Re: [css-d] media queries following prior rules

2016-07-11 Thread Peter H.
> On 11 Jul 2016, at 18:13, John J wrote: > > At the link below, the name, email, subject fields don't appear to be > obeying rules governing width as in the previous media breaks.. > > at 360 and 320, those fields exceed the width of their parent, rather than > respecting

Re: [css-d] 508 compliance

2016-04-14 Thread Peter H.
:03, Karl DeSaulniers <k...@designdrumm.com> wrote: > > I don't believe this is correct. Widths and heights hard coded or inline > trump external. > Unless I missed something along the way. (: )) > > Best, > Karl DeSaulniers > > > >> On Apr 14, 2016,

Re: [css-d] 508 compliance

2016-04-14 Thread Peter H.
If you specify any img width in the css then the html widths will have no effect. But beware that if you haven't specified any heights, then the html 'height' may cause havoc with your layout. In the css, even height:auto; is sufficient to overide the html. Maybe 508 compliance requires

Re: [css-d] rendering of Open Sans on my project site vs. Typekit

2014-12-31 Thread Peter H.
or graphics rendering thang rather than a problem with your code. Peter H. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List

[css-d] Fwd: Grids: what's all the fuss ?

2014-08-11 Thread Peter H.
De: Tim Dawson t...@ramasaig.com Fecha: 11 de agosto de 2014 12:25:24 GMT+02:00 Para: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Asunto: Re: [css-d] Grids: what's all the fuss ? On 11/08/2014 09:43, MiB wrote: 11 aug 2014 kl. 10:02 skrev Tim Dawson t...@ramasaig.com: what I'd do with an eight or twelve column

Re: [css-d] Do modern mobile browsers deliberately ignore font size?

2014-03-13 Thread Peter H.
On a Motorola G phone with Android Kitkat the p text is quite large and the table text is tiny. On an iPhone 4 all the text is the same size, and tiny. Peter El 13/03/2014, a las 23:31, Ezequiel Garzón escribió: Thanks again for your reply. Now I'm really beginning to

Re: [css-d] Will the unsemantic HTML elements B and I be soon phased out?

2014-02-17 Thread Peter H.
for the foreseeable future I'll prefer them over em and strong. They're quicker to key, too. Peter H. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css

Re: [css-d] Will the unsemantic HTML elements B and I be soon phased out?

2014-02-17 Thread Peter H.
El 17/02/2014, a las 11:01, Philip Taylor escribió: Peter H. wrote: I've always had a problem understanding why em and strong are supposedly more semantic than i and b. Because em means emphasised and strong means strongly emphasised (semantic, saying nothing about how

Re: [css-d] Will the unsemantic HTML elements B and I be soon phased out?

2014-02-17 Thread Peter H.
El 17/02/2014, a las 11:29, Barney Carroll escribió: While bikeshedding around 'how semantic' people feel any given element to be is a great laugh (although definitely off-topic for this list), I would highly recommend the HTML specification for insight into the purpose of any HTML

Re: [css-d] html email with css

2013-09-06 Thread Peter H.
. Peter H. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org

Re: [css-d] css-based flyout menu for mobile?

2013-06-15 Thread Peter H.
El 15/06/2013, a las 01:20, COM escribió: Can anyone point me to a 100% css-based flyout menu for use with mobile devices? By flyout, I mean that when User presses a Menu icon, the menu slides out or otherwise appears, User presses their choice and menu hides, chosen page loads. John

Re: [css-d] Simple Floats on Multiple Rows Getting Stuck

2013-05-30 Thread Peter H.
of window width: display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; I notice that the link that Georg posted is still functioning so I'll take the liberty of repeating it here: http://www.gunlaug.com/contents/test/test-floating-boxes-mc0.html Hope this is useful, Peter H

Re: [css-d] Floating boxes with variable heights

2012-07-27 Thread Peter H.
Georg, I'm intrigued by your example and have wanted that behaviour several times in the past and couldn't figure a way to achieve it without fixed height divs. But from your test page there's a bit of css that I don't understand: .floating { float-:left; width:140px;

Re: [css-d] Floating boxes with variable heights

2012-07-27 Thread Peter H.
thanks Georg, that's very handy. Peter - El 27/07/2012, a las 17:27, Georg escribió: an alternative to equal height floats, and inline-block are very often the best __

Re: [css-d] ie 6/7/8

2012-04-23 Thread Peter H.
El 23/04/2012, a las 17:13, David Laakso escribió: Your comments and suggestion on this site http://ccstudi.com/ in Internet Explorer 6/7/8 are appreciated. David, an oldish Acer portable running XP, browser windows at full width of the screen: in IE6 7 the page draws very vertically, as

Re: [css-d] Finding fallback fonts (for Calibri)

2012-03-05 Thread Peter H.
://www.brownbatterystudios.com/sixthings/2007/03/14/lucida-hybrid-the-grande-alternative/ Hope this is useful, Peter H. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css

Re: [css-d] desktop. tablet. mobile.

2012-01-31 Thread Peter H.
El 31/01/2012, a las 03:31, David Laakso escribió: First pass: http://ccstudi.com/site/portfolio/w/ Constructive comments and suggestions are always appreciated. Thanks. designery comments: really like the feel of it, nice sparseness, tasty use of colour, intriguing, slightly enigmatic

Re: [css-d] Container shifts, one page to another

2011-10-24 Thread Peter H.
the bounds of the area it's sitting in. Could it be just that the 2nd page draws a scroll bar, which causes everything to shift to the left ? Hth, best regards, Peter H. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css

Re: [css-d] Vertical centering? And another problem.

2011-08-12 Thread Peter H.
text, or what size image, I put int there. in case this is of any help: the only way I've ever found to reliably centre vertically, is to use a good old-fashioned table. In this case, say, a single row with a cell each for your text and your image would probably do. Best regards, Peter H

Re: [css-d] Browser Stacking Issues

2011-03-25 Thread Peter H .
and that for z-index purposes only, opaque is better. However, I see that your .swf is within javascript tags so I'm not sure whether the above is helpful, but it might at least give you a pointer. HTH, Peter H. __ css-discuss