Peter Hercek wrote:
> Eric Kow wrote:
>> How about plugging some of it into the issue tracker? At the moment,
>> it may be better to use the web the interface http://bugs.darcs.net
>> (because we're getting this annoying duplicate-bug problem from mail).
--
> Point 3. There is some opposition
> BTW, as an incentive we have a standing offer to buy and ship a new copy of
> Windows to anyone interested in using it for darcs development... :-)
On a tangentially related note, it may be worthwhile to try and get
darcs running under Wine. It may not give us the full Windows
experience, but
Karel Gardas wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Simon Marlow wrote:
>> zooko wrote:
>>
>>> Next, karel's solaris box fails to compile, with this error message:
>>>
>>> http://buildbot.darcs.net/builders/karel%20solaris%20Solaris-5.11%
>>> 20nevada-79a%20x86_64/builds/43/steps/compile/logs/stdio
>>>
>>> [ghc] sr
zooko wrote:
> Eric Kow:
>
> I totally agree with your list -- performance issues and Windows
> polish. One particular thing that I'm interested in is scaling darcs
> up to bigger projects. We have the perfect customer right now -- the
> GHC team. They have strong demands, cooperate well
Simon,
Simon Marlow wrote:
> zooko wrote:
>
>> Next, karel's solaris box fails to compile, with this error message:
>>
>> http://buildbot.darcs.net/builders/karel%20solaris%20Solaris-5.11%
>> 20nevada-79a%20x86_64/builds/43/steps/compile/logs/stdio
>>
>> [ghc] src/OldFastPackedString.o
>>
>> sr
zooko wrote:
> Next, karel's solaris box fails to compile, with this error message:
>
> http://buildbot.darcs.net/builders/karel%20solaris%20Solaris-5.11%
> 20nevada-79a%20x86_64/builds/43/steps/compile/logs/stdio
>
> [ghc] src/OldFastPackedString.o
>
> src/OldFastPackedString.hs:98:0:
>
Jules:
I've added to the buildmaster script three utility classes to display
the versions of buildbot, darcs and darcs --exact-version for each
builder.
This shows that your buildbot is indeed using the darcs-2 that you
installed. I also notice that you have the default "usePty=True"
set
Eric Kow wrote:
> How about plugging some of it into the issue tracker? At the moment,
> it may be better to use the web the interface http://bugs.darcs.net
> (because we're getting this annoying duplicate-bug problem from mail).
David is against 1 so it does not make sense to add it there (it is
Eric Kow wrote:
> Note that the choice of 'mv' vs 'remove' was quite deliberate (mv
> actually moves things, remove does not). But I think this distinction
> is probably lost on most users, and that renaming mv to move (more
> precisely, hiding 'mv' and unhiding 'move') should be fine. On the
> o
Peter Hercek wrote:
> 3) Make darcs really patch based:
>
> a) Amend-record should be safe. This probably means
>that a hierarchy should be added to patches.
>A patch (as seen in darcs log and other UI commands)
>should be composed of a sequence of patches so
>am
On 5/22/08, Peter Hercek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Kow wrote:
>> [cut]
>> Those are my personal desires anyway.
>> What do you think? Sound like a plan?
>
> Ok, those are short term things and I like them and they
> should be considered high priority.
> I (as a user) could add few more l
> I (as a user) could add few more low priority wishes which
> I did not notice in issue tracker. Not sure anybody else
> beside me would be interested. The last one is probably
> for something like darcs 3.0 :-D
Nice wishlist, Peter.
How about plugging some of it into the issue tracker? At t
phercek:
> Eric Kow wrote:
> > [cut]
> > Those are my personal desires anyway.
> > What do you think? Sound like a plan?
>
> Ok, those are short term things and I like them and they
> should be considered high priority.
On other UI notes, I'd like to see verbose output going to a pager by
defa
Eric Kow wrote:
> [cut]
> Those are my personal desires anyway.
> What do you think? Sound like a plan?
Ok, those are short term things and I like them and they
should be considered high priority.
I (as a user) could add few more low priority wishes which
I did not notice in issue tracker. No
> A 2.0.1 release should really consist of me stopping allowing
> non-bugfixes for a while, then tagging, updating configure.ac, and
> making tarballs. So how about no new features or performance patches
> from now until 2.0.1 is released? (I feel bad that I let in the Lcs
> rewrite, which include
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It may be time to start thinking about the next version of darcs (say,
> for early 2009).
...
> (1) critical/urgent bugs - darcs 2.0.0 seems much more robust than
> darcs 1, but we still do have at least one case where it blows
> Speaking of which, I remember seeing some profiler output for darcs.
> Can the person who did that send a darcs patch which enables
> profiling? See the --enable-hpc stuff for inspiration. [of course, if
> anybody else wants to take this on...]
Heh... already done. Thanks! [I was looking in th
> Also, from the engineering point of view, I would be quite interested to
> see darcs using SMP -- perhaps as some research prototype as a proof of
> concept motivating future hacking. It's been quite interesting to read
> the post here: http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/blog/2007/11
Sure... altho
Hello,
zooko wrote:
> I totally agree with your list -- performance issues and Windows
> polish. One particular thing that I'm interested in is scaling darcs
> up to bigger projects. We have the perfect customer right now -- the
> GHC team. They have strong demands, cooperate well with u
Eric Kow:
Sounds good!
It kind of seems like since the darcs-2.0.0 release we have been in
"stable development" mode. That's fine (and we have definitely done
a lot of good porting and bugfixing and testing which ought to go
into a darcs-2.0.1 release soon), but I agree that we also need s
Hi everyone,
It may be time to start thinking about the next version of darcs (say,
for early 2009).
I thought I might put down my personal wishlist and see what you
think. My goal here is to have a very small number of well-defined
objectives. Please keep in mind that, as usual, I am speaking a
21 matches
Mail list logo
