At 8:32 PM -0500 11/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the only way to bold and center all the text in every cell of a
particular column is to add those rules to every cell? (Sounds like bad
coding to me.) Or to pretend that they are header cells when they
aren't? (Sounds like bad coding to me.)
Wednesday, November 9, 2005, 10:01:21 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
.myclass {text-align: center}
td:first-child+td+td {text-align: center} /* the 3rd column */
***But***, and here IE is buggy again, you *cannot* group those
selector, else IE doesn't recognise the .myclass selector.
I
PROTECTED]; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:46:38 -0500
Subject: Re: [css-d] Styling COL and COLGROUP
At 8:32 PM -0500 11/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the only way to bold and center all the text in every cell of a
particular column is to add those rules to every cell
Thanks, Eric. It was just so nice when I had stripped away a ton of code
and had all these cells with no classes assigned or inline styling or
anything (literally just: tdX/td, whereas the old version that
somebody else coded looked like td align=center valign=middle
bgcolor=E1E4E4span
The extra classes have
relevant names, so you shouldn't feel that they are obstructing your
quest
for purity.
I think the problem posed is that *every* td has the same thing, the
same thing, the same thing, so why should a class have to specified 40
times (number pulled from a hat) to style
Thursday, November 10, 2005, 1:27:55 PM, CJ Larson wrote:
Making a colgroup for this city *one* time and being done with it is the
intuitive thing to do, but since it doesn't work... problem.
Have you tried it?
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=StylingColumns (Combination method)
table
Drawback is colgroup is only supported by IE and limited to width,
border, background and visibility styles. (I know the original poster
was designing for IE, but still...)
I think Eric Meyer had the right idea. I wouldn't advise using
adjacent sibling selectors. It's not very efficient.
CJ Larson wrote:
I think the problem posed is that *every* td has the same thing, the
same thing, the same thing, so why should a class have to specified 40
times (number pulled from a hat) to style this one type of td? Now, if
only one city td needed to be special, a class there would be
Have you tried it?
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=StylingColumns (Combination
method)
(Sorry you get this twice Steve; I sent it off list accidentally the
first time.)
I was referring to colgroup as specified in the original post, not
work-around methods (that consequently don't work
Thursday, November 10, 2005, 1:59:25 PM, Dan Kletter wrote:
Drawback is colgroup is only supported by IE and limited to width,
border, background and visibility styles.
Thanks to it's non-standard layout engine IE doesn't have these limitations
on styling via COL. Nor do CSS2 browsers styling
It's possible, and pretty simple. You just use the solution from the
wiki, where you style the COL and IE picks it up, and use adjacent
siblings for standards-complient browsers.
This is what I'm trying to avoid, since I would rather not style for
individual browsers, which means it would be
On 10 Nov 2005, at 9:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't hardly ever use these tags but I found they came in handy in my
current assignment. However, in IE (not my favorite browser but I have
to admit it's doing what I want to in this instance) everything
displayed the way I intuitively
I don't hardly ever use these tags but I found they came in handy
in my
current assignment. However, in IE (not my favorite browser but I
have
to admit it's doing what I want to in this instance) everything
displayed the way I intuitively imagined it would after adding
style
rules to
On 11/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't hardly ever use these tags but I found they came in handy in my
current assignment. However, in IE (not my favorite browser but I have
to admit it's doing what I want to in this instance) everything
displayed the way I intuitively
On 10 Nov 2005, at 11:13 am, James Bennett wrote:
I once read through a long and protracted Mozilla bug report on this
which I'm currently unable to locate; IIRC the problem, conceptually,
is that individual table cells are not actually children of the
COLGROUP or COL; as a result, they
15 matches
Mail list logo
