[css-d] site check PLEASE

Check my site.. i think there are some problems but i don't know how to fix them.. :| http://www.augustomurri.it/workBoard/MUSEI tnx to all! __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please - udrise.udayton.edu

Joe Otten wrote: >I saw the page viewed in FF 1.0 and it had some serious layout issues. I >was wondering if others could spot any issues with code, layout, etc. >Site: http://udrise.udayton.edu/index.asp >CSS: http://udrise.udayton.edu/style.css >Thank you, >-Joe > Joe, in Debian FF1.0.7 @1400

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please - udrise.udayton.edu

Joe Otten wrote, >I saw the page viewed in FF 1.0 and it had some serious layout issues. I > was wondering if others could spot any issues with code, layout, etc. > > Site: http://udrise.udayton.edu/index.asp > > CSS: http://udrise.udayton.edu/style.css > > > Thank you, > -Joe Joe: Looks very

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please - udrise.udayton.edu

At 10:45 AM 1/25/2006 -0500, Joe Otten wrote: >I saw the page viewed in FF 1.0 and it had some serious layout issues. I >was wondering if others could spot any issues with code, layout, etc. Sorry, no feedback on code issues, but in FF 1.5 (WinXP), it appeared fine to me, I did not notice any se

[css-d] Site Check Please - udrise.udayton.edu

I saw the page viewed in FF 1.0 and it had some serious layout issues. I was wondering if others could spot any issues with code, layout, etc. Site: http://udrise.udayton.edu/index.asp CSS: http://udrise.udayton.edu/style.css Thank you, -Joe

Re: [css-d] site check please: www.mmwebsite.com/vasquez

Hi Felix... Thanks for pointing these issues out. I still have some tweaking to do. Much appreciated. For what it's worth, I set the CSS font sizes to em values, not px, so that they are relative to what the browser is set to. Would you still consider that to be, as you put it, "so disrespectful

Re: [css-d] site check please: www.masstaxpros.biz

Michael Mendelsohn wrote: > at www.masstaxpros.biz. > > Is it bad practice to avoid inline styles? It seems to be valid. I'm > guessing you suggest avoiding it for maintenance purposes only? No problems with inline-styles when it comes to validity. However, inline-styles might become a maintenan

Re: [css-d] site check please: www.masstaxpros.biz

Thanks Georg, for the good feedback. I've updated my files with most of what you suggested, and they're now at www.masstaxpros.biz. Is it bad practice to avoid inline styles? It seems to be valid. I'm guessing you suggest avoiding it for maintenance purposes only? I'm still wondering how to ex

Re: [css-d] site check please: www.mmwebsite.com/vasquez

Michael Mendelsohn wrote: > www.mmwebsite.com/vasquez > I've only tested the site in IE, and I'm hoping it looks consistent > across different browsers. Sorry, but it doesn't. Opera, Firefox and Safari don't agree with IE, and not all that well with each other either. One reason is the errors f

Re: [css-d] site check please: www.mmwebsite.com/vasquez

Hi Richard... Thanks for looking! Which browser are you using? Also, for anyone who can shed some light: I have another question about my nav class: I'd like it stretch to the bottom of the content, not the bottom of the browser window. Is this possible? Thanks, - MM > The nav tabs i

Re: [css-d] site check please: www.mmwebsite.com/vasquez

Hi Michael The nav tabs in that top left corner don't work either. They all run into each other. Unfortunately I don't know why. I just wonder why you need to use javascript? Why couldn't you use these nav tabs: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/vertical02.htm On 8 Jan 2006, at 17:00, Mic

[css-d] site check please: www.mmwebsite.com/vasquez

Hello list...I've just joined! I'm winding up a website that I made extensive use of CSS with (www.mmwebsite.com/vasquez), and I'd love to get some feedback. Specifically, I have a two questions... In the upper left of every page, there's a javascript that puts a div on the page that's wrapped in

Re: [css-d] Site check Please

At 08/01/2006 00:57 (Sunday), david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Sam Leathers wrote: > > Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I think > > it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres > > anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility.

Re: [css-d] Site check Please

> Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I think > it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres > anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility. the > site is www.samleathers.com. Screenshot from my browser: http://jimbo.us/SamLeather

Re: [css-d] Site check Please

Sam Leathers wrote: >Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I think >it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres >anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility. the >site is www.samleathers.com. > >Sam > > > Ain't no expert. Don

Re: [css-d] Site check Please

On Jan 7, 2006, at 6:45 PM, Sam Leathers wrote: > Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I > think > it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres > anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility. the > site is www.samleathers.com. Y

Re: [css-d] Site check Please

Sam Leathers wrote: > Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I think > it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres > anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility. the > site is www.samleathers.com. Hmmm, I presume you're aware of

[css-d] Site check Please

Hey everyone. I finally got a chance to work on my own site, and I think it's pretty good, but I'd like the experts opinions on if theres anything I should change either for aesthetics or accessibility. the site is www.samleathers.com. Sam -- in life, direction is everything, distance is seco

[css-d] Site check please (take 2)

I have tested my web site in Firefox 1.5 and IE6 running on Windows XP Home. Can I please get a browser check for all other Windows, Linux and Mac browsers. Thank you. I normally design web sites for 800 by 600 resolution. HTML: http://www.infoforce-services.com CSS: http://www.infoforce-services

[css-d] Site check please

I have tested my web site in Firefox 1.5 and IE6 running on Windows XP Home. Can I please get a browser check for all other Windows, Linux and Mac browsers. Thank you. I normally design web sites for 800 by 600 resolution. Angus MacKinnon MacKinnon Crest Saying Latin - Audentes Fortuna Juvat En

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Catherine Post wrote: >Hi Everyone, > >Can someone please help me - I did my portfolio site in Dreamweaver and >tried to do the CSS properly; but now, a potential customer tells me that >she cannot "get into" the site at all. She seems to see a files list, but >cannot access the site. (The URL is

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Catherine Post wrote: > http://www.catherinepost.com Links don't work without javascript enabled, so my guess is that that's the show-stopper. Other than that I can't see anything wrong, although all pages I visited looked slightly broken because the layout is unable to take the stress of font-re

[css-d] Site check please

Hi Everyone, Can someone please help me - I did my portfolio site in Dreamweaver and tried to do the CSS properly; but now, a potential customer tells me that she cannot "get into" the site at all. She seems to see a files list, but cannot access the site. (The URL is in my signature) Help! Can s

[css-d] site check please

Hello, I've helped someone to develop a page. It is here: http://beta.erikvisser.net/clown/ http://beta.erikvisser.net/clown/stylecss/ I've tested it on Mac, Linux, Windows, with: Safari 1.3, IE Mac 5.2, Firefox 1.03, Mozilla 1.7.8, Opera 8.5, MS IE 6 Any remarks are welcome. But "the looks / t

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

Joshua Roark wrote: >I have a site I am working on and it is a WordPress template used as-is per >client request. I don't currently have Win/IE 5.x available to test the site >layout. I am told the site breaks unpleasantly in Win/IE 5.x and some >assistance would be appreciated. Presently, I

[css-d] Site Check Please

I have a site I am working on and it is a WordPress template used as-is per client request. I don't currently have Win/IE 5.x available to test the site layout. I am told the site breaks unpleasantly in Win/IE 5.x and some assistance would be appreciated. Presently, I have tested the site wit

Re: [css-d] site check please (IDA)

Emily Jones wrote: >I am still new to CSS and will appreciate your suggestions for making >the code cleaner and more accessible. (This is a transitional layout >to more-or-less emulate our site's current table-based layout; the >final design should be better-looking and easier to navigate.) >Te

[css-d] site check please (IDA)

I am still new to CSS and will appreciate your suggestions for making the code cleaner and more accessible. (This is a transitional layout to more-or-less emulate our site's current table-based layout; the final design should be better-looking and easier to navigate.) Test page is here: http://

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please (text greeking)

At 12:35 PM 11/26/05 -0500, you wrote: > >In Safari (1.3 and 2), the menu on the right-hand side with the navigation > >category text is almost starting to greek though (which might associated > >with the 'small' declaration.). > >Uhm, sorry. What does "greek through" mean in this context? In

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

On 11/26/05, Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > re: http://www.inkworkswell.net/booth/monroelab/ > These are apparently invalid: “solutions” According to: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/emen/ "Do not, under any circumstances, use “ through • for curly quotes." You should use: “ for an open

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

re: http://www.inkworkswell.net/booth/monroelab/ At 23:36 21-11-05, Sasha Gerrand wrote: >In Safari (1.3 and 2), the menu on the right-hand side with the navigation >category text is almost starting to greek though (which might associated >with the 'small' declaration.). Uhm, sorry. What does

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

At 18:30 21-11-05, Roger Roelofs wrote: >> http://inkworkswell.com/clients/monroelab >Safari and ie5/mac render the page comparably to ff1.5rc3 except for >the right hand navigation. In ie, only on the About Monroelab page, >that stripe is too far right and the nav is below the content on th

Re: [css-d] site check please - navigation

[css-d] site check please - navigation Adie Hart wrote: >I would really appreciate it if I could get a site check on a site that is >in production. The URL is www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html. At present >only the homepage and main sub-pages work, although they do not have >

Re: [css-d] site check please - navigation

Adie Hart wrote: > www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html The page is extremely vulnerable, and is breaking up and dropping elements in all directions in all browsers, when just a little font-resizing is applied. Advice you to take another look at the layout, and add a bit stability across browser-

Re: [css-d] site check please - navigation

Adie Hart wrote: >I would really appreciate it if I could get a site check on a site that is >in production. The URL is www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html. At present >only the homepage and main sub-pages work, although they do not have >content. >My main concern is achieving the correct layout

Re: [css-d] site check please - navigation

On (24/11/05 22:56), Adie Hart wrote: > The URL is www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html. I don't have any consistend advices to give you, but I can confirm you the page looks perfect on my GNU/Linux 2.4.29 box both with Opera 8.50, Firefox 1.5 and Konqueror 3.3.2 on my 15" LCD @ 1024x768. Only t

[css-d] site check please - navigation

Hi everyone, I would really appreciate it if I could get a site check on a site that is in production. The URL is www.adiehart.com/fratelli/index.html. At present only the homepage and main sub-pages work, although they do not have content. I have checked it on Windows XP with Firefox 1.0.7

Re: [css-d] Site Check, Please; Some Questions

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > However, keep in mind that the 62.5% base may result in very, very, > large fonts if a user apply 'min-font-size'[1] in their browser. Min-font-size isn't the only way for that to happen. User stylesheets can do the same thing: http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/css/share/user

Re: [css-d] Site Check, Please; Some Questions

Nick Fitzsimons wrote: > I personally find it useful to specify a font size of 62.5% on the > body, giving me a default size for 1em of 10 pixels. If I then want a > heading at 14 pixels, I can specify 1.4em. Yes, it's a simple calculation - although not too precise across browser-land. However

Re: [css-d] Site Check, Please; Some Questions

Nick Fitzsimons wrote: > One thing immediately stands out: you are declaring a font-size of 85% on > the body. As the standard browser font size is 16 pixels, and 85% of 16 is > 13.6, you're starting from a baseline of 13.6 pixels. As you can't have > fractions of a pixel, you're pretty much boun

Re: [css-d] Site Check, Please; Some Questions

L. Robinson wrote: >Converting legacy site to tableless layout and there are some advanced >(and not-so-advanced) cross-browser tricks eluding me. Having searched, >I'd be most grateful if someone can hit me with a clue stick on a few of >these. > >Site here: http://beta.consupro.net/default_new.

Re: [css-d] Site Check, Please; Some Questions

> -3- > > Font-sizing: Hardest to leave behind are my pixel-based fonts. :\ There > is a large difference between IE and Firefox, which I've slapped a > band-aid on for now... that Opera isn't happy with. > > I've read about many people's preferences on this, but could use a lot > more. Opinions o

[css-d] Site Check, Please; Some Questions

Converting legacy site to tableless layout and there are some advanced (and not-so-advanced) cross-browser tricks eluding me. Having searched, I'd be most grateful if someone can hit me with a clue stick on a few of these. Site here: http://beta.consupro.net/default_new.asp CSS here: http://beta.

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

:50 -0500 > To: > Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please > > We are looking for feedback on > > http://inkworkswell.com/clients/monroelab > > Especially from MacIE/Safari users. All comments on display issues welcome. > >

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

Reese, On Nov 21, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Reese wrote: > We are looking for feedback on > > http://inkworkswell.com/clients/monroelab > > Especially from MacIE/Safari users. All comments on display issues > welcome. Safari and ie5/mac render the page comparably to ff1.5rc3 except for the right hand

[css-d] Site Check Please

We are looking for feedback on http://inkworkswell.com/clients/monroelab Especially from MacIE/Safari users. All comments on display issues welcome. Reese -- Ink Works http://www.inkworkswell.com __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [css-d] site check please

Schalk wrote: >Greetings All > >Hopefully this will be the last request for a review of this site: >www.volume4.com/tc/ Thank you all in advance. > > > On zoom FF gets it right-- the nav container expands vertically, and throws h1. IE only /looks/ correct on zoom.You ignored Georg's comm

Re: [css-d] site check please - volume4.com/tc

Trish Meyer wrote: > At 4:57 PM +0200 11/16/05, Schalk wrote: > >www.volume4.com/tc/ > It looks like the photo should be the same height as the left column > (nav bar) area, but the left column is taller. You can't do that without sizing things in px. To me it's obvious it can't be, though ma

Re: [css-d] site check please

The top nav looks good in XP IE 6.0 and latest FireFox, but I wanted to mention one thing, from a usability standpoint. The page links are underlined until you mouse over them, and then the underline decoration disappears. This is a bit confusing on pages like http://www.volume4.com/tc/case/index.

Re: [css-d] site check please

At 4:57 PM +0200 11/16/05, Schalk wrote: >Greetings All > >Hopefully this will be the last request for a review of this site: >www.volume4.com/tc/ Thank you all in advance. > On Mac, Safari, when I hover over the nav bar, the hover state seems to be taller than the normal state? This results in

[css-d] site check please

Greetings All Hopefully this will be the last request for a review of this site: www.volume4.com/tc/ Thank you all in advance. -- Kind Regards Schalk Neethling Web Developer.Designer.Programmer.President Volume4.Business.Solution.Developers ___

Re: [css-d] site check please

Schalk wrote: > Greetings All > > Please have a look at: www.volume4.com/tc/ > > One problem I am aware of and would like suggestions on is the top > navigation. In Firefox it is perfect but, in IE the padding, margin, > background color etc. is totally wrong. Thanks! > Sent this earlier as a

[css-d] site check please

Greetings All Please have a look at: www.volume4.com/tc/ One problem I am aware of and would like suggestions on is the top navigation. In Firefox it is perfect but, in IE the padding, margin, background color etc. is totally wrong. Thanks! -- Kind Regards Schalk Neethling Web Developer.Desig

Re: [css-d] Site check please?

MANY thanks to those who replied on the list and privately with very helpful observations and information about my site. I was dismayed to see that in IE5/Mac there are serious problems, and I'm going to think about taking the advice to assume hardly anyone uses that browser. I'll see if I can fi

Re: [css-d] Site check please?

It's good, the only thing is if you are trying to avoid a horizontal scrollbar at 800x600, you need to make it about 2 pixels more narrow. -- -- C Montoya rdpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com __ css-dis

Re: [css-d] Site check please?

Charles Dort wrote: >If you'd be willing to glance at this index page >http://www.allsaintsofamerica.org/new_site/index.html >http://www.allsaintsofamerica.org/new_site/css/allsaints.css >Theophan (Charles) Dort > xp_sp2 ie/ff/opera Looks good to me, Charles. Some suggestions: body { /* dele

[css-d] Site check please?

I am changing my church's table-based site to XHTML/CSS, and I now have at least a pretty good "rough draft" that at least on my WinXP machine works well in Firefox and IE6. I'm still working on it, and as I "convert" more and more of the old site to the new format I find that I'm adding to and ch

[css-d] site check please - Ekstasis.net

SiteCheckPlease CheckEkstasis http://ekstasis.net/ I'm trying to learn CSS and would really appreciate a site check. I've validated xhtml&css + links. Any tips for fixing the following would be most handy: On the index page: 1. I cannot get a flash movie to position

[css-d] Site check please - First Draft

Greetings All Please review the following site: www.volume4.com/oxfordprice/ It is still in first draft form so some formatting will still need to be done. There are two pages that does currently render incorrectly. The faux column does not stretch the full height and so the forms overlap the

Re: [css-d] Site Check please - MLPforMen

On 10/14/05 5:18 PM, "RKN Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just getting ready to launch a new line for the customer. The mail for isn't > working here - but I know that works. > > http://www.rknstudio.com/sites/mlpformen/home.html > > Mac users input is greatly appreciated. Mac OS 10.2.4:

Re: [css-d] Site Check please - MLPforMen

RKN Studio wrote: Just getting ready to launch a new line for the customer. The mail for isn't working here - but I know that works. http://www.rknstudio.com/sites/mlpformen/home.html Mac users input is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Ron www.rknstudio.com A few Mac screen captures:

[css-d] Site Check please - MLPforMen

Just getting ready to launch a new line for the customer. The mail for isn't working here - but I know that works. http://www.rknstudio.com/sites/mlpformen/home.html Mac users input is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Ron www.rknstudio.com ___

Re: [css-d] Site check please - Huntly-online

At 10:04 AM 10/4/2005 +0100, Mike Davies wrote: I would appreciate a check on this new site, particularly in MacIE. Not a MAC, just Opera 7.54 on XP, the links look like they are strike-through (works fine on Opera 8.5). HTH, TTFN, David Director of Integrated Technology CATALyST Louisiana

[css-d] Site check please - Huntly-online

I would appreciate a check on this new site, particularly in MacIE. www.huntly-online.com www.huntly-online.com/huntly.css Only the 'Home' and 'Events' pages at the moment. It looks right in Firefox and Opera, and I think I have corrected for WinIE using conditional comments. I had to add top an

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please - Voices of CSM

Voices of CSM is a great website for a first attempt at CSS design. All those having trouble designing with CSS should learn from this example. > If anyone has a moment and can check out my site (this is my first all CSS > site) - it seems to be okay in IE6, FF, Opera & NN7, but I'm not sure > abo

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please - Voices of CSM

David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thursday, September 22, 2005 at 9:17 AM -0800 wrote: >Felix Miata wrote: > >>Juanita wrote: >> >> >She's looking and working much, much better now, Juanita. > > >>It's wonderful to see my text size preference there. :-) >The problem is, >>your 699px wide #wrapp

[css-d] site check please - http://www.Looperman-is-ready.com

This is relatively simple html css but I have been unable to check in browsers other than IE6 (computer disaster among other things) so any help in checking other browsers would be appreciated. Sample Pages are generated by a publishing program so the css in embedded. I started to make it exte

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please - Voices of CSM

Juanita wrote: > If anyone has a moment and can check out my site (this is my first all CSS > site) - it seems to be okay in IE6, FF, Opera & NN7, but I'm not sure > about other browsers or Mac. > I imported the stylesheet so as not to break in NN4, but haven't done a > more basic stylesheet fo

[css-d] Site Check Please - Voices of CSM

Hi - If anyone has a moment and can check out my site (this is my first all CSS site) - it seems to be okay in IE6, FF, Opera & NN7, but I'm not sure about other browsers or Mac. I imported the stylesheet so as not to break in NN4, but haven't done a more basic stylesheet for it yet. The site i

Re: [css-d] Site check please

On 9/17/05 5:32 AM, "olly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow, thanks for the feedback - really appreciated. I'm purchasing a Mac in > the next few weeks so then I'll be able to cover most browsers... Unless you have not uploaded the revised files, the problems are still occurring in IE 5/Mac. Not

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Wow, thanks for the feedback - really appreciated. I'm purchasing a Mac in the next few weeks so then I'll be able to cover most browsers :) Anyway, until then... On 17/09/05, Jono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IE/Mac 5.2.3: > > Home page: > The bottom of the second box - WhistleBump Records

Re: [css-d] Site check please--whistlebump

On 17/09/05, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mac/ie5.2 and Safari screen captures here > . > In XP_SP2 you are drawing a scroll bar at 800 in all my browsers. > Other than that she's 'working' well in XP, albeit unreadable at any >

Re: [css-d] Site check please--whistlebump

olly wrote: I'd appreciate it if some of you could check that a new site i'm working on in your browsers. It validates XHTML 1.1 and looks fine in IE6, Firefox 1.0.6 and Opera 8 on the PC. I'm mainly concerned about Macs. http://www.whistlebump.co.uk/test cheers, olly Olly, Mac/ie5.2 and Saf

Re: [css-d] Site check please

On 9/16/05 9:50 PM, "olly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > ... I'm mainly concerned about Macs. > > http://www.whistlebump.co.uk/test > Looks good in Firefox 1.0.6, Safari 2.0, Opera 8.02, and somewhat good in IE 5.2.3 for Mac OS 10.4.2 (Tiger). IE/Mac 5.2.3: Home page: The bottom of the

[css-d] Site check please

Hi, I'd appreciate it if some of you could check that a new site i'm working on in your browsers. It validates XHTML 1.1 and looks fine in IE6, Firefox 1.0.6 and Opera 8 on the PC. I'm mainly concerned about Macs. http://www.whistlebump.co.uk/test The download links will fail (until it goes li

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

This is a bit off topic for a CSS forum. I picked one of your images, the Californian Poppy, and opened it in Photoshop. On the site it's 29896 bytes. If I save it for web and chose medium quality (30) that comes down to 5057 bytes. IMHO quality 30 is virtually indistinguishable from the original

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

Peter, I am trying to come up with a new design for my website, one that uses less pictures. I actually used Photoshops "Save for Web" to make these pictures as small as I could. Thanks for checking my site. I'm new to this CSS, and need all the help i can get. Thank you, Brian On 9/14/05, P

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

Rahul, I think the white space is coming from the menumachine 1.74 code down at the bottom of the page, but I will check it out, thank you for looking at the page. I plan to replace that menu with a MM2 menu soon. Brian On 9/14/05, Rahul Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Se

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:53:34 -0700, Brian Gottier wrote: This is the first time I have used CSS, so don't laugh at me please! Every time I think I am finished...I learn something new and have to redo a bunch of stuff. http://www.tv-sewingcenter.com Brian: I'm getting a large amount of

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

A quick check on the home page in a few browsers: Firefox 1.0.6, IE6, Opera 8.02 and NS7.2 - looks OK and FF reports no warnings or errors. IE 5.01 and IE 5.5 - It's all there, but the graphics (vertical navigation and pictures) are no centered. Just for a laugh - NS4.7 looks useable to start

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please tv-sewingcenter.com

Brian Gottier wrote: > http://www.tv-sewingcenter.com > http://www.tv-sewingcenter.com/tvsc.css You're making it awfully hard on your hight resolution visitors by putting all those links in tiny text images and preventing the destinations they link to from displaying in the statusbar on hover: h

[css-d] Site Check Please

This is the first time I have used CSS, so don't laugh at me please! Every time I think I am finished...I learn something new and have to redo a bunch of stuff. http://www.tv-sewingcenter.com style sheet : http://www.tv-sewingcenter.com/tvsc.css _

Re: [css-d] site check please

>Link: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/. I cannot read your content because the color constrast is not sufficient. There are tools to analyze contrast at http://www.nils.org.au/ais/web/resources/contrast_analyser/index.html --- Paul Debban ___

Re: [css-d] site check please

Felix Miata wrote: Scott Glasgow wrote: (http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk). Just a suggestion... Wierd site. I can find no evidence of a way to create a login account. Sorry, I pointed to the Web interface for the list. The account creation URL is here: http://e-newslett

Re: [css-d] site check please tanreisoftware.com

Petro Verkhogliad wrote: > Hi, this is a site my friend and i put together. please check. > Link: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/. > CSS: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/basic.css It's not much better than invisible. Try plugging your foreground and background colors in at http://juicystudi

Re: [css-d] site check please

Petro Verkhogliad wrote: Hi, this is a site my friend and i put together. please check. Link: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/. CSS: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/basic.css Thank you, PV <<::SNIP::>> Well, Petro, not to put too fine a point on it, but the text is all but unreadable to la

addendum [css-d] site check please

Link: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/. CSS: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/basic.css PV Hi, this is a site my friend and i put together. please check. Petro, It seems fine in XP_SP2 ie/ff/moz/opera. You are showing an approx. 165px horizontal scroll bar at 800 in all versions of w

Re: [css-d] site check please

Petro Verkhogliad wrote: Hi, this is a site my friend and i put together. please check. Link: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/. CSS: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/basic.css PV Petro, It seems fine in XP_SP2 ie/ff/moz/opera. You are showing an approx. 165px horizontal scroll bar at 800 i

Re: [css-d] site check please

On (13/09/05 11:30), Petro Verkhogliad wrote: > Link: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/. > CSS: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/basic.css No apparent problems with Opera 8.02/Linux. Only think I could say (but I don't know if it was intentional or whatever), is that i see quite a lot of space bet

[css-d] site check please

Hi, this is a site my friend and i put together. please check. Link: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/. CSS: http://thomas.tanreisoftware.com/basic.css Thank you, PV __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/ma

Re: [css-d] site check please

Tanya Renne wrote: http://nolarelief.orchidsuites.net (all browsers) nav on the left - color should go to the top of the footer Background can only go as far down as the '#nav2' itself. You'll have to add a suitable background-image (faux column) to 'div#sitecontainer' behind '#nav2'. (NS)

[css-d] site check please

at http://nolarelief.orchidsuites.net I'm having the following issues: (all browsers) nav on the left - color should go to the top of the footer (NS) the whole middle content area slips down below the nav. - the top red part of the page is in table (sorry) and when I remove the dummy "option"

Re: [css-d] site check please

On 9/11/05 2:17 PM, "Keith Burgin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Mckee wrote: > >> site >> http://sixfoottwo.gotdns.com/~sixfoottwo/_test/index.html On my Mac running 10.4.2: -- Looks good in IE 5.2.3*, Opera 8, Safari 2.0, and Firefox 1.0.6 * In IE 5/Mac, the red "first-letter" is

Re: [css-d] site check please

Mark Mckee wrote: site http://sixfoottwo.gotdns.com/~sixfoottwo/_test/index.html Mark - The site doesn't validate, but all of the problems are minor and easy to fix. I would suggest validating it before chasing any bugs. Given what you have up, it seems fine. Looks good in Safari, and

[css-d] site check please

hi all i was wondering if i could get a site check please. any of you see any problems with my code or problems i may run into in the fututre site http://sixfoottwo.gotdns.com/~sixfoottwo/_test/index.html css http://sixfoottwo.gotdns.com/~sixfoottwo/_test/style.css thanks in advance mark m.

RE: [css-d] Site Check please...

> what I'm looking for a check on is any major layout issues. It looks the same in IE6, FF, NS, and Opera on the PC, and also in IE, FF, Safari, and Opera on the Mac. I saw no layout problems. HTH, Steven Olson __ css-discus

[css-d] Site Check please...

http://www.buyblue.org/stg/ user:buyblue pass:letmein There are a couple of things not functional at this time, but what I'm looking for a check on is any major layout issues. Thanks in advance! -- John Haas Web/Multimedia Designer [man][ape] design w: http://w

Re: [css-d] Site Check please!

John Haas wrote: >> http://www.phillyadclub.com/demo >> >> Thanks in advance! Hi John, - The Validator returns errors: http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//philadelphiaadclub.com/demo/ - Submitting the form leaving the field empty brings a weird page - You lose the headings with

Re: [css-d] Site Check please!

http://www.phillyadclub.com/demo Hi Looks the same on IE5Mac and FireFox Mac OSX everything looks like it is in the correct places - but you have a font resize problem in the search box and at 150% in the top navigation. HTH Moira -- Moira Ashleigh. M.A. Lead Designer SolsticeSun Design

[css-d] Site Check please!

http://www.phillyadclub.com/demo Thanks in advance! -- John Haas Web/Multimedia Designer [man][ape] design w: http://www.manapedesign.com e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] p: 215.868.2661 630 N. 17th St. #1 Philadelphia, PA 19130 _

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >