Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
I would like to contribute glib-1.2 to the Cygwin distribution.
+1 from me
Ciao
Volker
Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
I would like to contribute gtk+-1.2 to the Cygwin distribution. This
will allow porting of those apps which still use this version of GTK+
(e.g. dillo, gnucash). This package can install parallel to gtk2.
+1 from me.
Ciao
Volker
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, David A. Cobb wrote:
Using SETUP 2.427 (and re-downloaded it just today to make sure it wasn't
compromised).
While downloading the Xorg stuff, I get a message box
Microsoft Visual C Runtime: The application has requested termination in
an
unusual
On Aug 26 09:52, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
I would like to contribute glib-1.2 to the Cygwin distribution.
+1 from me
Ciao
Volker
This package as well as gtk+ are auto-voted per decree. Are you going
to review them, Volker? :-)
Corinna
--
Corinna
Hi Jani,
I moved this thread to cygwin-apps, are you already subscribed there?
you wrote:
I might be able to help with some... Since I'm messing with Gnome stuff
already... =)
Great! Yaakov and I have already started to port the most needed stuff.
But there are so many packages, we really
Reini,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:09:26PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
ok, postgresql-7.4.5-1 is ready.
Thanks, but I'm going to upload a postgresql-7.4.5-1 shortly. Let's
transition maintainership in the 8.0 time frame.
The problems were cygipc related (of course), which I patched away in
Jason Tishler schrieb:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:09:26PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
ok, postgresql-7.4.5-1 is ready.
Thanks, but I'm going to upload a postgresql-7.4.5-1 shortly. Let's
transition maintainership in the 8.0 time frame.
Super. So I can check tcl also.
Please also check my version of
Hi,
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was
considering ITPing it. However, parts of it are released under the Q
Public
Yaakov schrieb:
I would like to contribute glib-1.2 to the Cygwin distribution.
I was able to build and run dillo with the glib/gtk runtime/devel
packages, so it seems these are working ok. Have not tried to rebuild
the packages, however I believe it would work, so I would say, GTG;)
Gerrit
Igor schrieb:
Hi,
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was
considering ITPing it.
+1 vote from me.
However,
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Igor schrieb:
Hi,
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
However, parts of it are released under the Q
Public license, which GNU lists explicitly as
non-GPL-compatible. Does this mean an automatic
no to an official Cygwin package [...] ?
From http://cygwin.com/licensing.html:
In accordance with section 10 of the GPL, Red
Hi, all,
I just noticed that /bin/updatedb (from findutils) and /bin/bzdiff (from
bzip2) use tempfile, which is non-POSIX, and is missing under Cygwin.
The fact that tempfile is missing was reported as early as a year and a
half ago (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-01/msg00876.html), but the
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
However, parts of it are released under the Q
Public license, which GNU lists explicitly as
non-GPL-compatible. Does this mean an automatic
no to an official Cygwin package [...] ?
From
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was
considering ITPing it. However, parts of it are released
Igor schrieb:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Igor schrieb:
Hi,
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely,
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Eugene Kotlyarov wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin. It
builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor packaging issues
to be worked out, looks like it'll be easy to package nicely, so I was
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Igor schrieb:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Igor schrieb:
Hi,
In the course of my real job duties, I built O'Caml under Cygwin.
It builds OOTB, and, even though there seem to be some minor
packaging issues to be
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I'm still trying to get O'Caml to run properly (I keep getting the No
bytecode file specified message)
This sometimes means that the executable has been damaged by stripping it.
Max.
Wow, this is amazing. In all of the years that you've been following cygwin
in the mailing list, this is the first time you've ever read the licensing
page?
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:46:55PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I'm still trying to get O'Caml to run properly (I keep getting the No
bytecode file specified message)
This sometimes means that the executable has been damaged by stripping it.
Right. I've seen this on the ocaml lists, so
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Wow, this is amazing. In all of the years that you've been following cygwin
in the mailing list, this is the first time you've ever read the licensing
page?
Oh, I've read it before, but this particular exception seemed to not wedge
itself in my
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hi Jani,
I moved this thread to cygwin-apps, are you already subscribed there?
Not yet... But soon I'll will.
you wrote:
I might be able to help with some... Since I'm messing with Gnome stuff
already... =)
Great! Yaakov and I have already started to port the most needed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
| Next needed packages are:
| gconf
| gnome-vfs
|
| I have problems with the gnome-vfs testsuite, there are errors.
As I wrote before, GConf likely needs some work. I would see what
CyGnome2 has done with this to start. Don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
| This package as well as gtk+ are auto-voted per decree. Are you going
| to review them, Volker? :-)
Well, that's nice to hear. :-) Gerrit gave these a GTG, so could
someone please upload them? Thanks!
Yaakov
-BEGIN PGP
Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, David A. Cobb wrote:
Using SETUP 2.427 (and re-downloaded it just today to make sure it
wasn't
compromised).
While downloading the Xorg stuff, I get a message box
Microsoft Visual C Runtime: The application has requested
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Hi, all,
I just noticed that /bin/updatedb (from findutils) and /bin/bzdiff (from
bzip2) use tempfile, which is non-POSIX, and is missing under Cygwin.
Noted, thanks. Will fix in next release.
--
Chuck
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 04:33:38PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:46:55PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
However, parts of it are
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
| Next needed packages are:
| gconf
| gnome-vfs
|
| I have problems with the gnome-vfs testsuite, there are errors.
As I wrote before, GConf likely needs some work. I would see what
CyGnome2 has done with
29 matches
Mail list logo
