> On 11 Jul 2016, at 18:13, John J wrote:
>
> At the link below, the name, email, subject fields don't appear to be
> obeying rules governing width as in the previous media breaks..
>
> at 360 and 320, those fields exceed the width of their parent, rather than
> respecting
:03, Karl DeSaulniers <k...@designdrumm.com> wrote:
>
> I don't believe this is correct. Widths and heights hard coded or inline
> trump external.
> Unless I missed something along the way. (: ))
>
> Best,
> Karl DeSaulniers
>
>
>
>> On Apr 14, 2016,
If you specify any img width in the css then the html widths will have no
effect. But beware that if you haven't specified any heights, then the html
'height' may cause havoc with your layout. In the css, even height:auto; is
sufficient to overide the html.
Maybe 508 compliance requires
or graphics rendering thang rather than a problem with your
code.
Peter H.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
De: Tim Dawson t...@ramasaig.com
Fecha: 11 de agosto de 2014 12:25:24 GMT+02:00
Para: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Asunto: Re: [css-d] Grids: what's all the fuss ?
On 11/08/2014 09:43, MiB wrote:
11 aug 2014 kl. 10:02 skrev Tim Dawson t...@ramasaig.com:
what I'd do with an eight or twelve column
On a Motorola G phone with Android Kitkat the p text is quite large and the
table text is tiny.
On an iPhone 4 all the text is the same size, and tiny.
Peter
El 13/03/2014, a las 23:31, Ezequiel Garzón escribió:
Thanks again for your reply. Now I'm really beginning to
for the foreseeable future I'll prefer
them over em and strong. They're quicker to key, too.
Peter H.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
El 17/02/2014, a las 11:01, Philip Taylor escribió:
Peter H. wrote:
I've always had a problem understanding why em and strong are
supposedly more semantic than i and b.
Because em means emphasised and strong means strongly emphasised
(semantic, saying nothing about how
El 17/02/2014, a las 11:29, Barney Carroll escribió:
While bikeshedding around 'how semantic' people feel any given element to be
is a great laugh (although definitely off-topic for this list), I would
highly recommend the HTML specification for insight into the purpose of any
HTML
.
Peter H.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org
El 15/06/2013, a las 01:20, COM escribió:
Can anyone point me to a 100% css-based flyout menu for use with mobile
devices? By flyout, I mean that when User presses a Menu icon, the menu
slides out or otherwise appears, User presses their choice and menu hides,
chosen page loads.
John
of window width:
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
I notice that the link that Georg posted is still functioning so I'll take the
liberty of repeating it here:
http://www.gunlaug.com/contents/test/test-floating-boxes-mc0.html
Hope this is useful, Peter H
Georg, I'm intrigued by your example and have wanted that behaviour several
times in the past and couldn't figure a way to achieve it without fixed height
divs.
But from your test page there's a bit of css that I don't understand:
.floating {
float-:left;
width:140px;
thanks Georg, that's very handy. Peter
-
El 27/07/2012, a las 17:27, Georg escribió:
an alternative to equal height floats, and inline-block are very often the
best
__
El 23/04/2012, a las 17:13, David Laakso escribió:
Your comments and suggestion on this site http://ccstudi.com/ in
Internet Explorer 6/7/8 are appreciated.
David, an oldish Acer portable running XP, browser windows at full width of the
screen:
in IE6 7 the page draws very vertically, as
://www.brownbatterystudios.com/sixthings/2007/03/14/lucida-hybrid-the-grande-alternative/
Hope this is useful, Peter H.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
El 31/01/2012, a las 03:31, David Laakso escribió:
First pass: http://ccstudi.com/site/portfolio/w/
Constructive comments and suggestions are always appreciated.
Thanks.
designery comments: really like the feel of it, nice sparseness, tasty use of
colour, intriguing, slightly enigmatic
the bounds
of the area it's sitting in.
Could it be just that the 2nd page draws a scroll bar, which causes everything
to shift to the left ?
Hth, best regards, Peter H.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
text, or what size image, I put int there.
in case this is of any help: the only way I've ever found to reliably centre
vertically, is to use a good old-fashioned table. In this case, say, a single
row with a cell each for your text and your image would probably do.
Best regards, Peter H
and that for z-index
purposes only, opaque is better.
However, I see that your .swf is within javascript tags so I'm not
sure whether the above is helpful, but it might at least give you a
pointer.
HTH, Peter H.
__
css-discuss
20 matches
Mail list logo