On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 14:19, Alan Miles wrote:
All,
I concur - I have a couple of private packages that I build, and then use a
local copy of upset to create the setup.ini file. My packages are ** NOT **
XFree86 related, and I have the same type of $(cygpath -S) call in my
postinstall
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 01:30, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
FYI --- In further testing, archive.progeny.com is the mirror that has
not been updated yet. Selecting only archive.progeny.com gives me the
warning about setup.ini being older than when I last installed Cygwin.
Selecting only
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 11:20, Harold Hunt wrote:
Jehan,
Excellent summarization of the thread regarding how we can add
/usr/X11R6/bin to the path.
Looks like we had Dave Cook and Robert Collins discussing the best way to do
things but then the thread died.
I don't really think that I
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote:
On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes:
I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an external file.
All' it needs is *someone* willing to be a package maintainer for it.
Hardly an onerous role, yet no one
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:40, Morrison, John wrote:
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote:
On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes:
I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an
external
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 22:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Are you sure that we don't get licensing issues here? AFAIK, Qt is
(roughly) only free when running on a free OS. Basically we're
still running on Windows...
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/licensing/
Summary, 2.2 and later is QPL
===
- Original Message -
From: Nick THOMPSON [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygwin-xfree Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:22 PM
Subject: X via SSH (was: New (Delphi) xlauncher)
What I could do with is a mode that allows an X session to be setup
through an SSH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Tuesday, 23 July 2002 1:36 AM
Harold,
Who's to say that ReactOS won't have a registry?
1) ReactOS has a registry, and an editor.
2) ReactOS is targeting binary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Juan José
Andrés Gutiérrez
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 9:55 PM
As I can use these DLL in a program written with Visual C++?
1) Dlls are not libs. Conversion is not guaranteed.
2) These
-Original Message-
From: Juan José Andrés Gutiérrez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 10:04 PM
To: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: Problems with MSVC6.0
I need to use Visual C++ 6.0 because I'm making an ActiveX.
False. G++ can produce ActiveX objects
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Juan José
Andrés Gutiérrez
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 11:51 PM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems with MSVC6.0
I need a explanation, please. If I load
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2002 3:04 AM
To: cygx
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation Classes for setup.exe [was RE:
LibICE.DLL is a BIG problem]
Hi,
Instead of
- Original Message -
From: Tim Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rasjid Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: cygwin-xfree Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been playing with wxWindows with C++.
Why not just code to the Win32 API? It's not that hard, not for a trivial
launcher.
wxWindows is a
- Original Message -
From: Tim Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: New xlauncher (was: Re: Success with Java prog in XFree)
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 16:33, Harold Hunt wrote:
For future reference, the xlauncher-style
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Harold L Hunt
Sent: Saturday, 13 July 2002 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after installing with
setup.exe in win98SE
Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Harold
-Original Message-
From: Jehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 8:18 AM
To: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after installing with
setup.exe in win98SE
Robert Collins wrote:
Nope, it's also generated from mount information. Cygwin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Thomas Chadwick
I hate to jump into the middle of a religious argument (which this is
turning out to be) but it seems to me that a plausible
solution would be to
urge the maintainers of the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 10:29 AM
Chuck,
For crying out loud, 95% of the installers out there create
shortcuts for
the user in the startmenu and on the desktop. Why is this
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Wourms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 10:57 AM
To: Jehan Bing
...
No he isn't. There are two ways that someone will interface
with Cygwin,
via Console or via X11. The other apps you mention are Console apps,
therefore
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 11:09 AM
Robert,
I'll have none of this debian talk. You know full well that
I am working
very hard to get rpm-4.1 ready for inclusion into the
Whats your SHELL variable?
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:16 PM
and in setup.ini :
@ kdelibs-2
Get rid of this. I suspect that it is confusing setup.exe.
It should certainly do the right thing without it.
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upset would probably do the right thing with the above but I really don't
see any reason to use it, regardless. I don't see any reason why a user
would need to know that these are kdelibs-2 when it
Why not just run the patch through d2u?
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:59 PM
Subject: RE: [PATCH] -scrollbars option
Jehan,
That is an excellent patch! I was just thinking that we should add
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Alkov
Sent: Friday, 21 June 2002 3:20 AM
Also, specific kudos for the recent mousewheel fix for cygwin
setup
We fixed it? Ah, mmm, ok!. Thanks for the feedback.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Thomson
Sent: Saturday, 15 June 2002 8:54 PM
Hmmm, I first installed cygwin-xfree before it was
incorporated into the
setup.exe system, but have now used the setup.exe to install
on
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stuart Adamson
Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2002 10:11 PM
It does seem like this might get a bit complex (we would have
to hold the
hwnd
of each window in the windows private and use that to decide
, Robert Collins wrote:
Yes, but the X infrastructure for this is excellent. I had it mostly
working, but looking crap due to the decorations, and not
choosing which
windows to show on the taskbar terribly cluefully. Alan has various
patches from me. Unfortunately, my personal time
Enjoy.
YMWV, as this is against somewhat old sourceforge CVS. I'm also not sure
what quality I left it in :}.
At a minimum it should provide food for thought.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Harold Hunt
Sent: Thursday, 13
experiencing the same
issue. I contacted Robert Collins about the issue and he
said he would
look into why setup is doing that. Haven't heard from him
yet though...
Setup is doing what?
Rob
experiencing the same
issue. I contacted Robert Collins about the issue and he
said he would
look into why setup is doing that. Haven't heard from him
yet though...
Setup is doing what?
They mean the bug with the GNU long name extension, which
results in failed
kdebase
46 bytes sounds about right.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Adaos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: error downloading XFree86-base-4.2.0-1.tar.bz2
when I download the XFree86-base-4.2.0-1.tar.bz2 through the
hate to chime in with a me too, but I have been
experiencing the same issue. I contacted Robert Collins
about the issue and he said he would look into why setup is
doing that. Haven't heard from him yet though...
Cheers,
Nicholas
--- Jonathan Fosburgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri
One thing I'm not clear on - are both calls -required-?
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:52 PM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[5]: setup.exe and inuse files for X
Ok, I've
-Original Message-
From: Ton van Overbeek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 6:39 PM
By the way, what is the best place to discuss X packaging
issues, this list (cygwin-xfree) or cygwin-apps ?
Yes.
I'd suggest that any non-trivial discussions take place on
This is off-topic for the xfree mailing list, it's really a developer or
general topic. Anyway
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Habacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 5:36 AM
Robert Collins wrote:
In short, I don't like the idea of making key_t 32 bits
Randall,
theres nothing in X or Cygwin that could cause a CPU to
disappear on you.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:09 PM
Actaully, I think the long delay was the copy-on-reboot stage of the
cygwin upgrade. I vaguely remember something about XFree needing to
update a LOT of in use files, so
-Original Message-
From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:41 PM
To: Charles Wilson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Legacy Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs.
Setup.exe XFree86 Packages
Charles,
Wouldn't that copy-on-reboot
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Habacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 7:41 AM
What about using a new type respective casts for cygdaemon.
This would not break key_t compatibility and allows to
migrate single application to cygdaemon, while others works
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 10:20 AM
the cygwin-daemon code was recently merged into CVS; the
snapshots have
the functionality but the daemon itself is not turned on by
default.
Just like ipcdaemon.exe,
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Habacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 8:55 PM
To: Robert Collins; Charles Wilson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MIT shared memory extension
the cygwin-daemon code was recently merged into CVS; the
snapshots
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:44 AM
To: CygWin Apps; Cygwin-Xfree
Subject: Re: setup.exe and inuse files for X
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
I think I've got a handle
I think I've got a handle on this... looks like read only (-r--r--r--)
files don't delete properly, so setup fails to overwrite them.
Patches gratefully accepted, it's going in the TODO for now.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:25 AM
To: Robert Collins; cygx
Subject: RE: upset stumper [cgf, Robert Collins, please comment]
Robert,
I forgot to reply last night that I had hand-fixed the
setup.ini file
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Luke at work
Subject: A small contribution
I read through the contributors guide, but couldn't find any
mention of how to contribute a
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 2:33 PM
I've been thinking that maybe a Makefile version of this
might be more useful, as it would prevent the rebuilding of
packages that haven't had their XFree86 package updated.
-Original Message-
From: Ilya Goldin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 3:52 AM
When I restarted, Win2K (which is what I'm running here, with
all the latest patches), got stuck at the end of its second
...
Having read the list since, I surmise that the
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xfree86 install makes wininit not working
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:59:26PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
What's your prognosis
We've got a problem folks:
From MSDN
===
To rename or delete a file on Windows 95/98/Me
Check for the existence of the WININIT.INI file in the Windows
directory.
If WININIT.INI exists, open it and add new entries to the existing
[rename] section. If the file does not exist, create the file
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 6:56 AM
In a related question that has to do with my laziness, I need
a way to tarball a CVS tree without including the CVS
directories. I'm sure this can be done with a simple
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 8:48 AM
I didn't quite gather from the earlier discussions whether
we can have
a source package seperate from any binary packages. i.e., could we
have XFree86-full-src
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Robert Collins
Subject: RE: xfree86 install makes wininit not working
Robert,
Cygwin's setup.exe doesn't use wininit.ini, does it? I'm
I realised the ini file was present in Sylvain's email.
Sylvain - do the .NEW files exist? Are the paths correct?
ROb
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:59 PM
Also, setup must do the following (even without new 'views'
and whatnot)
Setup should already do that, why not make a test setup.ini and see what
happens :]. It's all data
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:30 PM
Dependencies work for installing. The behavior I noticed
when uninstalling is that dependencies are ignored. I'm
guessing that setup.exe was designed that way because there
In the span functions,
if pGc-CompositeClip has
(nbox = REGION_NUM_RECTS (pRegion)) == 0, what does that indicate?
Should we skip rendering the span? Grab 1 rect and hope we can read it?
Something else?
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Alan Hourihane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: makeNativeRgn
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:35:06PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
There's more that can be done, like moving
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:11 PM
I hope that clarifies things.
This may actually be documented in the Porting Layer
Definition, but I don't remember for sure.
Yes it is sortof - some frameworks have defined
I've made serious progress, but I'm having trouble with two things.
1) The mouse - I'm not getting any WM_MOUSEMOVE messages to the app
windows. Anyone seen this before?
2) I've broken fillspans for DRAWABLE_WINDOWs. I can fix it by drawing
into the root window hdc always,
but that's defeating
-Original Message-
From: Ian Burrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:49 AM
Is it possible to have multiple packages in a subdirectory and
setup.hint file? Or does each package needs its own directory?
Each package needs it's own directory.
For a
-Original Message-
From: Ian Burrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:57 AM
That is a list of subdirectories. But it won't work since the each
package needs its own subdirectory. A better hiearchy would use the
components from the package names.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:23 AM
Now, this works, and upset/setup are happy (every binary
package has a
src package) but it is hackish, ugly, and a pain to maintain. Is
there a better solution? (Or
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:19 PM
I don't think it's that big a deal to require cygwin packages
to follow
a parseable naming scheme; ours is pretty lenient...when it
fails, it's
not a terrible
]
+ * Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/
/* $XFree86: xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xwin/winsetsp.c,v 1.6 2001/10/22
15:21:12 alanh Exp $ */
@@ -48,8 +49,6 @@ winSetSpansNativeGDI (DrawablePtr pDrawa
HBITMAP hbmpOrig = NULL;
BITMAPINFO bmi;
HRGN
I've been thinking about rootless mode.
Here's my current thoughts:
1) We create a real win32 window for each X window.
2) We use SetWindowLong to store the X window pointer in the WIN32
struct, so that when a message arrives to that windowclass's WindowProc,
we can lookup the X window the
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 7:01 AM
To: Robert Collins; Ian Burrell
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: rootless mode
Rob,
One Win32 window per top-level X windows isn't an
optimization... it's just
For rootless, I'd ideally be able to go from a pdrawable to a pWin. Is
there a reliable way to do this?
Some scenarios where this makes sense:
1) Anything passed a pDrawable + a pGC - if it's a window we want a HDC
for that window.
2) Clipping. If we are drawing a window we need a win32 clipping
Just a question: how does X cope with region invalidate - say with the
Xnest engine? I'm wondering how the native GDI engine will handle having
regions invalidated by win32 apps in front of it, without an off-screen
buffer.
Rob
Hi,
I tried to build from CVS on
http://sourceforge.net/projects/xoncygwin using the instructions from
http://xfree86.cygwin.com/docs/cg/prog-build-native.html. I've attached
the bzip2'd log file from a standard build..
The summary is that it's failing to build the server binaries. All
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 10:49 PM
To: Robert Collins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Building from CVS
Rob,
We forgot to tell you that you have to pull the
windows-1-branch, which has that fix.
Thanks
Message-
From: Harold L Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 5:46 AM
To: Robert Collins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Building from CVS
That is correct.
Harold
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt
Does the build recipe expect the X11 headers to be installed? The
following is a sample error (there are many similar ones) indicating
that X11/Xlib.h is not found, and I not thate /usr/X11R6/include is in
the include path. I don't have X currently installed.
If it needs those headers, and
-Original Message-
From: mstucky5 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: missing telnet, solution
This whole thread got me thinking about possible ways
to avoid this xxx is missing problem...
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Markebo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:17 PM
| Or, were you planning on keeping the separate .tgz files around too?
separate .tgz? I The executable tgz's of the xfree package? I
am considering giving it a try using
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: And we have a xfree cygwin package.. (What are
they called?)
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:27:18PM -0500,
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Markebo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:44 PM
First thoughts, do a package with all required tgz's and then
do packages with the fonts not required.. docs..
Hmm what more is needed?? ;-)
Here's the easiest way to
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 4:46 AM
To: cygx
Subject: RE: DDraw Blt vs BltFast
Ralf,
Those are some very interesting results. I especially like
the ones where Cygwin is 10 to 1000 times slower than
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:06 AM
To: Cygwin-Xfree
Subject: Re: DDraw Blt vs BltFast
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:30:05AM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
I have done some analysing work with this and with
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DDraw Blt vs BltFast
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 06:06:16PM -0500, Harold Hunt wrote:
Fine. But how do you implement them on
-Original Message-
From: O'BRIEN,STEVE (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex1)
The problem library in gnome-vfs, where there appears to be
problems with
thread mutexes, although I really have not been able to debug
this at all.
Hi,
I'm the cygwin pthread maintainer. What seems to be
- Original Message -
From: Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have a look at autoload.c in the cygwin sources or the setup.exe
sources.
It provides a symbol to link to for the linker, but doesn't resolve
the
.dll until runtime.
Well, that's okay too, but w32api shouldn't be doing
===
- Original Message -
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Further separations can probably made (separate fonts packages,
separate
documentation packages, etc. Think of all the choices that the install
script gives youon what to install).
I'm talking about getting *something* up
- Original Message -
From: Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm kind of surprised that there were
errors at all, as I usually run the validator after submitting.
Cool. I was surprised too, but I didn't look further than the surface of
the issue.
I've already made lots of changes to get
===
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:03 PM
Subject: Cygwin XFree web page looks odd in Mozilla
Anyone else noticing that the XFree86 web page looks odd in Mozilla?
Maybe it's because I'm using the
85 matches
Mail list logo
