Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It is not safe to assume that s/palo/efi/g will give grammatically
correct results in all languages. If you do commit a patch including
such automated translations, please mark the translations as fuzzy for
any languages you don't personally know.
Quoting Helmut Wollmersdorfer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Quick dirty try of sarge-i386-netinst-20040621-build.iso under VMware:
... boot:
F1
- Welcome to Debian GNU/Linux sarge!
+ Debian GNU/Linux sarge.
-This is a Debian installation CD-ROM, built on 20040528.
Well, while working on french updates to partman templates, I see that
besides typos, there are some things which need changes to English
strings (such as yelling too loud here and there and some awkward
formulation).
This also is why string freezes exist : most tempaltes in d-i have
been
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I apologize for making string changes in partman today. I didn't guess
that Tuesday means probably 0:00 GMT and not 23:59 GMT (and I was
offline since the IRC-meeting so I missed the announcement in
debian-boot).
I must admit that I am *very*
1. second stage main menu contains an untranslated entry
Which one ? :-)
2. console-data configuration contains wrong characters
I have already seen such report. Dennis, could you try
dpkg-reconfigure console-data on a sid system ?
3. pppconfiguration is not translated at all
Bless its
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: i386 20040716
uname -a : Linux cicada 2.6.6-1-686-smp #1 SMP Wed May 12 16:41:10 EST
2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 7/17 - night time. :)
Method: boot from 113MB CD nightly installer, DSL, No Proxy.
Machine: Compaq Proliant 6400R
Processor: 2x
Hola Anton Zinoviev!
Then, I think that a GREAT difference could be made by transforming the Help
and Finish options into buttons at the bottom of the screen.
This is something that cdebconf doesn't allow (for now).
Uhm? I'm talking about a button like the Back button. Are you saying
that
Over 1,600,ooo males in the world used our product
for last year!Amazing, P E R MANENT
RESULTS! The most popular solDution for
Pen i T s E n laQYrgementDYGDU
TSQOJB KLHTOM
- 10o% s afe fr m ula and drs aproved
- Increase Your P e ni Us Width By 20 % and
3 + Full IncRhes
In Leng t h
- Stop P r
Package: grub-installer
Version: 0.52
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to be able to run d-i at critical priority to cut down the
number of questions asked. However, the with_other_os question is
currently high, even though it can render a previously working machine
unbootable if something goes wrong
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
Mounting the sarge netinst beta 4 .iso (on loopback), cd'ing to that dir, and running:
md5sum -c md5sums.txt
Gives an error. README.html has the wrong md5sum... assumably because it was
edited after the checksums were generated.
-- System
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20072004,
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/sid-amd64-monolithic.iso
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.6.7-5-amd64-generic #1 Thu Jul 15 02:11:18 CEST 2004 x86_64
unknown
Date: 21072004
Method: converted ISO to USB boot image,
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 03:26:07PM +0200, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
Keld Jørn Simonsen schrieb:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:15:07AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I'd say that current English is closer to US than GB so let's go ahead
for US.
I think it is better to use the en_GB
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 06:15:46AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
You should always survey the opposition. Anaconda, Red Hat's GPL
installer, is written in Python. It does both text-mode and graphical
installs.
The text-mode code and the graphical code in Anaconda are doubled. It
is as if
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 6/July/2004
uname -a: Linux kazbak 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14 19:38:07 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 6/July/2004 17:00
Method: Boot from CD, install from Network (ftp.uk.debian.org), Not Proxied
Machine: Acer Aspire 1355LC
Hello,
You have been choosen to qualify for a new mortgage.
You could get a $325,000 for as little as $700 a month!
Credit is no problem, you can pull cash out or refinance.
Get me qualified now
http://bechtel.lending-market.com/j8/jwex.php?h8x=51
Best Regards,
Jamie Lewis
--
To
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 07:01:48PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
It's now impossible to do 48 mb installs with d-i, much less 32, because
the new partman seems to never enable swap after formatting. So things
run out of memory eventually.
Why they would run out of memory? The idea is that we
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 254830 discover1-data
Bug#254830: Please include firewire for network installs
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `discover1-data'.
End of message, stopping
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 05:17:35PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce3 Host Bridge (rev a4)
:00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce3 LPC Bridge (rev a6)
:00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce3 SMBus (rev a4)
:00:02.0 USB
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:45:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
The third option is merely to optimise it. partman forks a hell of a
lot, and it sources the libraries over and over.
The busybox sh forks almost on every line of partman. It forks even for
internal commands such as [ and echo.
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004/7/19 got from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/current/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Fri Jun 18 02:04:50 PDT 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: Tue Jul 20 21:41:10 CEST 2004
Method:
Hello
Is there a way to set the partition type in the Sarge installer? I tried
to install Sarge into a primary partition that was used by FreeBSD
before. Formatting it as ext3 and copying the files went well, but
neither Grub nor Lilo could be installed to that partiton. It worked
after I
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 06:16:55PM +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
Is there a way to set the partition type in the Sarge installer?
No. The installer sets automatically the type.
I tried
to install Sarge into a primary partition that was used by FreeBSD
before. Formatting it as ext3 and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 260520 console-data
Bug#260520: d-i: german translation + charset bugs
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `console-data'.
tags 260520 + d-i
Bug#260520: d-i: german translation + charset bugs
There were no tags set.
Tags
hey,
I installed with the same Build as Herbert:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040719/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
When I install it, I don't see the screens he described. However, when I
run
dpkg-reconfigure console-data
it is broken too.
Herbert, how did you
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:51:35 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Bug#260629: duplicate of 260628
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:56:18 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Bug#260686: Sparc64 Install Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
partman-auto_26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_26.dsc
partman-auto_26.tar.gz
partman-auto_26_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
partman-auto_26.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_26.dsc
partman-auto_26.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_26.tar.gz
partman-auto_26_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_26_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 260600 hw-detect
Bug#260600: i386 Installation: network config problem
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `hw-detect'.
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 257863 ftp.debian.org
Bug#257863: tasksel in post-reboot d-i automatically pulls in language tasks - non-X
installation impossible.
Bug reassigned from package `tasksel' to `ftp.debian.org'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
clone 260658 -1
Bug#260658: Installation report (amd64)
Bug 260658 cloned as bug 260704.
retitle -1 pci ids for sata_sil
Bug#260704: Installation report (amd64)
Changed Bug title.
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
Can you provide the output of lspci -n please ?
Sure:
:00:00.0 0600: 10de:00d1 (rev a4)
:00:01.0 0601: 10de:00d0 (rev a6)
:00:01.1 0c05: 10de:00d4 (rev a4)
:00:02.0 0c03: 10de:00d7 (rev a5)
:00:02.1 0c03: 10de:00d7 (rev a5)
:00:02.2 0c03:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
I was asked twice to disable the IDE drivers I do not(!!!) want
(during Network Hardware Detection, and later during Hardware
Detection). Thats pretty strange. Maybe you could rely upon
discover here? Discover would have listed the sata_sil module,
too.
Um, we do run
reassign 257863 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Sven Luther wrote:
reopen 257863
thanks
Hello,
This is still present in todays sid install, which includes tasksel 2.06,
which supposedly fixed this. Well, at least it still pulls in kde, X and
openoffice, even if i didn't chose any task in the
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: base-config
Version: 2.36
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
(this bug is maybe a console-common bug)
After the welcome message of base-config, during any install (2.4 or 2.6,
any locale), the keyboard is improperly configured at second
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:23:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260655: debian-installer: MD5 check on sarge netinst beta 4 fails
for ./README.html
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Herbert Kaminski wrote:
On this system with FireWire + Ethernet, both were detected as
ethernet interfaces, firewire = eth0, ethernet = eth1. After reboot,
the order was reversed, so no connection to the internet was possible.
Bringing up the real ethernet manually and editing config files
[Colin Watson]
Perhaps this should be asked at critical instead?
I think dual boot scenarios should be considred special enough to
expect people to run on priority high or lower if they want that to
work. Critical should be used for questions where the default will
work for most people, not for
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso 20July2004
uname -a: powerpc_2.6.7
Date: 21 July 2004 circa 7pm BST
Method: Installed BootX 1.2.2 from http://penguinppc.org/projects/bootx/
copied 2.6 initrd.gz and vmlinuz from d-i CD to Linux Kernels in the
Hello
Am Mittwoch, 21. Juli 2004 19:49 schrieb Anton Zinoviev:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 06:16:55PM +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
Is there a way to set the partition type in the Sarge installer?
No. The installer sets automatically the type.
I tried
to install Sarge into a primary
Hi Horms,
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:14:34PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:50:09PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
it was a pci fix patch from Herbert Xu that b0rks,
hch has thrown it out for 2.6.7-1.
you may want to look at #253787.
Thanks, that does sill seem to be
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:57:32PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Colin Watson]
Perhaps this should be asked at critical instead?
I think dual boot scenarios should be considred special enough to
expect people to run on priority high or lower if they want that to
work. Critical should
[Colin Watson]
I appreciate that dual-boot scenarios are special for debian-edu.
However, I don't think they're special in the majority of
installations.
I do not know their relative frequency, but I do know that dual-boots
installs are fairly rare in my enterprise environment, at the
It's now impossible to do 48 mb installs with d-i, much less 32, because
the new partman seems to never enable swap after formatting. So things
run out of memory eventually.
Why they would run out of memory? The idea is that we enable the swap
before the hungry for memory commands and
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 11:08:50PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Colin Watson]
I appreciate that dual-boot scenarios are special for debian-edu.
However, I don't think they're special in the majority of
installations.
I do not know their relative frequency, but I do know that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems with the debian installer back in March, I would
very much appreciate it, if you could find time to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems with the debian installer back in March, I would
very much appreciate it, if you could find time to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
reported some problems with the debian installer back in March, I would
very much appreciate it, if you could find time to
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:15:52 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Bug#238335: success, with comments
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:28:40 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Bug#238412: success, network issues
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
The sarge-alpha-netinst boot CD failed to detect my NICs on my 164LX. I tried a 3Com
3C905 and an Intel EtherExpress. The Intel card kept returning a timeout error that
overwrote what was on the screeen, effectively ending the install.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 05:23:36PM -0500, Robert Oram wrote:
The sarge-alpha-netinst boot CD failed to detect my NICs on my 164LX. I tried a
3Com 3C905 and an Intel EtherExpress. The Intel card kept returning a timeout error
that overwrote what was on the screeen, effectively ending the
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:14:12 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
On my system, ethernet is brought up by discover, while firewire is
brought up by hotplug, and they run in that order, which is the same
order the installer brings them up, so I get the same interfaces. Is
your system doing something different,
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:36:12 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Bug#238424: hard to find how to tell partition tool to
mount partition w/o reformat
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:53:36 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: Bug#238459: success, with comments (regarding ext3)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and have come across
yours. Many thanks for all your feedback. It is much appreciated.
* Wolfgang Wieser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-28 12:22]:
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jul 2004 01:06:38 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#234162: problem with TDK burner
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
partman_43_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_43.dsc
partman_43.tar.gz
partman_43_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
partman-basicfilesystems_28_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_28.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_28.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_28_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
partman-jfs_4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-jfs_4.dsc
partman-jfs_4.tar.gz
partman-jfs_4_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
partman-ext3_28_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext3_28.dsc
partman-ext3_28.tar.gz
partman-ext3_28_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
partman-partitioning_23_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_23.dsc
partman-partitioning_23.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_23_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
partman-reiserfs_15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-reiserfs_15.dsc
partman-reiserfs_15.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_15_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
partman-xfs_15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-xfs_15.dsc
partman-xfs_15.tar.gz
partman-xfs_15_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: partman
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Severity: important
Along with the other swap-related breakage in this version of partman,
it no longer adds swap entries to /target/etc/fstab.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:32:02 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260512: fixed in partman 43
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Accepted:
partman-jfs_4.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_4.dsc
partman-jfs_4.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_4.tar.gz
partman-jfs_4_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_4_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
partman-ext3_28.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_28.dsc
partman-ext3_28.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_28.tar.gz
partman-ext3_28_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_28_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your
Accepted:
partman_43.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_43.dsc
partman_43.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_43.tar.gz
partman_43_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_43_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 260512
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_28.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_28.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_28.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_28.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_28_all.udeb
to
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_23.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_23.dsc
partman-partitioning_23.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_23.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_23_all.udeb
to
Accepted:
partman-reiserfs_15.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_15.dsc
partman-reiserfs_15.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_15.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_15_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_15_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
Accepted:
partman-xfs_15.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_15.dsc
partman-xfs_15.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_15.tar.gz
partman-xfs_15_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_15_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to
I repeated the install and didn't experience the display problems that
occurred first time around although the Partition Free space option
was still missing. This time I manually configured the partition table
to leave the MacOS install intact.
The quik installation loop manifested itself once
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 260628 lowmem
Bug#260628: Low memory (32Mb) install not possible.
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lowmem'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:26:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
There was a useful suggestion in this installation-report.
Submitter was unclear if success reports for d-i would be welcome based on
current text.
After current text:
After using the Debian-Installer, please send us an
On (20/07/04 10:31), Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 03:56:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 03:44:18PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
again tomorrow. Meanwhile, assuming I can get a network connection
what's the best way to issue the above commands
lowmem_0.13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lowmem_0.13.dsc
lowmem_0.13.tar.gz
lowmem_0.13_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_0.13_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:32:02 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260628: fixed in lowmem 0.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
lowmemcheck_0.13_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Accepted:
lowmem_0.13.dsc
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_0.13.dsc
lowmem_0.13.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_0.13.tar.gz
lowmem_0.13_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_0.13_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_0.13_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmemcheck_0.13_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
partman-basicfilesystems_29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_29.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_29.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_29_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
base-config_2.37_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.37.dsc
base-config_2.37.tar.gz
base-config_2.37_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_29.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_29.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_29.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_29.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_29_all.udeb
to
Accepted:
base-config_2.37.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.37.dsc
base-config_2.37.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.37.tar.gz
base-config_2.37_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.37_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 260303
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:17:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260746: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:17:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260303: fixed in base-config 2.37
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040719/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux rakuen 2.6.7-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 19 July 2004
Method: I installed via network using a
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 12:53:42AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
I repeated the install and didn't experience the display problems that
occurred first time around although the Partition Free space option
was still missing. This time I manually configured the partition table
to leave the MacOS
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 02:07:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Horms,
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:14:34PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:50:09PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
it was a pci fix patch from Herbert Xu that b0rks,
hch has thrown it out for 2.6.7-1.
First of all, the string freeze continues. The schedule is delayed by
2 days up to 07/26 00:00 because of recent partman changes.
Statistics as of 07/22 05:20UTC:
We currently have 12 complete languages:
uk, tr, sk, pt_BR, ja, he, fr, eu, de, da, cs, bg
17 nearly complete (over 95%):
sq, fi,
in inconvenient places.
Hi Steve,
I've tried the latest businesscard installer ISO, which at the time of
writing is 20040721. The automatic partitioning tool now takes into
account that it needs to cater to aboot to be able to boot from SRM. It
creates a 1MB partition before the root (/) partition. So
92 matches
Mail list logo
