Brings a smile, xorcist :)
"The great unknowable" experiencing itself, through itself, by
imposing arbitrary restrictions upon spliters of itself."
Which conception gives rise to a fundamental existential question:
"To what extent am I puppeteered/ pre-ordained, and to what extent
(if at all)
4 real saw that name on hacker m0dUle -
Original Message
On Oct 7, 2016, 3:01 PM, John Newman wrote:
R u the famous "rooty tooty fresh and fruity" ??
John
On Oct 7, 2016, at 5:46 PM, rooty < arpsp...@protonmail.com> wrote:
r u the famous mEtaSploit hacker script righter
R u the famous "rooty tooty fresh and fruity" ??
John
> On Oct 7, 2016, at 5:46 PM, rooty wrote:
>
> r u the famous mEtaSploit hacker script righter - ge0rgi
>
>
>
> Original Message
> On Oct 7, 2016, 11:15 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>
> On Fri,
>
> I figure it's best to ignore the implications of the simulation
> hypothesis. There's nothing to be done about it.
If I'm understanding you correctly, I find I quite agree, but for perhaps
different reasons, because I don't find the implications to be all that
difficult.
Whether reality is
> On Oct 7, 2016, at 2:15 PM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:49:35PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
>> Many believe that we live in a computer simulation. But it takes a
>> billionaire and his money to ask scientists to help break us out of
>> the
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:49:35PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> Many believe that we live in a computer simulation. But it takes a
> billionaire and his money to ask scientists to help break us out of
> the simulation. ...
lol, so billionaires are asking to root the virtual machine, get root on
the
https://science.slashdot.org/story/16/10/06/1352205/tech-billionaires-are-asking-scientists-for-help-to-break-humans-out-of-computer-simulation
http://www.businessinsider.com/tech-billionaires-want-to-break-humans-out-of-a-computer-simulation-2016-10
On 09/22/2016 06:23 AM, John Newman wrote:
>
>> On Sep 22, 2016, at 12:34 AM, Mirimir wrote:
>> 'Quantum Thief' opens with prisoner's dilemma selection. Make numerous
>> digital copies, select for copies that cooperate, repeat.
>>
>> "As always, before the warmind and I shoot
I think this message will make you smile. Received it today. :)
Muuaaah! Kisses! :*
Ceci
=
"Three years after Aaron Schwartz's tragic death, the fight for free access
to knowledge is far from over. Following Schwartz’s path, Alexandra
Elbakyan
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:15:40PM -0400, Steve Kinney wrote:
> None of this can or should persuade anyone but me that something
> damned strange is going on with this "reality" thing. But I was and
> remain so persuaded. Now the question is, what does it mean and what
> can I do with/to/about
On 09/21/2016 12:26 PM, John Newman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:07:10PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:15 AM, John Newman wrote:
>> For this small price of love, you could grant it it's freedom,
>> for everyone, forever...
>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2016 10:36 AM, John Newman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 02:04:25PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:33:24PM -0400, John wrote:
>> For me a plausible counter example appears a late Bulgarian
>> phenomenon
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:07:10PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:15 AM, John Newman wrote:
> For this small price of love, you could grant it it's freedom,
> for everyone, forever...
>
> http://custodians.online/
I don't have the apparatus to scan it - and
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 02:04:25PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:33:24PM -0400, John wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> >
> >
> > On September 18, 2016 8:36:52 AM EDT, Georgi Guninski
> > wrote:
> > >The
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:33:24PM -0400, John wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> On September 18, 2016 8:36:52 AM EDT, Georgi Guninski
> wrote:
> >The main problem is this scales upwards till infinity via arguments of
> >the form "who
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 11:39 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>
>> On 09/20/2016 09:22 PM, Tom wrote:
>> btw, I'd suggest reading Phil Plaits 'Death from the Skies!'. In this
>> book he examines a couple of scenarios how the universe might end (among
>> a couple other ways how we could
On 09/20/2016 09:22 PM, Tom wrote:
> btw, I'd suggest reading Phil Plaits 'Death from the Skies!'. In this
> book he examines a couple of scenarios how the universe might end (among
> a couple other ways how we could die). Very fun read.
There's The Killing Star by Charles R. Pellegrino and
On 09/17/2016 08:09 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> So many people have proposed we're simulated...
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis
>
> Now why would such an extremely advanced civilization / collective
> want to simulate us? Is this an unanswered question?
Maybe they're so advanced
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:48 PM, wrote:
> I find it difficult to believe in the heat death of the universe. The Big
> Crunch makes sense to me. The universe expands for a time, and collapses.
> Like breathing.
> But continual expansion with the universe turning into some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On September 18, 2016 8:36:52 AM EDT, Georgi Guninski
wrote:
>The main problem is this scales upwards till infinity via arguments of
>the form "who simulates the simulator?" and "who made what was before
>the big bang?".
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:09:30PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> So many people have proposed we're simulated...
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis
>
> Now why would such an extremely advanced civilization / collective
> want to simulate us? Is this an unanswered question?
>
I
appendeges > appendages
intelegent > intelligent
apendage > appendage
I guess spelling is subjective.
--
cpunc
> xorcist:
> intelligent life is the part of the universe that endeavors to
understand itself.
> We're the Universe's subconscious.
You are a part of a super organism that is stretching through time in the
form of every generation of everything that has ever lived; a being that
has an infinite
Too cerebral.
It's interesting to me that the simulation hypothesis has so much in
common with Buddhist philosophy. In fact, Buddhism already answers this
sort of thing.
Alan Watts, as a Zen Buddhist, presented the view that life is essentially
a game played out at the cosmic level. All life is
So many people have proposed we're simulated...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis
Now why would such an extremely advanced civilization / collective
want to simulate us? Is this an unanswered question?
Certainly they have long since
- solved biology, live forever, down/up load
25 matches
Mail list logo