On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:14:04PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Habacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have an idea for fixing this ? I have no problem to fix
this, if somebody could
give me a direction where I have to look on.
Use linux or get the KDE
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:53:51AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jerome BENOIT) writes:
I will try to rebuild the tetex-beta package this week-end. To avoid
any confusion, I plan to rename it `tetex-bin' as suggested in a
previous email.
Very nice.
Actually, I'm not so
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:39:38PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PT egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SUSv2 mandates both strings.h and string.h
mingw declares
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:08:18AM -0500, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:55:02 +0100
From: Gerrit P. Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which whois do you want to maintain?
http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/jwhois.html
http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/whois.html
Don't forget
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:51:12AM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
I'm interested in being the package maintainer for figlet. The latest
version is 2.2 and was released in 1996 (and so I can't realistically
see it being updated again). I have already compiled the source and
created a tar.bz2 of the
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:21:16PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:14 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: FIGlet
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 06:14:56PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Ok, here's my comments.
Chris, I'd like to make a few (non visible) changes for HTML conformance
to the header and menu on the main cygwin page. Is that ok with you?
Thank you for the examples - I think they will help a lot.
I've
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 04:18:17PM -, Stephano Mariani wrote:
I was wondering what the procedure was to get a package submitted to
cygwin, I have read the docs on the website, and would like to volunteer
my services as a package maintainer for cproto (http://cproto.sf.net).
The first rite of
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:30:37AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've altered some things (mainly cosmetic or trivial). One in particular
was the recommendation to include bar as a dependency if you directly
require foo
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 12:11:25PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
This is an example that would kill setup.exe:
@ ash
sdesc: A Bourne Shell (/bin/sh) workalike
category: Base Shells
requires: cygwin
install: latest/ash/ash-20011018-1.tar.bz2 33819
source:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:43:34PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2001-12-17 at 22:38, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Oops. Having actually read the new setup.html I see that the @ line is now
optional. Okay, so now I feel stupid and I shall see to it that I get a
severe beating in order to ensure
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:35:12AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Jason Tishler wrote:
I would like to contribute my rebase utility. Should it be a stand-alone
package? Be added to another package (i.e., cygutils -- sorry to suggest
this Chuck...)? Or, be added to winsup/utils?
I think it
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:16:58PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- Original Message -
From: Morrison, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is fun.
A couple of questions for you wrt setup.hint...
category: the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:04:22AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
Thats not what the help file says...
Note that category names may be multi-word, e.g., ASCII Games but,
currently all categories are only a single word.
I know that.
category: Shell Utils
is two
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:58:55PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Gah! I meant to send this to the list but I replied and so it went to
Earnie instead. Sorry about that...
Okay, I could be really wrong here but from what I can see,
http://cygwin.com/setup.html doesn't mention any Shell Utils
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:25:36PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Is there no way that the list program can rewrite the reply-to line? That
would Make Things Easier(TM), IMHO of course :)
How about if I just block any email that mentions Reply-To? That
would make things a lot easier for me.
cgf
: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:25:36PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Is there no way that the list program can rewrite the reply-to line? That
would
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:31:40PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
That's what the webpage implies. If that's not what it means, then surely
you have to agree that the page is confusing.
I guess now I understand at least one specific confusion.
Robert already clarified the intent of the section. Go
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 10:13:35AM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is there anything similar to this in Red Hat, Debian, SuSE, etc.?
Well, /etc/profile, hosts, passwd, group and other core config files are
owned by the 'setup' package in Red Hat Linux. Then there's
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:28:28PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 4:17 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
I hate to be a wet blanket about
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:46:58PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I'd like to pour fuel into the fire of `usefulness' of a package.
I'd like to contribute the NetBSD fortune package to Cygwin and
therefore I'd even like to propose to add a Games section *gasp*.
setup.hint:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:36:52AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm. Maybe I just convinced myself that they belong as a separate
package.
How about this:
John, why don't you create a bashutils package, to serve as a
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 03:27:33PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see how that applies to the first release of a new package.
I'd call it pretty basic risk management. If the package doesn't cause
any havoc, then put
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 04:25:49PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Btw, I think Earnie's idea of having a *New!* category is actually a
good one. I have been meaning to implement something like that for the
web package
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 03:15:33PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 12:37:31PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 12:18:51AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'm not sure what you're asking. sources.redhat.com is still going to
be the main repository for all of the cygwin distribution and mirrors
will be downloading from
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 12:34:25AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Obviously I made a mistake when announcing it the last week,
because my message doesn't arrive at cygwin-apps...
Well, once again:
I built the latest indent release (2.2.7) the last week.
It is available for preview at:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 10:48:29AM -0500, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 09:52:25 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your reference doesn't say that _ALL_ packages need a README.
Quoting from URL:http://cygwin.com/setup.html#package_contents:
In your binary
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 10:56:36AM -0500, Jeffrey Turner wrote:
Hi, I haven't had much chance to follow this list
is anyone working on porting gcc 3.0.3 to cygwin?
If not I'll give it a go if someone would just give
me a couple clues.
Wrong mailing list. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also check the
THIS IS OFF-TOPIC for cygwin-apps. Apache is not part of the standard
installation, and, at this rate, I very much doubt that it ever will be.
This is the last time I'll mention this. Next time I'll just block any
further email.
That includes apologies, incriminations, profession of confusion
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:27:35PM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
John Morrison writes:
Maybe all the packages ought to state where they originated?
FWIW this often helps :-)
% package --version
Should support for this be a requirement for all Cygwin packages ?
AFAIK it is for gnu applications
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 04:47:23PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
I finally got around to putting together the whois package I talked about
back in December. If whoever handles new packages could take a look at it
and check it out I'd appreciate it.
Files are at:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:26:35PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
small type correction:
sdesc: GNU Whois
ldesc: A client for the whois directory service. It allows you to retrieve
information on domain names, IP addresses, and more.
category: Net
requires: cygwin
Didn't even notice the typo.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:07:10AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wasn't expecting you to provide this. All that I wanted was
clickable categories. I'll take care of providing an uber-category.
FWIW, I was going to call it Full rather than All since
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:35:36AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
The second issue is that (IMO) for users, in a hierarchical environment,
finding a category Full, is less intuitive than a hierarchical container
that encompasses everything. I've the same objection about both things,
so I chose this
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:18:52AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
I prepared the package for the newest release of rsync.
It fails some tests, but (without need for special patches) is already
better than last version IMHO: last version didn't complain just because
didn't have a testsuite. I'll
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:22:14AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to put in a vote for NOT treating '_' and '-' identically.
..
In fact, I *thought* setup/upset didn't treat '_' any differently than
'a' but perhaps I
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 07:54:12PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:22:14AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to put in a vote for NOT treating '_' and '-' identically
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:14:24PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Didn't I already vote on this? I can't remember.
I say just do it, too.
I'm waiting for resolution/consensus on the '-' vs. '_' issue...if we
*are* going to rename auto*-[stable|devel] to auto*_[stable
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 07:38:34PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
And a question: Wouldn't it make sense to uninstall first on
Reinstall, too?
It doesn't do this already? Hmm. I would expect a reinstall to
be equivalent to an uninstall/install, yes.
cgf
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:10:29PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
How big are they? If they are only a single .c file each (killall.c,
utmpdump.c, last.c) then they are candidates for addition to the
cygutils package, if you'd prefer./.
One of these days I'll get around to creating a
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 03:49:08PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Note that Qmail is not listed right now, sorry. Too many packages for
me to handle, and Qmail is not an integral part of our application
server.
4 packages is a great contribution - there's not need to apologise for
not doing
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 01:59:57PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
The biggest issue with relying on libstdc++.a for for setup.exe is that it
requires this library to be built for cross-compilation. I have no idea how
to do that.
I don't know either -- this is why I'm asking for help.
I think
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 03:57:24PM +1100, Danny Smith wrote:
For what its worth, 3.1 libsupc++.a and libstdc++.a build natively with
mingw. (libsupc++.a contains the eh and new/delete stuff that is currently
in libgcc.a for mingw). Locale class support is missing (as it is with
cygwin/newlib),
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 12:46:27AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Chris,
Can you step up and explain the GPL issue...
Regarding the pthread implementation, thank you :}.
I am very open to changing/improving it to meet the needs of open source
products, so if/when time arises, and you see how
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:28:12PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:28 PM
Subject: gcc v3 issue -- hacky solution
If we can generate new operators for all
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 07:39:10AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:45:17PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Or maybe Danny Smith can provide details on what it takes to build said
library, and one of the folk that keep building gcc for-the-hell
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 05:40:18PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Chris, I'm assuming this was accidental, and am backing it out. I've
also backed out the -fno-exceptions switch to gcc.
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/winsup/cinstall/Makefil
e.in.diff?r1=2.45r2=2.46cvsroot=src
I
There is no su command in the cygwin release.
This mailing list is intended for discussing cygwin packaging issues
(and secondarily it is apparently intended for me to tell ever other
poster that they are off-topic).
cgf
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:34:19AM -0800, Alexander Nanou wrote:
Hi!
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 11:08:49PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Alex, I cannot access your web site, can you post the patch to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] please, or even just direct to me.
Btw, this is not appropriate for cygwin-patches:
http://cygwin.com/lists.html#available-lists .
cgf
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 12:24:10AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Setup.hint:
@ base_files
sdesc: Core common files needed for correct operation of cygwin
category: Base
The entire package is attached.
The /etc/profile generation is getting removed from setup.exe unless
someone provides a _real
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:44:23PM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 20:24
Subject: RE: setup crashing - fixed?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:46:23AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Hi,
I've sent a patch a while ago that included a 'fix' for
cinstall/configure.in wrt CFLAGS; but I could not reproduce the error,
so it was removed.
It turns out that the pregenerated configure in cinstall is buggy.
Can someone
Can we concentrate on releasing a new version of setup.exe, please?
I'd like to eliminate the confusion that the current version of setup.exe
is causing. It seems like we are in a standard add one more thing mode
when people are experiencing real problems and real confusion with the
currently
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 05:11:32PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
11:32:51 fred@appel:~cinstall$ MINGW32=yes CFLAGS='-mno-cygwin' ./configure
Why are you doing this? It's
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:36:35PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
There's one more urgent issue: I have a bzip2 and libbz2_0 package
waiting for release, and the new setup must be able to handle that
name(*)...I think most of these changes are in Robert's sandbox right
now, but there's also a
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:58:31AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Can we concentrate on releasing a new version of setup.exe, please?
I'd like to eliminate the confusion that the current version of setup.exe
is causing. It seems like we are in a standard add one more thing mode
when people
I just built the latest setup.exe. It looks really nice. And, I see that
clickable categories are working!
Can I suggest one more GUI feature that I think has been lacking from
Categories? (I know I said no new features but I think this is
important)
I keep meaning to suggest that we add a
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 01:40:44AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Heh. Well I only had 3 bits of feedback from a snapshot. Sigh.
I'm waiting for the real release. At that point I'll say something
like: I tried the new release of setup.exe version 4.192 and it
seems to me...
I can't figure out
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 10:35:00AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi there,
I just build rcs-5.7-2 which fixes the reported 1024 byte trunctation
bug, see http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-07/msg00161.html for
details.
It's available at the usual place for upload.
It's protected:
You don't
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 08:25:02PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 10:35:00AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi there,
I just build rcs-5.7-2 which fixes the reported 1024 byte trunctation
bug, see http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-07/msg00161
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 08:25:02PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 10:35:00AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi there,
I just build rcs-5.7-2 which fixes the reported 1024 byte trunctation
bug, see http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-07/msg00161
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:35:45PM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote:
Ok, after some reviewing, here is what I have:
# TCP Wrappers
@ tcp_wrappers
sdesc: TCP Wrappers
ldesc: TCP Wrappers: Tool to provide host based access restrictions for tcp
bas
ed services
skip:
curr: 7.6
prev:
test:
category: Net
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 04:38:07PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 04:19:39PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
$ cat cygwin/contrib/texmf/texmf-doc/md5.sum
f4751de5359e0e119c27fb7cd9f1160e setup.hint
489cf538d03bc4cc9ce4e47a66123468 texmf-doc-2804-2.tar.bz2
Thx
I've moved 'upset' to a new home and have begun modularizing the upset
perl code so that it will be possible to write a setup.hint 'linter'.
The new home for upset is
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/sourceware co infra/bin/cygwin
upset2 also lives there. It is a work in progress but it
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:04:10PM +0100, Holger Spielmann wrote:
Any ideas regarding this problem? A patch would be quite handy!
This is the wrong mailing list for bug reports. Please goto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cgf
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:35:57PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Ok,
finally got some breathing time.
Setup with char * eliminated is ~350K. Ouch.
This is why I've not committed my patch yet (I've been trying to see
*where* the extra 100K appeared from).
Chris - is this a problem? IMO it's
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:42:28PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
*please* make sure that the '-' vs. '_' fix is in before releasing the
new setup. I've been sitting on the bzip2 update waiting on this...
(Also, the localdir-is-on-remote-share fix would be nice, but it isn't
as urgent as the
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:02:54PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Oh -- well, I guess I coulda done that too, but I don't like
unilaterally messing with code in someone else's kingdom (but since
you're the Grand High Emperor Moppet, it's okay for YOU). I know that
Robert has had the fix in his
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 08:27:37AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Please, no checkins to cinstall until this is sorted
I have a bucketload in my sandbox - including that one! - and I don't
want to face merge issues - which your commit is causing.
So can you please back that commit out.
Huh?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 09:33:22PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
upset2 seems to work okay for me, on a few locally-constructed trees.
In fact, discounting the tarball listings in html that upset generated,
the output is identical to upset's...nice job.
Phew. Thank you. Saw the subject and
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 09:43:23AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
I didn't add a command line option for it yet, though. That will be
trivial, though.
Would you be willing to accept a patch for the above?
I'll add the functionality eventually. I'm still mulling over the best
way to do it.
In
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 12:27:26PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
1) If I have a group of packages installed and I select the Test option
to see what packages are available for in Test should all the packages
I have installed that do not have a Test Version show Uninstall or
should they should
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:46:01PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Setup doesn't *default* to uninstall. Two things have to happen: The
user has to select Test (which means 'give me a testing distribution').
Their has to be no valid testing version for that package.
If I click on Test
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 03:26:48PM -0800, Tristan Juricek wrote:
Hello, I'm new to this list, and a cursory search for MSI brought up only
one item.
This really isn't a topic for this list. Please move to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cgf
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:48:04PM -0500, Brian Keener wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
What TAG did you build from? setup200202 works fine for me, and doesn't
uninstall installed packages when test is selected. Like Chris I feel
Built from HEAD - which is why I guess the fix for the
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:48:17PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Michael A Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did try it yes, whats the problem?
base_files.sh:
if [ ! -f /etc/[profile ]; then
cp -a /etc/profile.default /etc/profile
fi
At some point, an
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:53:50PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
This is it, no bugs left AFAIK. How should we move forward?
Advertise the snapshot on cygwin@cygwin, give it a couple of days, and
then release it?
cgf
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:26:53PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
10) Please capitalise the first letter of words in class names. Setup
has been quite haphazard, I'm trying to be more consistent :}. Also, I
prefer things like FreeList to free_list - I find them easier.
The above made me smile! I
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 09:51:53PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Well,
setup200202 has the following remaining key issues:
doesn't detect links for /etc/passwd and /etc/group
overwrites both /etc/passwd and /etc/group if either are missing (or
links)
(new) may have issues on win98SE.
(new)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:48:13PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Uhmm, UPX should be part of the distribution first, as a maintained
pacakge, before folk start packing distributed binaries with it. Do we
have a volunteer to maintain UPX?
UPX is quite cross-platform: you can use win32 version to
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:23:38AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:19 AM
Could do - chat to Chris, the basefiles package maintainer :}.
Sorry, once upon a time, some time ago, setup
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:56:30AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:39 AM
Actually, I don't think there is any reason to have a default
/etc/profile for ash. I think it is really only
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 11:08:17AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:56:30AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:39 AM
Actually, I don't think
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 01:59:21PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
If someone wants to contribute, I think it should just be a standard
package.
Chuck, I hate to say this, but I don't see a real reason for growing
cygutils. The more packages we add to cygutils, the more
I've just crossed my fingers and set up the cygwin and cygwin-apps
mailing lists to use some revamped spam blocking software that I've
written for sources.redhat.com.
I won't go into details of what is new because I'm still working on
things. Basically, for now, I have revamped stuff to make it
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 02:38:03PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
To the patch package maintainer - (which is?)
Looks like it's Corinna. Corinna is on vacation for a couple of weeks.
I don't know if she will be reading email or not.
Funny, but I thought she'd updated this recently.
cgf
patch
Checked into branch and trunk. I uploaded a new version of setup.exe to
sources.redhat.com, too, since this was affecting setup.ini creation.
cgf
2002-03-19 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Makefile.in (setup_version.c): Add back magic which allows detection
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 02:38:51PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Thanks Michael - do you want to put that somewhere on the web (it could
be at www.cygwin.com), and we can advise the cygwin crowd that
tested... that they should run this?
You can submit an announcement or submit it as software.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:58:37PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
appears to be in a lib category, not libs.
oops. I'll fix it when I get home (yep, still at work...)
I fixed it already, Chuck. I didn't think you'd mind.
cgf
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:17:42PM +1100, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
Building gcc-3.1 now requires texinfo-4.1. It builds OOTB. If there
are no objections I will package it up over the weekend and submit it.
Thanks for the offer but I'm all set up to handle this.
I may rethink this if
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:17:42PM +1100, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
Building gcc-3.1 now requires texinfo-4.1. It builds OOTB. If there
are no objections I will package it up over the weekend and submit it.
Can you actually build texinfo-4.1, David? I can't build it on either
linux or
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 04:24:02PM +1100, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
Built it about 6 times already (for various sad reasons).
/usr/local/src/texinfo-4.1/configure --prefix=/usr
make
make install
Yeah, I figured it out. It doesn't like being cross-compiled. I forgot about
that.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:53:58PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Please keep replies on-list.
And? Your points below don't give any rational that means NASM is good
or bad to include. There are lots of things that only a few folk use in
cygwin already - i.e. robots.
Other things also build
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:09:57AM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote:
Ok, gang,
I finally got the time to finish up the build so that I had all
the pieces defined in the contributor's document. It is now
ready for upload.
Can you repost the setup.hint? Chuck made some
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:09:33PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
(In the old days, making a DLL required intrusive and exhausting changes
to lots and lots of source files -- __declspec(dllexport) this,
__declspec(dllexport that)... -- but no longer.) With auto-import
binutils, and the
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:29:34PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
And what the heck happened to my big white box?!?!? ;-)
I think I happened to it. I kept promising some art work but I could
never get my son to finish it.
It's basically a cygwin C with an otter lounging on the bottom. The C
Is anyone investigating the problem with /usr/lib/w32api problem in
setup.exe?
w32api is being created in c:/cygwin/usr/lib/w32api rather than
c:/cygwin/lib/w32api .
cgf
I'd like to remove 'diff' in favor of a new 'diffutils'?
Is there any way to do that without causing problems? Is
there anything new in setup.exe that would eliminate the
dreaded libncurses problem?
cgf
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 04:13:06PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: And we have a xfree cygwin package.. (What
1 - 100 of 2794 matches
Mail list logo
