On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:13:20PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:53:51PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> >> A sparc build hasn't appeared in the snapshots repo yet, but I've
> >> posted a build of the latest
___
> >_ Be a better pen pal.
> > Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.
> > http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/
>
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s missing important version information. Please see:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelReportingBugs
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or so.
No ABI change is planned, so a d-i respin shouldn't be necessary - but
I'll leave it up to the d-i team to make that call.
I should also point out that sarge has a number of issues piling up as
well, but it would save a lot of effort to do it after 3.1r6 *hint* :)
--
dann f
how frequent are these messages?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pport for
it available in Debian 4.0 ('etch') and later.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
A 2.6.23 should be uploaded to sid today - please test that when its
available and let us know if it also fixes this issue for you. In the
meantime, it would also be useful if you could test one of the 2.6.23
snaphots. See http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel for details on
accessing the snapshot bu
et their changes accepted into the upstream
kernel - this way all distributions will automatically get a
working version
* Ask Sangoma to use dpkg-diversions to replace the system-provided
module
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 06:48:42PM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-22 10:10]:
> > > dannf, could you please take a look at #452069 and let me know if this
> > > bug is worth addressing in a stable update.
> > Yes, this c
f you've made any changes to the default sysstat configs, I'd also
be interesting to try them locally to see if I can reproduce.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lock_page+0x20/0x77
I suggest running memtest86 on your system to see if your memory is
failing.
--
dann frazier
t's not something I'd like to do if it can be avoided.
Bad RAM seemed to be the problem here:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0603.0/0502.html
> would the output of /proc/meminfo help somehow?
nah
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
an.org/DebianKernel for snapshot info.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ou provided
just to be sure, and it does not succeed on the latest etch kernel
(2.6.18.dfsg.1-17).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lone.
Michael: Do you know (and can you share) what the changes were to the
fw in this changeset?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=af3ee519c5d6bebbda9bf0ca3b81bc50b4dd2163
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
t to the Linux driver. This
> was clearly a bug as promiscuous mode should include reception of all
> packets. I think the firmware programmer did not foresee such a
> scenario and our test cases did not include something like this.
>
> So the change in the firmware was to correct
I plan to upload the first linux-2.6.23 for etchnahalf this coming
Sunday. The changes I have in mind before then are:
* Merge in 2.6.23.13 (one changeset)
* Revert to the older Firewire stack (for compatability w/ etch)
Anything else?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:10:22PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:01:57PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-10 23:08]:
> > > I plan to upload the first linux-2.6.23 for etchnahalf this coming
>
tra that reverts the security fix before it
applies the unmodified vserver patch, then reapply the security fix to
vserver in 17-extra. But, both of these options break the generation
of old vserver source trees. Personally I'm not too bothered by this,
but does anyone have a better suggestion?
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-17
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: causes serious data loss
References:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=1a499150e4ec1299232e24389f648d059ce5617a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:51:59PM -0700, Gordon Farquharson wrote:
> Hi Dann
>
> Do you have target date for uploading 2.6.18.dfsg.1-17etch1?
yes, today (started the build this morning)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
et me
know.
Once these packages are available in p-u, I'll notify Frans who can
then start the d-i work for 4.0r3.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can also use ifrename and create an /etc/iftab file. This will
let you create a static map of mac address/interface name.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h no issues.
> The latest linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 (ETCH) kernel causing kernel panics and
> CPU
> sync errors causing the system to reboot in a loop.
Please provide a log of the console from boot to reboot.
See also: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelReportingBugs
--
dann frazier
-
tches for kernel-wedge for it and
>hope to get it ready for tomorrow or so.
Awesome.
Is there anything special we need to add to deal with etch 1/2
kernel metapackages? We were talking about using a name like
linux-image-2.6-686-etchnhalf.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
ave
> no grub installed.
Then you need to remove the hooks that call grub in
/etc/kernel-img.conf.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.6.24 on hardware supported
by 2.6.22, and then the follow-on beta would add support for the
remaining hardware (that supported by 2.6.24 but not 2.6.22). Unless
someone sees a problem with this, it seems fine to me.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &qu
y what should be included on them [3].
> (Hell, the whole "Etch + Lenny D-I" concept hasn't even really been OKed.)
> Because of mirror space issues _and_ because of required preparations on
> the debian-cd side this _really_ needs to be discussed with Sledge
> urge
ES1983S Maestro-3i PCI
> Audio Accelerator'
Rob,
Does /dev/dsp reappear if you run the following?
# modprobe snd-pcm-oss
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sumably to optimize for space
by sharing files across multiple packages. You shouldn't need it when
building custom kernels with make-kpkg.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:41:54AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 February 2008, dann frazier wrote:
> > hey Ritesh,
> > ?This package is linux-2.6 specific, presumably to optimize for space
> > by sharing files across multiple packages. You shouldn't
at the "etchnhalf netinst" could even
> be used in combination with Etch CD/DVD sets from previous (point)
> releases.
Let me try and reiterate some points of your proposal to make sure I
understand. The only install media for etchnhalf will be netinst
cds. These cds will be
> deb http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/ etch main
> deb-src http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/ etch main
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib
>
> Can somebody please help me with:
>
> 1. Is there a m
Package: firmware-nonfree
Version: 0.4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertag: SRM
Looks like this package should've been updated with each linux-2.6 ABI
bump - its still build-depending on linux-support-2.6.18-4.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
that's necessary, we should be able to add support in etch's 2.6.18.
--
dann frazier
commit 5881cde8a38cab3b228a63516ab64f8d79acc4f5
Author: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Aug 31 14:27:47 2006 -0700
e1000: Add PCI ID 0x10a4 for our new 4-port PCI-Express device
Package: kernel
Version: 2.4.27-6
Severity: important
The fix for CAN-2004-1056, added in 2.6.8-11, also applies to 2.4 - however,
I don't think it will compile, because 2.4 doesn't define the
LOCK_TEST_WITH_RETURN() in drmP.h.
from 2.6.8's changelog:
* [SECURITY] Fix insufficient locking check
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:39:58PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have put together the packages that I would like to upload as
> kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-7 and kernel-image-2.4.27-i386 2.4.27-7.
>
> This includes increasing the SONAME to 2.
> Could anyone who is interesetd please take a look
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 05:45:50PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> $ ls -l /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.4.27/debian/series/2.4.27-7
> -rw--- 1 root root 344 Dec 21 19:39
> /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.4.27/debian/series/2.4.27-7
>
> Are those perms correct?
builds fine on ia64 otherwise
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 12:39:32PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> there was an ABI change in this release, but I am not sure
> that is the problem that you are seeing. It seems to be
> AMD64 specific. Dannf, perhaps you have some ideas.
I don't know much about amd64, sorry (I'm the ia64 guy)
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 15:50 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 03:02:31PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > Any debian-kernel folks gonna be at Debconf this year? Anyone planning
> > to talk? I was thinking about proposing one - maybe a general overview
> > talk?
>
.
I'd suggest dropping these for now while I work with upstream to get
non-SMP builds fixed again. These problems still exist; but have just
been shuffled around. We'll catch up on kernel-tree-2.6.11-LATER.
Thanks Sven.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
I can get ia64 ones out this week, probably.
Thanks Sven.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject:
2.6.11-1 status, ready for an upload
this WE ?
Date:
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:50:59 +0100
(07:50 MST)
--
dann frazier <[EM
fyi, I have a patch to the kernel-image build system that would spit out
a separate package w/ a debug kernel image & module set under /usr/lib.
I did this in the 2.4.25 timeframe, and I was getting ~204M debug
packages per flavor. I don't know how big it would be for just the
image (no modules).
ioth.debian.org/pipermail/kernel-svn-changes/2004-July/21.html
And participation in what I think was our only formal irc meeting:
http://minbar.dodds.net/~vorlon/kernel-2.6.10-discussion.log
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 22:16 -0800, Matt Taggart wrote:
> dann frazier writes...
>
> > fyi, I have a patch to the kernel-image build system that would spit out
> > a separate package w/ a debug kernel image & module set under /usr/lib.
> > I did this in the 2.4.25
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:56 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:32:25AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > I've submitted the following as a proposal for a DebConf5 talk. Those
> > of you who will be there and are willing to co-speak, please let me know
> > so
oops; cc'd the wrong address
Forwarded Message
From: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: k-i-ia64-2.6.8 -3 ABI
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:49:49 -0700
The ia64 2.6.8-3 ABI change has been accepted into unstable. This ABI
I assume you mean modprobe (instead of modinfo)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ABI/security discussions have left me with a question - at what
point does security maintenance of our kernels transition from the
debian-kernel/testing security teams to the Debian security team, and
how will we interact with one another? I assume there will be some
overlap, but it might be g
I'm trying to decide what I want to do about the ia64 kernel ABI. I
rev'd it from -2 (currently in sarge) to -3 to turn off PREEMPT
(prevents at least one user triggerable oops). This seemed convenient,
since the k-s-2.6.8-14 had its own ABI change.
Well, turns out this was a bad idea - we've de
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 19:37 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 06:22:32PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > I'm trying to decide what I want to do about the ia64 kernel ABI. I
> > rev'd it from -2 (currently in sarge) to -3 to turn off PREEMPT
> &
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 19:37 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 06:22:32PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > I'm trying to decide what I want to do about the ia64 kernel ABI. I
> > rev'd it from -2 (currently in sarge) to -3 to turn off PREEMPT
> &
ld for ppc and ia64 that would be
> great.
They build fine on ia64.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 17:30 -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > disagreed,
> > all the archs managed in the d-k svn got their updates steadily.
> > problems are the trees outside of it as well d-i udebs relying
> > on a stable abi, which is easily broken
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 10:50 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > ia64: version in Sarge: 2.6.8-12
> >
> > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/trunk/kernel/ia64/kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64-2.6.8/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
>
> Will -14 will be an ABI change from -12 or not?
Yes, it sh
thanks for getting this going Horms!
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 11:53 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 10:50 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Horms wrote:
> > > > ia64: version in Sarge: 2.6.8-12
> > > >
> > > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/
rg break d-i as well?
I figured it would continue pulling udebs from r0, giving us until r1 to
spin d-i. Is there a problem I'm not seeing?
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is in a custom d-i
I built for HP.
Joey (and debian-kernel) - please let me know if you think this is
unsuitable for our stable/point-release tree.
[1] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel?op=comp&[EMAIL PROTECTED]&[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UN
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 15:37 +0900, Horms wrote:
> I have made my proposed packages for testing-security
> and testing-proposed-updates available as follows.
> I'd like to make the latter available in unstable as well.
> Neither contain the ABI change in question. I can add
> that to the testing-pro
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 10:57 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:13:14AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > I'm happy to do it if you'd like. Though, I'd like to get a yea or nea
> > on including the ABI change before spinning new ia64 packages. I'
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 18:30 +0900, Horms wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-10
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch, security, pending
>
>
> I got this from Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-284.html This is
>CA
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 00:22 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 18:30 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> > Version: 2.4.27-10
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: patch, security, pending
> >
> >
> > I got t
topics (or one I didn't mention), let me know.
Horms: I listed you as an author in this draft because I stole some
content directly from a couple of your .au slides; let me know if you'd
prefer I didn't.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 02:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> I think the best solution at this point is to build a
> kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) that reverts this change and prepare
> a kernel-image along with it, therefore requiring no changes to
> kernel-source-2.4.27. What
g an upload of kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 version 2.6.8-14,
> wich contains all current security updates.
>
> I'll notice you again as soon as my sponsor has done the upload.
I've just completed a sponsored upload of Frederik's changes.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:49 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:17:57PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 18:45 +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > Hello,
>
> > > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:57:52PM -0700, Steve Langas
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 05:21 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:36:58PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:49 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:17:57PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 05:01 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:50:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > If you want to merge those changes into kernel-source-2.4.27
> > (obviously for a future, non-sarge r0 release) please
> > feel free to do so.
>
> AIUI, he's saying that a fix he
As this is a FAQ, I've added some content from one of Horms' Debian
Kernel slides to the wiki:
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
Maybe that'll make it easier to respond to such bug reports.
--- Begin Message ---
reassign #303918 kernel
thanks
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Ste
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 23:47 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2005, dann frazier wrote:
>
> > hey,
> > I posted a draft of a paper for DebConf here:
> > http://people.debian.org/~dannf/debconf5/
>
> cool
>
>
> > If you have ti
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 14:28 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 08:06:42AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> >hey,
> > I posted a draft of a paper for DebConf here:
> > http://people.debian.org/~dannf/debconf5/
> I would like to see a section
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 13:51 +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am surprised by the package description which says:
>
> Note that these patches do NOT apply
> against a pristine Linux 2.6.11 kernel but only against
> kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz from the Debian archive.
>
> In
e to believe that this driver is not yet
integrated upstream, and is therefore an unlikely candidate for
inclusion in an official kernel-source tree.
See http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines for
more information.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:37 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:14:45AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 13:51 +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am surprised by the package description which says:
> >
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 13:18 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 08:06:42AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > hey,
> > I posted a draft of a paper for DebConf here:
> > http://people.debian.org/~dannf/debconf5/
> >
> > If you have time in the next c
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 19:40 -0300, Rodrigo Colao Merlo wrote:
> Package: kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-k7
> Severity: normal
Thanks for the report Rodrigo.
> The command "make-kpkg modules_image" do not generate modules to
> specific -k7 kernel_image package.
What does it do instead?
> An example is
Looks like the issue is that include/linux/version.h sets UTS_RELEASE to
2.6.11 instead of 2.6.11-1-k7. Strange - looks like all the other x86
flavors have the right value, and previous -k7 uploads had the right
value. I rebuilt the k7 flavor, and it looks correct as well.
Dunno how to explain
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 16:09 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:14:20AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:36:15PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to start preparing a seurity update for kernel-source-2.6.8
> > > in sarge, wich rel
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 11:59 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On the grounds that a) it fixes a security bug and b) it doesn't appear
> to change the ABI, yes, please go for it.
kernel/sarge-security/kernel/source currently has "testing-security"
instead of UNRELEASED in the changelog in svn - should I put th
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:14 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> I've backported the fix for CAN-2005-1764 to our 2.6.8 with [1]
> applied (attached).
Correction - this is CAN-2005-1761, not 1764.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&qu
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 01:53 -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> GOTO Masanori writes...
>
> > At Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:08:51 +0300,
> > Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > This is the source package only, not the binary (image) package; so, if
> > > users have a working kernel installed, they will be able to upgra
ausing system crash and maybe
> even filesystem corruption at least with ext2 filesystem.
Thanks for the report. There will be another update soon to fix this
issue.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:59:12PM +0100, Bruno Cornec wrote:
> dann frazier said on Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:04:50PM -0700:
>
> > I backported a couple of changsets to 2.6.18 that add support for
> > these cards. I did some light testing on a low profile model, and it
>
hey Klaus,
Does this package resolve the issue for you?
http://kernel.debian.net/debian/pool/main/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386/kernel-image-2.4.27-4-k6_2.4.27-10sarge7_i386.deb
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
s patch.
See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2008/02/msg00278.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2008/02/msg00566.html
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 06:09:08PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 05:06:18PM +0100, Vladislav Kurz wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I wanted to file this through BTS but I'm not sure which package is the
> > right
> > place ot file kern
at Thu Mar 6 16:10:13 2008 ...
> castor vmunix: invalid opcode: [#1]
...
fyi, the output of 'dmesg' would be easier to read, or a portion of
/var/log/kernel.log - ideally from bootup to oops.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
roken SELinux
system than the other way around - at least until there's an accepted
fix for this issue upstream.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:13:20PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:40:43AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > This is wrt #463669. Enabling POSIX file capabilities breaks signaling
> > atd and therefore at job submittal, and there is no fix yet that has
&g
hat you have to upgrade the kernel yourself.
This is documented in the release notes:
http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-kernel-metapackage
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not receive router
> advertisements, other times 33:33:ff:81:16:3a is missing and neighbor
> discovery breaks instead. There was a similar problem in bug #410375.
Can you test this image and see if it fixes the problem for you?
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/466719/
--
dann frazier
--
criteria for a stable release
update, but you might find that its pretty easy to generate and
install such a package on your own:
# aptitude install module-assistant unionfs-source
# m-a prepare -l 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64
# m-a a-i unionfs -l 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUB
could there
> have been fs corruption or corruption at the md-raid5 layer?
Is this something you see on every reboot?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is due some new disks, I'll be keeping a close eye on dmesg
> the next few days, let's see.
Of course, I'd suggest fscking the filesystem if you haven't already.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
86 :
> It boots properly.
>
> Franklin Piat
Franklin,
You will need to provide more information to help us determine the
cause. See: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelReportingBugs
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 463606 - moreinfo
thanks
oops - I see now that this was a follow-up, not a new bug, sorry about
that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~/src/stable-queue$ ls -1 queue-2.6.24/ | wc -l
> 65
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
proposed (moving the lazy_mmu_prot_update
call) is believed to sufficiently resolve the issue. This fix, along
with a similar fix for migrate.c, was picked up by the RHEL kernels
(attached). I suggest including this fix in stable.
--
dann frazier
From: Luming Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
701 - 800 of 1291 matches
Mail list logo
