Please upload the new and long overdue ImageMagick package. Actually
this are four packages, find links below.
Since upstream version 6.3.8-5 of ImageMagick the following changes
were made by the ImageMagick team:
Renames:
/usr/include = /usr/include/ImageMagick
libMagick = libMagickCore
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 20 19:30, Volker Quetschke wrote:
Since upstream version 6.3.8-5 of ImageMagick the following changes
were made:
Renames:
/usr/local/include = /usr/local/include/ImageMagick
libMagick = libMagickCore
libWand = libMagickWand
Magick-config (deprecated
Since upstream version 6.3.8-5 of ImageMagick the following changes
were made:
Renames:
/usr/local/include = /usr/local/include/ImageMagick
libMagick = libMagickCore
libWand = libMagickWand
Magick-config (deprecated) = MagickCore-config
Wand-config (deprecated) = MagickWand-config
And as
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Volker?
On Mar 11 15:57, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Volker Quetschke writes:
I just looked into the ImageMagick stuff and I would also like to keep
grace.
By the way, there is a grace version sitting in test for more than a
year now. What about that version
Gergely Budai wrote:
I'm slightly irritated. Is there some hidden agreement between you
and Volker to take over all his packages? If so, it would be nice
if we would know about that.
No there is no hidden agreement between us, neither did I want to take over all
his packages.
Well, lets
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 5 20:51, Gergely Budai wrote:
http://home.arcor.de/thuffir/cygwin/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.8-2-src.tar.bz2 \
http://home.arcor.de/thuffir/cygwin/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.8-2.tar.bz2 \
http://home.arcor.de/thuffir/cygwin/gnupg/setup.hint
Uploaded. I added bash and tar to
As the current maintainer of gnupg I don't mind passing the
maintainership to Gergely. I didn't thoroughly test the package
but it looks good on a first glance.
This does not need to be a test package, if no problems arise
this should be curr.
If no one beats me to it I will do more test later
David Rothenberger wrote:
On 3/3/2008 11:47 AM, Gergely Budai wrote:
Package location:
=
http://home.arcor.de/thuffir/cygwin/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.8-1-src.tar.bz2
This doesn't build for me, but maybe that's because I already have GPG
installed? Only the tests fail.
Making all in
Eric Blake wrote:
According to Volker Quetschke on 11/5/2006 2:45 PM:
Please upload:
...
Done, and sorry for not more closely reviewing the -1 version (cgf's wet
blanket caught up with me). I assume you wanted 6.0.4-1 left as previous,
and delete 6.3.0.1-1; so that's the approach I took
Thanks to Yaakov's hints this now builds without special patches.
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/ImageMagick/setup.hint
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-6.3.0.1-1.tar.bz2
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-6.3.0.1-1-src.tar.bz2
Charles Wilson wrote:
(snip)
Furthermore, there are some packaging issues in the main ImageMagick
package:
/usr/share/doc/ImageMagick-6.3.0/www/subversion.html
/usr/share/ImageMagick-6.3.0/ChangeLog
/usr/share/ImageMagick-6.3.0/config/coder.xml
Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
Volker Quetschke wrote:
| The only problem is that due to a MakeMaker problem, see
| http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-11/msg00024.html
| the build is not completely self contained. An extra patch for
| MM_Unix.pm is needed.
A fix for this is part of
ports
As ImageMagick is a dependency for XmGrace and other packages I'm
proposing to adopt ImageMagick. I followed Yaakov's Cygports
packaging and divided it in four packages.
The only problem is that due to a MakeMaker problem, see
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-11/msg00024.html
the build is not
Sorry, typo in the URLs. Fixed below.
As ImageMagick is a dependency for XmGrace and other packages I'm
proposing to adopt ImageMagick. I followed Yaakov's Cygports
packaging and divided it in four packages.
The only problem is that due to a MakeMaker problem, see
New upstream version using libintl8 and containing a patch for the
'--refresh-keys' problem.
Please upload:
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/setup.hint
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.5-1.tar.bz2
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.5-1-src.tar.bz2
Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
I would like to propose my cygport package as a new package
building/maintaining method, as well as a new package for the distribution.
This still needs two more votes and a GTG. In the meantime, I've made
an update. New URLs:
Eric Blake wrote:
According to Volker Quetschke on 2/24/2006 5:21 PM:
New upstream version, please upload:
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/setup.hint
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.2.1-1.tar.bz2
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.2.1-1
New upstream version, please upload:
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/setup.hint
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.2.1-1.tar.bz2
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.2.1-1-src.tar.bz2
Regards
Volker
--
PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from
Hi Yaakov,
Applications relying on GnuPG to authenticate digital signatures may
incorrectly believe a signature has been verified.
Solution: upgrade to 1.4.2.1.
I got the hint ;) Expect a new version in the next week or so.
Volker
--
PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from
Please upload grace-5.1.19-1 (new upstream release) and
grace-5.99.0-1 (development version, as test).
The grace-5.1.17 version can be removed.
New setup hint:
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/setup.hint
URLs:
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/grace-5.1.19-1.tar.bz2
Christopher Faylor wrote:
upset: *** warning package grace requires non-existent package libjpeg-62
I changed that to libjpeg62.
Oops, thanks! I changed that here too.
Volker
--
PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913 9E53
After updating my installed packages to the current versions with
setup.exe xemacs 21.4.17-1 started to complain about a missing
pq.dll in my path.
Downgrading postgresql to 7.4.5-1 fixes this problem, but that
is obviously not a permanent solution.
Volker
--
PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D)
I updated these packages to the latest upstream versions.
(Yes, i know gnupg just released the RC2 for version 1.4.2, but this
means 1.4.1 is still the last released version.)
Please upload:
URLs:
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/libgpg-error/libgpg-error-1.1-1.tar.bz2
This is a package update to a new upstream version.
Please upload.
URLs:
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/grace-5.1.18-1.tar.bz2
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/grace-5.1.18-1-src.tar.bz2
No cygwin related changes, see
http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Grace/doc/CHANGES.html
for
Hi Lapo,
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.0-2.tar.bz2
For what is worth I'm using this both alone and together with
enigmail/thunderbird with no problem (even downloading keys from
keyservers).
I also verified that it works. Do you thing this is enough to promote
it from test to
According to the discussion in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-12/msg00099.html
I prepared new gnupg packages that contain the mentioned fix
for the keyserver helper programs.
Please upload, the 1.2.6-2 version is the stable version for
cygwin and 1.4.0-2 is still a test package.
Hi David,
I'm having a problem retrieving keys from keyservers with this release.
With the default configuration, the keyserver helper programs die with a
message that they can't find the cygwin1.dll.
The problem is that by default, gnupg sets the PATH to /usr/sbin/gnupg
when it invokes these
Hi!
There is already a gnupg 1.4.0 upstream, but I just finished this one.
Please upload.
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/setup.hint
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.2.6-1.tar.bz2
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.2.6-1-src.tar.bz2
The setup.hint changed
Hi Lapo,
Volker, did you think about adding it?
That way, LDAP-based keyserver can be contacted.
All that is required to have the support is to have openldap-devel
installed at compile-time: GnuPG's configure will auto-detect and use it.
I'm overdue with gnupg 1.2.6 anyway, yes it will contain
I would like to contribute and maintain the t1lib package:
* http://site.n.ml.org/info/t1lib/ (Homepage)
* http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/libs/graphics/ (Download location)
This packacke is a prerequisite for xpdf, a PDF Viewer for X, which I will
announce shortly.
+1
Volker
--
PGP/GPG key
Hi!
Sorry, my fault, misread your repliy. I already described why I don't
do it dynamically. Anyway, what is the problem with the great patches?
You can open an editor and search for +++ and you'll see that the
interesting files are always Makefile.am configure.in.
Patchfiles are not for
I would like to maintain the cygwin-port of the libgpg-error library.
This is a library that defines common error values for all GnuPG
components. Among these are GPG, GPGSM, GPGME, GPG-Agent, libgcrypt,
Libksba, DirMngr, Pinentry, SmartCard Daemon and possibly more in the
future.
This package
As advertised, I would like to maintain the cygwin-port of the
libgcrypt library.
Libgcrypt is a general purpose cryptographic library based on the code
from GnuPG. It provides functions for all cryptographic building blocks:
symmetric ciphers, hash algorithms, MACs, public key algorithms, large
I would like to maintain the cygwin-port of the libgpg-error
library. This is a library that defines common error values for all
GnuPG components.
It's basically some refactoring-as-a-lib of code common to all those
projects?
In which version do they begin to need it?
I didn't check thorougly, but
Hi Harold,
| I want to contribute/maintain cppunit.
| Canonical website: http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/
Pro from me.
Just need one more vote now. I've been using the package for creating
unit tests, so I give it my own GTG review. Let's get that extra vote.
Sounds like a usfull package.
+1
Hi!
Once LessTif 0.93.94 is no longer marked test this package will
become the current version.
Harold just did this, can someone please upload/change the setup.hint
file?
URL: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/grace/setup.hint
(or just change curr:, test: to:
prev: 5.1.12-1
curr: 5.1.14-2
)
This is a test package for the current upstream version.
*ATTENTION* LessTif 0.93.94 (also a test version) *is* required!!
Once LessTif 0.93.94 is no longer marked test this package will
become the current version.
Harold just did this, can someone please upload/change the setup.hint
file?
URL:
This is a test package for the current upstream version.
*ATTENTION* LessTif 0.93.94 (also a test version) *is* required!!
Erm... why did you then remove lesstif from the requires line?!?
*blush* I didn't remove it, it was already missing in the old releases.
(But it is linked in statically in
This is a test package for the current upstream version.
*ATTENTION* LessTif 0.93.94 (also a test version) *is* required!!
Once LessTif 0.93.94 is no longer marked test this package will
become the current version.
NEWS
* Grace now uses the XmHTML library to display the online help.
Please
Also +1 for this package.
Max Bowsher wrote:
APR is the Apache Portable Runtime. APR-util is an addon package to APR
containing non-core useful features.
Both are required by Subversion.
I have prototype packages installed on my machine right now. I'll make apr,
then apr-util, sequentially
This has my vote +1
(This might come in twice, I accidentally used a wrong from
adress before, only one +1 is intended ;) )
Neon is a WebDAV client library, which is required by subversion.
(Dave Slusher's candidate subversion package currently bundles neon.)
This package would reduce the need
Hi Max,
I've uploaded patchutils-0.2.29-1 (marked test, as it is my first official
package).
Errm, can you please consider patchutils-0.2.30pre1.tar.bz2? The
difference to .29 is a fix that
* src/filterdiff.c (do_unified): Handle no-newline line counts
correctly.
I tripped over
Hi!
Volker Is cygipc required? I guess cygserver/cygipc is handled by the
Volker XFree86 dependency.
Yes this is true. Here is the new setup.hint file.
Errm, no! It still contains cygipc. I just wanted to ask here to
upload the package, but the setup.hint should be fixed first.
Volker
Hi!
Please upload XmHTML, I'd like to update grace to a version which uses
it.
It got the required third vote,
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-04/msg00023.html
and is GTG.
Volker Z's packages should be here:
-- cut here
#!/bin/bash
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
This is the list of pending packages as of Saturday, March 27, 2004.
If you see something missing, please let the list know.
Package: XmHTML 3.2-1 [2004-01-16]
Description: XmHTML provides a widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2 conforming text
Proposal:
Hi Volker,
Here is the setup.hint file:
sdesc: XmHTML provides a widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2 conforming text
ldesc: XmHTML provides a widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2 conforming text.
category: Libs Web XFree86
requires: cygwin cygipc expat lesstif libfontconfig1 libfreetype26
Now that gnupg is back, please upload.
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Hmm, I had the 1.2.4 version ready for a while, but forgot to mention
it.
I was asked for the links, here they are:
Changes since version 1.2.2-3:
* New upstream version
NOTES
-
You find build instructions for a windows native
Hmm, I had the 1.2.4 version ready for a while, but forgot to mention
it.
I was asked for the links, here they are:
Changes since version 1.2.2-3:
* New upstream version
NOTES
-
You find build instructions for a windows native executable (MinGW)
after unpacking the source (see gnupg.README
No, I wouldn't, but I didn't intend on that being the only statement.
Consider this: The gpg which we distribute contains the *exact* same
cipher, AES{128,192,256}, as ccrypt plus gpg also has twofish
blowfish.
The last time I checked, those two were also considered
strong encryption
Hi!
Rafael I haven't tried building anything that uses XmHTML, but I'm making the
Rafael assumption that since the testhtml program builds and works, that should
not be
Rafael an issue.
I build this especially for grace, which right now shows it's help with
lynx in an xterm window. It
Oops,
) This is a package update from a new upstream version.
) I also patched grace to use /usr/share/man and /usr/share/info.
) http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace/setup.hint
) http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace/grace-5.1.14-1.tar.bz2
) http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace/grace-5.1.14-1-src.tar.bz2
I'm really sorry for the confusion, but discussion on cygwin-xfree
revealed a problem either in grace, but more propably in lesstif.
grace 5.1.14 crashes under certain circumstances. The 5.1.12 version
doesn't! (All libraries linked in static)
I'd like to withdraw the 5.1.14 version until a
Hi Harold,
grace 5.1.14 crashes under certain circumstances. The 5.1.12 version
doesn't! (All libraries linked in static)
OK, this was very confusing, what I meant was that 5.1.12 was linked
using static libraries. I'm even not sure if this was really the case,
but the executable is 1 meg bigger
Harold
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Hi Harold,
grace 5.1.14 crashes under certain circumstances. The 5.1.12 version
doesn't! (All libraries linked in static)
OK, this was very confusing, what I meant was that 5.1.12 was linked
using static libraries. I'm even not sure if this was really the case
override the VendorShell.
Harold
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Harold,
Okay, with this additional info, I suggest rebuilding your 5.1.12
version against the new LessTif libs and on an updated Cygwin
installation and see if that build works.
I just did this, using shared libraries. It fails the same way
Hi!
This is a package update from a new upstream version.
I also patched grace to use /usr/share/man and /usr/share/info.
Please upload.
URLs:
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace/setup.hint
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace/grace-5.1.14-1.tar.bz2
Hi!
This is a respin with cygwin 1.5.5 for the cygwin gnupg package.
I also switched to /usr/share/man and /usr/share/info and use
_update-info-dir now instead of a postinstall script.
Please keep gnupg 1.2.2-1 as prev, delete the test version.
Changes since version 1.2.2-2:
* Respin with
I recompiled gnupg-1.2.2 for Cygwin 1.5.1.
Changes:
- version 1.2.2-2 -
* Some changes to use current gettext.
setup.hint:
# No comment
sdesc: GnuPG is GNU's tool for secure communication and data storage.
ldesc: GNU Privacy Guard is GNU's tool for secure communication and data
storage.
Hi Daniel,
I got my source archive from a server in France, but I just noticed,
that the author's original site is up again:
http://knackered.knackered.org/angus/psutils/
Here you can download the source, and it does *not* contain the
Makefile. You probably have the Debian patched version.
Hi Daniel,
[...]
Well, beside the fact that you don't provide a patch to restore the
original source archive. This is the main (?) reason to provide the
patch, it is there to get back the official sources.
Grr @!%$, forgot to put it into the source archive again :) Fixed.
The original source
Hi Daniel,
I fixed the points from your mail. The new packages are available under
the same URLs as before:
http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/psutils_cygwin/psutils-1.17-1.tar.bz2
http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/psutils_cygwin/psutils-1.17-1-src.tar.bz2
...
The REAME now tells you how to build
Hi!
+1 for the package from here.
as seen at
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg01132.html
the psutils disappeared from the TeX-distribution and are AFAICS not yet
a seperate package. The unsupported packages on Jan's site seem to be
lost as well, so I compiled it from source and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I send the last mail before I read your mail Earnie.
| 1. grace
| ...
| Max did a review in:
| ~ http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00267.html
|
| and all proposed changes are applied to the packages at the url
| mentioned above.
|
| OK,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
|1. grace
|...
|OK, I've completed the review I began there. I have the following
|notes:
|
|- The warning about gracerc and gracerc.user being overwritten on
|reinstall is in the README. I'm not sure very many people will read
|that. I suggest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|Hmm, I thought the:
|
|- -Recommended reading:
|+Recommended reading: ( files are in /usr/grace/ )
|
|would be enough for that.
|
| Here is the file as it is now, |-indented:
|
| | GRACE - GRaphing, Advanced Computation and Exploration of data
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Igor,
| Hope the following chunk helps:
|
| #!/bin/sh
| [ ! -e /etc/gracerc ] cp -a /etc/gracerc.default /etc/gracerc
| [ ! -e /etc/gracerc.user ] cp -a /etc/gracerc.user.default
/etc/gracerc.user
|
| And include /etc/gracerc.default and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
| Actually, maybe the postinstall *should* use -e, not -f - just in case
| someone wants to do some symlink trickery.
Changed and uploaded!
Volker
- --
PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
key-fingerprint 550D F17E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
| 1. grace
|
| date : 25 Nov 2002
| version: 5.1.12-1
| status : updated package available for review
| notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html
| reviews: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00254.html
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
| 1. grace
|
| date : 25 Nov 2002
| version: 5.1.10-1
| status : not reviewed
| notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html
| votes : 2 (Lapo and Robert)
| url: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1.tar.bz2
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
|I updated to grace 5.1.12, the new urls are:
|~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.12-1.tar.bz2
|~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.12-1-src.tar.bz2
|~ http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/setup.hint
The urls above now points to the new
Hi!
Earnie Boyd wrote:
(This request is directed to the bison maintainer, propably Christopher)
The reason why I would like to get back access to the old bison 1.35
version is, that it is a prerequisite for the build of OpenOffice 1.0.2.
And you're uncapable of building this version from
Hi!
The problem with this scenario is that it requires that a user revert
their version of bison just for this package. It also assumes that
bison is not going to change. That is not the case. There is a new
version of bison coming soon. So the old version will soon be 1.75.
So, if I put
Can I suggest that a much less intrusive solution would be to provide
patches to the affected .y files to get them to work with the latest
version of bison? Then people just have to apply a patch and move
on, rather than having to download an executable and figure out what
to do with it.
Hmm,
1.35 on ooo.ximian.com.
Bye
Volker
Martin Hollmichel
Tools OpenOffice.org Project Lead
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:23:55AM +0100, Volker Quetschke wrote:
Can I suggest that a much less intrusive solution would be to provide
patches to the affected .y files to get
Hi!
As I needed this program for my work anyway I packaged grace for cygwin.
Grace is great for data analysis/presentation and it compiled OOTB.
Hmm, maybe I should have done a bit more advertising. ;-)
See http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Grace/ for more infos on grace.
Bye
Volker
--
Hi Pavel,
1. xerces-c
...
2. xinetd
...
3. chkconfig
...
You probably missed my package proposal from yesterday:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html
Bye
Volker
--
PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9
Hi!
As I needed this program for my work anyway I packaged grace for cygwin.
Grace is great for data analysis/presentation and it compiled OOTB. I
only changed the default on-line documentation viewer from netscape
(obviosly not there) to lynx and the default editor to nano.
Here are the
Hi!
This is an update release for the cygwin gnupg package. See:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2002q4/000256.html
for details.
Changes for the cygwin version:
* New upstream release. All patches for cygwin, except the patches to
build gpg with a newer gettext, went into the
Hi!
I'm preparing the gnupg 1.2.1 version right now, and I like the
packaging with the signed files :-), but I found a few problems in the
script:
...
I found another one:
all) prep conf build install \
strip pkg name=$0 text=SCRIPT sigfile spkg \
finish echo All finished!
Hi,
2. text=... is set, but never used.
text is used in sigfile() to print which file must be signed:
echo $text signature need to be updated; \
Oops, I was blind :-)
Bye
Volker
--
PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082
Hi,
Lapo Luchini wrote:
3 build script updated to support digital signatures
4 source package now contains original's package detached gpg signature
by the author and detached signatures on the script itself and on the
patch, signed by me
5 signatures can be checked with ./rsync-2.5.5-2.sh
Hi Pavel!
Here is a snippet from a clear text signature made by gpg-1.2.0.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (Cygwin32)
I think Cygwin32 is obosleted by and should be replaced by Cygwin.
Ok, I will change that in the next cygwin version, but the Cygwin32 is from
the
Hi!
Sorry, replied to the wrong mailing list in the first place.
Hi Robert,
Right, well I'll happily run generate checksums of what I download, and
if the poster to here posts the expected checksums, in a gpg signed
message, then we can be fairly sure that whomever sent the email,
created
Hi,
the people at www.gnupg.org released a new GnuPG version, GnuPG 1.2.0.
See: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2002q3/000252.html
I build a cygwin package, but I'd like to have some other people
to test this new version before doing a real release.
Please upload the package
Hallo Corinna,
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 05:11:30PM +0200, Volker Quetschke wrote:
URLs:
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin_gnupg/setup.hint
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin_gnupg/gnupg-1.0.7-2.tar.bz2
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin_gnupg/gnupg-1.0.7-2-src.tar.bz2
P.S.: I droped
Hi Rob,
Hello???
Any comments?
Apparently not :}. Does this need uploading?
Is there a guide with hints for Smart annoncements somewhere? ;-)
Yes this mail was ment to be a Please upload my new test package mail,
but somehow I missed the point.
OK, so:
Please upload the GnuPG 1.1.90
Hello???
Any comments?
there is a new GnuPG beta release, GnuPG 1.1.90.
...
I used the new sources and also changed the loadable module / library
generation of gnupg to use libtool. The --load-extension=xxx commands
of gpg should now be fully functional ( like a real *nix ;-) )
In
-PATCHES/gnupg.MinGW.README
- changelog -
2002-07-08 Volker Quetschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* scripts/autogen.sh: Add check for the correct libtool version and
the libtoolize command.
* configure.ac: Add prerequisites for libtool and change object
fileendings
Hi!
there is a new GnuPG beta release, GnuPG 1.1.90.
(Here thould be the pointer to that mail in the GnuPG mailing list
archiv, but since yesterday the website is dead. I will post the link
when it is up again.)
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2002-July/007372.html
Bye
Hi!
You probably should add a postinstall script to install-info the .info
files -- oh wait -- you could just rely on cgf's _install_info virtual
package to handle that...
The postinstall is added.
Other than that, it looks good (although I'm a gpg newbie, so I haven't
actually tested
Hi!
I think Chuck better look at the buildscript, there seem to be a couple
of (unnecessary?)kludges throughout the script. For instance,
re-autoconfilizing the autoscripts shouldn't be a necessary step in the
user build process. You should do that ahead of time, delete the
of windows registry for cygwin.
* You find build instructions for a windows native executable (MinGW) after
$ cd /usr/src
$ ./gnupg-1.0.7-1.sh prep
in /usr/src/gnupg-1.0.7-1/CYGWIN-PATCHES/gnupg.MinGW.README
- changelog -
2002-06-05 Volker Quetschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* configure.ac
92 matches
Mail list logo