Bug#840295: Requesting RC exception for stretch for browserified javascript

On Wednesday 23 November 2016 01:07 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I am quite reluctant to give an exception to this. IMHO if it has to go in > non-free with rdeps in contrib, that's better than not having those rdeps at > all, and it can be improved to having them in main in the future when

Bug#825342: marked as done (mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:55:48 +0800 with message-id

[RFC] Enabling bindnow by default in dpkg-buildflags?

Hi! This was discussed relatively recently, but it was not entirely clear to me what was the conclusion, if there was any(?), about enabling bindnow by default. And although this got enabled by default in gcc-6 6.2.0-7 when PIE also got enabled, it seems it got disabled in 6.2.0-10 when I

Bug#845387: jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u7

On 2016-11-22 16:18, Stephen Dowdy wrote: > sorry to butt-in here, but: > > FYI: typo alert? fqsrt -> fsqrt ?? (transposition of q & s) > > I know it's just in the e-mail twice and the patch changelog once, but it'd > be good if the changelog was typographically correct, esp for searches.

Bug#845387: jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u7

sorry to butt-in here, but: FYI: typo alert? fqsrt -> fsqrt ?? (transposition of q & s) I know it's just in the e-mail twice and the patch changelog once, but it'd be good if the changelog was typographically correct, esp for searches. --stephen

Bug#845387: jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear stable release managers, I would like to upload a new glibc package for the next jessie release. Here is the changelog with some additional comment: * Update from upstream

Bug#842846: marked as done (transition: ros-vision-opencv)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:11:09 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#842846: New ros-vision-opencv transition has caused the Debian Bug report #842846, regarding transition: ros-vision-opencv to be marked as done. This means

Processed: Re: Bug#819530: transition: icu

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 819530 + pending Bug #819530 [release.debian.org] transition: icu Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 819530: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819530 Debian

Bug#842571: marked as done (transition: tango)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:07:57 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#842571: transition: tango has caused the Debian Bug report #842571, regarding transition: tango to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#841911: marked as done (transition: pari)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:13:25 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#841911: transition: pari has caused the Debian Bug report #841911, regarding transition: pari to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: Bug#842821: transition: hypre

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 842821 + pending Bug #842821 [release.debian.org] transition: hypre Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 842821: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842821

Processed: Re: Bug#843334: transition: czmq

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 843334 + pending Bug #843334 [release.debian.org] transition: czmq Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 843334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843334 Debian

Re: ITM: Britney2 branch britney-patch-bundle-201611 into master -- small update

Martin Pitt: > Hello Niels, > > Niels Thykier [2016-11-13 12:53 +]: >> [...] >> * It cherry-picks 4 commits proposed by Martin Pitt to assist Ubuntu >>with refactoring some their changes into policies. >> >> Martin Pitt (4): >> Move build checks before running policies > > This

Bug#841863: marked as done (transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:05:58 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#841863: transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit has caused the Debian Bug report #841863, regarding transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit to be marked as done. This

Bug#840501: marked as done (transition: ipython)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:07:06 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#840501: transition: ipython has caused the Debian Bug report #840501, regarding transition: ipython to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Re: ITM: Britney2 branch britney-patch-bundle-201611 into master

Niels Thykier: > > Hi, > > I intend to merge the branch [britney-patch-bundle-201611] consisting > of 21 patches into master no later than Monday the 21st of November. It > has been tested with [no regressions]. > * I have Cc'ed people, whom I know run Britney > > > [...] > This was merged

Bug#845304: transition: libxtables12

On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:29:26 + Simon McVittie wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: iptab...@packages.debian.org > Forwarded:

Bug#840295: Requesting RC exception for stretch for browserified javascript

On 16/11/16 13:03, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2016, നവംബർ 12 9:46:15 PM IST, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> We now have grunt in the archive, but the upstream philosophy of grunt >> is to force everyone to use a locally installed grunt for each project >> and not support using

Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl - will both 1.0.x and 1.1.x be in Stretch?

Afif Elghraoui: > > > على الأحد 20 تشرين الثاني 2016 ‫23:05، كتب Niels Thykier: >> Which source packages are we talking about? > > gridengine and ori. In the case of gridengine, we have a contributed > patch, but it has not been applied upstream or seen more than > compile-testing. In the case

Bug#813272: Problems with item delivery, n.1862418

Hello, We could not deliver your parcel. Delivery Label is attached to this email. Minne Casaus - Area Manager FedEx , CA Thank you for choosing FedEx FedEx.doc Description: MS-Word document

Bug#843775: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2

On 2016-11-22 16:42, Jens Sauer wrote: (dropping 845311@) According to my inbox it's possible to perform source-only uploads for jessie-proposed-updates (at least it worked for src:debian-installer), so I've just sponsored your package this way. Please close the RFS if it gets queued as

Bug#836010: marked as done (nmu: libodb_2.4.0-1)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:53:41 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#836010: nmu: libodb_2.4.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #836010, regarding nmu: libodb_2.4.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

Hi, On 26/07/16 06:39, YunQiang Su wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 09/06/16 21:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 07/06/16 19:38, YunQiang Su wrote: After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running), >>>

Bug#818104: marked as done (nmu: xul-ext-*)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:56:20 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#818104: nmu: xul-ext-* has caused the Debian Bug report #818104, regarding nmu: xul-ext-* to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#843775: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2

(dropping 845311@) > According to my inbox it's possible to perform source-only uploads for > jessie-proposed-updates (at least it worked for src:debian-installer), > so I've just sponsored your package this way. Please close the RFS if it > gets queued as expected; otherwise I'll re-sponsor the

Processed: Re: Bug#828557: sslsniff: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #828557 [src:sslsniff] sslsniff: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > unblock 827061 by -1 Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 827061 was blocked by: 837960 828416 828297 828480 828462

Processed: block 843265 with 843543 845331

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 843265 with 843543 845331 Bug #843265 [release.debian.org] transition: xorg-server 843265 was not blocked by any bugs. 843265 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 843265: 845331 and 843543 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#840942: jessie-pu: package isenkram/0.18+deb8u1

On 2016-11-22 12:45, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Adam D. Barratt] Yes, please. I've flagged the current upload for rejection. Once you receive the confirmation from dak that the rejection has been actioned, please upload the new build. When I build in a fresh jessie chroot, I get this

Bug#840942: jessie-pu: package isenkram/0.18+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt] > Yes, please. I've flagged the current upload for rejection. Once you > receive the confirmation from dak that the rejection has been > actioned, please upload the new build. When I build in a fresh jessie chroot, I get this debdiff: % debdiff

Bug#845304: transition: libxtables12

On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 at 10:49:11 +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > I missed the point that libxtables (which is in src:iptables) added a > few new symbols that triggers transitions. Wait, *added* a few new symbols? Adding symbols is not usually meant to trigger a transition; it just needs a

Bug#843775: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2

(dropping debian-boot@, adding 845311@) Hi Jens, Jens Sauer (2016-11-22): > Thank you for reviewing this package. It was my first time doing this, > I hope everything is alright. It looks to me everything was right on the first attempt. :) > I opened a RFS to find a

Bug#843775: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2

Am Sonntag, den 20.11.2016, 19:27 +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > Control: tag -1 + confirmed - moreinfo >  > Jonathan Wiltshire (2016-11-20): > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 01:52:25PM +0100, Jens Sauer wrote: > > > I prepared a package for mdadm to fix bug #840743 > > >

Bug#812573: marked as done (nmu: libaec_0.3.2-1)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:51:08 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#812573: nmu: libaec_0.3.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #812573, regarding nmu: libaec_0.3.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#832470: marked as done (nmu: deal.ii_8.4.1-1)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:48:49 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#832470: nmu: deal.ii_8.4.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #832470, regarding nmu: deal.ii_8.4.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#845304: transition: libxtables12

On 22 November 2016 at 10:39, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > To the maintainer: Why bump to a snapshot at this point in the cycle? Have the > rdeps been build-tested against the new libxtables? Are you aware we are in > the > transition freeze and this is a transition? > I

Bug#838692: marked as done (nmu: nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-1~bpo70+1)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:44:43 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#838692: nmu: nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-1~bpo70+1 has caused the Debian Bug report #838692, regarding nmu: nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-1~bpo70+1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#842816: marked as done (nmu: syslog-ng_3.7.3-3)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:41:54 +0100 with message-id <1333f4fc-7a50-4240-d44a-c1fdcb864...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#842816: nmu: syslog-ng_3.7.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #842816, regarding nmu: syslog-ng_3.7.3-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#838693: marked as done (nmu: libteam_1.12-2~bpo70+1)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:43:25 +0100 with message-id <0e77ca06-4b7a-e51f-d810-27083a224...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#838693: nmu: libteam_1.12-2~bpo70+1 has caused the Debian Bug report #838693, regarding nmu: libteam_1.12-2~bpo70+1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#845304: transition: libxtables12

On 22 November 2016 at 10:29, Simon McVittie wrote: > > src:iptables contains libxtables, which bumped SONAME recently, > starting a small uncoordinated transition. For extra confusion, > libxtables.so.12 was briefly shipped in libxtables11 (#844755); > after that was fixed,

Bug#845304: transition: libxtables12

On 22/11/16 10:29, Simon McVittie wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: iptab...@packages.debian.org > Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-iptables.html > > src:iptables

Bug#845276: marked as done (nmu: slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-2+b1)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:35:00 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#845276: nmu: slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-2+b1 has caused the Debian Bug report #845276, regarding nmu: slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-2+b1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#845304: transition: libxtables12

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: iptab...@packages.debian.org Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-iptables.html src:iptables contains libxtables, which bumped SONAME recently,

Bug#845156: jessie-pu: package monotone/1.1-4+deb8u2

On 11/21/2016 06:42 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > +monotone (1.1-4+deb8u2) jessie-security; urgency=high > > With the distribution updated to "jessie", please go ahead. Thanks. With that change, I uploaded monotone-1.1-4+deb8u2. Regards Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Broekaert J, ontvang gratis een LED TV met een track & trace systeem

Plaats een track & trace systeem in uw vloot en ontvang gratis een 40" LED TV* - Besparing op brandstof kosten - Beveiliging van uw materiaal en wagens - Planning optimalisatie Ja, ik wens van deze tijdelijke offerte te genieten:

Re: iptables transition (was Re: Bug#844755: fixed in iptables 1.6.0+snapshot20161117-2)

On 22 November 2016 at 05:00, James McCoy wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:00:47AM +, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: >> Changes: >> iptables (1.6.0+snapshot20161117-2) unstable; urgency=medium >> . >>* [146c602] libxtables: bump from libxtables11 to libxtables12