, March 18, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Tim Bunce
Cc: Jarkko Hietaniemi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Using perl 5.8.0?
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Tim Bunce wrote:
Thomas, did you get round to doing this?
Tim.
Hi Tim,
I have worked on it a bit...
I attempted
Is this a Perl problem, a make problem, or a RedHat problem?
Lincoln
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 05:40 pm, Thomas Good wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Lincoln Stein wrote:
Oddly enough, installing Perl 5.8 from source on a virgin RedHat 8.0
system fails with this mysterious error:
make:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Lincoln Stein wrote:
Oddly enough, installing Perl 5.8 from source on a virgin RedHat 8.0 system
fails with this mysterious error:
make: *** No rule to make target `built-in', needed by `miniperlmain.o'.
Stop.
Anyone seen this?
Lincoln, yes, I had to use
--- Thomas Good [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Lincoln Stein wrote:
Oddly enough, installing Perl 5.8 from source on a virgin RedHat
8.0 system
fails with this mysterious error:
make: *** No rule to make target `built-in', needed by
`miniperlmain.o'.
Stop.
Thomas, did you get round to doing this?
Tim.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:54:12AM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 05:30:31PM -0500, Thomas Good wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Tim Bunce wrote:
While I was using 5.8 large data transfers via DBI failed consistently.
I have
18, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Tim Bunce
Cc: Jarkko Hietaniemi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Using perl 5.8.0?
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Tim Bunce wrote:
Thomas, did you get round to doing this?
Tim.
Hi Tim,
I have worked on it a bit...
I attempted to reproduce
Lincoln Stein wrote:
My test case is part of a big script that requires BioPerl. What I'll do is
to pull it out into a self-contained script.
Frankly I don't think that this has anything to do with DBI, but rather
something fundamental that changed with Perl's IO handling. A whole bunch of
From: Tim Bunce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone using perl 5.8.0?
After a lot of upgrades (seg fault, DBI connect hangs), we seem to have one old RedHat
server happy w/ 5.8.0.
Linux version 2.4.7-10 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux
7.1 2.9
6-98)) #1 Thu Sep 6
Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2003-02-25 21:34:52 -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
Generally speaking, I've been impressed with 5.8.0 on both Solaris 7
(UltraSparc) and also on MacOS X (10.2.3 at the moment). On MacOS X,
there's a peculiarity in the way CPAN and CPANPLUS manage to put the
first
On 2003-02-27 06:17:53 -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
Peter J. Holzer wrote:
As a workaround, you can unset the EDITOR variable.
Intriguing -- and effective. I wonder how that happens! What's your
value for $EDITOR - mine is usually vi or vim.
Mine, too.
hp
--
_ | Peter
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 05:05:59PM -0500, Lincoln Stein wrote:
My test case is part of a big script that requires BioPerl. What I'll do is
to pull it out into a self-contained script.
Frankly I don't think that this has anything to do with DBI, but rather
something fundamental that
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 05:30:31PM -0500, Thomas Good wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Tim Bunce wrote:
While I was using 5.8 large data transfers via DBI failed consistently.
I have compared notes with others (including Lincoln Stein) and this
problem is easily reproduced. In fact, I
On 2003-02-25 21:34:52 -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
Generally speaking, I've been impressed with 5.8.0 on both Solaris 7
(UltraSparc) and also on MacOS X (10.2.3 at the moment). On MacOS X,
there's a peculiarity in the way CPAN and CPANPLUS manage to put the
first character of output on
I'm afraid I can't offer any feedback that would be useful, other than the
fact that Lincoln is most likely correct that this problem is manifested due
to changes in PerlIO. I have several daemons running on Tivoli TMR servers,
many of which use DBI and DBD::Oracle; one of which is experiencing
Ah, mentioning PerlIO and DBD::Oracle points the finger at the fact that
DBD::Oracle hasn't been updated to use PerlIO for warnings/trace (at least
not in the release on CPAN). That may be a factor.
If DBD::Oracle needs to 'say' anything (which is very rare in normal
operation) it'll be passing a
I am using perl 5.8.0 and DBD-Oracle-1.12 with DBI-1.32, on Solaris 5.8.
I have trouble inserting data into CLOBs if the data is over 32K, and the
DBD does not understand Oracle type XMLDATA at all.
I posted a question about this earlier, but no one appeared to know
anything.
Doesn't seem to
I would like to take this moment to thank Lincoln Stein for his wonderful
book Network Programming with Perl; it's been a wonderful resource for me
..has been a great resource for me as well.
on this current project. If you've
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Tim Bunce wrote:
Anyone using perl 5.8.0?
Jarkko and I would be interested in any feedback you may have.
Obviously my main interest is with DBI and drivers but Jarkko's
is wider.
Please reply to Jarkko (CC'd) and then also CC me if your reply
includes any feedback
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le Mardi 25 Février 2003 13:50, Tim Bunce a écrit :
Anyone using perl 5.8.0?
Yes.
Jarkko and I would be interested in any feedback you may have.
Obviously my main interest is with DBI and drivers but Jarkko's
is wider.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:26:03PM -, Steve Haslam wrote:
Tim, Jarkko; my main problem with using perl 5.8 for our
DBD::Oracle/DBD::Sybase apps is the inability to use signals to time out
an operation. We have constructs like:
eval {
alarm(60);
local $SIG{ALRM} = sub { $sth-cancel();
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:13:47AM -0500, Thomas Good wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Tim Bunce wrote:
Anyone using perl 5.8.0?
Jarkko and I would be interested in any feedback you may have.
Obviously my main interest is with DBI and drivers but Jarkko's
is wider.
Please reply to
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Tim Bunce wrote:
While I was using 5.8 large data transfers via DBI failed consistently.
I have compared notes with others (including Lincoln Stein) and this
problem is easily reproduced. In fact, I can't stop reproducing it. ;-)
A self-contained test case would be
My test case is part of a big script that requires BioPerl. What I'll do is
to pull it out into a self-contained script.
Frankly I don't think that this has anything to do with DBI, but rather
something fundamental that changed with Perl's IO handling. A whole bunch of
symptoms showed up in
Tim Bunce wrote:
Anyone using perl 5.8.0?
Jarkko and I would be interested in any feedback you may have.
Obviously my main interest is with DBI and drivers but Jarkko's
is wider.
Please reply to Jarkko (CC'd) and then also CC me if your reply
includes any feedback related to the DBI and/or the
24 matches
Mail list logo
