Le samedi 31 mars 2007, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > Yes, I did. But since you can't read debian-private any more, you couldn't
> > have
> > known it.
>
> Yes, i know. Sad to see you go, and i wish you good luck in whatever you are
> now doing.
Thanks.
-
Le samedi 31 mars 2007, Sven Luther a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:04:04PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It looks like I'm still listed in the meta-ocaml package uploaders.
> > I just left the project so I guess the email addre
Hi,
It looks like I'm still listed in the meta-ocaml package uploaders.
I just left the project so I guess the email address will bounce anytime soon.
Thanks in advance for removing it.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Le dimanche 17 décembre 2006 14:48, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> Hi Jérôme,
>
> I just committed the changes to svn, will take effect with the next
> upload of the packages.
Thank you very much.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi,
I'm still uploader of the folowing packages:
- advi
- hevea
- meta-ocaml
- tuareg-mode
Could you please remove me from the uploader list?
Thanks in advance.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:22:34PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Well, it is too bad. I'm about to leave this mailing list because
> > I don't maintain any more OCaml packages.
>
> Bh, blame on you! :-)))
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:49:50PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > > I could create the list if I were admin on Alioth.
> > > Just say a name for the list.
> > Something like "debian-ocaml-maint-changes
Quoting Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Quoting Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I intend to or
Quoting Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I intend to orphan ocamlsdl (libsdl-ocaml, libsdl-ocaml-dev), my
> > sole ocamlsdl package.
> >
> > I used to package sdl-ttf2.0 for it, and
Hi,
I intend to orphan ocamlsdl (libsdl-ocaml, libsdl-ocaml-dev), my
sole ocamlsdl package.
I used to package sdl-ttf2.0 for it, and I'll give this one to
anyone interested as well.
Please tell me if any of you is interested.
Regards,
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
ng to be
useful (I just switched to AMD64 myself).
Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 01:43:23PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > I could create the list if I were admin on Alioth.
>
> Just say a name for the list.
Something like "debian-ocaml-maint-changes" or
"pkg-ocaml
> subscribed to the PTS of almost all ocaml related packages for the
> "upload-source" action.
>
> Splitting seems indeed the right thing to do.
All we need is to create a list on Alioth and subscribe packages to it.
I could create the list if I were admin on Alioth.
As for
unnecessary mess (dealing with shared
objects and their breakages, that is) to something which works fine already.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > > Was there any rationale for subscribe all those packages?
> > > It was a proposal, discussed and accepted on this list.
> > Hey! It's
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:51:30AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Sure, but please don't ask me to create the list, unsubscribe the
> > > current one from all packages and resubcribe the new one to all of them
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:11:57AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Would it be possible to move package changes fowarding elsewhere?
> > There seems to be more and more packages subscribed to
> > this list and it is real
package changes would be free to subscribe.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ese years, and i hope
> we can meet again in a next debconf or something.
I hope too.
--
Jérôme Marant
then maybe havingthese could be a feature.
Ahhh, yes. You're right.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ox: binary-without-manpage ocamldep.opt
> W: ocaml-nox: script-not-executable ./usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/camlheader
> W: ocaml-native-compilers: binary-without-manpage camlp4o.opt
> W: ocaml-native-compilers: binary-without-manpage camlp4r.opt
> W: ocaml-native-compilers: binary-without-manp
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:54:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:20:33AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I did a bit of lintian warnings huntin
Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> gcc and al are standard packages. Is this really relevant?
> Please don't depend on gcc.
>
> Policy says you don't need this dependency (4.2):
>It is not necessary to explicitly specify build
Remi Vanicat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the other side, I believe that one could compile a program with
> ocamlc without it (at least, when you use no C library). But I still
> believe we should depend on it.
Committed.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Here are my last changes. If noone objects, I'll commit them.
Done, after testing :-)
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I saw libocurl and libnumerix being removed just now whewn i apt-get
> dist-upgraded it, don't know exactly why though.
Likely to be unrelated I think.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, any idea how ocaml will behave when part of the libraries and runtime was
> built with gcc-3.3 and the rest with gcc-4.0 ?
I don't think there is any ABI change for C (only for C++). So, I don't
think we have to care for th
Remi Vanicat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2005/9/3, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> gcc and al are standard packages. Is this really relevant?
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> gcc is not an essential package, only a build essentia
Hi,
gcc and al are standard packages. Is this really relevant?
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
grotate
dh_installemacsen
Index: ocaml-nox.dirs
===
--- ocaml-nox.dirs (révision 1732)
+++ ocaml-nox.dirs (copie de travail)
@@ -5,5 +5,4 @@
usr/share/man/man1
usr/share/man/man3
usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/misc
-usr/X11R6/include/X11/pixmaps
usr/share/lintian/overrides
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; This should be \\.ml[iylp]?$ as for ocaml-mode. Or is there some filename
> pattern missing?
Oh, right. We all agree.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hen tuareg takes precedence. Users who
> wish to overwrite this behaviour should consult the instuctions given
> in the file /usr/share/doc/ocaml-mode/README.Debian.
Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
le I sould look to? never bother to learn how to make an debian
> emacs package). Note also that the ocaml-mode is configured to run on
> the extension "\\.ml[iylp]?$" may be we could uniformized those
> extansion.
What is not uniform?
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;
> Both should be invoked within a trunk/ directory of a package in the svn
> repo. The former should be used while building test packages while the
> second for the final build since it also tags the repo.
>
> More info in the svn-howto in the policy/ directory of the repo.
Thanks.
Hi,
I noticed the svn repo does have a specific layout as well as
svn-deblayout files.
How do you all build packages from the repo?
Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ion files of other packages.
I think so too.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:49:54AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > What bugs was it supposed to close? If you think of emacs related bugs,
> > isn't it better for users to confirm first and then to close bugs
> > ma
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 08:50:46AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > I intend to review how README files are handled, sooner or later.
> > There is also a plenty of lintian warnings that shall be checked.
>
> Jerome, do yo
,
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:31:20PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Yes, sure. BTW, where do they come from? From the orig tarball?
>
> Yes, from the labltk examples, have a look at #322712.
> I just added a find in the &
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:33:52AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > to be tested and I'll commit it afterwards.
>
> While your are at it, could you please check that in your .deb there are
> no more CVS/ directories aro
something better, you can
change it in the SVN.
I moved the ocaml-md5sum out of dpatch in my own tree. It needs
to be tested and I'll commit it afterwards.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... svn add ocaml-mode.dirs in my last commit. I'll fix soon.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 06:38:13PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>>
>> I noticed an empty changelog entry (lintian warned me about it):
>>
>> ocaml (3.07.2a-5) unstable; urgency=low
>>
>>
>> -- Sven Lu
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:53:13PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> I'm all for it, if there aren't technical downsides.
>
> The only reason I put it as a .dpatch file was that in that way
> disabling it would h
Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a bit confused about files shipped in /usr/share/doc.
>> Some are links, some are plain copies.
>> README.Debian is shipped by ocaml-base-nox, ocaml-nox links to it.
>
am I missing something?
It is a possibility but I think it is too hackish :-P
I've commited my changes but I haven't done anything about this
yet. So far, I think the cleanest way would be to just rename
them to .save or something.
--
Jérôme Marant
t; but I can't see them in the .md5sums of any ocaml package I've
> installed.
You shoulf find the md5sum for /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50ocaml-nox.el,
but not /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50ocaml.el.
Otherwise, have a look to the status file.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
ve them without the consent of the user.
--
Jérôme Marant
sh.
I think there is something I'm missing.
>> I could leave them around if so, but they'll probably mess with
>> the new ocaml-mode file. Or rename them? Any other idea?
>
> What kind of trouble could be caused? In the worst case there
> is a slight overhead for reading a useless file. Otherwise
> I don't see any particular problem.
OK.
--
Jérôme Marant
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 07:36:47PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
>> > Well, a system administrator might have modified these files,
>> > and then it would not be OK when they disappear on a remove.
>> > Can y
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 06:36:13PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
>> BTW, I added some code in ocaml-nox.postinst in order to remove
>> those 50ocaml.el and 50ocaml-nox.el files, because they are not
>> removed on upgrades
I noticed an empty changelog entry (lintian warned me about it):
ocaml (3.07.2a-5) unstable; urgency=low
-- Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:06:33 +0200
I think it should be removed.
--
Jérôme Marant
r to remove
those 50ocaml.el and 50ocaml-nox.el files, because they are not
removed on upgrades (conffiles are only removed on purge).
Is it the right place?
--
Jérôme Marant
uareg, modified in this sense,
> into svn (but not upload yet).
I'm not convinced by this. Most of Emacs users I've heard are usually
annoyed by autoloads and prefer setting themselves in their .emacs.
--
Jérôme Marant
ng.
Hmm, it seems that tuareg is not loaded by default and neither
set autoloads. So, this should not be necessary.
Am I missing something?
--
Jérôme Marant
Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Since ocaml-md5sum is provided as a dpatch, there is a problem
>> on clean.
>>
>> The clean target depends on the unpatch one. So, once unpatched,
>> -$(MAKE) -C ocaml-md5sums/ d
Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Wasn't it Samuel?
>
> I don't think so.
Indeed. After looking into logs, I found out that it was Michael Furr.
Michael, could you enlighten us, please? Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50ocaml-mode.el
>
> and tuareg could install
>
> /etc/emacs/site-start.d/51tuareg-mode.el
No, you're right. 51 will override 50.
--
Jérôme Marant
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 12:09:18PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> > I'm a bit confused about files shipped in /usr/share/doc.
>> >
Hi,
Since ocaml-md5sum is provided as a dpatch, there is a problem
on clean.
The clean target depends on the unpatch one. So, once unpatched,
-$(MAKE) -C ocaml-md5sums/ distclean cannot work since the Makefile
vanished, and this leaves compiled files around.
--
Jérôme Marant
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 01:45:23PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> If you want to avoid any problem in the future, just forget about
>> >> alternativ
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If you want to avoid any problem in the future, just forget about
>> alternatives.
>
> Why?
Link mess. It breaks all the time.
--
Jérôme Marant
es is managed by /etc/alternatives?
If you want to avoid any problem in the future, just forget about
alternatives.
--
Jérôme Marant
t; You are seriously comparing the ocaml emacs mode with dselect ?
Yes. Noone uses dselect as well :-) (I hope so :-)
--
Jérôme Marant
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 12:09:18PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
>> > About NEWS.Debian: what package should ship it? Are all packages
>> >
meant to provide it (or a link to it)?
Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:16:47AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> > I vote for ocaml-mode (even if I believe that's a bit a namespace abuse
>> Let's go for ocaml-mode
>
> Ok, just be sure to specify in pack
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Salut,
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
>> The work of splitting the emacs stuff in a separate package
>> is almost done. Few questions though:
>>
>> 1/ it is called caml-mode
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> 1/ it is called caml-mode in sources since it applies to caml light
>>as well. Shall I keep calling it caml-mode or ocaml-mode?
>
> I vote for oc
ot for the
people to see it mysteriously vanish.
Why wouldn't we follow the same guidelines?
--
Jérôme Marant
to
depend on it until etch is released (for transitional purpose),
which makes a circular dependency. Is this a problem?
T.I.A.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:35:27AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > OK. I'll have a look this week-end.
>
> Great.
>
> > Also, I'll suggest to move it in a separate ocaml-mode package.
>
> We will all b
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:54:23AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Still, I know almost nothing about emacs and I thus asked for help on
> > > debian-ocaml-maint to people with more emacs policy knowledge.
> > D
> That said your bug is proper, serious, and need to be fixed.
>
> Still, I know almost nothing about emacs and I thus asked for help on
> debian-ocaml-maint to people with more emacs policy knowledge.
Do you want me to help fixing this? (if nobody has already stepped up)
I can take care o
update depencies accordingly.
PS: I noticed a new tuareg-mode is out. Since debian-ocaml seems to be
its maintainers, is anybody allowed to update the package now?
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rectory
install: cannot stat `typing/*.o': No such file or directory
install: cannot stat `parsing/*.cmx': No such file or directory
install: cannot stat `parsing/*.o': No such file or directory
-==-=-=-=-=-
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
> Would this be sufficient for your purposes?
Mike,
You absolutely need to point out that those internal libs are QPL
and not LGPL. So, using them in GPL projects is not allowed.
A big warning in debian/copyright is recomended.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
> Would this be sufficient for your purposes?
Mike,
You absolutely need to point out that those internal libs are QPL
and not LGPL. So, using them in GPL projects is not allowed.
A big warning in debian/copyright is recomended.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;t add my name to the uploaders list.
Also, I'm going to review the whole set of packages in order not
to appear as an uploader of a package I don't use.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
;t add my name to the uploaders list.
Also, I'm going to review the whole set of packages in order not
to appear as an uploader of a package I don't use.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e semantic is
different". The "config spec" concept does exists in other VC systems
like Clearcase.
The concept of "CVS tag" means identifying a set of files with respect
to their version. With arch, it is as simple as a given changeset.
--
Jérôme Marant
e semantic is
different". The "config spec" concept does exists in other VC systems
like Clearcase.
The concept of "CVS tag" means identifying a set of files with respect
to their version. With arch, it is as simple as a given changeset.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e bytecode interpreter, so won't need ocamlrun.
So, this depende,cy is not mandatory.
--
Jérôme Marant
e bytecode interpreter, so won't need ocamlrun.
So, this depende,cy is not mandatory.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:57:43PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does someone remember why lib*-ocaml needs to depend on
> > ocaml-base-X.Y? I received a mail from a libsdl-ocaml
>
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:57:43PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does someone remember why lib*-ocaml needs to depend on
> > ocaml-base-X.Y? I received a mail from a libsdl-ocaml
>
Hi,
Does someone remember why lib*-ocaml needs to depend on
ocaml-base-X.Y? I received a mail from a libsdl-ocaml
user who think that this is not requred.
TIA.
--
Jérôme Marant
Hi,
Does someone remember why lib*-ocaml needs to depend on
ocaml-base-X.Y? I received a mail from a libsdl-ocaml
user who think that this is not requred.
TIA.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Jérôme Marant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> I think that free programs shall not refer to non-free ones.
>
> Thou Shall not refer to non-free programs
>
> Thou Shall not promote non-free
>
> Non-free i
n.
> Anyway non-free software seems not to be included in tasks. IMO
> it does still make sense to list these books, derived distros
> may include non-free software if they want.
Derived distro will probably customize tasks w.r.t. their
needs.
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Jérôme Marant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> I think that free programs shall not refer to non-free ones.
>
> Thou Shall not refer to non-free programs
>
> Thou Shall not promote non-free
>
> Non-free i
n.
> Anyway non-free software seems not to be included in tasks. IMO
> it does still make sense to list these books, derived distros
> may include non-free software if they want.
Derived distro will probably customize tasks w.r.t. their
needs.
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
--
To
ms even if
there is no such info in Depends/Recommends/Whatever.
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
ms even if
there is no such info in Depends/Recommends/Whatever.
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ckages
> distributed on a cdrom. Imagine now that you select the archive in a way
> to add non-free or any third party repository which happen to have
> packages dedicated to the ocaml task.
I can't imagine that because I can't imagine myself promoting
non-free software ...
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
in tasks, they
> will not propagate out to the Task fields in the Packages files in the
> Debian archive.
Since tasksel is mainly used for the debian-installer, I don't
see the point in adding non-free entries into it, since we
don't ship them.
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
ckages
> distributed on a cdrom. Imagine now that you select the archive in a way
> to add non-free or any third party repository which happen to have
> packages dedicated to the ocaml task.
I can't imagine that because I can't imagine myself promoting
non-free software ...
--
Jér
gt; will not propagate out to the Task fields in the Packages files in the
> Debian archive.
Since tasksel is mainly used for the debian-installer, I don't
see the point in adding non-free entries into it, since we
don't ship them.
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
--
To UNSUBSC
en - English book: "Developing applications with Objective Caml"
> ocaml-doc - Documentation for Objective Caml and Camlp4
You need to remove those packages. They are not part of main (Debian, that is)
so tasksel cannot support them.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
1 - 100 of 1343 matches
Mail list logo
