On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:55:40AM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-11-24T08:59-, Morrison, John wrote:
) Daniel Reed wrote:
) On 2003-11-22T20:05-, John Morrison wrote:
) I marked them as binary-only, so the next MPL (if there is a next
) one :) won't have that notice.
) I presume
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:31:34AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:
pdksh Elfyn McBratney
Since Elfyn has disappeared, and his packages appear to be up for grabs,
I'd like to take over maintainership of pdksh.
Thanks. Please give
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 06:18:53PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
I'll take maintainership of the links package. The 0.96 version that is
currently released for Cygwin is from 2001/07/03. The stable version,
0.98, is from 2002/06/30.
The
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 07:46:40PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 05:13:04PM -, Daniel Reed wrote:
splint Elfyn McBratney
Has someone already proposed to take over maintainership of this package? If
not, I'd be willing to do so..
Gold
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:00:58AM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
Harold, the following is what I did to get new Links and Links
2 to compile and work properly on Cygwin.
os_dep.h:
-#elif defined(_WIN32) || defined (__CYGWIN__)
+#elif defined(_WIN32)
Why do you need to do this? It is
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:41:08AM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:00:58AM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
Harold, the following is what I did to get new Links and Links
2 to compile and work properly on Cygwin
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:17:51PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-11-24T11:01-0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
) On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:55:40AM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
) For now it's just in my records. Even if it is made publicly tunable, I
) imagine it will be made outside of setup.hint
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:34:04AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Maintainers/Packages List, 2003-11-22)
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:17:51PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-11-24T11:01-0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
) On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:55:40AM -0500
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:40:43AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:32, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-11-25T20:53+1100, Robert Collins wrote:
) I'm not sure why this is non-setup information. Both binary only (no
) source: entry for a package), and Maintainer are setup.ini
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:19:12AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 08:40:43PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
BTW, another piece of non-setup information that might be useful is an up
for adoption (or orphaned) flag.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:16:38AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 03:10:51AM +, David F wrote:
) We could decide on a comment convention for setup.hint that could be
) used for some other tool to process
http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/joe/joe-2.9.8-1-src.tar.bz2
http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/joe/setup.hint
Aye votes: Christopher Faylor (cygwin-apps-thread.12071) [1/3]
Status: Package available.
HOLD-UPS: Not enough votes (need 2 more). No good to go review
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:33:17PM -0500, Robb, Sam wrote:
If it is possible to vote for me, I would like to vote for joe...
Only package maintainers get to vote.
Doesn't anyone else want to give this an aye, even on general
principle?
+1 on general principle (that principle being, of
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 07:36:43PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Check this out:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cygwin]$ grep libPropList setup.ini
@ libPropList
ldesc: libPropList is required by Window Maker.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cygwin]$ find -name libPropList
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cygwin]$
libPropList is
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 07:40:25PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Corinna,
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
This means, not too far from now, we can drop the cygipc package and
packages like postgresql can switch to using Cygserver.
Additionally, most XFree86-* packages and anything that depends upon
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:36:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Is it safe to rely on /tmp already existing when the postinstall
script runs?
I see from the source that setup.exe creates tmp. If it doesn't exist
when postinstall scripts are being run, that's clearly a bug. I don't
think we
Fixed.
cgf
- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon -
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] cd /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin;
/sourceware/infra/bin/cygwin/upset -C -u setup.ini; /usr/local/bin/upx -q -q -q
setup.exe || exit 0
Date: 3 Dec 2003 16:30:12 -
upset: *** warning package
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:05:31AM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Thanks! (I, umm, was gonna get to it eventually :) Thanks, too, to all
who voted for it and expecially to Harold for reviewing the packages so
thoroughly.
I'd like to give a special thanks to Harold for his diligence in
reviewing
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:36:54AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote:
[snip]
Additionally, configure.ac looks for convert:
Don't recall this happening
This is easily explained by the value of the check_case directive in the
CYGWIN
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:49:09AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:36:54AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote:
[snip]
Additionally, configure.ac looks
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:56:55PM +0200, Hazem Mahmoud Hegazy wrote:
I'm trying to install one of Mentor Graphics tools on Cygwin. It seems
that the installation program probe which operating system it works on.
And I get these message on the shell:
***FATAL ERROR
*** Unsupported
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:57:53PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies in advance if this is considered to be 'off topic' for
this list.
Which it is.
We get a fair number of off-topic posts here so I thought I should
make it clear what happens when someone posts an off-topic message.
Here's what I do:
1) Make sure that they have been notified that message is off-topic.
2) Block the subject from further discussion.
3) Silently unsubscribe
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:27:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 8 14:14, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
Good idea, except that I'd personally prefer a mount point in stead of a
symlink but that's just personal preference.. (Personally, I'd prefer that
the Cygwin DLL make /WINDOWS a
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:15:01PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 8 11:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:27:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 8 14:14, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
Good idea, except that I'd personally prefer a mount point in stead
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:54:14PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
perhaps /cygdrive/WINDOWS would be another alternative.
Let me say it more clearly -- there will be no magic in cygwin1.dll for
this.
cgf
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:48:40PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
I do link to http://cygwin.com/setup.html which truly documents the setup.ini
and setup.hint files. Maybe that page would be a good place to add some
comments about upset?
If comments are added, then make sure that they
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:02:58PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am pleased to announce the availability of libsmi 0.4.2 for the Cygwin
Net Release.
Library to access SMI MIB information
libsmi-0.4.2-1 is available from:
sdesc: libsmi
Not very informative.
BIN
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:00:22PM -0500, Bruce Ingalls wrote:
EMacro, an .emacs, which makes Emacs and XEmacs easy, is now available at
http://emacro.sourceforge.net/cygwin/
Just add this to setup.exe's URIs.
Have you noticed how other people do this?
How about going back and checking how this
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:27:35AM -0500, Bruce Ingalls wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:00:22PM -0500, Bruce Ingalls wrote:
EMacro, an .emacs, which makes Emacs and XEmacs easy, is now available at
http://emacro.sourceforge.net/cygwin/
Just add this to setup.exe's
Since I just issed another previously submitted package, I thought I
should check this one, too. I'd missed the fact that libsmi had also
been previously submitted. I did find this message though, which
confused me.
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:42:28PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
[I haven't
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:00:01PM -, Daniel Reed wrote:
Package: otcl 1.0.9-1 [2003-10-29]
Description: OTcl, short for MIT Object Tcl. (main package)
Proposer: Harold L Hunt II
Proposal: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:34:18AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:15:01PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 8 11:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:27:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 8 14:14, Ronald
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:30:40PM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:50:02AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 17:48, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
I do link to http://cygwin.com/setup.html which truly documents the
setup.ini and setup.hint
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 11:26:54AM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
I think we can remove the test status of man-1.5k and make it current.
Done.
cgf
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 10:09:28AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
I think we can remove the test status of man-1.5k and make it current.
Ditto for pdksh-5.2.14-3, IMO.
Done.
cgf
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 11:16:10AM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Hi
I would like to contribute and maintain the xemacs package:
* http://xemacs.org/ (Homepage)
* http://ftp.us.xemacs.org/ftp/pub/ (Download location)
and also the accompanying packages
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 04:22:27PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Sounds reasonable to me.
Ditto.
Thanks to Chuck and Harold for doing the research on this one, too. It's
rather an unusual case.
cgf
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 07:15:47PM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
The only problem with commiting is that I don't have write permission
to the directory:
Checking in index.html;
/cvs/cygwin-apps/htdocs/index.html,v -- index.html
new revision: 1.4; previous revision: 1.3
cvs [server
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:01:37AM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
o In the xemacs package there are two files in common with the standard
emacs
package
/usr/bin/b2m.exe
/usr/bin/rcs-checkin
How should I deal with them ?
I guess you should work this out with Joe
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:19:38PM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
This was noted during the emacs package development. I moved the tags
stuff to a separate package, which I believe is not currently part
of the Cygwin mirrors.
? Could you rephrase this? What does this mean
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:41:50PM -0700, Bill Geddes wrote:
Boy do I feel stupid. There is a package called libiconv... And
including that in the custom mirror (+ rebuilding setup.bz2) seems to
have fixed it.
I still would like a tool that would help determine the full set of
packages needed
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:31:14PM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Hi
I would like to contribute and maintain the static LDAP libraries and clients
from the openldap package:
* http://www.openldap.org/(Homepage)
* http://www.openldap.org/software/download/ (Download
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:39:43PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
This is great. Thanks for making a quick release to get this in. I
have repackaged the distcc package for Cygwin for this new release. Our
platform-specific patch now contains only our Cygwin README file and our
setup file;
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 03:26:16PM -0800, Rafael Kitover wrote:
These modules are built against Perl 5.8.2, which is in testing for some
reason right now, so I marked this package as testing as well.
I vote +1 for this but 5.8.2 is not marked as testing so this doesn't have
to be either.
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 12:19:03AM -0500, Robert R Schneck-McConnell wrote:
Awhile ago Corinna Vinschen suggested that someone update and take over
maintenance of ssmtp. I hereby propose to do just that.
http://math.berkeley.edu/~schneck/ssmtp/setup.hint
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:50:41PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 9 08:36, Jason Tishler wrote:
Corinna,
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:46:18AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 3 10:08, Jason Tishler wrote:
I am using cygwin-inst-20031231.tar.bz2 with cygserver from the latest
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 04:52:39PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hmm, my cygserver is cross-build and I don't see this sort of problem.
My build is from 2003-12-16.
Huh? You know that we are using different compilers. We've traded several
private messages about this. You *know* that I can't
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:24:33PM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
The gv-3.5.8-1 package has been added to the Cygwin distribution.
o http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~plass/gv/
Description:
`gv' is a comfortable viewer of PostScript and PDF files for the X Window System.
It uses the
Sorry, but this is not a bug-reporting mailing list.
I've redirected this observation to the cygwin mailing list and set the
Reply-To appropriately.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:41:02AM -0500, B. Marchand wrote:
I've encountered this issue with several programs that try to use gs to
load EPS
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:25:22PM -0800, Rafael Kitover wrote:
As all issues with the package have been resolved, bugs fixed and 3 votes received
(thanks to everyone involved) this package is
ready to be uploaded:
http://libwin32-exp.sf.net/setup.hint
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 10:11:27PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Daniel Reed wrote:
I believe I am all caught up from this past week's posts. A PPL will go
out as scheduled on Tuesday (the day before LinuxWorld*).
It looks like while I was out gtypist and perl-libwin32 fulfilled all of
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:58:28PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
After running setup I noticed that the exim postinstall
had not run. Indeed:
/etc postinstall/exim.sh.done
Signal 11
That seems to come from
/etc setfacl -m u::rw-,g::rw-,o:r-- defaults/etc/exim.conf
Segmentation fault (core
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:27:33PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:58:28PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
After running setup I noticed that the exim postinstall
had not run. Indeed:
/etc postinstall/exim.sh.done
Signal 11
[Dropping cygwin-xfree]
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 01:04:34PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Brian Ford wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Atwood, Robert C wrote:
[snip]
Also I believe the following addition to the script would probably save
some people (like me) much headache
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:43:00PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Does http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg00409.html count as
(temporarily) passing the baton?
Yes. What are you waiting for? :-)
cgf
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:52:22AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Brian Ford wrote:
This is just a note to Harold so he can correct this error for his next
ddd release (whenever that is). Ddd is an X11 app, so it should be
rooted in /usr/X11R6 rather than /usr.
I don't know if it is an error so
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:45:05PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:52:22AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Brian Ford wrote:
This is just a note to Harold so he can correct this error for his next
ddd release (whenever that is). Ddd is an X11 app, so it should be
rooted
- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon sources.redhat.com -
upset: *** warning package xemacs requires non-existent package libopenldap2
- End forwarded message -
The below is just an FYI.
This means that the iconv stuff could be built into the DLL, bloating the dll
even more I suppose.
Is this something that we want to do? I vote no, but I thought I should mention
this to the collective wisdom of cygwin-apps since it essentially boils down to
a package
Recent security concerns, coupled with lack of response from the apache
maintainer have forced me to remove apache from the distribution.
If I don't see some movement by next Friday towards fixing the concerns,
I'll be looking for another maintainer.
cgf
- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon -
From: root (Cron Daemon)
Subject: Cron cgf cd /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin;
/sourceware/infra/bin/cygwin/upset -C -u setup.ini; /usr/local/bin/upx -q -q -q
setup.exe || exit 0
Date: 3 Feb 2004 18:20:06 -
upset:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:07:56PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Andreas Seidl wrote:
[snip]
Interestingly, gcc-3.2 has a hit, but *not* gcc-3.3:
usr/include/gnu/gcj/convert/Input_iconv.h
usr/include/gnu/gcj/convert/Output_iconv.h
And gcc-3.2-3.tar.bz2 is four times
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 09:04:40AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 05:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon -
From: root (Cron Daemon)
Subject: Cron cgf cd /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin;
/sourceware/infra/bin/cygwin/upset -C -u
- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon root -
From: root (Cron Daemon)
Subject: Cron cgf cd /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin;
/sourceware/infra/bin/cygwin/upset -C -u setup.ini; /usr/local/bin/upx -q -q -q
setup.exe || exit 0
Date: 11 Feb 2004 21:10:04 -
upset:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 03:59:06PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2004-02-11T15:15-0500, Sam Steingold wrote:
) http://www.podval.org/~sds/data/clisp-2.32-2.tar.bz2
) http://www.podval.org/~sds/data/clisp-2.32-2.src.tar.bz2
^
)
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 06:52:37PM +0100, DarkSoul wrote:
I upgraded my cygwin distribution and packages yesterday, and now I am
faced with an unpleasant bug :/
1) wrong mailing list, redirected.
2) already reported in the right mailing list.
3) fixed in latest cygwin snapshot.
I think our textutils/nascent coreutils maintainer is again MIA.
Can I get a volunteer to support the coreutils package? coreutils
will supercede fileutils and textutils.
cgf
I have no idea how to fix this so I am moving xerces-c out of the cygwin
release and up a level in the directory until someone provides
instructions on how to proceed.
That means that xerces-c will be missing from the distro.
cgf
- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon root -
From: root
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:00:48PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Since the setup.hint files that Abe sent looked ok after a cursory glance,
I'm wondering... It looks like xerces-c is the only package with an
external-source directive pointing to a name with a -... Could there be
a bug in
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:22:51PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:00:48PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Since the setup.hint files that Abe sent looked ok after a cursory
glance, I'm wondering... It looks like xerces-c
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:31:13PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:22:51PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:00:48PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Since the setup.hint files that Abe sent looked
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 02:26:58PM -0800, Abe Backus wrote:
I'm sorry guys. Thank you for taking a look at the problem Igor.
Chris, I can't figure out what's wrong with the package. It does look like
the package version part of the file names is 2.5.0-4 on some files rather
than 2.5.0-1. Would
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:27:17AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
So, yeah .. can someone please submit this package into cygwin =) ..
i was surprised that dictd wasn't included yet - it's extremely useful
I vote pro this package anyway. Would like to review it further.
Where is a download?
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Andreas Seidl wrote:
However, a new problem might have popped up. Reading this thread
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01103.html
I wonder if there are legal problems for RedHat to distribute the ccrypt
package?
You're right. There are.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:27:06PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
cgf wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Andreas Seidl wrote:
However, a new problem might have popped up. Reading this thread
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01103.html
I wonder if there are legal problems
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 05:03:16PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
FWIW, since these scripts are going to be Cygwin-specific, perhaps CGF
might even consider hosting a CVS repository for them on cygwin-apps, so
that others can send in patches against the development version...
Feel free to check
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 05:53:47PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
cgf wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:27:06PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
cgf wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:39:49PM +0100, Andreas Seidl wrote:
However, a new problem might have popped up. Reading this thread
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:11:02AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Since Chris doesn't seem to want to come right out and say it for
everyone to understand, I'll say it:
Please don't profess to speak for me since you really have no idea
what I'm saying or not saying.
I am not considering that we
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:26:09AM -0500, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia wrote:
CG Faylor scribbled on Monday, February 23, 2004 9:19 AM:
I am going to contact our legal staff about gnupg.
The legal status of openssh, openssl, libcrypt and whatnot with respect
to present-day US ITAR regulations need to
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:25:15AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'm not speaking for you and did not claim to.
Since Chris doesn't seem to want to come right out and say it for
everyone to understand, I'll say it:
You are implying that you are voicing my unspoken
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:00:11PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Someone was installing Cygwin from scratch on a clean system, and they
had a problem running the postinstall scripts. On further
investigation, it turned out that most of the scripts assume /bin is
going to be in the PATH, and
I've asked our legal department to file the proper paperwork to
enable us to provide the following packages:
- GnuPG
- ccrypt
- zip/unzip with encryption
They seem to be indicating that there is no problem doing any of the
above (which isn't too surprising for GnuPG and zip/unzip at least) but
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 07:16:26AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:12, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
This might work, except that a) postinstall scripts on the whole are
updated more often and more easily than setup.exe (i.e., this solution
won't help people using the version of
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:52:44PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I'm not sure if it would be easy to test that the path pointed to by a
mount is valid and writable? Do you know of a clean way to do it?
Umm, why not just test [ -w /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts ]? But as for
checking that it's
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:16:48PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:52:44PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I'm not sure if it would be easy to test that the path pointed to by a
mount is valid and writable? Do you know of a clean way to do it?
Umm, why not just test
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:41:08PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:52:44PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I'm not sure if it would be easy to test that the path pointed to by a
mount is valid and writable? Do you
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 05:03:27PM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is there a better name than --mode?
It might be easier to use in a script if the syntax were more like this:
if [ cygpath --is-binary /tmp ] ; then
Except that I'm returning either binary or text which
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:12:18PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Warren Young wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is there a better name than --mode?
It might be easier to use in a script if the syntax were more like this:
if [ cygpath --is-binary /tmp
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:36:16AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 24 18:02, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:41:08PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I guess --mount-mode, to make it explicit. For a short option, -M seems
unused.
I thought about that but it's
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 08:26:18PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo Igor,
24. Februar 2004 at 21:00:
gcc-mingw*.sh: ln
Note: uses tar, but tar is not required. Also, do we *really*
want this weird extraction mechanism?
Package tar is in base.
I remember that there was a reason
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 06:05:05PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
I've been rewriting cygwin-doc's postinstall to remove the
bash-specific syntax and came up with this script to take care of
removing (possibly stale) preformatted man pages. I was thinking that
this is a possible problem for
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:36:53AM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote:
Now that gnupg is back, please upload.
Done.
I also removed gnupg-1.2.2-1*.
Please send an announcement to cygwin-announce.
cgf
I've gotten a green light from our legal department for all three
packages mentioned in the subject.
I've put gnupg back into the distribution.
We can now go forward with the ITP of ccrypt and, if Chuck so desires,
generate encrypting versions of zip and unzip.
cgf
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:44:04PM +0200, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
I'm seeing a strange message from cygcheck. CAn anyone shed a light?
When I run the program, it displays a message window:
The dynamic link library /dev/null could not be found ...
Mailing list challenged? This is not a
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:35:25PM +0100, J?rg Schaible wrote:
Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote on Friday, March 05, 2004 2:44 PM:
I'm seeing a strange message from cygcheck. CAn anyone shed a
light? When I run the program, it displays a message window:
The dynamic link library /dev/null
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:16:45AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Andreas Seidl wrote:
The TeXmacs package has acquired the necessary 3 votes and a good to go
review (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-02/msg00158.html)
more than two weeks ago.
So please
We've had a flood of package ITPs and a missing package maintainer.
I'm imposing a moratorium on ITPs for now.
I think I'm beginning to detect the sign of breakage in the process and
possibly am detecting the fact that we are overloading setup.exe.
It is rather a shame that we have a package
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:56:13PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
[snip]
But it's also a shame that http://cygwin.com/ported.html contains so
many broken or outdated links. Can I go through it and submit a diff ?
You most certainly can.
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:55:04PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
It is rather a shame that we have a package like coreutils going
unclaimed while people are busily proposing other packages which would
be of general utility to only a tiny percentage of cygwin users.
You did
701 - 800 of 2794 matches
Mail list logo
