CRMSoc List of Classes and Properties to be redistributed / considered New Spec doc with initial classes and properties proposed

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 580: CRMsoc redefinition of scope

2022-02-07 Thread George Bruseker via Crm-sig
Hi All, Another part of this homework was to clear up the state of classes that were 'in' CRMSoc under the old definition, being considered to be in or just being bandied about as ideas. The idea is to house clean the whole business so that we can start off anew in the correct direction and also

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 580: CRMsoc redefinition of scope

2022-02-04 Thread Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
On 2/4/2022 11:30 AM, George Bruseker wrote: Following on this helpful new iteration of the thought by Martin maybe a phrasing like 'in distinction to facts established directly through / at the levelĀ  of material physical processes and interactions' is more expressive of the content/intent?

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 580: CRMsoc redefinition of scope

2022-02-04 Thread George Bruseker via Crm-sig
Following on this helpful new iteration of the thought by Martin maybe a phrasing like 'in distinction to facts established directly through / at the level of material physical processes and interactions' is more expressive of the content/intent? On Thu., Feb. 3, 2022, 11:52 p.m. Martin

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 580: CRMsoc redefinition of scope

2022-02-03 Thread Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
On 2/2/2022 10:36 PM, Francesco Beretta via Crm-sig wrote: Dear Martin, Thank you for your message and comments. The sentence in question is not the happiest, and George and myself were not totally satisfied with the wording but it was necessary to send the homework to the SIG. We can of

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 580: CRMsoc redefinition of scope

2022-02-02 Thread Francesco Beretta via Crm-sig
Dear Martin, Thank you for your message and comments. The sentence in question is not the happiest, and George and myself were not totally satisfied with the wording but it was necessary to send the homework to the SIG. We can of course reword it and a refomulation that is certainly also not

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 580: CRMsoc redefinition of scope

2022-02-02 Thread Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
Dear Francesco, I find this text very well written and clear. My only question is, why: " For facts which are established by convention as opposed to pure spatio-temporal facts," I do not see ground in the CRMbase, and the methodology applied, to regard that facts which are described in the

[Crm-sig] Issue 580: CRMsoc redefinition of scope

2022-02-01 Thread Francesco Beretta via Crm-sig
Dear all, Please find in attachment the homework of George Bruseker and myself concerning "Issue 580: CRMsoc redefinition of scope" for presentation at the next SIG. All the best, Francesco What is CRMsoc_20220201.docx Description: MS-Word 2007 document