On May 25, 2006, at 12:11 AM, Paul Annett wrote:
This definition list looks great in Firefox, but the positioning of
the
definitions is consistently not what I want across all versions of IE.
http://www.nice-design.co.uk/dl/
Which browser has it right? Do you have any ideas on how to
Ingo Chao wrote:
in [1], you have two solutions, but in Jack's case, only 4:onclick
handler worked for me, not 3:negative z-index.
Maybe another bug is interfering. I've tried a similar approach as with
links not working when placed over an absolutely positioned element with
a filter
Michel Sabatino wrote:
Hi.
Which is the easiest and more efficient way to work in CSS and XHTML to
get at once a view on how it will look on IE 6 and firefox?
How to handle external css files during the same process described before?
In one word, which are the best tools (more efficient)
As already mentioned, this is covered at
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CssEditors
and is off topic for the list (and anyone who thinks it isn't hasn't
done the list the courtesy of reading the posting guidelines)
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=PostingGuidelines
So no more
Go sha wrote:
... Please let me know (and
forgive me) if I break any of the lists' rules...
Hello Sharon.
It is more likely to get help when you offer an URL to a valid testcase.
I have a list that displays information of certain items. ... I
had to absolutely position elements within the
Hi,
I have a problem with my background colours disappearing when I use
internal anchor linking inside my page.
An example can be seen here
http://2006.plasti-kote.oidadev.co.uk/testbug.htm
If you click on application tips on the left it links down to an anchor
and the background
Cameron Rimington wrote:
I have a problem with my background colours disappearing when I use
internal anchor linking inside my page.
Disapearing background colours/images in IE are usually caused by the
element not having 'hasLayout'. Giving an element 'hasLayout' often
fixes odd
Hi,
than the bottom is okay, but the TOP image is overwritten by the MIDDLE
layer, so this is not really the best :(
Erik
Tom Livingston wrote:
.ako-pokracovat-box-middle div {
float: left;
width: 500px;
background: url(../images/ako-pokracovat-box-middle.gif) repeat-y;
}
Try this
body {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
// Sebastian
-Original Message-
From: richard hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25. maj 2006 15:56
To: Sebastian Dammark; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] 100% height
Sebastian,
Thanks!
This worked
Dave Goodchild wrote:
An absolutely positioned element will be positioned relative to its nearest
positioned parent (ie I tend to use a wrapper div with position: relative if
I am going to use absolutely positioned elements, but as I learn more I am
beginning to understand that floated layouts
Scott Sauyet wrote:
The paragraphs after the header elements need to have no top margin.
Ideally, you would do this with
h1 + p, h2 + p, h3 + p {
margin-top: 0;
}
but the 800-lb gorilla that is IE(7) doesn't understand this. You can
simply add a class to those
Chris W. Parker wrote:
Ingo Chao mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:15 PM said:
This does not sound wrong.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#choose-position
When a box B is relatively positioned, the position of the following
box is calculated as though B
Courtney Burge wrote:
On this page:
http://www.cofc.edu/~hml/index2.html
I have a header image that is set to display:none on the regular
stylesheet and will print with the use of a print stylesheet.
Is there a way to also hide this header when toggling OFF the CSS on
the page? I can't
Thank you for responding, Ingo!
I apologize for not offering an URL to a testcase, our test site is
not accessible from the outside and I didn't take the time to sign up
for one of those free webpage sites... :-)
I seriously thought about rethinking the positionning inside the LIs,
but I'm
14 matches
Mail list logo