Hello,
On Thu 18 Apr 2024 at 06:24pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>>
>> Hello Xiyue,
>>
>> Please explain the autopkgtest_keep change. Remember that autopkgtests
>> are to test the installed p
-Using with the justification that it's an
arch:all package, but that doesn't make sense; Built-Using is for
licensing reasons, and may well be applicable to an arch:all package (I
think this came up before with one of your uploads?).
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
close 1068564
thanks
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Fri 12 Apr 2024 at 12:44pm +01, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> On 2024-04-12, at 17:53:15 +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Do you have your 1.34 upload of buttercup in git, please?
>
> Yup, it's all on Salsa.
Er. I got confused, then, didn't I? Should this RFS be closed?
-
to work on top of the branch on salsa :)
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Looks like the Source: in d/copyright is bogus?
--
Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hello,
Looks like you didn't push to master :)
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
close 1067127
thanks
--
Sean Whitton
,
1:0.2.0-4, which is not accounted for in our history. Please merge it
in. 'gbp import-dsc apt:persp-projectile/sid', and then a manual merge,
is probably what you want, because of how the patches are unapplied.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
arch:all package have Built-Using? Built-Using, per
Policy, is for license issues. arch:any vs. arch:all isn't
determinative.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
to be honest (especially the latter doesn't cause any issue for the
> tests), so please feel free to leave them as is.
Cool, thanks for reviewing.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sat 09 Dec 2023 at 04:23pm GMT, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Xiyue,
>
> I made some commits before uploading. Please review.
>
> For the dgit-maint-merge(7) workflow, there is no need to manually
> refresh patches. dgit will do it for us whenever necessary. See the
eal reason :)
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t;
> I've now also pushed an "upstream/0.3" tag at the commit that matches
> the "0.3" tag, but not sure whether this is what you were referring to.
> If this works better I can remove the upstream branch to avoid further
> complications. Please advice. Thanks
.
I will still work out of git, so please don't push a signed tag there.
See dgit-sponsorship(7) for more.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sun 15 Oct 2023 at 10:46pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun 15 Oct 2023 at 03:10pm +01, Sean Whitton wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Sun 15 Oct 2023 at 05:14am -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>&
Hello,
On Sun 15 Oct 2023 at 03:10pm +01, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun 15 Oct 2023 at 05:14am -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>
>> Sure! It's at https://salsa.debian.org/manphiz/bison-mode. FYI I have
>> also filed an RFS bug#1053987.
>
> Alright, pushed that t
upport for doing what?
- in general, do you mind if when I upload I commit the 'dch -r' change
for you? I.e. the upload is signed off by me, but there'd be [ Xiyue
Deng ] in the changelog. This avoids an e-mail roundtrip. Totally up
to you.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
on-mode
Can you give me a git repo to clone, please? I'll create and push it to
that team repo, then review and sponsor.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ticket from other DDs is needed.
This is not true.
Non-DDs cannot look at tickets in the system, but they can submit them.
I was a DM uploading to backports long before becoming a DD and I
submitted the request to RT myself.
--
Sean Whitton
d
exit status 2
Looks like you need to update your symbols file.
Please be sure to `dch -r`.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e
fakeroot when it invokes dh_auto_configure, though ...
I would suggest just disabling address sanitising for now. My sbuild
setup is v. similar to the buildds, so I suspect we are going to see an
FTBFS if this is left turned on.
[1] https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/786
--
Sean Whitton
ping once I am ready. Sorry for noise.
The source package format is not the issue, afaict. pristine-tar can
work with source format 1.0
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t deborig`. But I understand just
asking Dmitry!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
too.
Please try typing `origtargz`.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
rs are used to seeing, so it seems
fine to have them IMO.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
til buster+1.
Please justify this conclusion. Someone on debian-mentors might see a
way out.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
esting in a previous mail that I was planning on doing
that. Just wanted to get the Vcs-* fields fixed.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ould be able to do it yourself... are you saying that you were
unable to create a repo under emacsen-team? I just bumped your
permission level.
I don't want to upload the package with the wrong Vcs-* headers, so
let's get this fixed first.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
team/ I'll
grant it.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 14 2018, Sean Whitton wrote:
> If you do this, please upload using `dgit push-source` since Dmitry is
> using a dgit-based workflow.
>
> (you can just run `dgit push-source` and it should do everything for
> you)
Oh, plus --overwrite since the last upl
c is not out-of-date {updated this sunday}.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/iu-guest/inotify-tools
If you do this, please upload using `dgit push-source` since Dmitry is
using a dgit-based workflow.
(you can just run `dgit push-source` and it should do everything for
you)
--
Sean Whitt
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 13 2018, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2018-02-13 4:18 GMT+01:00 <kact...@gnu.org>:
>>> I suspect that the debomatic sid chroot is out-of-date.
>
> amd64 chroot was updated on Sunday, February 11, 2018 4:20:10 PM UTC
> (1518366010.2514317).
Thanks
Hello Dmitry,
On Tue, Feb 13 2018, kact...@gnu.org wrote:
> [2018-02-12 13:07] Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name>
>> > Last version is at bacef877c2f9293f9e1fd624b32d5306d7bc3c27 Maybe,
>> > you could try again?
>>
>> Still FTBFSs. Log attached.
effect
unless you export it? Not sure; I have not used this feature.
- It FTBFSs for me. Log attached.
--
Sean Whitton
sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.73.0 (23 Dec 2016) on iris.silentflame.com
+==+
| inotify-tools 3.14-4 (amd64
team sponsor if necessary.
I won't be sponsoring this, I'm afaid.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: noowner -1
Dear Ben,
On Wed, May 24 2017, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I will continue as the reviewer and eventual sponsor of the chapel
> source package itself (i.e. this RFS).
Unfortunately, I'm going to have to renege on this. I recently got a
new job within Debian, and the new se
Hello Branden,
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 04:35:23PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Please accept my apologies for letting this RFS sit for so long. Thank
> you for all your work. Looking forward to uploading it soon.
>
> Here's a full review of dc84e1861798b3aba0969e2fe81a2431f2
ther changes).
> * Control: limit build-depend on libaio-dev to linux-only.
Could you explain the need for this change, please? Perhaps directly in
the changelog.
Also, you need to run `dch -r` -- the changelog timestamp is behind
changes you've made.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
dependency?
If you're able to address the issues I've raised in this message, please
remove the moreinfo tag in this bug, and don't forget to re-run `dch -r`
to refresh the changelog timestamp.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
fter cloning the repository the package can be built like this:
>
> $ cd farbfeld
> $ git deborig
> $ dgit build -tc
Thanks. Will review & hopefully upload soon.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
portunity to review it yet.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
for every mode, sure.
> Emacs-ivy-doc is also pretty much ready to upload to non-free/docs; I
> just need to find out what I should build from the .texi--man page,
> and info page? Man page, info page and html doc? Something else?
Without looking at the source, Info and HTML sounds s
to refresh the changelog timestamp.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e package.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> For now, do you think I should create a README.Debian with these
> examples or wait for upstream to merge them?
I don't think you need to do either. Just mention that it's meant to be
a more flexible/improved version of diminish.el.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
out this. Failing that, I can open an
> upstream issue/request for clarified description.
diminish.el works like this:
(diminish 'auto-fill-function)
That's it. Clearly simpler.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:35:21PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> I do not yet have DM privileges for this package, but if I had
> uploaded the new build (with the same version) using dput, would it
> have been rejected?
Yes.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ight be a good idea to mention diminish.el in the description
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n version 1.1
.. would anyone want to install this?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
in shape.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s the issues I've raised in this message, please
remove the moreinfo tag in this bug, and don't forget to re-run `dch -r`
to refresh the changelog timestamp.
--
Sean Whitton
sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.73.0 (23 Dec 2016) on zephyr.silentflame.com
+
f you're able to address the issues I've raised in this message, please
remove the moreinfo tag in this bug, and don't forget to re-run `dch -r`
to refresh the changelog timestamp.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
end
> you upload to experimental
> first. Besides, experimental is more fault-tolerant.
This is not needed for completely NEW packages. We should upload this
to unstable.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t main.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 05:47:13AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> in deferred/2, so Sean can review changes if needed :)
LGTM. Rescheduled to 0-day. Thanks again.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
orporated in the
>package
> * some questions about the long-term plans of a fully featured
>(non-minimal) Chapel package.
Thank you for all this. I'm very busy for the next two to three weeks,
so I wanted to let you know it'll be a little while before I get to this
-- but I will get to it.
Hello Gianfranco,
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 05:47:13AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> in deferred/2, so Sean can review changes if needed :)
Thanks for uploading -- could you reschedule an extra 2 or 3 days
please?
I am currently moving house.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Descript
0, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Also, could you confirm that your changes have been forwarded upstream?
>
> Yes, I emailed some of them to Tim Mann on 3 April, and the rest on 17
> April. I think there were some cosmetic changes to the man pages after
> that.
Great. Thanks for confirming.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
timestamp.
--
Sean Whitton
sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.73.0 (23 Dec 2016) on iris.silentflame.com
+==+
| xtrs 4.9d-3~~unreleased (amd64) Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:1
t;
% dgit clone acpi
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
some time. :)
>
> See attachments. I've also pushed my work to alioth.
Please remove the moreinfo tag from the bug when it's ready to be
uploaded.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
for it but it's a big task, rather
> involved, and not required.
What is the status of this RFS? Are you still working on the upload to
experimental?
Thanks!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
remove the moreinfo tag in this bug, and don't forget to re-run `dch -r`
to refresh the changelog timestamp.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
dn't upload to unstable unless we *expect* it to be
unblocked.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
that no changes were required when bumping the
std-ver in the template.
- You should say that you are bumping the debhelper compat level, not
the "debhelper version"
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
oad, it is inappropriate
to bump the standards version. You should limit your changes to those
necessary to fix the RC bug.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t
changing anything to be compliant with the new version.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Hello Jonathan,
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 09:37:41AM +0200, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package
> "gnome-shell-extension-tilix-dropdown":
Surely this package should depend on tilix?
--
Sean Whitton
ou may wish
> to peruse for QA purposes:
Thank you for these!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Will I be able to overwrite -4 will a
> fresher upload?
Yes, mentors will let you overwrite. Or you could just send me an
updated debdiff, since it's tiny, and I can apply it to the current
version in the archive. Whichever you prefer.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-Depends change intentional? It's not in the changelog.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
least-effort solution (for other people) that
> doesn't involve shipping a badly broken package in Stretch.
Well, letting it drop out of testing is technically the least-effort
solution.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
gt;
> So my goals were, in this order:
> 1) Get the package suitable for unstable (which it wasn't); then
> 2) Get the package suitable for testing.
Generally speaking, something shouldn't go into unstable unless it would
also be suitable for testing (once deps and r-deps are also ready t
Dear Marco,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Marco Balmer wrote:
> Is the package quality from your view ok?
Sorry, I haven't reviewed it.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ilarly for some Files: fields.
If you're able to address the issues I've raised in this message, please
remove the moreinfo tag in this bug, and don't forget to re-run `dch -r`
to refresh the changelog timestamp.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
this as-is, you will need to target experimental.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ts."
> (Closes: #511645)
Is it impossible to backport this fix to the version currently in
stretch?
You are very unlikely to get release team approval for this upload as it
stands. Given what you wrote in #511645, is your intention for xtrs to
drop out of stretch, to be rein
on for 4pane_4.0+dfsg.orig.tar.*
I guess that you haven't uploaded an updated signature.
I tried to verify the change by comparing the tarballs with diffoscope,
to work around this, but the paths within the tarball have changed
(4pane-4.0/ -> ./4pane-4.0/) so that is not feasible.
--
Sean Whit
we could go ahead and upload and see what the ftp-masters think of
my proposed solution.
> Finally, my ITP has timed-out and the package removed from
> mentors. Does this now matter?
We don't need mentors since I am working out of your git repo. Your ITP
does not appear to have timed out. If the RFS gets closed, you can just
re-open it.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e problem of this
> simple way was).
There is also `dgit -wgf build-source` which means "build a source
package exactly matching git HEAD", which is quite reassuring, even if
you don't use dgit for the upload.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
remove the moreinfo tag from the unblock bug,
you say "some changelog tweaks with no functional change (feedback in
RFS)".
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ges to d/copyright not documented
- the last point about avoiding lintian warnings is unnecessarily
brief. Please expand it. There is a convention for std-ver changes:
* Bump standards version to 3.9.8 (no changes required).
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
the changelog timestamp.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Zoltan,
Due to the freeze, this needs to be uploaded to experimental, not
unstable.
Similarly for your other RFSs.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
oad needs to go to experimental, not
unstable.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
is is not a big deal
(integers are cheap)
- the debdiff you submitted to the unblock request is not the same as
the debdiff between your proposed upload and the version in sid. Can
you explain why? We don't want to upload this to sid unless we are
sure it will be unblocked.
Thanks.
-
ight claim as it was stated by the upstream author..
- Files in .build/ remain, and are not given in d/copyright.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
release. With absolutely zero reverse dependency and migration
> blocking, I believe fgrun should be able to enter unstable even though we are
> in freeze now (because it wouldn't affect other packages or Stretch release
> at
> all).
Note that the release team's freeze policy does not a
mit undoing most of the changes in
f4f7bda. Is it possible that you are working with the wrong orig.tar on
your system? Or is your Emacs performing changes across the source
tree? Make sure you use the orig.tar from the archive.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
, uscan looks for tags matching the URI
pattern. I'm not an expert on uscan but I think you should be able to
get it to substitute the version and just download that.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
has 4.0-1 as the version
number..
While we're at it, why do you have an additional .1 suffix to the dfsg
version number? It's certainly not a deal-breaker, but it's hardcoded
into the watch file, which could be annoying in the future.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t see how we could explain it any differently.
We are saying that is _should_ depend on poppler.
After the release of stretch, I intend to work on removing xpdf from the
archive for the reason that it is unmaintainable, not because it depends
on poppler.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Desc
t; complains about unused override.
You can use wildcards ('*').
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Dear Dmitry,
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 08:46:37AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> control: tag -1 -moreinfo
>
> [2017-03-06 20:54] Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name>
> > Dear Dmitry,
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:23:46AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrot
we would not expect most security bugs in one of them to
also be present in the other.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
al_ upstream sources.
I explained this in detail in one of my previous e-mails.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:05:19AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inotify-tools"
- you could install NEWS as the upstream changelog
- you could add a doc-base registration
This would bring you down to a single lintian tag!
--
source format to 3.0 (quilt) -- also not appropriate for an NMU.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
patch header has been updated to a better text.
Please consider using it: https://manpages.debian.org/dgit-maint-merge
- Changes to d/rules not in changelog.
- Just fyi: https://manpages.debian.org/git-deborig
Don't forget `dch -r` once you've addressed these.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.as
1 - 100 of 531 matches
Mail list logo
