Branden Robinson writes (Re: Ian Jackson, please get me the hell off your
blacklist.):
I see no reason not to reply [...]
I think you are being hypocritical. You complain when other people
post their opinions and discussions of this topic with you, yet you
post your own diatribes here. Since
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 12:56:11AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
I think you are being hypocritical. You complain when other people
post their opinions and discussions of this topic with you, yet you
post your own diatribes here. Since your request to keep the
discussion to private email seems
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:08:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
your right to free speech does not include the right to force anyone
else to listen.
Then this principle must
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:53:06AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Your complaint against us using the DUL is valid. It should not be
used. Your complaint against IWJ is not, and your complain/threat
against Debian even less so since we are not doing that.
I'm making no threat. I reserve the
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
your right to free speech does not include the right to force anyone
else to listen.
Then this principle must apply universally. I reserve the right to ignore
bug reports for any reason I choose, then.
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:00:35PM +0100, Diana Galletly wrote:
Yes, sure we could get other addresses that don't use SAUCE, but
some of them might use DUL or some such, and then Joseph would be
ranting ...
Well, everything has consequences.
Sysadmins have the right to employ DUL.
People on
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:08:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
your right to free speech does not include the right to force anyone
else to listen.
Then this principle must apply universally. I reserve the right to ignore
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 03:11:27PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:08:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
your right to free speech does not include the right to force anyone
else to listen.
Then
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 02:09:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Then that is what you do every time you reject an incoming mail message
having to do with project business.
you know, you have a point there - if i wanted to redefine reality into
some bizarre idiosyncratic perception of it then
Branden Robinson writes (Re: Ian Jackson, please get me the hell off your
blacklist.):
Sending me mails -- with whatever content -- and discarding my replies
regardless of their content is nothing short of harassment.
[further polemic]
I reiterate, iwj and I are discussing this in private
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 03:20:00PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
If you really want the topic only to continue in email I suggest that
you abide by that yourself ! If you continue to post these kinds of
heated messages on -devel you can hardly complain when people respond.
It's a matter of
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 11:32:49AM +0100, Stephen Early wrote:
All of the recent discussion about various blacklists, dial-up user
lists, etc. seems to have frayed people's tempers. I see a lot of
messages from angry people, with little useful content. I suggest
everyone takes a step back and
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:43:27AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I'm fighting with iwj about this in private mail, and won't trouble
the lists further about it at this time.
I do have a better idea of what's going on now, but I still feel his
MTA is presuming my box guilty of spam generation
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:43:27AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
why? it's his mail server, he can do what he likes with it. he is
entitled to reject or defer mail delivery to his system for any reason
he chooses, regardless of
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
your right to free speech does not include the right to force anyone
else to listen.
I think Branden's whole point was that he doesn't like to be forced to
listen to something
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you don't correct this at once I will be forced to re-evaluate my place
within a project that is nominally devoted to free and open communication
among
its members and the rest of the world.
Your complaint against us using the DUL is valid. It
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
Mar 29 15:20:15 apocalypse sendmail[7886]: e2T8qEi03048: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.greenend.org.uk, ctladdr=branden (1000/1000), delay=11:28:01, xdelay
=00:00:21, mailer=esmtp, pri=6332789, relay=chiark.greenend.org.uk.
[195.224.76.132], dsn=4.2.0,
Branden Robinson writes (Ian Jackson, please get me the hell off your
blacklist.):
Mar 29 15:20:15 apocalypse sendmail[7886]: e2T8qEi03048: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
ctladdr=branden (1000/1000), delay=11:28:01, xdelay=00:00:21, mailer=esmtp,
pri=6332789, relay=chiark.greenend.org.uk.
18 matches
Mail list logo
