Re: to build "JVerein"

Am 07.07.19 um 22:02 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Hi Mechtilde, > > Le 07/07/2019 à 18:45, Mechtilde Stehmann a écrit : > >> Or where should I look for a solution? > > If you don't absolutely need an official Debian package but just a .deb > that you distribute yourself I recommend using jdeb >

Re: New Package JVerein

Hallo Mechtilde, Am 25.05.19 um 08:51 schrieb Mechtilde: [...] > Can someone advise me through the steps? I just comment on all the warnings I can find. source-contains-prebuilt-java-object The upstream sources contain various jar files. We always remove them from the upstream tarball to

Re: openjdk-8 removed from Buster?

Hello, Am 29.04.19 um 17:29 schrieb Thomas L: > It seems that openjdk-8 was also removed from jessie-backports. > Why? Is it a mistake? jessie-backports is obsolete and no longer supported. Regards, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Request to join Debian Java Packaging Project

Hi, Am 01.04.19 um 15:26 schrieb Andrius Merkys: > Hello, > > I have recently been granted Developer rights in Debian Java Project on > Salsa (as 'merkys'). However, I am unable to create new repositories > there, and I am willing to upload a couple of new packages. Are there > additional

Re: One step ahead but compile errors (Was: netlib-java contains nealy empty jar)

version. Cheers, Markus From: Markus Koschany Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:44:22 +0100 Subject: URLClassLoader --- src/org/netlib/generate/JavaGenerator.java | 14 -- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/org/netlib/generate/JavaGenerator.java b/src/org/netlib

Re: One step ahead but compile errors (Was: netlib-java contains nealy empty jar)

, well explained here: http://java9.wtf/class-loading/ (I love the homepage name) I tried to follow the solution and hope it helps. Regards, Markus From: Markus Koschany Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:44:22 +0100 Subject: URLClassLoader --- src/org/netlib/generate/JavaGenerator.java | 17

Re: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Am 13.03.19 um 17:47 schrieb Matthias Klose: > On 13.03.19 10:54, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about >>> this? >> >> In case there is no answer to this question I assume

Re: Bug#923756: libhac-java: FTBFS in buster/sid

Control: reassign -1 javahelper Control: retitle -1 javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module Am 05.03.19 um 21:06 schrieb Andreas Tille: [...] > Considering that the problem can be solved by fixing javatools instead > of libhac-java do you think

Re: Bug#923756: libhac-java: FTBFS in buster/sid

ore fine grained control about their -doc packages and we don't have to worry about those errors anymore. Here is my proposed patch for jh_build against src:javatools master. Regards, Markus From e731cb503712fea1618b9b3bff041c89800bcf1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Koschany Date: Tue, 5

Re: jruby FTBFS with openjdk-9

Version: 9.1.17.0-1 Am 26.02.19 um 21:00 schrieb Miguel Landaeta: > Thanks again for fixing the outstanding RC bugs on this package!! Fully agreed! I guess we can close those bugs now. Cheers, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: jruby FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi, Am 25.02.19 um 19:40 schrieb Miguel Landaeta: > Hi Markus, > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 08:39:48PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: >> JRuby is a mess. I guess we "just" need to package the latest upstream >> release to fix the FTBFS bugs. Nobody felt like doing th

Powermock RC #875358

Hi, powermock has been failing to build from source since we introduced OpenJDK 9 to Debian. It has not been removed yet because several packages build-depend on it. reverse-depends -b libpowermock-java Reverse-Build-Depends-Indep === * jline2 Reverse-Build-Depends

Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name

Hi tony, Am 17.02.19 um 21:27 schrieb tony mancill: [...] > Assuming the rest of my ratt build is successful, any concerns with an > upload to unstable referring to 919798? (Are there any other suitable > options at this point?) No objections from my side. I don't know a better solution at the

Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name

Hi Ingo, Am 17.02.19 um 16:45 schrieb Ingo Bauersachs: > Tony, Markus > >> [...] >> Any thoughts on whether we should focus on fixing javadoc generation or >> look at other ways to mitigate the FTBFS? > > I've been notified that weupnp [1] has been marked for autoremoval [2] > because of this

Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name

Hi tony! Am 15.02.19 um 15:42 schrieb tony mancill: [...] > Hi Markus, > > We independently executed identical experiments, which I'm glad for, > because I would have wanted some external verification before uploading > any of this to unstable. (I started building the r-build-deps of >

Re: old version of scala

Am 14.02.19 um 22:59 schrieb Thomas Finneid: [...] > Either this is what I had in mind originally or some detail is missing. > > Said another way, the rules script is in two parts. The first part is > used in experimental, to download external sbt tools to bootstrap the > build of the pre-version

Re: old version of scala

Am 14.02.19 um 17:45 schrieb Thomas Finneid: > On 14.02.2019 11:55, Markus Koschany wrote:> > >> What you can do of course is to patch sbt or scala. We use so-called >> quilt patches. For instance take a look at sbt. In debian/patches you >> can see several Debian s

Re: sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8

Am 14.02.19 um 17:21 schrieb Thomas Finneid: > On 14.02.2019 11:43, Markus Koschany wrote:> [btw are you subscribed to > the list? Then I don't need to CC you] > > Sorry, it seemed I had subscribed to the wrong java list, but should be > fixed now. > >>> No matt

Re: old version of scala

Am 14.02.19 um 00:22 schrieb Thomas Finneid: > > > On 12.02.2019 22:40, Markus Koschany wrote: >> There are different rules for contrib and non-free. [1] You could >> package scala and sbt for contrib, because both pieces of software >> comply with the DFSG. If

Re: sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8

[btw are you subscribed to the list? Then I don't need to CC you] Am 14.02.19 um 00:09 schrieb Thomas Finneid: [...] > No matter how one looks at it, Debian needs to make a strategy change > regarding OpenJdk releases and versions supported. We did take all that into consideration. :) If you had

Re: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name

Hi, Am 26.01.19 um 20:07 schrieb tony mancill: [...] > I'm trying to peel the onion and believe that this is a problem in the > maven-javadoc-plugin package. I found the same issue for a project > outside of Debian, for example [1], which refers to a JIRA ticket for that > plugin [2]. There is

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Hi Robert, Am 12.02.19 um 20:09 schrieb Robert Scholte: [...] > Hi Markus, > > first of all thanks for the insights, it is important for us to know how > Maven is used and in which way we can improve that way-of-work. Hervé is > already working hard on the reproducible builds specs with your

Re: sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8

Am 12.02.19 um 23:14 schrieb Thomas Finneid: [...] > Is Scala and Sbt the only software that haven't migrated away from > jdk-8? considering how much time and money the entire world has invested > in jdk-8, I think its a bit early to remove it. > > (At work, 70 developers have spent the last

Re: sbt / scala and jdk 6 and 8

Hi, Am 12.02.19 um 22:45 schrieb Thomas Finneid: [...] > Is there a jdk6 version available in Debian? I think I have read > something about removing jdk-8 from debian, is that correct? > > Also, if I understand the Debian/Java Policy correctly, all jvm-based > packages must depend on

Re: old version of scala

Hi Thomas, [I add debian-java back to CC in case someone else can reply with something helpful] Am 12.02.19 um 22:17 schrieb Thomas Finneid: > > > On 08.02.2019 22:12, Markus Koschany wrote: >> First of all thank you for your interest in helping us to improve Scala >> in

Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Hello, Dalibor Topic (Oracle) and Robert Scholte (Apache Maven) contacted me and were so kind to agree to make this discussion public, so that others can chime in too. I would like to use the opportunity to answer the initial question "what we are interested in seeing better supported from build

Re: old version of scala

Hi Thomas, Am 08.02.19 um 03:54 schrieb Thomas Finneid: [...] > I have been trying to read some of the documentation on package > mainteneance, especially "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" and the newer > "Guide for Debian Maintainers". > I havent been able to find yet, any documentation that

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Hi, I'm still recovering from the infamous conference flu but I wanted to give you a short report about the talk and the discussions afterwards. You can find all the relevant links here. [1] While I was going through all the stuff we talked about, I realized that I would easily exceed my time

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Am 01.02.19 um 23:53 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 01/02/2019 à 22:41, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> It is not very important but if you have some spare time in the next month >> we could figure this out and create some sort of statistics page like >> >> h

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Am 01.02.19 um 21:39 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 01/02/2019 à 14:28, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : Great. Thanks! > Total packages added to testing: 179 > Total packages removed from testing: 95 > Total packages updated in testing: 291 > Total packages upgraded in testing: 283 What numbers do we

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Hi! Am 01.02.19 um 14:28 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Hi Markus, > > Le 29/01/2019 à 19:00, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> I will attend FOSDEM 19 in Brussels this weekend (03.02.2019, 12:40 >> local time) and give a lightning talk (15 min) about our heroics. >> >&

Re: Buster soft freeze question

Hi, Am 30.01.19 um 20:55 schrieb Felix Natter: > hi Debian-java, > > I would like to get freeplane-1.7.5-1 into buster, because it contains > important fixes. Unfortunately, upstream is still fixing regressions. > > For stretch, a soft freeze is described as: > "no new packages, no re-entry,

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Am 30.01.19 um 11:10 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner: > > Great that you are giving that talk! I think the Java Team's work is > generally under-appreciated, so getting the word out should help with > that. Here's what I would add: > > I think one thing to mention is how the Debian Java Team

FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Hi all, I will attend FOSDEM 19 in Brussels this weekend (03.02.2019, 12:40 local time) and give a lightning talk (15 min) about our heroics. https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/debian_java/ Naturally there is not enough time to explain everything in detail but it should be adequate to put

Bug#920703: RM: mysql-connector-java -- ROM; replaced by mariadb-connector-java

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Dear ftp team, please remove mysql-connector-java from Debian. It was replaced by mariadb-connector-java which is a drop-in-replacement. No other package depends on it anymore. See also https://bugs.debian.org/912916 Regards, Markus

Re: Attempt to upgrade libjsonp-java - help needed

Am 24.01.19 um 17:47 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Markus, > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 12:27:35PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: >> If the documentation is not super important to you, I recommend to just >> drop the -doc package. > > Doc is absolutely not important

Re: Attempt to upgrade libjsonp-java - help needed

Hi, Am 24.01.19 um 11:31 schrieb Andreas Tille: > [ERROR] Exit code: 1 - javadoc: error - The code being documented uses > modules but the packages defined in > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/ are in the unnamed module. I believe this is Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/919798

Re: Netbeans 10 status

Am 22.01.19 um 17:08 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] > I have no objection to reuse the old classes from libequinox-osgi-java, > we are too short on time to work out a proper patch and netbeans is the > last package still using it anyway. Just ensure it doesn't conflict with > the other Eclipse

Re: Netbeans 10 status

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 22.01.19 um 16:43 schrieb Markus Koschany: > > > Am 22.01.19 um 16:30 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] >> What classes are missing? They are likely to be in one of the >> numerous libeclipse-*-java and libequinox-*-java

Re: Netbeans 10 status

Am 22.01.19 um 16:30 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] > What classes are missing? They are likely to be in one of the numerous > libeclipse-*-java and libequinox-*-java packages that were introduced. I thought so too in the beginning but I couldn't find them. I get hundreds of errors like error:

Netbeans 10 status

Hi all, on the 27th of December 2018 Netbeans 10 was finally released. Most importantly it supports Java 11 now. I have managed to update the beast and both libnb-platform18-java and netbeans itself can be built from source again. I need a bit more time to test Netbeans at runtime and I would

Re: Bug#917174: davmail: FTBFS with libjackrabbit-java 2.18.0

Hello Alex, Am 04.01.19 um 13:16 schrieb Alexandre Rossi: >>> unfortunately davmail fails to build from source with >>> libjackrabbit-java 2.18.0. Long deprecated methods have been removed. >>> Your package build-depends on a very old version of jackrabbit (2.4.3). > > This is too much work and

Re: Bug#893409: pixelmed FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi, Am 19.12.18 um 09:58 schrieb Andreas Tille: [...] > Any hint how to fix this? The missing class is in libjaxb-api-java. Just make sure it's on the CLASSPATH. Regards, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Verbose mvn output ?

Am 09.11.18 um 15:48 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > Hi there, > > What do I need to tweak to get a verbose mvn output in: > > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/fop/blob/wip-2.3/debian/rules You can override dh_auto_build like that override_dh_auto_build: dh_auto_build -- -X package

Re: Gradle and JDK 11 issues

Hi, Am 03.11.18 um 23:25 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] > For mockito (#910738) this issue has been fixed [1]. It seems to happen > when the build.gradle file doesn't specify the source/target level. Try > adding this: > > sourceCompatibility = 8 > targetCompatibility = 8 > > > Emmanuel

Re: OpenJDK default versions and security/patch updates

Hi, Am 27.10.18 um 12:38 schrieb Behrooz Nobakht: [...] > To summarize my questions: > > - Is there a policy page or a discussion list that clarifies when/how a >   security/patch update on OpenJDK is applied on a Debian (LTS) version? > > - How a default version of OpenJDK is chosen for a

Re: Now we have antlr 4.6 - any chance to get 4.7 soon (Was: beast-mcmc2: Cannot find symbol CharStreams.fromString(newick))

Am 19.10.18 um 17:33 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] > @Andreas: We have a script [1] to create the repositories on Salsa. It's > important to use it because it configures the IRC/BTS/mail hooks properly. > > [1] >

Re: Process for submitting a new release of package

Hi, Am 07.10.18 um 11:26 schrieb Miroslav Kravec: > What's the process? Make your changes, document everything in debian/changelog, set it to UNRELEASED and test that reverse-dependencies continue to work. Then make a pull request. Alternatively you can follow the instructions from

Bug#910308: ITP: jiconfont -- API to provide icons generated by any icon font

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany * Package name: jiconfont Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : jiconfont * URL : https://github.com/jIconFont/jiconfont * License : MIT Programming Lang: Java Description : API to provide icons

Bug#910304: ITP: commons-dbcp2 -- Database Connection Pooling Services 2

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany * Package name: commons-dbcp2 Version : 2.5.0 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation * URL : https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-dbcp/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java

Re: Unneeded empty repository akismet-java

Hi, Am 01.10.18 um 22:34 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > it seems > > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/akismet-java > > is empty and unneeded. I'd suggest to remove this repository. > > Kind regards > >Andreas. Removed. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: Repository java-team/libmatthew-java should be removed

Am 21.09.18 um 17:19 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > the repository > >https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libmatthew-java > > is totally outdated and unused. The packaging is currently happening here: > >https://salsa.debian.org/debian-iot-team/libmatthew-java > > Could some admin

Re: Minimal versions of the class files in buster

Hi, Am 17.09.18 um 23:23 schrieb Alexandre Rossi: > Hi, > > I have two ways of fixing #909040 [1] : either I build against an > older jdk or I use a wrapper script ensuring at least java9. > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/909040 > > What should I do? What is the policy? > > Thanks, > > Alex

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

Hi, Am 31.08.2018 um 19:36 schrieb Javier Fernandez-Sanguino: [...] > I agree too as I wrote most of the content a long time ago (18 years!). > > This is > partly because the people who created the old Debian Java FAQ are no > longer involved in Debian Java or may even have

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

Hello, Am 31.08.2018 um 18:27 schrieb shirish शिरीष: > Dear all, > > I was reading > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ > > and it seems the manual is pretty old and seems to have lot of oudated info. [...] We have recently started to improve our Java documentation about

Re: cgview: Does not start

Am 29.08.2018 um 19:31 schrieb Andreas Tille: [...] >> Maybe you should raise this issue with upstream (Batik and/or cgview) > > Well cgview is not actively maintained (but has quite a number of users) > and what exactly should I say to Batik upstream if they decided to move > it to a noew

Re: Do you have any clue? [andr...@an3as.eu: cgview.jar does not find class from batik-util]

Hi, the newer Batik version in testing does not provide the XMLConstant class anymore. They have split the functionality and moved it into a new project called Batik Constants. https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.xmlgraphics/batik-constants See also

Re: Update of jmeter

Hi Onkar, Am 16.08.2018 um 21:39 schrieb Onkar Shinde: > Hi all, > > Is there anyone working on updating jmeter to latest version?I am > trying to return to the packaging world after almost 8 years so my > skills are rusty. > If no one is working on this then I can give it a try. I am not aware

Java packaging documentation

Hi folks, during DebConf18 I tried to improve our documentation how to package new Java applications and libraries. I completely rewrote most of the current documentation. I had the following ideas: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging/ To me Java packaging is like following existing

Re: Bug#893184: artemis FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi, Am 13.08.2018 um 13:23 schrieb Andreas Tille: [...] > I tried hard to add junit4.jar to the classpath but my attempts failed. > It should be done in the latest quilt patch in test/build-test.xml but > I have no idea how to use it properly (I actually think all *.jar in > /usr/share/java are

Re: tomcat9 preview

Am 12.08.2018 um 19:52 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > On Sun, 12 Aug 2018, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> May I suggest that we turn this objection into more positive energy. > > Sure (given enough time; but as I need the Java stuff for $dayjob > I can justify doing some of t

Re: tomcat9 preview

Am 12.08.2018 um 03:45 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: >> * The sysv init script has been removed and the service is now >> exclusively started with systemd. systemd brings so many > > Objection! Strong objection! > > I *will* file an RC bug if it won’t work without systemd! May I suggest that we

Re: Rethinking the Servlet API packaging

Am 12.08.2018 um 00:52 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] >> I can start packaging >> libservlet4.0-java (I would name source and binary package the same). Is >> it this one? >> >> https://github.com/javaee/servlet-spec/releases/tag/4.0.1 > > Yes that's this one, thank you for jumping in but I've

Re: OpenJDK 11 -- testing needed

Am 11.08.2018 um 17:27 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] > My next target will be Gradle 4.x because it's blocking OpenJFX 11 and > other packages which have been fixed upstream to work with Java 9+ but > require a more recent version of Gradle. We have to adapt > gradle-debian-helper to work with

Re: Rethinking the Servlet API packaging

Hi! Am 06.08.2018 um 12:47 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Hi all, > > I'm starting to plan the packaging of Tomcat 9 which should be the > version of Tomcat shipped with Buster. Before doing that I'd like to > rethink how the Servlet/JSP API are packaged in Debian. [...] That is a very good idea. I

Re: Help needed for Artemis

Hi, Am 05.08.2018 um 13:48 schrieb Andreas Tille: [...] > > Is there any clever way to solve this instead of doing a lot of copying or > symlinking? To me it looks like the jar-rules.patch is responsible for this build failure. Some files and directories don't exist in your upstream sources.

Re: OpenJDK 11 -- testing needed

Hi, Am 20.07.2018 um 21:43 schrieb Matthias Klose: > Hi, > > OpenJDK now is feature complete, and the package in unstable should migrate to > testing soonish. I didn't do any test rebuilds with 11 yet, but I think now > it's time to start doing these. Chris West did these for 10, but doesn't

Re: Help needed to build prottest

on. Patch is attached. Cheers, Markus From: Markus Koschany Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 13:05:25 +0200 Subject: alter import --- .../es/uvigo/darwin/prottest/util/fileio/AlignmentReader.java | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/main/java/es/uvi

Re: Help needed to build prottest

Hi, Am 11.07.2018 um 23:02 schrieb Andreas Tille: [...] > > Any idea how to fix this? Some of those class files are in alter.jar [1] but I don't know the corresponding upstream project. If you get "package X does not exist or cannot find symbol" errors, you have to build-depend on the

Re: Moving Eclipse forward

Hi, Am 05.07.2018 um 23:46 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] Good work! It would have been nice though, if you had sent a short notice to #681726 to avoid double work because I said I would work on aspectj. I started to bundle the needed eclipse source code with aspectj but I agree that working

Re: Java Example Packages

Hi, Am 24.06.2018 um 14:53 schrieb Geert Stappers: > > Hi, > > Information for updating https://wiki.debian.org/Java/ExamplePackages is > wanted. > > What would be the new list of demo packages? I will talk about Java packaging at DebConf18 and my intention is to use this as a starting point

Re: Bug#900124: ITP: libjavolution-java -- Java core library for real-time and embedded systems (Was: Re: What happened here?)

ge and imported it with git-buildpackage but I didn't change your changelog entry. So your name is listed as the committer. Gitlab is smart enough to show " Andreas Tille Committed by Markus Koschany " though, hence it's clear that the Koschany guy is responsible for the commit. >

Re: What happened here? (Was "Re: Help with encoding issue needed for libjscience-java" and Re: [Git][java-team/libjavolution-java][master] Import Debian changes 6.0.0+dfsg-1)

Hi, Am 26.05.2018 um 07:55 schrieb Andreas Tille: [...] > Hmmm, Markus, if you have some better explanation - how can I get your > (admittedly promising) changes? Yes, I worked on libjavolution-java a little but didn't send the email to debian-java because it was quite late. The solution was

Re: Eclipse is 6 Years Behind in Debian

Hello, Am 25.05.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Josh Blagden: > Hi folks, > >     I just wanted to make the observation that Debian has had the same > version of Eclipse for the last six years. When can we expect to see a > new version to the Debian repository? Maybe when a solar and lunar eclipse happen

Re: Help with encoding issue needed for libjscience-java (Was: Help needed for libapfloat-java)

Hallo Andreas, Am 25.05.2018 um 15:32 schrieb Andreas Tille: [...] > Any hint how to fix this? In this case you need to override the default iso8851 encoding and pass --javacopts="-encoding UTF-8" to jh_build. I have pushed this change already but the build fails because of missing

Re: Problems building libsbml

Hi, Am 14.05.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Markus, > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 03:00:44PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> Though you should expect that this will also stop working eventually. I >> would also consider to drop the documentation from the package c

Re: Problems building libsbml

Am 14.05.2018 um 14:27 schrieb Andreas Tille: > package com.sun.tools.doclets.standard is declared in module jdk.javadoc, > which does not export it Hello, com.sun.tools.doclets was superseded by jdk.javadoc.doclet and the errors you see are due to the new module system since Java 9 and

Re: After move to Salsa: Tried to upgrade some packages I feel responsible

Hi, Am 07.05.2018 um 16:13 schrieb Andreas Tille: [...] >> I can build libejml by calling ./gradlew (gradle 4.3 is being downloaded). > > Wait a moment - its really downloading something? I have no idea why > this works in a pbuilder chroot and whether this should be uploaded. > Should pbuilder

Re: Import git repo from alioth to salsa

Am 04.05.2018 um 15:26 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 04/05/2018 à 11:48, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> I have converted all these packages and moved them to salsa. > > Thank you! > >> libjgraphx-java, libjrosetta-java, xmlbeans, c3p0 and colorpicker did >>

Re: Import git repo from alioth to salsa

Am 01.05.2018 um 22:07 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] > asm3 > boilerpipe > c3p0 > colorpicker > fontchooser > jama > jardiff > jcm > jline > kunststoff > libajaxtags-java > libbasicplayer-java > libbsf-java > libcobra-java > libcommons-discovery-java >

Re: Import git repo from alioth to salsa

Am 01.05.2018 um 23:35 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 01/05/2018 à 23:21, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> apt source yourpackage ? > > This doesn't give a Git working copy. The command git clone will give you a working copy. You can also use git clone g...@salsa.de

Re: Import git repo from alioth to salsa

Am 01.05.2018 um 23:17 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 01/05/2018 à 22:54, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> debcheckout https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/yourpackage ? >> >> I don't understand why you would need such a tool that simply calls >> >> git clon

Re: Import git repo from alioth to salsa

Am 01.05.2018 um 22:49 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 01/05/2018 à 21:18, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> I have tried to discuss this on debian-devel but as usual there is >> always someone who strongly disagrees, mostly those people who update >> five packages

Re: Import git repo from alioth to salsa

Hi, Am 01.05.2018 um 20:31 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani: > Hi, > > Il 29/04/2018 23:13, Markus Koschany ha scritto: >> Let's remove all VCS fields from all our packages. Those fields are >> optional and not required. We simply use conventions. All packages are

Re: Import git repo from alioth to salsa

Am 29.04.2018 um 23:13 schrieb Markus Koschany: [...] > I suggest the following: > > Let's remove all VCS fields from all our packages. Those fields are > optional and not required. We simply use conventions. All packages are > maintained in Git at salsa.debian.org. Period. Th

Re: Push rights for salsa/java-team

Hi Felix, Am 01.05.2018 um 13:57 schrieb Felix Natter: [...] > Can I (fnatter-guest) be added to team-java, or did I do something > wrong? Sure, please request membership at salsa.debian.org and I will add you to the team. Cheers, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Import git repo from alioth to salsa

Am 29.04.2018 um 22:33 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: [...] > As far as I’m informed, due to the massively different structure > of GitLab, such a service cannot be provided with reasonable or > even somewhat unreasonable effort, and there *were* tons of URL > redirection layers already anyway, so they

Re: Access to the Debian Java Maintainers group was granted

Am 24.04.2018 um 12:37 schrieb Daniel Pocock: > > > On 24/04/18 11:58, Debian GitLab wrote: >> You have been granted Developer access to the Debian Java Maintainers >> group. >> > > > Do I need Owner level access to import a repository from alioth?

Re: Question regarding libjsyntaxpane-java on alioth

Hi, Am 23.04.2018 um 21:44 schrieb Felix Natter: > Felix Natter writes: > >> hello Debian-java, > > hello again, > >> when accessing libjsyntaxpane-java I get "Bad object id:" on each commit: >> https://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/libjsyntaxpane-java.git > > I

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

Am 04.04.2018 um 10:24 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 04/04/2018 à 09:48, Matthias Klose a écrit : > >> I wouldn't spend any time on that. We are moving towards 11, and openjfx is >> split out there. So yes, maybe packages have to drop openjfx support for >> some time. > > +1, Oracle has

Re: Bug#893247: Intend to take over libjbzip2-java and libnanoxml2-java into Debian Med team

Am 26.03.2018 um 07:55 schrieb Andreas Tille: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 11:56:18PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Le 25/03/2018 à 19:55, tony mancill a écrit : [...] >>> (b) relaxing the default pkg-java permissions to be like those of the >>> Debian Perl Team and allow all DDs by default >>

Re: classpath-contains-relative-path

Hi, Am 20.03.2018 um 11:57 schrieb Jose Gutierrez de la Concha: [...] > So far all the entries use file:/ isn't this considerted a valid > absolute and I missing something or the warning is bogus? I'm not sure if file:/ is valid. I would just use /usr/share/java/foo.jar:/usr/share/java/bar.jar

Re: Bug#893454: libjloda-java: FTBFS with java 9

Am 19.03.2018 um 09:30 schrieb Andreas Tille: > package com.sun.istack.internal is not visible With OpenJDK 9 com.sun.* API is no longer accessible unless you explicitly tell the compiler to export the module which provides said functionality. I presume passing --add-exports

Re: Bug#893298: libsbml FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hello Andreas, Am 18.03.2018 um 09:30 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Control: tags -1 help > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:07:50PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> ... >> CMake Error at docs/CMakeLists.txt:212 (message): >> Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR. > > I

Re: Updating BND to 3.x

Am 04.03.2018 um 15:41 schrieb 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan: > I have been working on updating "bnd"[1] to 3.5.0. I had to say this time it > is much smoother than what Markus did 2 years ago. Here is a summary of the > progress so far: Wow! Excellent work. I will grant you upload permissions for

Re: javacc-maven-plugin, javacc, and the jtb update

Hi, Am 02.03.2018 um 06:33 schrieb Tiago Daitx: > Hi, > > A simple relocation in jtb fixed the FTBFS - tested for surefire, > javacc-maven-plugin, hawtbuf, avro-java, and activemq-protobuf. Thank you very much for the investigation. I can NMU the package if Ludovico is currently to busy.

Re: RFS: maven-repo-helper-extras/0.1 [ITP]

Hi, Am 16.02.2018 um 15:47 schrieb 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan: > I wrote 2 Debhelper plugins for easing maintenance of packages with Maven > artifacts. They are in a new package called "maven-repo-helper-extras" [1]. > > "mh_shlibdeps" works just like "dh_shlibdeps". It examines the Maven > artifacts

Bug#890610: ITP: jboss-bridger -- Java Bridge Method Maker

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org> * Package name: jboss-bridger Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Red Hat Inc. * URL : https://github.com/dmlloyd/bridger * License : LGPL-2.1+ Programming Lang: Java Descr

Re: Move of gradle from expiremental to sid

Hi Olivier, Am 10.02.2018 um 17:24 schrieb olivier sallou: > Hi, > is there a plan to move soon Gradle from expiremental to sid ? > Experimental version fixes some issues related to tests that would be > useful for some of our packages (debianmed) > > Thanks > > Olivier I wrote about this

Re: Is there any drop-in replacement for "json-evil" to use in Rockhopper

Hi, Am 09.02.2018 um 19:00 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > I intend to work on Rockhopper[1] but lintian says: > >rockhopper source: license-problem-json-evil org/json/README > > Is there any replacement for this JSON library for Java? I had a similar issue with triplea a while ago.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >