Bob Rosenberg wrote:
Which responds with a blanket NO ignoring the possibility that
there may be layouts that can be done via Tables but is impossible to
create via CSS.
That possibility doesn't exist.
The only thing that may bother us a bit at times, is legacy browsers
that don't support
At 10:33 PM -0400 8/1/09, Bob Rosenberg wrote:
Except for the fact that in some cases CSS is (currently?) incapable
of creating the same layout as can be created with a Table (Maybe
CSS3 will be able to once it gets rolled out in a few years).
That's news to me.
I've been wandering around for
Tedd post toasted:
I've been wandering around for years using css
to solve every styling problem I've run into
and have never found one I couldn't solve.
It does take some creativity and ingenuity to create some of the complex
layouts with CSS... but that is what listservs like this one
At 3:41 PM + 8/2/09, Conyers, Dwayne wrote:
Tedd post toasted:
I've been wandering around for years using css
to solve every styling problem I've run into
and have never found one I couldn't solve.
It does take some creativity and ingenuity to create some of the
complex layouts with
Bob Rosenberg wrote:
At 19:36 +0100 on 08/01/2009, MEM wrote about Re: [css-d] the old
'tables vs. divs':
I was studying the CSS and the page structure and I noticed that
the designer used a series of table cels to create that design.
Not only will the page not validate but I wondered what
What do you all think..
todd
Well... you ask this on a CSS list... what do you expect? ;)
I was studying the CSS and the page structure and I noticed that the
designer used a series of table cels to create that design. Not only
will the page not validate but I wondered what you
Todd Bingham wrote:
Gentlemen,
This is not my site, but I went there as a result of a tutorial I was
taking on Lynda.com.
http://www.nypl.org/
I was studying the CSS and the page structure and I noticed that the
designer used a series of table cels to create that design. Not only
On 2009/08/01 14:40 (GMT-0400) Christian Heilmann composed:
Todd Bingham wrote:
http://www.nypl.org/
http://www.shouldiusetablesforlayout.com/
It's quite common among major sites to continue using layout tables.
http://developer.apple.com/internet/webcontent/bestwebdev.html
My view on the subject is that you may abuse anything, and i mean anything,
to make your site look as it should. And that should be done as stable,
standards-complaint, pretty, elegant and small as possible. Tables is not
any of those, but they may get the job done.
From there on it's viewing per
At 19:36 +0100 on 08/01/2009, MEM wrote about Re: [css-d] the old
'tables vs. divs':
I was studying the CSS and the page structure and I noticed that the
designer used a series of table cels to create that design. Not only
will the page not validate but I wondered what you guys have
At 19:40 +0100 on 08/01/2009, Christian Heilmann wrote about Re:
[css-d] the old 'tables vs. divs':
Todd Bingham wrote:
Gentlemen,
This is not my site, but I went there as a result of a tutorial I was
taking on Lynda.com.
http://www.nypl.org/
I was studying the CSS and the page
Bob Rosenberg wrote:
Except for the fact that in some cases CSS is (currently?) incapable
of creating the same layout as can be created with a Table (Maybe
CSS3 will be able to once it gets rolled out in a few years).
Good grief. Give it up.
Structure site layouts as table-less
12 matches
Mail list logo
