On Monday, November 28, 2005 6:36 PM, Joshua Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
The following is using the search box at:
http://www.us.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents
Search for anything with AMD64 as the architecture and testing as
On Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:27 PM, Wolfram Schlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Package: security.debian.org
/debian-non-US/ can only be found on one of the three
security.debian.org mirror servers:
[...]
Is that by design?!
There's no reason at all why any security.d.o mirror needs to
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 23:07 -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote:
Package: security.debian.org
The Release.gpg files in the security and nonus archives are
still being created using the old automatic signing GPG key:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/ziyi_key_2003.asc
not the new key
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:08 +0200, Oskar Pearson wrote:
Package: security.debian.org
Hi there
I used to mirror security.debian.org via rsync, but since the
recent security compromise, the config appears to have changed.
It seems that rsync is no longer enabled on that machine.
[...]
As
Package: developers-reference
Tags: patch
Hi,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg01651.html and the
surrounding thread suggests that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the appropriate address to
use if one suspects a maintainer is MIA, as opposed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The attached patch applies
reassign 342237 debian-keyring
severity 342237 wishlist
retitle 342237 Please provide Debian archive keyring
merge 342237 316344
thanks mateOn Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:30 PM, Sean Finney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
package xbase-clients
close 308448
thanks
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:12 AM Anton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
!!![OOps. Typo in previous mail...]!!
Please don't open a new bug report just to correct a typo.
Closing
Package: passwd
Version: 4.0.3-33
Severity: critical
Tags: sid
Justification: Breaks unrelated software (exim4 plus others)
Hi,
Between -32 and -33, a chunk of code from libmisc/chkname.c:good_name() was
moved in to 406_good_name.dpatch. Unfortunately, that file is currently
commented out in
package gaim
tags 309435 + pending
thanks
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote, Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:57 AM
This is just a reminder that there are known vulnerabilities in
gaim 1.2.1 in sarge that need to be fixed in the release process
either through t-p-u or by allowing 1.3.0 in to sarge:
package dpkg
reassign 309790 emacs-goodies-el
thanks
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 18:21 +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.10.27
Severity: normal
Recent install of dpkg-dev-el reads:
[...]
Setting up debian-el (24.10-1) ...
install/debian-el: Handling emacs21, logged in
reassign 345883 bugs.debian.org
merge 345883 327591
thanks
Hi,
Package: debbugs
Severity: wishlist
Please allow usertags to be set when a bug is submitted. This would
really help those of us that need to track rc-type bugs for non-rc archs
with usertags.
A similar request has already been
Package: lsb
Version: 3.0-13
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The attached patch allows lsb to be built on a sarge system, and at least
lsb-base to be installed correctly on sarge (tested on i386). Obviously
lsb-core will be uninstallable without more work by the backporter due to
the glibc
# BTS control commands
package apt
# Raising severities as per the rationale in #345891
severity 346002 serious
severity 345823 serious
severity 345956 serious
merge 346002 345823 345956 345891
thanks
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 20:25 +0100, Ferenczi Viktor wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43
Steffen Joeris wrote, Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:20 AM
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 01:33, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Steffen Joeris [Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:50:21 +0100]:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious
Please remove this package because the provided binary now
exists in kdeedu
reassign 347540 apt
severity 347540 serious
merge 347540 345891
thanks
On Wednesday, January 11, 2006 12:08 PM, jetxee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
As of Wed Jan 11 12:58:48 CET 2006, I get the following error messages
on aptutude update:
W: GPG error:
On Friday, January 13, 2006 3:12 PM, Justin Pryzby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
What is the purpose of this list?
I know that I'm not sure myself, but I know that it isn't supposed to
be for discussion of random bugs that people find, which are almost
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:25 -0600, Tim Christian wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.28.6
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/apt-get
I was using (via `dpk -l`): kernel-image-2.4.27-1-38 2.4.27-6
I noticed the following security alert:
http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-921
package debian-policy
severity 344158 wishlist
merge 344158 230217
thanks
On Tuesday, December 20, 2005 2:17 PM, Michelle Konzack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.1.1
Severity: normal
Error description:
The Filesystem Hierarchy Standard in
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 21:22 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
This is concerning bug #329597.
[...]
notfound 329597 egroupware/1.0.0.007-2.dfsg-2sarge1
found 329597 1.0.0.007-2.dfsg-2sarge1
But the BTS reacted to the first line with
reassign 344980 apt-utils
retitle 344980 'Please provide a means for generating Contents files for source
packages'
thanks
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 00:53 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org, www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
File: ftp://debian.org/, http://packages.debian.org,
On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 06:00 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
[...]
cvm, mailfront and vpopmail are not migrated yet, so it hasn't been done
yet. I only checked cvm, and on that package, there isn't even a bug
filed requesting it to be migrated.
What's up?
package xbase-clients
severity 345671 normal
merge 345671 345446
thanks
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 19:55 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
The new /usr/X11R6/bin/startx script contains statement that is
is not /bin/sh compatible. I use
On Wednesday, October 05, 2005 9:49 AM, Emiliano Gabrielli (aka AlberT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 10:46, you wrote:
[...]
Closing this report as this isn't a bug.
ok, sorry for the report .. I searched in the sh man page .. but it
was bash :-P
thnx for
package spamassassin
tags 333430 + patch
thanks
Duncan Findlay wrote, Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:58 PM:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:41:38PM -0400, Douglas F. Calvert wrote:
THe new spamassassin changes the syslog entries. The logcheck.ignore
files were not updated to reflect the new logging
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 10:26 -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
Package: exim
Severity: wishlist
spohr.debian.org aka bugs.debian.org gets a lot of spam. Sometimes
spammers try to send large ammounts of spam at once from many
locations. spohr is currently suffering such an attack, with over
, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
The main reason for doing so that is that the ftp team (at least those
regularly processing removals) don't use severities for that processing.
Curious. Why not? It seems to me that developers are not just random
in the severities they assign (and they can
unmerge 398899
severity 398899 serious
reassign 398899 python-iconvcodec
retitle 398899 python-iconvcodec: irrelevant for python 2.4; should not
ship with etch
unmerge 398039
severity 398039 serious
reassign 398039 python-cjkcodecs
retitle 398039 python-cjkcodecs: irrelevant for python 2.4, should
Hi,
On Monday, September 11, 2006 8:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Somehow the patch for the docu didn't make it. I'm submitting it with
this mail.
You may have done so, but it wasn't attached to the mail that arrived at the
bts...
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.3.7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
As discussed on #d-devel earlier today, it is necessary to include the
.orig.tar.gz again when uploading a package to a new section, in order not
to fall foul of a bug in dak (see #367267 and others). The attached
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 19:06 +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
Package: exim
Severity: normal
There is no SELinux policy for exim available so far.
Until this is resolved, users should use postfix or sendmail if they
intend to run SELinux.
You've filed this bug against the exim 3 packages,
Package: gnomeicu
Version: 0.99.10-1+b1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Hi,
gnomeicu is currently uninstallable on i386 due to a dependency on
exactly the same version of gnomeicu-common. The latter is Arch: all,
and this dependency therefore breaks when gnomeicu is bin-NMUed.
This issue can be
retitle 387916 [auto-cruft] RM: ferm/experimental -- RoM; NVIU
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 15:12 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
The new version 1.2 of ferm has entered unstable, rendering version
1.1.0.trunk.r433-1 in experimental useless. Please remove it.
The
retitle 395030 RM: clustalw [m68k s390] -- RoM; uninstallable
thanks
Hi,
On Tuesday, October 24, 2006 2:28 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
clustalw was NMUed during the lesstif transition, but not rebuilt on
every arch on which it was already available. As a consequence, it
retitle 397241 RM: chetcpaswd -- RoM; RC-buggy; security issues
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 16:52 -0200, Eriberto wrote:
The upstream author is not willing to cooperate on fixing the reported
bugs and considers Debian to be too demanding. Still, the upstream
disrespected the Debian
# Purely for documentation
retitle 394044 RM: ctsim:ctsim-athlon -- RoM; NBS
thanks
Hi,
On Thursday, October 19, 2006 4:32 AM, Kevin Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
The ctsim source package no longer supports or builds the ctsim-athlon
package (due to that CPU declining in popularity)
Hi,
On Thursday, October 19, 2006 6:37 AM, Mike Hommey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: bugs.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #393990
I think I'm seeing this bug on xulrunner.
#390140, #390472 and #391119 don't show up in the source or binary
package summary... but the package is correctly
merge 396600 385450
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 13:37 -0500, Norbert Veber wrote:
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.1.4-1
Severity: wishlist
http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Apache-SpamAssassin-3.1.7-available!-tf2415849.html
Already reported as #385450; merging.
Regards,
Adam
--
retitle 392403 RM: discover1-data -- RoM; superseded by discover-data
thanks
Hi,
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote, Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:52:41 +0200
I just uploaded a new version of the discover-data source which
now replaces the discover1-data source package completely. It
generates the
Hi,
On Friday, September 29, 2006 11:00 AM, Andrew Schulman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, this bug is fixed in the upstream version 1.1.0, but that
version is still quite buggy and unstable at present.
I think you might have meant 3870*8*6. The bug you actually sent it to is a
samba bug... :)
Hi,
On Monday, October 02, 2006 10:50 AM, Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writing this to request the removal of some built packages
from unstable/testing.
You'll need to ask the Release Team ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in order to
get the packages removed from testing.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 15:50 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Monday, October 02, 2006 10:50 AM, Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writing this to request the removal of some built packages
from unstable/testing.
You'll need to ask the Release Team ([EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 18:52 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Julien BLACHE writes:
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-13
Severity: important
Hi,
gcc-4.1 bails out with an error while build OpenSER 1.1.0-3 on arm, see
[G... let's see if we can send it with some content this time...]
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 21:32 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
[...]
One question.
If I change the architecture list (remove or add). Do you need to manually
do things in order for it to take effect (especially remove) or can
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 21:32 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
[...]
One question.
If I change the architecture list (remove or add). Do you need to manually
do things in order for it to take effect (especially remove) or can I control
it myself this way?
Regards,
// Ola
Regards,
Adam
retitle 379332 RM: kernel-patch-2.2.25-m68k -- RoQA; obsolete
thanks
Hi,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote, Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:29 PM
[...]
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:05:34PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
OK, it's clear from
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 09:41 -0400, Graham wrote:
Package: clamav
Version: 0.88.4-2
When I run clamscan as root, it shows this message:
ERROR: Can't get information about user clamav
then exits without scanning anything.
Indeed, there does not seem to be a clamav user on my
On Thursday, October 05, 2006 9:06 AM, Ryan Finnie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ryan Finnie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: grepcidr
Erm... didn't you already submit this as #391168? :)
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
reassign 391359 qa.debian.org
thanks
On Friday, October 06, 2006 9:51 AM, Raúl Sánchez Siles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
With aptitude changelog is quite easy to know the latest modifications
of a package, but it quite often refers to new upstream release.
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:00 +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
Debian Installer a écrit :
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
collatinus-doc_7.14-1_all.deb: package says section is text, override says
doc.
package ftp.debian.org
severity 388381 wishlist
merge 388381 337968
thanks
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:58 AM, Robert Millan [ackstorm]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
See:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=384285;msg=28;mbox=yes
Mail contains UTF-8 characters
package ftp.debian.org
block 382907 with 370436
block 384179 with 370436
block 378751 with 370436
block 378752 with 370436
severity 382907 normal
thanks mate
Hi,
As Jeroen pointed out in #370436 a while ago, mozilla won't be removed from
the archive until a suitable replacement (i.e. seamonkey)
Hi,
Mike Hommey wrote, Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:47 PM
I figured out libgnutls11, 12, and 13 were pulled out when
debootstraping a fresh sid. We may want to drop the priority for the
libgnutls11 one from important to optional. There shouldn't be any
reverse dependency requiring it being
block 382907 with 370436
block 384179 with 370436
block 378751 with 370436
block 378752 with 370436
thanks
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 17:08 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
unblock 382907 with 370436
[...]
As Jeroen pointed out in #370436 a while ago, mozilla won't be removed from
the archive until a
Hi,
On Thursday, September 21, 2006 5:55 AM, Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
[...]
On that basis, this is just a quick ping to confirm that these
bugs will not be actioned until mozilla has actually been removed.
If it's not obvious that the blocking
retitle 382330 RM: gmime2.1 -- RoM; superseded by gmime2.2
thanks
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 11:40 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 07:32:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
Once gmime2.2 is accepted in the archive, and tomboy, beagle, balsa and
pan
merge 385781 389308
thanks
On Monday, September 25, 2006 1:12 AM, Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
On bug #385781 I forgot to ask to remove hardinfo from unstable too. I
want to remove support to alpha, arm, ia64, m68k, s390 on
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:46 AM, Klemens Kasemaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Package: cpp-3.3
Version: gcc-3.3-base
Erm... that's not a version number of the package cpp-3.3.
Severity: important
Cannot install gcc because of dependency problem:
cpp-3.3: Depends: gcc-3.3-base
Hi,
This was downgraded to normal, without comment, by
Adam D. Barratt who is not a Debian developer and
is not listed in any ftpmaster documentation I can find
either in the list at http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
or http://ftp-master.debian.org/.
No, I'm not a developer. I have
On Tuesday, August 08, 2006 10:55 AM, Benoit Panizzon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: clamav
Version: 0.88.3-0volatile1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: causes serious data loss
Looks like this has not been reported yet:
Well, except that you already did, 15 minutes
reassign 382249 debbugs
merge 382249 89569
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 14:08 -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
[...]
If I go to http://bugs.debian.org/ and do a search by submitter email,
the following searches give different results:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The latter
retitle 382330 [auto-cruftable] RM: gmime2.1 -- RoM; superseded by
gmime2.2
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 13:32 +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
[...]
Once gmime2.2 is accepted in the archive, and tomboy, beagle, balsa and pan
are
recompiled gmime2.1 source package can be removed.
package ftp.debian.org
retitle 382781 RM: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-cs -- Ro??; superseded by
thunderbird-locales
tags 382781 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 12:14 +0200, Hans Öfverbeck wrote:
Could you please remove the following SOURCE packages:
mozilla-thunderbird-locale-cs
package ftp.debian.org
retitle 382781 RM: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-cs -- RoM; superseded by
thunderbird-locales
tags 382781 - moreinfo
thanks
---BeginMessage---
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 14:25 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
package ftp.debian.org
retitle 382781 RM: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-cs
reassign 348089 debian-builder
thanks
On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 18:52 +0100, Laurent George wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43.1
Severity: minor
when we want to see athlon-builder can only show with : apt-cache search
athlon-bulder without the i ,
and when we do : apt-cache
On Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:31 AM, Jeremy Malcolm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Marc Haber wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 03:22:30PM +0800, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
[...]
Which part of documentation is wrong?
update-exim4.conf(8):
dc_other_hostnames
is used to build the
On Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:08 PM, Iosif Peterfi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sarge stable hasn't been updated yet.
Yes, it has. #320014 is CAN-2005-2450, which was fixed in clamav
0.84-2.sarge.2 in August 2005.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 20:39 +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, aurelien said:
the /etc/init.d/clamav-freshclam, used in the postinst script, is
missing. It prevents package installation.
$ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/clamav-freshclam_0.88-2_i386.deb | grep init
[Not sure if Jeroen was following this bug any more, so added to Cc]
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 19:00 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 11:02:36PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Justin Pryzby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060120 15:59]:
In the past, the developers reference has said
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 16:33 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
When a bug contains ‘merged-upstream’ information as a result of an
appropriate ‘forwarded’ command, the resulting bug report page
generated has an invalid URL in the page.
An example: bug#494058 URL:http://bugs.debian.org/494058 was
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 00:36 -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
Look at the notice that I reassigned the bug in this report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422944
strongBug reassigned from package `a
href=pkgreport.cgi?pkg=wnppwnpp/a#39; to `a
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 18:23 +0100, James Westby wrote:
My use case for uscan --download-version is to programatically retrieve
old versions of an upstream tarball. Currently this will give output
like this:
[...]
Newest version on remote site is 0.81.5, local version is 0.82.0
= remote
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 19:39 -0400, Eric Gerlach wrote:
Admission: That second patch was horribly broken.
I've attached a third patch, this one actually works on git repositories
*with* commits too.
Just a quick note to let you know that we're not ignoring your
patch. :-)
I've got a
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 10:29 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: libnet-netrc-ruby
Version: 0.2.1-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20081006 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in a lenny chroot, your package
Hi,
Josh Triplett wrote, Monday, October 13, 2008 8:54 AM
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 06:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
please could you try devscripts 2.10.39 once it hits the
mirrors and see if that fixes the problem? (specifically the HELO
handling changes).
My laptop doesn't have an /etc
Hi,
Eric Gerlach wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
I've got a local copy of debcommit with a slightly revised patch
(using exit status rather than attempting to parse the output) that
works great for commits and debcommit --diff $file but haven't
found a method that works properly
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 22:28 -0700, Rob Browning wrote:
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Rob,
* Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-21 14:23]:
[...]
Thanks for the report. I'll look in to this in the next few days.
Any news on that? Do you need an NMU in case you
Tim Dijkstra wrote, 2008-10-15 12:38 +0200:
Bradley Smith schreef:
tags 501997 +patch
I've tested this and it does indeed fix the problem.
I have attached a patch with the actual changes needed.
Let me know if you would like an NMU.
I would first want to know why we need that header. Why
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 22:58 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
On 08/10/15 13:04 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag said ...
On 08/10/11 21:51 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld said ...
Hmm, if that bug affects many other packages it would probably better
to get a fixed nant in lenny instead.
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 06:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 22:58 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
I posted a nmudiff to #483073 and it would be great if someone who is
able to reproduce tests the fix before we do an upload.
In a repeated build run overnight
Hi,
root wrote:
The attached patch updated old FSF addresses information in all files
(SVN checkout 2008-10-17):
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330,
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag 502517 uscan
severity 502517 minor
retitle 502517 [uscan] Document USCAN_TIMEOUT
thanks
Hi,
Jari Aalto wrote:
Uscan code contains:
my %config_vars = (
'USCAN_TIMEOUT' = 20,
This one admittedly isn't documented. I'll add it shortly;
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 07:47 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During installation, dokuwiki seems to prompt for things, then fails.
Running outside piuparts:
Setting up dokuwiki (0.0.20080505-2) ...
X_LOADTEMPLATEFILE /var/lib/dpkg/info/ucf.templates ucf
[...]
dpkg: --compare-versions takes
package python-apt
severity 459821 grave
notfixed 459821 0.74
found 459821 0.74
close 459821
thanks
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 18:33 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 459821 important
Bug#459821: uninstallable: needs to depend on a apt
) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add missing dependencies on openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver and
+update-inetd, since netbase no longer provides either (Closes: #502828)
+
+ -- Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:42:08 +0100
+
netkit-rwall (0.17-6) unstable
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 00:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Attached is the diff for my NMU of netkit-rwall (versioned as 0.17-6.1).
The changelog entry for the upload is:
netkit-rwall (0.17-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Add missing dependencies
reassign 503058 devscripts
thanks
Hi,
Sebastian Krysmanski wrote:
When specifying a different location for the changelog file (i.e. not
debian/changelog) and using --increment the changelog file gets
changed correctly but then the following error occurs:
[...]
It doesn't matter whether one
Hi,
On Mon, August 25, 2008 11:56, Holger Levsen wrote:
downgrading severity, as this is about an old issue with tetex and because
there is probably even a lintian check for this already. (Too lazy to
confirm
now, thus I'm also not reassigning the bug to lintian yet.)
As far as I can see,
On Thu, August 28, 2008 14:07, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:31:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
But this package has a deliberate *or'ed* build-dependency to facilitate
backporting:
libcups2-dev | libcupsys2-dev
So this is not an error, and lintian should not
#lintian (1.25.0) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * checks/debhelper{,.desc}:
#+ [FL] Do not require versioned build-depends for compat level 5
# anymore. Sarge is not supported anymore. (Closes: #496826)
# * checks/fields{,.desc}:
#+ [ADB] Don't issue an error tag for obsolete packages
#devscripts (2.10.36) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * debcommit: When committing to a bzr repository with a message including
#bug closures, pass corresponding --fixes to bzr. Thanks James Westby for
#the patch. (Closes: #496643)
# * nmudiff: Add support for using $DEBFULLNAME as well as
#devscripts (2.10.36) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * cowpoke: If BUILDD_ROOTCMD is set, use BUILDD_USER for debrsigning, rather
#than root. Patch from Cyril Brulebois. (Closes: #495536)
#
package devscripts
tags 495536 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 00:51 +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.24.4
Severity: important
the check for embedded prototype javacsript library is prone to many
false positives, as prototype is a pretty common word in js-space,
and also that it can be common for
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 02:21 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:37:54AM +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:25, Raphael Geissert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
the check for embedded prototype javacsript library is prone to
#lintian (2.0.0~rc1) experimental; urgency=low
#
# * checks/files{,.desc}:
#+ [ADB] Re-add an accidentally removed slash to the check for embedded
# Javascript libraries, removing some false positives. (Closes: #497215)
#
package lintian
tags 497215 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 12:03 -0300, Jose Carlos Medeiros wrote:
Package: security.debian.org
Severity: important
Hi,
Im fowarding this security bug reported by awffull upstream.
Im mantain awffull package and it havent this bug as I updated to
3.7.4 version.
This package must be
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 22:24 +0200, Moritz Naumann wrote:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
The search / redirection
http://packages.qa.debian.org/common/index.html
points to may provide unexpected results in some cases.
For example, put a single dot into the search box and
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 17:17 +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
In your website www.debian.org/CD/faq/index.de.html#record-windows the
section about CDBurnerXP Pro the link Handbuch des Programms (in the
program's manual) is broken.
The link appears to be working again.
Regards,
Adam
--
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 22:04 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
Looking at lintian.debian.org, the new
versioned-dependency-satisfied-by-perl check incorrectly triggers on the
perl and perl-modules packages due to their Conflicts and Replaces fields.
The attached patch makes the check simply ignore
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 19:19 -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
usertags 496520 + Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496520: Insecure use of /tmp in sympa scripts
Ignoring illegal tag/s: [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 20:48 +0200, Luca Bruno wrote:
merge 145575 298821
untag 298821 sarge
thanks
Hello,
thanks very much for your help!
The patch is as similar as the merged bug one, it looks good.
Apologies if there was a Bcc:, but note that by default [EMAIL PROTECTED]
doesn't
1 - 100 of 12755 matches
Mail list logo
