Bug#1039923: RFP: scip -- linear and nonlinear mixed integer optimization suite

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-science@lists.debian.org, debian-m...@lists.debian.org * Package name: scip Version : 8.0.3 Upstream Contact: s...@zlib.de (Mailing list) * URL : https://www.scipopt.org/ * License : Apache 2.0 Programming

Re: MRs on salsa and letting janitor automate things

Stuart Prescott writes: > Hi folks > > tl;dr: there lots of untriaged MRs on salsa; let's permit Janitor to > automatically commit its updates > > > There are lots of MRs on salsa for science-team packages that are open. > Many of these have been open for months and many have no comments, >

Re: [RFS] resampy

Antonio Valentino writes: > > David (in cc), how performed the initial packaging, recommends to > maintain the package in debian-python. > I have not a strong preference but my sponsoring request posted on > debian-python have been ignored for long time, so I fear that there is > not too much

Re: Incoming new flint 2.9.0 ==> beta1 in experimental

"Torrance, Douglas" writes: > On Thu 19 May 2022 08:47:24 AM EDT, julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote: >> version beta1 of flint 2.9.0 is out, with big changes announced. >> >> I could already check it would have broken flint-arb, and uploaded a >> version with a patch to unbreak it. [A new upstream

Re: Team upload policy

Drew Parsons writes: > The Python Team policy looks sensible to me. > > Any member of the team should be able to fix and upload any team package > in general. That helps spread the load and keeps the packages fresh. > > But reasonable also to have a stronger oversight model (the weak >

Re: RFS: macaulay2

Doug Torrance writes: > > Thanks for the note! I considered using dh_elpa when I decided to split > off the Emacs files into their own binary package. But dh_install > already installs them to the correct place, and there are not any test > suites to run. Is there another reason to use

Re: RFS: macaulay2

Doug Torrance writes: > >> - couldn't the emacs component be another source-package ? > > I considered this, but it's too tied to Macaulay2 itself. It doesn't > build by itself; several of the files in the M2-emacs submodule are > generated during the main Macaulay2 build. And Macaulay2

Re: How to step away from a package maintained inside the science team

Philipp Huebner writes: > Hey everyone, > > I am no longer interested in maintaining ceres-solver which I > re-introduced into Debian in March 2013. > > Given that I have been effectively the only active maintainer for that > package, I am wondering what to do, so please advise! > > > The

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

Olzhas Rakhimov writes: > Hello All, > > Is source-only uploads into mentors.debian.net acceptable for review? > > scram 0.16.2 is moved to C++17 requiring gcc7, boost 1.61, qt 5.9, > so I am currently on franken-Ubuntu 16.04 with custom ppas to build it. > However, it

Re: New GitLab-Salsa service and Debian-Science Team

Andreas Tille writes: > I *really* hope that there will be a solution which does not need any > VCS-field replacement. I'm pretty bored by replacing VCS-fields every > third year (or so). > I sympathize with your boredom (although that is really something doesn't need an

Re: intending to orphan COIN-OR packages

Miles Lubin writes: > Hi all, > > I am the main uploader on clp, coinor-cbc, coinor-cgl, coinor-osi, > coinor-symphony, and coinutils. These are mathematical optimization > packages (linear and integer programming) from the COIN-OR > organization. I no longer have

Re: Inclusion of additional Numerical Libraries (FGSL and lis)

Ghislain Vaillant writes: > It is too late to work on new packages. Please file a "request for > packaging" bug for the packages you mentioned, and someone from the team > might consider working on it for the next cycle. > > Ghis Backports to stretch from buster are another

Re: about consecutive RFS

Ghislain Vaillant ghisv...@gmail.com writes: Is it ok to submit another RFS for the latest version and ask for both 2.4-4 and 2.6-1 to be uploaded sequentially? At least, this solution would prevent me from having to alter the current changelog. I would not worry too much about having one

Re: cddlib

Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes: I found the explanation in the pdf documentation. In libcdd.so the functions with dd_ prefix use floating point arithmetic. In libcddgmp.so the symbols with dd_ use gmp and there are copies of all the function with floating point arithmetic with

Re: Sagemath: going further

Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes: Both versions of cddlib are in the package (libcdd0d) so that should work for polymake, right? polymake needs to use symbols from both libraries, and I believe they are the same. Again, maybe some wrapper could do the trick, although that might

Re: Sagemath: going further

Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net writes: Let me remind you all of this is done by using as many system-installed packages as possible, in order to see which debian packages need to be modified and how. Until now, only maxima needs some love, and we're lacking packages for : libgap,

RE: Distribution of non-GPL models with GPL Software (Was: [Qucs-devel] Closed bugs)

Getz, Robin robin.g...@analog.com writes: Adding the debian maintainer, and debian-science list to make sure there aren't distribution objections before I start verifying everything. Some background: I would like to include some vendor specific SPICE models with Qucs, which are not under

Re: RFP 702564: graphtea -- software framework to work on graphs

Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de writes: Questions: 1. Is the Science Team interested in maintaining this package? 2. Any preference regarding DH vs. cdbs? 3. Java experts around who know how to handle the dependencies? Hi Adrian, Hi Ali; I guess if Ali and you are

Debian Science and GSoC

I saw that Charles already put up an idea for a bioinformatics cloud image. What about some more science related ideas at http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2013/Projects I was thinking in particular of Sage in Debian as a potential GSoC project. Anybody willing to mentor such a project? d

Re: Debian Science and GSoC

Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes: On 10/03/2013 12:33, David Bremner wrote: I saw that Charles already put up an idea for a bioinformatics cloud image. What about some more science related ideas at http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2013/Projects I was thinking

Re: SAGE in Debian status page

Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes: what is the best way to view the dot file? Here it was opened by LibreOffice. the dot command can be found in the package graphviz. d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: RFP: GNU C-Graph 2.0 -- Visualizing Convolution

Adrienne Thompson a...@codeartnow.com writes: Programming Language: Fortran Description: GNU C-Graph is an interactive package that demonstrates the Convolution Theorem fundamental to engineering systems and signals analysis. The package is written in Fortran. C-Graph is an abbreviation

Re: RFS: GNU C-Graph for Debian

Adrienne Thompson a...@codeartnow.com writes: Dear Debian Science Team: This is a request for sponsorship of GNU C-Graph. Your Debian FAQ advises that the following information be included: Dear Adrienne; Thanks for the mail. In Debian jargon, sponsorship refers to uploading a debian

Re: GAP: local package installation

Rupert Swarbrick rswarbr...@gmail.com writes: As such, I suspect you want to untar it in /usr/share/gap/pkg/, which is the pkg subdirectory for Debian's GAP installations. Note: I haven't tried this. You should never install things into /usr unless you _really_ know what you are doing. /usr

Re: Yet another way to break a Git repository

Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes: Hi, seems I can prove my point that Git might end up with broken repository in several ways: $ git clone git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/vrr.git Didn't we already discuss this repo? d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Yet another way to break a Git repository

Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes: Hi, seems I can prove my point that Git might end up with broken repository in several ways: $ git clone git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/vrr.git As discussed previously, I have removed this repo. d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Another broken Git repository

Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes: As a Git beginner I think there are many powerful features in Git but also many ways to end up with a broken repository. That's a bit frustrating, thought. Any hint? I guess mycae-guest did not use the setup-repository script. I have run

Re: debconf13 debian-science track

David Bremner brem...@debian.org writes: So far I heard discussion about a batch system bof. Should I create that? What about sage, will there be enough people there to discuss it? Any other ideas? Julien C points out I meant debconf12. d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ

debconf13 debian-science track

Hi Folks I was chatting with Gunnar Wolf and he mentioned that there are no submitted talks for the debian science track yet. I think the track itself will be created today, but we should have some talks, if having a track makes sense. So far I head discussion about a batch system bof. Should I

Re: Permissions to Debian Science Git

Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes: On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:22:54PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: Probably the best thing is remove that repo to avoid future confusion. If you don't have permissions for that, let me know and I can do it. Fine for me. However, this does not explain why

Re: Debconf10: Batch Queuing Systems BoF -- revisited

Michael Hanke m...@debian.org writes: Unfortunately, I can't attend Debconf this year, but maybe there are enough people interested in the topic to have a follow-up BoF to revisit the issue. I'll be at debconf in Managua, and I would certainly attend such a BoF. I also have some interest in

Re: Git repositories without master tag

Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org writes: I see the reason. The checkout dir does not show a debian/ directory and I need to checkout a certain tag debian/* before this dir becomes visible. I do not know whether it is a strong requirement but wouldn't it be more comfortable to have a master

Re: Is there any point in loading SVN with outdated upstream source?

On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:40:05 +0200, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: thanks for the clarification. However, my question had a more general part: Is it OK to simply delete upstream code of *any* package I might stumble upon from our SVN in case I would stumble upon it = I can safely

Re: Proposal: Debian Science mailing lists

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:06:54 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote: I would like to propose the following: * move all packaging related discussions to debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org * use debian-science@lists.debian.org only for user oriented discussions *

Re: issues with pdflatex and font creation in scientific software ?

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:18:48 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme prudh...@debian.org wrote: Hi The diagnosis is pretty clear to me too as well as the cure However the error occured on the Debian build machines I have no access to these machines. It seems to me that something is fishy with the

PhD student in parallel/distributed computing sought

Systems Programming - Batch systems and cluster computing Candidates are encouraged to contact David Bremner brem...@unb.ca with a resumé and unofficial post-secondary transcripts. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Re: yet another talk submitted

On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:24:23 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Kumar Appaiah wrote: Although not requested, I've decided to share the abstract I've just submitted. I wanted to get your feedback (does it sound worth lecturing or may be some kind of

Re: Math/Science track for Debconf10: Presentations/Talks and coordinator needed

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:24:01 -0500, Kumar Appaiah a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in wrote: We would also like someone to come forward to coordinate a thematic track about debian and science, and handle the scheduling and of talks in this track. The track coordinator would help encourage a diverse

Re: RFS: nauty graph isomorphism package (fixes RC bug).

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:11:43 -0400, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote: The upload would fix these bugs: 569269 (FTBFS due to appearence of getline in default namespace). Sigh. That should be bug #569626, fixed in a new upload to mentors. d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science

RFS: lrslib, package to enumerate solutions to linear inequalities

rom: David Bremner brem...@unb.ca To: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: lrslib Dear All; I am looking for a sponsor for my package lrslib. * Package name: lrslib Version : 0.42c-1 Upstream Author : David Avis a...@cs.mcgill.ca * URL : http

DM-Upload-Allowed: yes on first uploads

At Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:22:22 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: I can't upload the packages, so I need to ask to debian-mentors-list (or debian-science) to find a sponsor for the upload, is this correct ? Yes. In this case I would also strongly recommend: DM-Upload-Allowed: yes to

Re: RFS: graph isomorphism package nauty

I found a silly packaging bug that causes the package to FTBFS almost everywhere. I uploaded a new version to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/n/nauty/nauty_2.4~b7-1.dsc or from git://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/nauty.git signed tag: debian/2.4b7rc2 I

Re: RFS: graph isomorphism

Andreas Tille wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:57:22PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: Description : graph isomorphism testing library, with command line tools Thanks for working on this (and ping me in case nobody else shows up as a sponsor) Andreas. Hi Andreas; So far no one

tasks files maintence (Re: RFS: graph isomorphism)

Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:12:09AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: Currently it is organised that way that you have to be a member of Blends team on alioth. There is no explicite need for this and it might also go into the debian-science SVN (but it has to be SVN for the moment

RFS: graph isomorphism

David Bremner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: graph isomorphism package nauty

Sorry, doze-n-send, strikes again. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/n/nauty - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget

hosting non-free packages in debian-science git repos

Hi All; After getting OK from alioth admins, I put the non-free graph-isomorphism package nauty in alioth.debian.org:/git/collab-maint/nauty.git I realized later that the package is most naturally maintained in debian-science. This raises two questions: 1) Is it ok with the team if we

Re: note-taking and PDF annotation: jarnal

Michael Hanke wrote: On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:16:00PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: Xournal is in debian, and seems to work OK. Is jarnal superior to xournal in some way? Okular also has annotation capabilities and is in Debian. My experience with okular annotation has not been too

Re: RFC: new version of bibutils

At Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:37:33 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Dear David, I had a brief look to your package, but did not manage to build it out of the box from a cloned git directory. Hah, yes it seems some combination of topgit and maybe my incompetence makes this harder than necessary to

RFC: new version of bibutils

Dear mentors, Dear debian-science people; I am hoping that Yaroslav Halchen will continue sponsoring this (Hi Yaroslav!), but I made quite a few changes in this new version including: - soname bump - added a symbol file - converted packaging to topgit - two standards

Re: Moving IT++ to team maintenance

Andreas Tille wrote: On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Kumar Appaiah wrote: 3. Could you recommend an easy way to shift the history to the new repository location? I hope the Git experts might be able to answer this question properly. Perhaps I misunderstand the question, because it seems too easy :-).

Re: gerris - Gerris Flow Solver

At Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:30:08 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote: I've used git on the Xorg project, I greatly prefer it over svn. Upstream on the other hand uses darcs. debian-science admin folk, should we manage gerris using darcs for the sake of consistency with upstream? (darcs.debian.org

Re: Axiom FTBFS on sparc

At 11 Nov 2008 12:40:02 +, Chris Walker wrote: I've just tried to build axiom on sparc on a lenny system- and get exactly the same build error. It builds fine on an i386 system. Unfortunately I suspect that to track this down needs someone with a good understanding of GCL and access to a

Re: RC bugs in debian-science packages

At Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:33:22 +0100, Chris Walker wrote: Package: axiom (optional; Camm Maguire) [axiom/20050901-10 ; 20050901-10.1 ; 20/10 days ; sparc(Failed)] [add/edit comment] 500997 [ B] axiom_20050901-10.1(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc, code.o': No such file or directory I'll have

Axiom FTBFS on sparc

Hi Camm; I remember mail is a bit in-transition for you. Did you see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500997 It looks like it is sparc specific. I tossed around the idea of a transient failure on IRC, but it looks like it fails in the same place on two different buildd

Re: RFS: maxima (NMU) [UPLOADED]

Riku Voipio uploaded this NMU. Thanks all. David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: maxima (NMU)

non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/maxima/maxima_5.13.0-3.2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards David Bremner pgpyAmyf770A6.pgp Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature

Re: future of blas/lapack/atlas packages?

Ondrej == Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ondrej Do you have experience with git packaging? I don't, but Ondrej maybe we could try it, as it could be easier for all of us Ondrej -- no need to joing any team, just git collab main. Debian science is also using git, and you are

Bug#474909: Build maxima with sbcl for lenny?

Package: maxima Version: 5.13.0-3.1 Followup-For: Bug #474909 Maybe this is the same bug as #467474? At least it looks the same to me. Although the build failure happens in a slightly different place for me, I still have a FTBFS with gcl 2.6.7-36.1 and gcc 4.3.1-2. It now seems to die the

Bug#486671: ITP: ntl -- C++ library for arbitrary precision integers, vectors, matrices, and polynomials

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: ntl Version : 5.4.2 Upstream Author : Victor Shoup [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.shoup.net/ntl * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : arbitrary

Re: git repo structure partial concensus

Manuel == Manuel Prinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Manuel On Wed, May 21, 2008 4:46 pm, David Bremner wrote: Can I assume that the location /git/debian-science/packages/foo.git is the right place for package foo? Manuel I'm fine with that. After all the replies

git repo structure partial concensus

Apologies to those of you who are bored of this discussion. Can I assume that the location /git/debian-science/packages/foo.git is the right place for package foo? I don't think it is necessary for my immediate needs to fix the rest of the structure, or decide about the fate of the

migration from svn to git

Sylvestre == Sylvestre Ledru [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sylvestre If there is no strong objections, I will migrate the Sylvestre current svn to git. I have migrated sketch, vrr, and bibutils to git. Here a little script I used. Hopefully those new to git are not too horrified; one does

Re: migration from svn to git

Teemu == Teemu Ikonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Teemu On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:54 PM, David Bremner Teemu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have migrated sketch, vrr, and bibutils to git. Here a little script I used. Teemu Does your script preserve revision history if it spans

Re: debian-science repository structure

Daniel == Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Daniel In case of SVN I would suggest you put all packages under Daniel /packages (as suggested somewhere else in this thread) and Daniel use svn:external for the category idea. Just make Daniel /category another top-level

Re: debian-science repository structure

Andreas == Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andreas Uhm, I hope so. I really hope that using quilt _and_ git Andreas is no contradiction. None at all. I think the X task force works this way, for example. I think it should be possible to generate mr configurations, or

Re: debian-science repository structure

Sylvestre == Sylvestre Ledru [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin Prinz wrote: OK. I just thought this was due to some misunderstanding by the people who checked those in. My fault! Thanks for your work an that! Sylvestre No worries, David Bremner has to decided which category

Re: debian-science git repository

Hi Teemu; Thanks very much for your informative post on using git on alioth. I didn't see any mention of shared? Shouldn't we initialize shared repositories to enable team maintenance? I have to run, but I remember the Collab-maint howto on wiki.debian.org tells how to do this. All the

Re: Alioth project to use is pkg-science

Err, the svn repo seems to have been migrated without history? That seems undesirable to me. svnadmin dump and svnadmin load or svnadmin hotcopy should do the trick. I won't make any more commits to either repo until I get the all clear from Sylvestre. I suggest others hold off as well. David

Re: {debian,pkg}-science repository

Daniel == Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Daniel Shouldn't git-svn help here? I know several projects on Daniel sf.net where authors use it to maintain the source locally Daniel with git and online with subversion. Daniel So people can choose to use svn or git for the

Re: {debian, pkg}-science repository [Was: Science linguistics and debian-science SVN repository at alioth]

Andreas == Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andreas On Tue, 6 May 2008, David Bremner wrote: If there is to be any sort of reorganization, ... Andreas So well, David, no answers from pkg-scicomp so far. I do Andreas not really know what this means, but I think we should

Re: Choose between TeXmacs and Auctex

Hero_xbd!.RRR wrote: Dear all, I am an undergraduate major in natural science. I am choosing a scientific paper editor for my remaining lifetime. Recently I find it hard to decide between TeXmacs and Auctex. I hope to have some advice from you gurus on the list. I can only tell you my

Re: 2nd RFS/RFC vrr: dynamic vector graphics with TeX text

pabs == Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: pabs On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:40 AM, David Bremner pabs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package vrr. This is my second post, essentially unchanged. Since last time I added icons and a .desktop file

Re: pkg-science, again

Andreas == Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andreas On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: This group could take inspiration from pkg-scicomp or debian-med to create his own policy (goals are very similar to pkg-scicomp). Andreas I'm a little bit concerned

Re: Bug#426581: meshlab - anyone still working on this

Paolo == Paolo Cignoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paolo Yes, it phones home regularly. [snip] Paolo In any case i need this Paolo feature so i could disable it but only for Debian builds. Paolo Is it possible to know at compile time if the runnining Paolo system is a 100%

pkg-science, again

Sylvestre == Sylvestre Ledru [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sylvestre I would like to jump on this opportunity to remind that Sylvestre we have the alioth projects pkg-science which could be Sylvestre use for maintenance of non-scientific-computing Sylvestre software if people are

package bibutils looking for sponsors (was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Sorry about the bad subject. Updated for those of you who auto-spam-filed it. The original message can be found at http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2008/01/msg00054.html David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: Science group on alioth

Raphael == Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Raphael On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: I really don't mind giving up the idea of pkg-science (Raphael already created the project and the svn... Sorry for this). Raphael Once decided, please don't forget to

Re: Science group on alioth

[ I originally sent this by mistake to Christophe only, sorry about the extra noise] Before we kill pkg-science, are people ok with pkg-scicomp including e.g. graph theory? I.e. stuff outside the normal numerical idea that some people have about scientific computing? I