,
Igor
On 2014-06-27, 10:27, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
On 26 Jun 2014, at 10:49, Doug Schaefer wrote:
We build directly against the Eclipse one. Does that mean we can't do
that any more?
you haven't been able to do that for ~2 years.
Michael - do you recall why ODT keeps getting be allowed
[stephan.herrm...@berlin.de]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 12:16 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] org.eclipse.jdt.core from objectteams
gets selected due to higher version
On 06/27/2014 05:34 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
But I do remember a lot of concern
Then again, maybe removing it will give Orbit incentive to get off of CVS.
Doug.
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] on behalf of Oberhuber, Martin
[martin.oberhu...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday,
for Orbit? Git is not really suited, see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=349048#c4 and the rest of that
bug.
Please continue discussions about Orbit there.
Markus
From:Doug Schaefer dschae...@qnx.com
To:Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Date
the release has been declared.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2014-06-19, 10:02, Doug Schaefer wrote:
For what it's worth, I'm testing our internal product builds against
releases/staging, and we're fine with that. We've probably spent more time on
this thread than it does to change your target to point
I wonder if it's getting confused with the product IU that get's created for
the SDK. It has the same name. In fact I was going to try and figure out how
you did that since category.xml files usually only support bundles and
features, not these magic product IUs. The workflow is so much nicer
Also, do we raise bugs when we see issues? There are at least two former
committers who's contributions are showing up in the Contributors section for
CDT and I can't see a way on the page to make the correction.
Doug.
From:
that the commits use email addresses that we don't know
about. This sometimes happens after committers change jobs and email addresses.
Wayne
On 05/22/2014 04:35 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
Also, do we raise bugs when we see issues? There are at least two former
committers who's contributions are showing up
,
Is there documentation on how to do that?
I'm going to prepare the WIKI page with details about the styling of the
preferences via CSS by the end of the week. I will send the link to the mailing
groups
thanks,
Daniel
From: Doug Schaefer dschae...@qnx.commailto:dschae...@qnx.com
.
- Konstantin
-Original Message-
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Doug
Schaefer
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 12:33 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler SR3 for Java
I would think that if they are advanced enough to jump on Java 8 the minute it
releases, they can figure out how to install the Java 8 support into Kepler.
Doug.
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
That¹s excellent. Thanks Eike!
On 2/13/2014, 5:07 AM, Eike Stepper step...@esc-net.de wrote:
Hi all,
I find it cumbersome and error-prone that I have to look up the latest
Orbit build on
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads modify my various build
scripts accordingly before I can
project issues
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at 9:36 AM
To: Jeff Johnston jjohn...@redhat.commailto:jjohn...@redhat.com, Doug
Schaefer cdtd...@gmail.commailto:cdtd...@gmail.com, Eclipse Cross Project
Issues
cross
...@eclipsesource.com
Reply-To: Cross project issues
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 11:39 AM
To: Cross project issues
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Cc: Doug Schaefer cdtd
Yikes indeed. I’ll double check CDT’s to see what happened.
Doug.
From: David M Williams
david_willi...@us.ibm.commailto:david_willi...@us.ibm.com
Reply-To: Cross project issues
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at
I'm not sure our +123 system works well enough anymore. The deps are more than
four deep. We should really graph them out.
Sent from my BlackBerry Z30 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Igor Fedorenko
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 3:07 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Reply
As a Mac user, I prefer the bundled package. I can then place my
Eclipse.app into my /Applications folder and it can look like any other
Mac app that I put there.
Doug.
On 12/10/2013, 1:52 AM, Eike Stepper step...@esc-net.de wrote:
Thank you for the infos. I've found the code that causes my
Been through this hell :). The typical p2 mirror type operations usually
operate without macosx-bundled being defined so the required IU falls off.
Not sure how to fix it.
Doug.
On 12/9/2013, 7:09 AM, Eike Stepper step...@esc-net.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install org.eclipse.sdk.ide with the
, at 3:50 PM, Doug Schaefer
dschae...@qnx.commailto:dschae...@qnx.com wrote:
Xtend is a Java language extension, no? I'm talking about a template engine
that we use in the new project wizard to instantiate code templates based on
various user selectable options.
I was originally thinking of Jet
Has anyone tried to get Freemarker into Orbit? Or is there a better template
engine that people are using. CDT has it's own but I'd like to use something
more standard (and better).
Thanks,
Doug.
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
Hey gang,
As I try to get our Momentics builds closer to the bleeding edge, I'm wondering
if we have nightly builds of Kepler SR-2 simrel repo on the go. I know we
talked quickly about that but now I have a burning need.
Thanks,
Doug.
___
October, 2013 9:51 AM
To: Cross project issues
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Making your project more openŠhowto
enable Gerrit
Doug Schaefer dschae...@qnx.commailto:dschae...@qnx.com wrote on 10/04/2013
06
I almost wonder if we should just enable Gerrit for all projects. That's what
we do internally here for all git repos that feed into product. It's great for
all the reasons you mention Ed.
The thing I like most about it is the verification jobs in co-ordination with
Hudson. You have so much
No they're not. I can't see any way that patches in bugzilla are easier
than gerrit. It's one Push to Gerrit and one Publish and Submit clicks
away from getting a contribution made and accepted.
And can't help wonder that these two statements aren't related in some way:
m2e has no plans to
Yes, that generally how we work too. We're big users of Gerrit internally here
on Momentics. That's generally how things go. Discussions happen in our bug
system (JIRA), but only comments on the code happen in Gerrit.
In all the bugzilla's I've looked at over the years, there actually weren't
I get the same thing. So I gave up and made the changes directly to the files
using the text editor. Not good by any means.
From: Mark Russell mrruss...@google.commailto:mrruss...@google.com
Reply-To: Cross project issues
CDT will be participating in the Luna simrel. Offset is kinda +1 although we
have a tiny bit that depends on RSE but it seems to work out in the end.
Now to be weird, we are releasing CDT 8.3 with Kepler SR-2 but it will also
appear on Luna milestones. We will then transition to CDT 8.4 for the
I think you dodged the answer :). If you use Java 5, you're have no guarantees.
We could change org.eclipse.* to 1.6, but that would be a huge effort for
little gain.
From: Ed Willink e...@willink.me.ukmailto:e...@willink.me.uk
Reply-To: Cross project issues
+1
This causes more pain on the community than it solves. Mind you I said that
last year too.
At the end of the day, I pushed our last kepler build into Luna M1, which is
what would have happened by default.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
From: Laurent Goubet
Clearly this is a very sensitive issue. It's probably going to take us years to
get over our history. And as an open community, we're not always going to
agree. But let's keep the discussion technical. I think that'll really help
move us forward.
And to that end, I think Ed Merks raises a
I've re-enabled CDT. Sorry for wasting the time of the person who put
enabled=false into our file.
Doug.
From: Sergey Boyko serg.boyko2...@gmail.commailto:serg.boyko2...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Cross project issues
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Sigh. RSE isn't enabled so CDT fails.
From: Doug Schaefer dschae...@qnx.commailto:dschae...@qnx.com
Reply-To: Cross project issues
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Date: Wednesday, 21 August, 2013 10:49 AM
To: Cross project issues
cross-project
Not to join would be a disservice to the community. Glad you allow us in. :)
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
From: David M Williams
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 2:54 PM
To: Cross project issues
Reply To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev]
BTW, as I work through my maven/tycho prototype for the aggregator, it doesn't
seem that far fetched that would could have nightly aggregator builds. Not sure
why we couldn't have that now mind you.
BTW2, I fear the Nexus. But that's probably just me and my lack of education on
it. I know how
Yeah actually that doesn't make sense. Why have the release sit around for a
month instead of fixing bugs in it right to the end of the SR?
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
From: Igor Fedorenko
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:24 AM
To:
all the
committers hang out to share common themes. I like it a lot.
Cheers,
Wim
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Doug Schaefer
dschae...@qnx.commailto:dschae...@qnx.com wrote:
Hey gang,
Denis has set up the ide-dev mailing list for us. Cross project issues was
really meant for release
That's great question I was asking myself looking at the Download page the
other day. I don't think I have a great answer though.
I like the idea of the big uber package for the reason you list as #3. I'd like
to fix our tools plug-ins to play nicer together. Having this package would
give us
BTW, we have a new mailing list that's getting created tonight, ide-dev, which
is probably a better place for these types of discussion (since most of the
packages are IDE packages). Look for it tomorrow.
From: Doug Schaefer dschae...@qnx.commailto:dschae...@qnx.com
Reply-To: Cross project
?
Another potential solution that should be on the list for consideration is a
reasonably smart installer.
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkov...@eclipse.orgmailto:mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org
+1.613.220.3223
From: Doug Schaefer
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 8:16 PM
To: Cross project issues
Reply To: Cross
Great words Gunnar. It's funny, as a Canadian, I still have hope, dreaming
maybe, but hope. And that hope stems from watching the reaction in the room as
the Bling IDE guys showed off, not only a really cool SWT port, but their
passion for building a modern IDE based on Eclipse targeted at some
Thanks John. I'm glad you commented.
And you are right, I think the problem is just perception and based more on the
past than the present. And, in many ways, it's those changes that help give me
hope. If we do get more people interested in contributing, we have a much
better ability at
-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Preferences (topic was touched in
Eclipse smells kind of dead thread)
On 07/17/2013 06:23 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
My answer: It's something I expect the PMC to provide. Which PMC that is, is
being
Thanks Mike. Spot on. But I do have one comment with all due respect.
I'm not sure why we're always expecting companies to drop bus loads of
developers into projects when we have a pretty healthy individual contributor
community already at Eclipse. In fact, over half of CDT contributions of
-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Doug
Schaefer
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 12:50 PM
To: mike.milinkov...@eclipse.orgmailto:mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org; Cross
project issues; 'Mickael Istria'
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev
The secret is simple. Manage the project differently, if barely at all.
Let the contributors manage it. Be open, really open.
And automate as much as you can so you aren't relying on individuals so
much. Hell, I've managed to do that with our commercial product builds.
(Jenkins, uh, I mean
difficult problem. How about if the user just exports
whatever prefs they're interested in to the 'common' area and we auto-import
these whenever we're working against a new workspace ?
Onwards,
Eric
Doug Schaefer ---07/15/2013 01:23:51 PM---It may be hard, but it's is one huge
item that we've all run
it. If you're interested in discussing this more, I've opened bug
412864 on this issue.
Greg
On Jul 2, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Doug Schaefer
dschae...@qnx.commailto:dschae...@qnx.com wrote:
Hey gang,
We have a discussion going in the CDT community and we are currently planning
out how to achieve a 6
It may be hard, but it's is one huge item that we've all run into with our
users. It's probably worth the price.
From: Pascal Rapicault
pascal.rapica...@ericsson.commailto:pascal.rapica...@ericsson.com
Reply-To: Cross project issues
Eclipse because it doesn't show line numbers by
default in the text editors. I personally hate line numbers. They're a waste
of valuable space. But that's just my biased opinion.
Cheers,
Fabian
On 12.07.2013, at 18:25, Doug Schaefer
dschae...@qnx.commailto:dschae...@qnx.com wrote
Those bugs are fairly old and both are closed WONTFIX. It would be interesting
if they could be reopened for discussion.
Denis
On 07/12/2013 11:31 AM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
http://www.ihateeclipse.com ???
Pretty awesome feedback from our passionate user base.
:D
From: cdtd
@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] FW: [Doug on the Eclipse CDT] New
comment on Eclipse smells kind of dead???.
On 07/12/2013 12:25 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
It is. And I'm sure there are hate sites for every tool people use. Eclipse
I wonder, for those companies that want stability, should they focus on
the LTS program where old releases are maintained for long periods of time.
I'm of the opinion that the entire stack needs new feature development, at
least on the IDE side. We are falling behind the competition and my
How often do the Eclipse packages get build and tested and what appears on
the Eclipse download page?
On 13-07-03 12:02 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik
konstantin.komissarc...@oracle.com wrote:
Glad to see interest in my frequent aggregation proposal. To answer some
of
the questions that were
Hey gang,
We have a discussion going in the CDT community and we are currently planning
out how to achieve a 6 month release cycle. The feeling is that we need to get
new features out faster to our users. The year long wait we currently have is
making releases sluggish and I fear it's slowing
-07-02 11:30 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
Hey gang,
We have a discussion going in the CDT community and we are currently
planning out how to achieve a 6 month release cycle. The feeling is that
we need to get new features out faster to our users. The year long wait
we currently have is making
the point of releasing often if there are no new features?
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-07-02 11:56 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
Funny, that came up in our conversation too. Years ago, M releases were
awesome. They always had new features and the quality was pretty good.
But then the quality stopped being so
something regarding multiple releases per year, and I'm doing my best do
understand the different constraints we have.
Cheers,
Ian
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Doug Schaefer
dschae...@qnx.commailto:dschae...@qnx.com wrote:
Thanks Ian, to answer your questions:
We do expect both releases
What Denis said. +1
From: Denis Roy denis@eclipse.orgmailto:denis@eclipse.org
Reply-To: Cross project issues
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Date: Thursday, 13 June, 2013 3:16 PM
To:
to upgrade GEF, but at least no one
will be running with pre-release code. Pick your poison.
- Konstantin
From:
cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Doug
Schaefer
Sent
David can correct if I'm wrong here. But the decision was to actually remove
Egit from the SR2 repo resulting in the Egit from SR1 getting picked up
instead. Egit 2.2 wasn't considered.
It's a pretty troubling situation. The community shouldn't be taking this
lightly.
Sent from my BlackBerry
If Ian is correct then SR1 already shipped a 3.9 milestone. Bizarre as that
seams, that ship already sailed.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Konstantin Komissarchik
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 5:55 PM
To: 'Cross project issues'
Reply To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re:
Haven't seen a mail from David yet. So in hope, CDT has a rebuild to fix a CCE
from bug 400747 that we just published.
Thanks, Doug.
Sent from my BlackBerry Z10.
From: David M Williams
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:51 PM
To: Cross project issues
Reply To: Cross project issues
Subject:
).
From:Doug Schaefer dschae...@qnx.com
To:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org, Cross project issues
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
Date:02/13/2013 07:33 PM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook
Yup. CDT failed too with a Hudson exception.
Sent from my BlackBerry Z10.
From: Greg Watson
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2013 9:03 PM
To: Cross project issues
Reply To: Cross project issues
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson failure
For some reason Hudson has started failing. Anyone else
+1. Was trying to set things up for my contractor who's not a committer
and ran into this problem as well. And I'm not sure how to install some of
these things from the p2 repo since they don't have features.
On 13-01-14 3:36 PM, Ed Willink e...@willink.me.uk wrote:
Hi
My understanding is that
Nope, I just got in fine. Is your IP address blocked? Happens time to time.
On 12-10-02 2:46 PM, Greg Watson g.wat...@computer.org wrote:
We're not able to access build.eclipse.org or git.eclipse.org via ssh. Is
anyone else seeing this problem?
Greg
Back to someone's earlier question, yes, for me this is a bit of a silent
protest. CDT has never contributed to an M1 build. We're too busy with
vacations or working on SR-1 of the previous release. That was fine because we
were always enabled and picked up the final bits from the previous
Kepler should work with our Juno bits. In the past those were picked up
automatically. I may have missed it, but is that no longer true?
From: Greg Watson g.wat...@computer.orgmailto:g.wat...@computer.org
Reply-To: Cross project issues
Since you're doing this so early on Friday, +1 for CPP.
From: Markus Knauer
mkna...@eclipsesource.commailto:mkna...@eclipsesource.com
Reply-To: Cross project issues
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Date: Friday, 8 June, 2012 9:35 AM
To: Cross
I'm seeing the same thing. The build page says there were No
changes. Checking the polling log, I see:
Started on Feb 26, 2012 3:01:15 AM
Using strategy: Default
[poll] Last Build : #255
[poll] Last Built Revision: Revision
d39f64adfb1570f6be9f07a636d4d2a1bf781562 (origin/cdt_8_0)
Last build was
101 - 170 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
