On Monday 30 March 2009 17:23:48 Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
This is not even an RFS :)
Now, seriously - I've prepared a package for dma, the DragonFly Mail
Agent, as ITP'd in my #511410, I've uploaded it to mentors.d.n, and
I've sent out a request for debconf
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 14:54:41 Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.19.dfsg-3
of my package dante. This version does not fix any problems
listed in the Debian BTS; what it DOES fix is a serious problem
with libsocksd0-dev
On Sunday 22 March 2009 02:17:30 Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hello,
Well, actually what I did was take this change, another couple of
things (the example files, a small fix to the testing framework), and
just go ahead and release a new upstream version, confget-1.02.
A Debian package for it is
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 11:43:40 Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package confget.
* Package name: confget
Version : 1.01-1
Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net (myself)
* URL :
On Thursday 19 March 2009 23:12:22 Peter Pentchev wrote:
--cut--
It took me some time to assimilate the hardening notes at wiki.d.o [1],
I'm remotely familiar with, though this document is informative enough
about potential build and run-time failures on different architectures
wrt
On Sunday 08 March 2009 21:29:51 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
Hi,
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.30-1.dsc
Uploaded. Thanks.
P.S. Providing upstream Changelog would be very much appreciated by the
cppcheck users, though it is unlikely they haven't seen diff, diffstat
On Friday 06 March 2009 17:15:57 Christopher Schramm wrote:
Jelle de Jong wrote:
I agree this package is welcome in debian, somebody fancy to sponser?
Since nobody was yet: Is there any problem with sponsoring the package?
Hi,
It is not necessary for the package to have any technical or
On Sunday 08 March 2009 03:43:00 David García Garzón wrote:
--cut--
Hi,
Well, no problem. We are also volunteers so i understand. I hope we can
find an sponsor soon or someone that could take it a closer look to find
more issues.
You may also want to check your sourses with cppcheck as
On Monday 02 March 2009 22:02:47 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.29-1.dsc
Uploaded. Thanks for your work.
P.S. Could you please change the version in subject line next time, to avoid
possible confusion.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 14:35:27 Helmut Grohne wrote:
Hi,
Can you give an example of a ???debian/rules??? that does not work, and
what the desired behaviour would be?
Well my basic idea was to add a .PHONY line to the 3-line example like:
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
$@
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:07:19 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Dear mentors
I am looking for sponsorship for my package 'copher' (Paul Wise
sponsored last time). It closes a serious bug #513710, and also includes
the VCS fields now that I have converted my repository to git.
The dsc is on
Quoting Reijo Tomperi aggr...@users.sourceforge.net:
Reijo Tomperi wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package cppcheck.
* Package name: cppcheck
Version : 1.25-1
Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki hyd_dan...@users.sourceforge.net
Reijo
On Monday 02 February 2009 22:40:26 you wrote:
--cut--
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.28-2.dsc
FYI: cppcheck 1.28-2 uploaded.
Thanks for your work.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Saturday 31 January 2009 11:58:10 Loïc Fejoz wrote:
Dear mentors and debian-science,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package avl.
...
dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/avl/avl_3.27-1.dsc
Hi,
This is an interesting package I've never seen before, although even being
On Friday 30 January 2009 08:08:43 Thomas Dreibholz wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hi,
We are looking for a sponsor for our package rsplib. RSPLIB is the Open
Source implementation (GPLv3) of the IETF's standard for Reliable Server
Pooling (RSerPool), which is described in RFC 5351 to RFC 5356. If you
On Thursday 29 January 2009 15:22:06 Alexander Block wrote:
Hello mentors,
Hi,
I'm currently packaging the application jDownloader which requires very
frequent updates. The mainstream devs have solved the updating with an
auto-update feature that checks for new versions of the core part and
On Monday 26 January 2009 20:55:09 Raphael Geissert wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/whohas/whohas_0.22-2.dsc
Why do you think the information in README.Debian is relevant to anyone
installing the package?
Also, some typos in README.Debian:
Intrebid
wih
upsream
Sure,
On Monday 26 January 2009 22:24:12 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
--cut--
Sure, that particular README.Debian is somehow superfluous here (and
could be removed in the next release, Jonathan: hint, hint, but no rush
or you will need some jumbo sponsors ;-), since it duplicates
descriptions given
Quoting Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 06:10, LI Daobing (李道兵) lidaob...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
debian/watch
- what about adding one?
all other issues fixed except this one.
uscan only works when every
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 00:46:22 Martin Meredith wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Martin Meredith [Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:05:11 +]:
Hey Martin,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* history: I haven't seen
Quoting Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 02:59, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
* When fixing bugs that prevented a previous release (e.g. one made to
mentors.debian.net) from making it into Debian (e.g. because the
sponsor requires further changes),
On Sunday 18 January 2009 11:43:33 Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hi Gudjon,
The package is more or less lintian clean :)
What does that mean? You better describe what the problem is and find ways to
deal with it properly. Uploading a *new* package with already known flaws, is
not
On Sunday 18 January 2009 19:24:05 Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:37:20 +0100
Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu wrote:
Hi.
Le dimanche 18 janvier 2009 à 12:24 +, Neil Williams a écrit :
... I'm now going to require, for any package
using debconf that
On Thursday 15 January 2009 07:36:08 Teddy Hogeborn wrote:
Hi,
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mandos/mandos_1.0.4-1.dsc
Fixing bugs is always nice idea and in fact your new version brings notable
improvements compared to the version in sid. However, while checking your new
On Saturday 17 January 2009 04:46:01 Teddy Hogeborn wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.5-1
of my package mandos.
It builds these binary packages:
mandos - a server giving encrypted passwords to Mandos clients
mandos-client - do unattended
On Monday 12 January 2009 15:35:26 Nima Talebi wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1-1
of my package hotwire-irbd.
Hi,
Here are some comments:
* I don't think you need python-all-dbg in build-depends, do you ?
* There is a forgotten dangling symlink you
On Monday 12 January 2009 17:45:08 George Danchev wrote:
On Monday 12 January 2009 15:35:26 Nima Talebi wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1-1
of my package hotwire-irbd.
Hi,
Here are some comments:
* I don't think you need python-all-dbg
On Friday 09 January 2009 10:13:26 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:38:33AM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
I'd appreciate if someone else could sponsor this for now; my
internets are slow ATM.
whohas 0.22-1 uploaded.
Cheers!
Jonathan,
I forgot to add
On Friday 09 January 2009 07:38:48 Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:52:37PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
Either is fine, slight leaning towards no need for a bump (so I don't
have to remember to use
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 16:03:45 Luke Faraone wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Matt Arnold mattarno...@gmail.com wrote:
I am the original ITPer of this package and for the benefit of
- -mentors I had to drop it due to lack of time. I am glad that someone
has picked this up.
On Saturday 03 January 2009 12:54:01 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
* README.Debian could be dropped, it talks about gxemul-doc, while
control:gxemul has it listed in recommends, which will do the job.
Ok, dropped it.
It would be even better to downgrad that to Suggests: gxemul-doc, since it is
On Saturday 03 January 2009 05:37:30 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hi George (and others)
Hi,
gxemul/0.4.7-1 is a new upstream, and I've also taken the opportunity to
fix some minor lintian warnings and improve the packaging. It's now
lintian clean including info tags and builds nicely in a
On Tuesday 30 December 2008 23:27:28 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
Hi and Happy New Year to all,
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.27-2.dsc
Uploaded. Thanks for your contribution.
P.S. I'm still not ready yet with my(our) list of findings/wishlists around
cppcheck
On Tuesday 30 December 2008 04:04:55 Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:12 AM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Why is libfoo-X-dev better than libfooX-dev, where 'X' is being some sort
of API version discriminator ?
Both of those are the same,
I'm glad to read that.
my
On Tuesday 30 December 2008 00:07:34 Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:12:24 +0200
George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
http://bugs.debian.org/libpkg-guide
Firstly, do you need that library? Nothing
On Monday 29 December 2008 02:01:56 Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Martin Godisch mar...@godisch.de wrote:
I'm not doing library packaging all day and I'm a bit unsure about the
new sleuthkit upstream release. It would be nice if some of you could
have a look at sleuthkit
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 13:44:39 Peter Miller wrote:
Dear Mentors,
Hello Peter,
Package: libexplain
Version: 0.4
Upstream Author: (myself) Peter Miller
URL: http://libexplain.sourceforge.net/
License: GPLv3 or later
The libexplain project provides a library which may be used to
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 17:40:42 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday 2008 December 24 08:19:27 George Danchev wrote:
strerror_r(3) (which is
GNU-specific, ok)
SUSv3 introduced strerror_r as well, as part of the Thread Safe Functions
option. The two definitions
On Thursday 18 December 2008 17:21:22 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk (18/12/2008):
No problem by me :-)
Uploaded as is.
Thanks to both of you for taking care of that. I don't mind other sponsors
uploading packages I've sponsored, in fact I welcome that
On Friday 12 December 2008 01:16:00 Paul Gevers wrote:
So how to complain about packages that don't want to change the
policy? I filed a bug at upstream [1] but it was a wontfix.
Why? What was the excuse? You'll need to persuade upstream that it is
not acceptable. How you do that is up
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 17:27:28 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am seeking a sponsor for my updated package replaceit (George Danchev
kindly sponsored previously). This upload:
* fixes bug 506767, and also
* migrated into a git repository with public access
* makes proper
On Sunday 07 December 2008 19:21:26 Eric Lavarde wrote:
BTW, code duplication isn't liked in Debian, so it is probably best to
package whatever it is you found separately and then make processing
depend on that.
Agree, many Java projects package their sources with the libraries they
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 22:46:47 Alexander Block wrote:
Hello,
hexec - a tool to intercept/hook and change program calls
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexec
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
- dget
On Monday 01 December 2008 16:04:33 Alexander Block wrote:
Hi,
Hm, interesting approach. Package looks good to me, except that it builds one
binary package, not three, which is fine. Adding a watch file would be good
idea too, regardless you are both upstream and debian maintainer of that
On Sunday 30 November 2008 22:03:16 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
--cut--
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.26-1.dsc
Uploaded. FYI: Package is still hanging in Debian's new queue.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu
signature.asc
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 19:21:46 Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think it is severe enough to be put forward for lenny?
I'm not sure. The patch looks straight-forward enough, so perhaps the
release team would approve
On Monday 24 November 2008 17:27:16 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hello,
I am seeking a sponsor for a bugfix in gxemul, George Danchev kindly
sposored last time. This is a patch taken from upstream's CVS pending
it being included in a release, and fixes a segmentation fault if
gxemul is started
On Monday 24 November 2008 00:19:14 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:42:43PM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
* slight regression: dpatch was introduced in that revision, but the
01_manhyphens_patch.dpatch is not applied during build. Basically you
don't need to call dpatch
On Thursday 20 November 2008 11:16:14 Olivier Berger wrote:
Le mercredi 19 novembre 2008 à 21:51 +, Neil Williams a écrit :
I've no idea what is going on but a version of tslib has been uploaded
to mentors.debian.net.
I'm the maintainer for tslib and I see no reason for any such
On Sunday 16 November 2008 19:50:10 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.6.6-1
of my package gxemul. This is a minor new upstream version, the
packaging has basically not changed.
Well I believe it has changed enough compared to the version in
On Saturday 15 November 2008 13:16:07 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3p1-2
of my package poco.
Package uploaded. Thanks for taking care of these bugs.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu
On Sunday 09 November 2008 21:49:52 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
--cut--
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.25-4.dsc
Package uploaded. Thanks.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Saturday 08 November 2008 20:47:58 George Danchev wrote:
On Thursday 06 November 2008 17:31:29 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
--cut--
What about the cppcheck package, you didn't give any comments about it,
does that mean it is now perfect? ;)
Package looks fine to me, although I can't figure out
On Sunday 09 November 2008 22:41:13 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
--cut--
Few questions as I'm still new with all of this:
- In mentors.debian.net I have set the seeking for sponsor option to
yes. Are you now my sponsor for the future updates also? Should I set
the value to I have found a sponsor? Or
On Thursday 06 November 2008 17:31:29 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
--cut--
What about the cppcheck package, you didn't give any comments about it,
does that mean it is now perfect? ;)
Package looks fine to me, although I can't figure out why xsltproc warns like
that [0] when -nonet option were passed
On Sunday 02 November 2008 13:27:45 Jann Horn wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package cdarch.
Hello,
How is that better than mounting image loopback and then engage the whole old
unix tool armament in searching files ?
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
On Thursday 30 October 2008 11:33:53 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3p1-1
of my package poco.
...
Also I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3-1
of my package poco-doc.
Both uploaded. Thanks for your work!
--
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 18:09:07 Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:30:25PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
* Thorsten Alteholz [Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:06:09 +0200]:
Hi,
Hello,
I need some advice on building packages with different libs.
Assuming that I have software
On Monday 29 September 2008 15:55:55 Charles Plessy wrote:
Hello,
Le Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 02:46:00PM +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 06:36 -0700, Kruti wrote:
i mean when you do apt-get install package, all the files of the
package are installed in /usr.for eg:
On Sunday 28 September 2008 22:08:28 markus schnalke wrote:
Hello mentors,
Hi,
lintian reports this warning:
using-question-in-extended-description-in-templates
(see [1])
But there is no question where lintian sees one. Instead it's a
literally question mark. The text is:
You can use
On Monday 22 September 2008 22:04:44 Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
there seems to be no interest in my package, but I will continue providing
updates to this list. Below is my proposal of debian/copyright.
The package seems to be in a very good shape, but I don't currently have
On Friday 12 September 2008 13:03:20 Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tmux.
Hello,
Package looks good to me, provided the following:
* control: your Depends line is empty, but your package depends on libncurses5
(at least) run-time.
On Thursday 04 September 2008 15:30:32 Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
Hello mentors,
I am looking for someone to upload an updated version of blam. This was
already reviewed by Vincent Bernat but it has been over a month since
that (I've been away from my computer and keys), so I'm asking again
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 05:04:12 Ben Finney wrote:
--cut--
I'm experimenting with Bazaar's loom feature, which allows a single
branch to contain multiple threads of development. A loom allows any
of the threads to be advanced, turned into separate patches as needed,
while still having a
On Sunday 31 August 2008 20:50:57 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
--cut--
Ok. Done, re-uploaded.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bindfs/bindfs_1.8-1.dsc
Uploaded. Thanks and sorry for the delay. Please, consider reading that
announcement [1] when you request release team to unblock.
On Sunday 31 August 2008 08:30:03 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Hi -mentors!
I am looking for a uploader for the new version 1.8-1
of my package bindfs.
My usual sponsor for this package, Kapil Hari Paranjape, seems to be busy
now. I want for pre-approved by release team upload of new version
On Sunday 31 August 2008 08:24:13 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.01-3
of my package exiftags. My previous sponsor, Anibal Monsalve Salazar,
seems to be busy for more than week, so I am seeking for uploader or new
usual sponsor for
On Sunday 31 August 2008 10:00:44 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
George Danchev wrote:
On Sunday 31 August 2008 08:24:13 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.01-3
of my package exiftags. My previous sponsor, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Sunday 31 August 2008 09:49:05 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
George Danchev wrote:
On Sunday 31 August 2008 08:30:03 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Hi -mentors!
I am looking for a uploader for the new version 1.8-1
of my package bindfs.
My usual sponsor for this package, Kapil Hari
On Sunday 31 August 2008 20:25:57 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
George Danchev wrote:
On Sunday 31 August 2008 10:00:44 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
George Danchev wrote:
Ok, thanks for fixing an RC. Builds fine per autobuilders
(dpkg-buildpackage -B), but fails to build with fakeroot debian
On Sunday 31 August 2008 21:07:55 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
--cut--
[cut build log]
Ok, thanks, I finally understood you. Fixed, re-uploaded to mentors.d.o.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exiftags/exiftags_1.01-3.dsc.
Thanks, uploaded will get to you in several hours.
--
On Saturday 30 August 2008 04:30:21 Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hello,
* Package name: xinha
Version : 0.95~rc2-1
Version 0.95 has now been released, could you please update the package?
DD's: can anyone take a look at the package when updated? there are several
packages
On Thursday 28 August 2008 17:17:20 Stephan Peijnik wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4-12
of my package netmon-applet.
Hello,
here are some comments, you might want to address:
1) debian/copyright lacks important information - linux-data.c is
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 21:14:06 Fabio Balzano wrote:
Hello, I am Fabio Balzano,
I write from Italy, I use debian sinc 1999
and currentli I am system administrator of different
systems for my customers all debian based.
I also made VOIP systems asterisk based with
custom modifications
On Saturday 09 August 2008 05:26:33 William Vera wrote:
Thanks everyone for their comments
Nevertheless still a little confused, apparently I do not see any
patch applied, apparently only need add to debian/rules manually
delete those files, am I right?
Hello,
Your diff.gz brings in a
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 01:56:59 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
If the policy suggestion that leads to that lintian warning is so
unreasonable, it might as well be taken off the policy.
I'm not aware of any such thing in policy
Then maybe
On Monday 04 August 2008 02:13:30 Ben Finney wrote:
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--cut--
Advice given here needs to be carefully examined for dogma, and a
clear line needs to be maintained between you should do this and
this is one way to do it.
I'm guessing here -- Have you ever
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 02:42:59 Robert Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 21:29 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 23 juillet 2008, vers 21:37,
Julien Lavergne [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
On Sunday 03 August 2008 02:43:24 Ben Finney wrote:
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All other upstream files should be modified with patches.
Or by some other method that results in the Debian source package
format, with a pristine upstream tarball and all maintainer
On Friday 18 July 2008 10:01:01 dmanye wrote:
hello,
Hello,
let me explain my environment. i'm in a university taking care of
computer science department's computer labs. teachers say: i need for
my course app1, app2 and app3. most apps are windows ones and in most
of the lab sessions
On Saturday 19 July 2008 17:04:20 Marc Schoechlin wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.0-1
of my package whatsup.
Hello,
This is an interesting approach, but the package looks unfinished.
There are
some *.ex files in debian/ which are actually
On Thursday 17 July 2008 17:47:51 Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:19:37PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.19.dfsg-1
of the dante package - I'm adopting it, fixing three RC bugs
(dante does not currently have a version
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 17:59:14 Yavor Doganov wrote:
В Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:33:52 +1000, Ben Finney написа:
POSIX is usually treated as an initialism, so should be spelled in
all-capitals.
Not necessarily:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/13886/focus=4187
Quoting Star Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wrote a program to copy the memory content of - to a
file, but it says Segmentation fault, (i use AMD64 lenny, so the
address is long), how could i fix it? thanks!
you should only fclose() if Memory != NULL, so your function would be
On Sunday 13 July 2008 13:10:24 Benjamin Mesing wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I am trying to understand the new dpkg-source format 3.0 (quilt).
There are two points in the documentation (man-page) I do not
understand:
* In the section Building of the description of 3.0 (quilt) it
is
On Sunday 13 July 2008 18:30:34 Benjamin Mesing wrote:
* In the same section there is a note:
Note: dpkg-source expects the source tree to have all patches
applied when you generate the source package. This is not the
case when the source tree has been
On Monday 07 July 2008 16:39:14 Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:34:33PM +0300, Yavor Doganov a écrit :
Charles Plessy wrote:
Hello,
When a Debian binary package is built, environment variables such as
{{{CFLAGS}}} and {{{CXXFLAGS}}} are set by {{{dpkg-buildpackage}}}
On Monday 30 June 2008, Paul Gevers wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package winff. This is my first
contribution to Debian.
* Package name: winff
Version : 0.42-1
Upstream Author : Matthew Weatherford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
Hello George,
2008/6/25 George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
of my package poco.
[...]
The upload would fix these bugs
On Friday 27 June 2008, George Danchev wrote:
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
--cut--
I just realized that I forgot to add new patch to patches/00list, so
pacakge is still buggy. Version 1.3.2+dfsg1-3 has this missing line
add.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Yavor Doganov wrote:
--cut--
Hi,
If you define
CFLAGS = ...
in debian/rules, this is a make variable, not an environment variable,
and it won't propagate to sub-make.
However, if you do
$(MAKE) CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS)
that value will be used for the build and will
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Георги Данчев wrote:
This is true, unless the `override' directive is used in the
makefile to override variables set with a command line argument.
Sure, make gives you plenty of rope to hang yourself, to abuse the
users of your program, or to
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
of my package poco.
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpocodata5 - The C++
On Saturday 21 June 2008, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Hi!
Hi,
--cut--
Your changes seems to bring improvements..., yet could you please also
fix debian/rules so that both the binary-arch (buildd's call
`/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch') and binary-indep targets
exist (see Policy
On Sunday 22 June 2008, Thomas Knott wrote:
Am Sonntag, 15. Juni 2008 19:32:50 schrieb George Danchev:
Hi,
Hi! Thanks for your suggestions.
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gtkwhiteboard. It was
uploaded before by José L. Redrejo Rodríguez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but got
On Sunday 22 June 2008, The Fungi wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 05:41:11PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
Is there any use in adding your fingerprint to the signature ? ... It
seems misleading at least, if users think they can trust that... and
without the public key, it's useless anyway.
On Monday 23 June 2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] (22/06/2008):
In order to shorten my appendix with one line I decided on key ID only
instead, which is enough for public key diggers.
Even shorter: Sign your mails.
Bleh 3 words 3 failures ;-) is it really so
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Noah Slater wrote:
--cut--
Hello, and sorry for the late reply,
Seems like cdbs magic doesn't cope with that, but you can still save the
day: clean:: unpatch
common-install-prehook-impl:: patch
This is a bug in CDBS, I have reported it as #486848:
On Saturday 21 June 2008, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
thanks for hunting RC bugs ;-)
I prepared a QA upload for the latest upstream version of windowlab, a
small and simple windowmanager.
The upload would close the following bugs:
- 486978 (serious): FTBFS: windowlab.h:37:34: error:
On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Thomas Dreibholz wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hi,
the package seems to be in a good shape, but here are some remarks:
No need to use the trailing unstable1 in the version string
(2.5.0~beta7-0unstable1) since the package is also supposed to migrate to
testing at some point
201 - 300 of 487 matches
Mail list logo
