On 30/03/2019 10:16, Andy Simpkins wrote:
On 30/03/2019 09:56, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
i wrote:
The same checksum duplicity can be seen with
5849124a0e25d1318a880e98b9a8123f
debian-live-9.8.0-amd64-cinnamon.contents
5849124a0e25d1318a880e98b9a8123f
debian-live-9.8.0-amd64
On 30/03/2019 08:49, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
(Cc-ing debian-l...@lists.debian.org)
Evert Kuijpers wrote to debian-cd:
Both debian-live-9.8.0-i386-lxde.contents and
debian-live-9.8.0-i386-mate.contents have all the same hashes.
Both debian-live-9.8.0-amd64-lxde.contents and
On 30/03/2019 09:56, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
i wrote:
The same checksum duplicity can be seen with
5849124a0e25d1318a880e98b9a8123f debian-live-9.8.0-amd64-cinnamon.contents
5849124a0e25d1318a880e98b9a8123f debian-live-9.8.0-amd64-gnome.contents
Andy Simpkins wrote
On 20/02/19 18:28, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please indicate your availablility out of:
>
> - April 13
> - April 20 (Easter weekend)
Sorry I am away for the above two weekends
> - April 27
Can do
>
/Andy
Hi there,
We have the release of Buster scheduled to happen next Saturday. As
always on a release day new iso images are generated and *before* they
get signed we try and smoke test them to make sure that the builds went
ok and nothing critical is missing from the manifests. We do the same
for
I wouldn't object to dropping the older hashes completely
On 16 July 2019 16:04:28 BST, Holger Levsen wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 03:58:13PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> ...I'm looking
>> into dropping generation of the older, less secure MD5 and SHA1
>> checksums. I'm planning on
On 19/08/19 17:00, slow_sp...@att.net wrote:
> You may be interested to know that the iso's listed at
> https://cdimage.debian.org/images/unofficial/non-free/images-including-firmware/10.0.0-live+nonfree/amd64/iso-hybrid/
>
> are missing some firmware information.
>
> I selected the
Ok I'll mark it on family calendar
On 29 July 2019 10:47:09 GMT-03:00, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>Ok, we have a winner. Let's make them both 7th September so press
>aren't
>under too much pressure.
>
>--
>Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
>Debian Developer
Either wfm thanks
On 21 July 2019 00:36:30 BST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 07:35:01PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> - August 24th
>
>I have no idea how I missed the event that weekend...
>
>> - Auguest 31st
>> - September 7th
>
>These look like the two options so
Right now you would get a "no network device found" / "no netwirk found" /
"unable obtain an IP address" message.
Is this not sufficiant?
You are given the option to go back and try again. Please remember that it is
also possible that no wifi device wiuld have been detected either.
Lets face
You also have a user account as well.
So you can, and should, log in using that.
On 5 February 2020 01:22:56 GMT, ykla wrote:
>If you set root password when you installs debian, then system will not
>install package sudo. But debian ban root login default. So install CD
>should install sudo
What are the many errors you are seeing?
From what I recall things take a while (in the case of some platforms without a
HRND enabled that can be several hours) to buuld up enough entropy before some
services (such as sshd) can successfully start.
I agree that havegd will help here. But is
Sorry. No.
It isn't safe to mirror security patches because we can not assure the
integrity of the updates on a mirror server.
We are aware that bandwidth is limited either for financial or geographic
reasons.This is why you can install from local media without network
access.
However
I stand corrected.
I learned somthing new today
Thanks
On 6 February 2020 12:54:03 GMT, Ian Campbell wrote:
>On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 07:41 +0000, Andy Simpkins wrote:
>> It isn't safe to mirror security patches because we can not assure
>> the integrity of the updates on
I can do any of these. Probably best avoid FOSDEM though.
/Andy
On 6 January 2020 21:42:29 GMT, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It's (really past) time to consider a date for the next point releases
>for buster and stretch.
>
>I've listed some suggested dates below; please indicate which you
Hi Jason
You might want to wait a few hours. we are in the middle of 10.4 release right
now. So expext 10.4 XFCE. To be availabe today (overnight?)
Cheers
On 9 May 2020 13:38:06 BST, Jason Quinn wrote:
>Thanks Steve for the quick reply.
>
>You are correct. My report appears to be a false
I can do either and have no preferance.
/Andy
On 9 September 2020 19:24:06 BST, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>We're slightly off our previous schedule because of delaying 10.5, but
>we should really get on with arranging 10.6.
>
>Please could you confirm your availability, and any
On 18 July 2020 22:39:05 BST, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:12:41PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>>On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 15:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 12:46 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> > Argh, massive apologies...
>>> >
On 15/06/20 19:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adam D. Barratt (2020-06-15):
>> To get the ball rolling, please could you confirm your availability
>> for:
>>
>> - July 11/12
>> - July 18/19
>
>
> Anyway, I should be available, whatever date(s) get picked.
>
Preferance would be the
Thanks.
Will keep that weekend free
On 2 November 2020 21:07:27 GMT, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The next point release for "buster" (10.7) is scheduled for Saturday
>December 5th. Processing of new uploads into buster-proposed-updates
>will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
>
Of cause firefox claims that the browser is working as intended and this is
correct behavior (relying on the Google safe browsing API)
Google on the other hand don't provide a working, reliable method to resolve
their proprietary API database issues.
Perhaps it is time to push for the feture
Isy and I can do any of these dates.
We'll keep the dates clear until you announce the point release.
Cheers
On 30 October 2020 19:10:20 GMT, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>In an attempt to be slightly more efficient than usual at planning a
>point release... it's about a month since 10.6,
I can do either, it's not like I can go anywhere either weekend :-)
Isy is available to help as well.
/Andy
On 16 January 2021 21:54:25 GMT, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Adam D. Barratt (2021-01-16):
>> Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
>> the following:
>>
>> -
On 08/06/2021 19:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi all again,
On 07-06-2021 23:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 20:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Nevermind 10 July. Steve, you can stop contemplating about it. We'll
go for 24 July as the *tentative* release date.
Unfortunately I've
On 07/06/21 19:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 06-06-2021 20:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> With the availability of Adam now known (and some off-list info), we have:
>>
>> 26 June
>> [Ansgar (ftp), Sebastian (release), Adam (release)]
>> 3 July
>> [Ansgar (ftp), Paul (release), Adam
On 07/06/2021 22:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 20:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi all,
On 06-06-2021 20:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
With the availability of Adam now known (and some off-list info),
we have:
[...]
So, what to pick? We still believe that shorter freezes are
Isy and I can do 12th or 19th.
We have a prior commitment on the 26th... Sorry
/Andy (rattusrattus)
On 30 May 2021 17:41:54 BST, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We're now a little overdue for 10.10, but it looks like we're ready in
>terms of shim etc. changes, so we should look at dates.
Or if you really need the binaries for each and every package in your chosen
architecture you could run your own mirror.
Because lets face it if you need every package you are running multiple
machines because many packages can not coexist with others...
On 5 February 2021 09:14:45 GMT, Alexey
Preferance would be 27th
But can do the others if need be.
/Andy (& Isy)
On 15 March 2021 20:54:45 GMT, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>Hi!
>
>El 15 de marzo de 2021 13:33:15 CET, "Adam D. Barratt"
> escribió:
>>Hi,
>>
>>It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point
Hi Terry
That is strange, the Live images should work just fine without needing
to enter any password to login.
I have tested most of the images myself, they start with the desktop
associated with the image that you chose and do not require that you
enter a username or password.
Should
On 14/09/2021 20:14, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 07:04:11PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the responses everyone. Mark indicated on IRC that he'd be
happy to be ftpmaster-du-jour on any of the dates.
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 12:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 06/09/2021 12:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt (2021-09-06):
We've ended up being late with planning 10.11 due to the timing of the
bullseye release, and also need to look at getting 11.1 sorted.
Traditionally, we've combined stable and oldstable point releases (at
2-
On 23/11/2021 20:18, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hey Adam!
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 08:12:11PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
It's (a little past) time that we organised the next point release. As
an "every other" release, this time will only be for stable.
Any of the first three weekends of December
On 18/07/2021 00:24, Donald Norwood wrote:
Hi!
On 7/17/21 4:58 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:25:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi all,
On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
would love to confirm
On 07/03/2022 23:38, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:51:57PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
Hi,
As you may have noticed, we're a bit overdue now for both 11.3 and the
penultimate buster point release, 10.12.
Some potential dates:
- March 19th (means freezing next weekend, so not
On 9 November 2023 18:15:43 GMT, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
>On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 14:55 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:28:21AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> > Argh, forgot to respond to this. :-(
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 06:59:03PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire
On 20 May 2022 15:11:09 BST, Zhang Boyang wrote:
>Package: debian-cd
>
>Hello,
>
>I suggest debian release a new variant of ISO images, the all-in-one images.
>These all-in-one image contains ALL debian packages in a single ISO image
>(possibly all source packages in another all-in-one ISO
On 17 June 2022 21:04:02 BST, "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 08:31:23PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for
>> bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the Deb{Camp,Conf}
>> period. I think
On 7 August 2023 18:22:09 BST, M Goppold wrote:
Greetings People!!
Seems in the testing cd-s, I dont see i386 at all anymore.
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/
I tried web searches to find out the status of debian and i386. But I couldnt
find any information. Maybe its due
On 28 June 2023 09:09:42 BST, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-28):
>> The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September
>> 2023. Please indicate your availability for:
>>
>> 23 Sep
>> 30 Sep (preferred)
>> 7 Oct
>
>I should be able to make any of those
On 29/03/2024 22:34, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:24:09PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2024-02-16 at 17:35 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
The next point release for "bookworm" (12.6) is scheduled for
Saturday, April 6th. Processing of new uploads into bookworm-
On 01/04/2024 13:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
As we had to postpone 12.6, let's look at alternative dates.
April 13th
- Not great for me for personal reasons, mhy previously said no. I
could probably do if need be
April 20th
- Doesn't work for me; I'm away from the Tuesday before until late
On 21/04/2024 01:57, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 05:41:13PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:58:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hiya!
Not wanting to pester *too* much, but where are we up to?
Right now I can still have 27th April on the cards
43 matches
Mail list logo
