Bug#866865: (no subject)

2017-07-08 Thread Francesco Muzio
I'm running a stable Debian and I can confirm, this bug happen to me always when I use sddm with openrc (or simply boot with sysvinit-core, sysv-rc and systemd-shim installed) With systemd reboot/poweroff/suspend options are "almost" always available (9 boot on 10)

Bug#800313: [dolphin] dolphin ignores services available on /usr/share/kservices5/

2015-09-27 Thread Francesco Muzio
Package: dolphin Version: 4:15.08.1-1 Severity: normal Dear maintainer, "plasma5" version (4:15.08.1-1) of dolphin ignores services available on /usr/share/kservices5/ for example I have ark installed (4:15.08.1-1) and some files are present as a service $ dpkg -L ark | grep kservices

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-10 Thread Francesco Muzio
Il 10/01/2015 02:18, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto: that this symlink is actually always created by the postinst script of the display manager (on Debian, Fedora uses the [Install] section of the .service file for that by setting an alias to display-manager.service) and looking at the

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-09 Thread Francesco Muzio
also I think it's impossible that a soft-link /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service is created on a fresh install who only installs KDM as display-manager.service. Otherwise on the system there would be a /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service who not point to no service. -- To

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-09 Thread Francesco Muzio
Il 10/01/2015 00:43, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto: Ok, I thoroughly analyzed your qemu image and eventually found out that the symbolic link /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service which points to /lib/systemd/system/kdm.service was missing. A simple ln -s

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-09 Thread Francesco Muzio
Il 09/01/2015 15:45, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto: After that finished, I rebooted the machine and it booted right into kdm without any issues or error messages. Whatever I did, I could*NOT* reproduce your problem - at all. it means if you type the command # journalctl --no-pager |

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-09 Thread Francesco Muzio
Il 09/01/2015 22:45, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto: Ok, I actually understand now what your problem is. What you are seeing there is a mere *warning* by the systemd generator for the display manager unit that there is no service file for kdm present and that systemd used different means

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-08 Thread Francesco Muzio
I have done a test with a new installation of Debian. Yesterday I have created a minimal installation of Debian for i386 architecture with qemu. I have downloaded the latest weekly build of debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso image and I have installed it on a qcow2 image of 4GB I have

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-08 Thread Francesco Muzio
Why did you copy the extra kdm.service file into the systemd directory? Because you have told me to do it. see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755359#10 There is something that you are fundamentally doing wrong. I assume you do a minimal installation without using tasksel

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-08 Thread Francesco Muzio
Il 08/01/2015 23:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto: I can, btw, not examine your qemu image since you did not provide me with any passwords. I would have mount it manually now and modify the passwd database but you could have just told me the password. Oops... I have forget to tell you

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-06 Thread Francesco Muzio
ops... I have correct only the path for the var ExecStartPre Now I have done a new test with both paths updated: - I have copied the file kdm.service to /lib/systemd/system/kdm.service - I have rebooted the system kdm is not started, the output of systemctl status kdm shows me the service as

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-06 Thread Francesco Muzio
Ok, next days I try to test your solution on a most recent installation of Debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54ac68a1.90...@gmail.com

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-06 Thread Francesco Muzio
Il 06/01/2015 22:35, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha scritto: I presume you probably ran into this issue [1] which has been fixed in systemd 215-8. This version of systemd includes a generator which creates the necessary display manager unit file on-the-fly. I'm using a Debian testing constantly

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2015-01-06 Thread Francesco Muzio
thanks for your reply, but kdm is located at /usr/bin/kdm and not /usr/sbin/kdm with the correct kdm.service file the display manager won't start and the message about display-manager.service still exists. after a boot the command systemctl status kdm.service shows me this ● kdm.service -

Bug#764362: [akregator]

2014-10-17 Thread Francesco Muzio
Package: akregator Version: 4:4.14.1-1 this is the official patch https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdepim/repository/revisions/c5b703e7c1a3f5da43a3864536cfa606d112d60a source: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336417#c21 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#755359: [kdm] systemd seem to fail to start display-manager.service

2014-07-19 Thread Francesco Muzio
Package: kdm Version: 4:4.11.9-1 Severity: minor Dear maintainers, My machine (updated debian testing) has only KDM as display manager, it starts without problem after upgrading/trasition to systemd. But in journald log I see this message systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for unit

Bug#708461: solution

2014-03-09 Thread Francesco Muzio
sometimes KDE needs the spring cleaning I have had the same problem on a very old installation (the problem not happens on systems less old than 2009) and I have solved with an rm -r /var/tmp/kdecache-kdm* So now KDM use always the default directory /var/tmp/kdecache-kdm/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#673791: (no subject)

2012-06-24 Thread Francesco Muzio
Version: 4:4.8.4-2 The problem still persist and I have seen that also with the desktop effects enabled the fade to grey on logout effect doesn't work. Actually I used the last KDE version available on testing (4:4.8.4-2) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#673791: [kde-window-manager] Problem with basic desktop effects after upgrade

2012-05-21 Thread Francesco Muzio
Package: kde-window-manager Version: 4:4.7.4-2+b1 Severity: normal I have a Debian testing which is upgraded frequently After an upgrade done the Monday of 14 May 2012, I experienced a problem with the effects on my KDE environment. For meet my paranoid needs and solve strange behaviours of

Bug#631391: solution

2011-07-10 Thread Francesco Muzio
Adding Section Extensions Option Composite 0 EndSection in /etc/etc/Xorg.conf solves the issue, but the problem on KDE still remains should not behave in this way -- Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it

Bug#631391: (no subject)

2011-07-04 Thread Francesco Muzio
It's partially solved in KDE 4.6.4 KDM doesn't longer show the garbage but the logout/shutdown/reboot dialog of KDE is again garbled -- Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Offerta all

Bug#620533: [plasma-widget-folderview] folder view disordered

2011-04-02 Thread Francesco Muzio
Package: plasma-widget-folderview Version: 4:4.4.5-2 Severity: normal After the recent upgrade of QT library in testing this component has a strange behavior. The order of folders and files displayed doesn't respect the setting defined in the options of this component --- System