David,
> I had a paper calibrated by ZEDOnet (Turboprint) and compared the
> output to the paper manufacturer's icc ... the results from both
> appear very very similar and gave a good representation of my screen
> when printed through Turboprint/CUPS.
>
> I cannot understand why the same icc
I had a paper calibrated by ZEDOnet (Turboprint) and compared the output
to the paper manufacturer's icc ... the results from both appear very
very similar and gave a good representation of my screen when printed
through Turboprint/CUPS.
I cannot understand why the same icc displays differen
David,
> Is anybody else having similar problems?
Definitely not me. You said that you have a calibrated paper, what ICC
profile are you using?
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://www.obry.net
gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.n
Hello,
I am in the same case with my canon Pixma 4950 : Turboprint is the only way to
get correct printouts.
With this model (or brand... I don't remember whether it is related to the
model or the brand itself), trying
to print the usual way would produce awful results, far worse than what y
I have until recently been using Turboprint as my base driver installed
on CUPS and print output has been quite satisfactory but after a system
rebuild I decided to try and go with the non-commercial default
Epson-CUPS driver and I assumed that it would make little difference
since this is th
