On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:56:20PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:13:27PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
pv_ops dom0 patches will require more maintenance than the forward-ports
though.. since it's not yet feature-complete, and will have many
patches and fixes still..
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:06 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:13:27PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
pv_ops dom0 patches will require more maintenance than the forward-ports
though.. since it's not yet feature-complete, and will have many
patches and fixes still..
You just won a free maintainership of the forward port in Lenny.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:06 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
It is based on the pv-ops tree.
Excellent, I think that's the right choice. If there is anything I can
do to help please let me know.
Well, the most important thing is to
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:31 +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
[...]
7) Steve Langasek to talk to Marco further.
[...]
Steve has been busy, so I've taken on this task.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The obvious mathematical breakthrough [to break modern encryption] would be
development of an easy way to
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
xen dom 0
+
Upstream development is splintered but Bastian Blank is willing to
implement the patch for squeeze. Final decision on inclusion subject
to
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
xen dom 0
+
Are you basing your patch on the PV-ops tree or on one of the SuSE
forward ports?
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:06 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
xen dom 0
+
Are you basing your
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:06:55AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
xen dom 0
+
Are you basing your patch on the PV-ops tree or on one of the SuSE
forward ports? Based on your recent posts to xen-devel I had assumed the
former but Ben's initial post suggested perhaps the later.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:43:31PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
If this is the case, and if we assume that pv-ops xen support is
eventually included upstream (which certainly appears to be the goal),
why the deprecation notice?
who stepped to properly maintain the patch in the current
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 05:08:15PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
you still didn't read or get my question:
Who will maintain the chosen pvops patch for the Squeeze lifetime?
yes, this is the part of the work:
* backward port important fixes, securtiy patches
* read bug reports, decipher
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:06:03AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:43:31PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
If this is the case, and if we assume that pv-ops xen support is
eventually included upstream (which certainly appears to be the goal),
why the deprecation
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:24 -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 05:08:15PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
you still didn't read or get my question:
Who will maintain the chosen pvops patch for the Squeeze lifetime?
yes, this is the part of the work:
* backward port
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:00:21AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 23:19 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
xen dom 0
+
Upstream development is splintered but Bastian Blank is willing to
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
xen dom 0
+
Upstream development is splintered but Bastian Blank is willing to
implement the patch for squeeze. Final decision on inclusion subject
to building.
Current status:
The tree is building and running in my
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:45:52AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
xen dom 0
+
Upstream development is splintered but Bastian Blank is willing to
implement the patch for squeeze. Final decision on inclusion subject
to
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
xen dom 0
+
Upstream development is splintered but Bastian Blank is willing to
implement the patch for squeeze. Final decision on inclusion subject
to building.
Novell/OpenSUSE has forward-ported Xen (dom0)
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 23:19 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
xen dom 0
+
Upstream development is splintered but Bastian Blank is willing to
implement the patch for squeeze. Final decision on inclusion subject
to
also sprach Vincent Sanders vi...@debian.org [2009.10.15.1431 +0200]:
Debian Kernel Group Meeting
===
Report by Vincent Sanders for Debian Project Kernel List
Dear kernel team, and Vincent the reporter,
I really appreciate this account, for two reasons: first
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
This became a discussion about the general kernel packaging and how we
might use the upstream provided facilities better. There was some
discussion we have way too many ways to build a kernel.
A general agreement was reached
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 18:34 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
This became a discussion about the general kernel packaging and how we
might use the upstream provided facilities better. There was some
discussion we have way too many ways
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 06:49:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 18:34 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
This became a discussion about the general kernel packaging and how we
might use the upstream provided
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 20:37 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 06:49:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 18:34 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
This became a discussion about the general kernel
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 06:49:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 18:34 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
This became a discussion about the general kernel packaging and how we
might use the upstream provided
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:02:09 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 09:49:11AM -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
[...]
Has the kernel team decided to no longer make DEBs available for
upcoming versions of kernels? Or will the 'experimental'
distribution be used to make such
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 10:29 -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
[...]
Too bad you couldn't get a directory on a Linux Kernel Organization
server, like here
http://www.kernel.org/pub/dist/
or here
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/
Seems like Debian Kernel Team activities are exactly
I've read the notes posted by Vincent Sanders about the meetings at the
Plumber's Conference. I saw the references to automated testing and
uploads of 2.6.31 to experimental in the notes about Session 4, but I
saw no comments about the loss of kernel-archive.buildserver.net.
Has the kernel
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 09:49:11AM -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
[...]
Has the kernel team decided to no longer make DEBs available for
upcoming versions of kernels? Or will the 'experimental' distribution
be used to make such kernels available?
For now, the 'experimental' distribution will
Debian Kernel Group Meeting
===
Report by Vincent Sanders for Debian Project Kernel List
The meeting was held as a series of 60 to 90 minute sessions over a
four day period.
The location was:
Linux Plumbers Conference
Mariott Waterfront,
Portland,
Oregon
My primary
Report by Vincent Sanders for Debian Project Kernel List
Thanks for writing such a verbose and informative report.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
30 matches
Mail list logo
