:11): avc: denied
{ getattr } for pid=3104 comm="daemon-init"
path="/home/bcv/.thunderbird" dev="dm-5" ino=257
scontext=system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:thunderbird_home_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file
permissive=0
I am not sure why on earth
comm="daemon-init" path="/home/bcv/.thunderbird"
dev="dm-5" ino=257 scontext=system_u:system_r:virtd_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:thunderbird_home_t:s0 tclass=lnk_file
permissive=0
I am not sure why on earth would daemon-init try to read .thunderbird
directory
Hoi Paul,
On 11/02/2021 19:18, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hallo,
Het booten van een machine gaat nogal traag, dit lijkt te komen doordat
er randomness wordt aangemaakt tijdens het booten, want ik zie na ruim
een minuut wachten "Random: CRNG init done".
De machine heeft blij
Op 11-02-2021 om 22:15 schreef Richard Lucassen:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:18:41 +0100
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Weet iemand een manier om het booten te versnellen?
"haveged" heb ik geïnstalleerd en draai ik als daemon. Dat wil echter
nog niet zo helpen, hoe kan ik testen of het randomness heeft
andom: CRNG init done".
En hebben we het over een fysiek computer of over een VM?
Fysieke computer.
En elke boot of bij boot na installatie?
Elke boot.
De machine heeft blijkbaar geen hardware-random, want na het booten zie ik:
"No TPM or TPM has problems." Het gaat om een HP P
andom: CRNG init done".
De machine heeft blijkbaar geen hardware-random, want na het booten
zie ik: "No TPM or TPM has problems." Het gaat om een HP Proliant
ML110 G6 met een Xeon processor. Ik vind niets over TPM in het bios.
En als ik rng-tools installeer dan klaagt
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:18:41 +0100
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Weet iemand een manier om het booten te versnellen?
>
> "haveged" heb ik geïnstalleerd en draai ik als daemon. Dat wil echter
> nog niet zo helpen, hoe kan ik testen of het randomness heeft
> aangemaakt?
Was het niet een
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 07:18:41PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> Het booten van een machine gaat nogal traag, dit lijkt te komen doordat er
> randomness wordt aangemaakt tijdens het booten, want ik zie na ruim een
> minuut wachten "Random: CRNG init done"
Hallo,
Het booten van een machine gaat nogal traag, dit lijkt te komen doordat
er randomness wordt aangemaakt tijdens het booten, want ik zie na ruim
een minuut wachten "Random: CRNG init done".
De machine heeft blijkbaar geen hardware-random, want na het booten zie
ik: "No
You might have better luck asking on debian-cloud:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/
On December 19, 2020 4:31:22 PM CST, James Allsopp
wrote:
>Hi,
>Does anyone have an example or tutorial for using cloud-init with
>debian
>images. I'm currently trying to do terraf
Hi,
Does anyone have an example or tutorial for using cloud-init with debian
images. I'm currently trying to do terraform with kvm, but struggling as
although terraform picks up the cloud-init, the fqdn and the ssh key isn't
working. I'm trying to use this image
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage
Quoting Mark Raynsford (2020-02-22 17:38:20)
> 'Ello.
>
> On 2020-02-22T17:32:59 +0100
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> > Maybe you have... held broken packages?
> >
> > If you use aptitude instead of apt, then you can step through more
> > options, including options involving downgrading
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 04:51:01PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> On 2020-02-22T17:39:15 +0100
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > Not all is lost [...]
> Thanks! I was about to try that, but it seems that aptitude found an
> alternative solution. Firstly, "# aptitude install chromium" said:
Great
t might work.
>
> Cheers
> -- t
Thanks! I was about to try that, but it seems that aptitude found an
alternative solution. Firstly, "# aptitude install chromium" said:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
runit-init : Conflicts: systemd-sysv but 241-7~deb1
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 04:24:01PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> On 2020-02-22T17:08:48 +0100
> wrote:
> > I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd.
> >
> > Just for kicks, try
> >
> > apt install chromium sysvinit-core
> >
> > If that works, you'd perhaps want to
'Ello.
On 2020-02-22T17:32:59 +0100
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Maybe you have... held broken packages?
>
> If you use aptitude instead of apt, then you can step through more
> options, including options involving downgrading (which is unsupported
> by Debian, but since your system is already
Hi Mark,
Quoting Mark Raynsford (2020-02-22 17:24:01)
> On 2020-02-22T17:08:48 +0100
> wrote:
> > I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd.
> >
> > Just for kicks, try
> >
> > apt install chromium sysvinit-core
> >
> > If that works, you'd perhaps want to adapt your
On 2020-02-22T17:08:48 +0100
wrote:
> I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd.
>
> Just for kicks, try
>
> apt install chromium sysvinit-core
>
> If that works, you'd perhaps want to adapt your apt-preferences
> (either pushing sysvinit-core or lowering systemd).
>
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 04:02:16PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Attempting to install chromium results in the following:
>
> # apt install chromium
I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd.
Just for kicks, try
apt install chromium sysvinit-core
If that
-string-perl xml-twig-tools nvidia-vdpau-driver
nvidia-legacy-340xx-vdpau-driver nvidia-legacy-304xx-vdpau-driver
The following packages will be REMOVED:
runit-init
The following NEW packages will be installed:
adwaita-icon-theme at-spi2-core chromium chromium-common chromium-sandbox
dbus-user
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 12:42 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jun 25, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>> Seems this would work as well, with less collateral damage:
>>
>> apt install -y sysvinit-core elogind
>> apt --purge autoremove
>>
>
> This works great and, as
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Seems this would work as well, with less collateral damage:
>
> apt install -y sysvinit-core elogind
> apt --purge autoremove
>
This works great and, as noted, is far more elegant.
Thanks, Jonas!
Rick
Quoting Rick Thomas (2019-06-26 09:13:37)
> Hi Jonas,
>
> > On Jun 25, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> > Would be helpful to know if those experiencing long pause in
> > dbus-depending environments had _no_ dbus installed (and actively
> > running) or had it running with
Hi Jonas,
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Would be helpful to know if those experiencing long pause in
> dbus-depending environments had _no_ dbus installed (and actively
> running) or had it running with elogind.
How can I tell which situation I have?
Thanks!
g a Debian buster system from systemd to sysv init.
> >
> > The short version [1]:
> >
> > apt-get install -y sysvinit-core
>
> So our goal is to start with a working Debian buster system with the
> Mate desktop using the systemd init, and convert
Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> In any case, the solution I came up with is
>
> apt-get --purge install -y sysvinit-core dbus- glib-networking-
> libgtk-3-0-
> apt-get --purge autoremove
>
> Note the trailing minus-signs on dbus- glib-networking- libgtk-3-0- These
> packages need to be
> On Jun 23, 2019, at 2:24 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 05:45:39PM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Purely out of curiosity, I'd like to see what's involved in
>> switching a Debian buster system from systemd to sysv init.
>
> The
> On Jun 23, 2019, at 2:24 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 05:45:39PM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Purely out of curiosity, I'd like to see what's involved in
>> switching a Debian buster system from systemd to sysv init.
>
> The
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019, Bob Bernstein wrote:
How should I approach this change with an eye to maximum
safety?
Again, the wiki proved spot on:
https://wiki.debian.org/systemd#Installing_and_Testing
Sorry about the false alarm.
Thank you
--
These are not the droids you are looking for.
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:55:58 -0400
Bob Bernstein wrote:
> I encountered an error during the install of a deb which
> led me to the discovery that my current init system is
> still sysvinit.
>
> The error was:
>
> /sbin/init: invalid option -- '-'
> Usage: init {-e
I encountered an error during the install of a deb which
led me to the discovery that my current init system is
still sysvinit.
The error was:
/sbin/init: invalid option -- '-'
Usage: init {-e VAR[=VAL] | [-t SECONDS]
{0|1|2|3|4|5|6|S|s|Q|q|A|a|B|b|C|c|U|u}}
Thanks to the wiki:
https
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 01:27:08PM +0200, arne wrote:
>
> > That's right. "Modern" desktop environments (Gnome and derivatives,
> > most probably also KDE) depend these days on systemd. I don't know
> > how hard those dependencies are -- you'd want to look at Devuan [2]
> > [3] to see how far
> That's right. "Modern" desktop environments (Gnome and derivatives,
> most probably also KDE) depend these days on systemd. I don't know
> how hard those dependencies are -- you'd want to look at Devuan [2]
> [3] to see how far they went, if at all, into fixing this.
The Devuan default
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 05:45:39PM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> Purely out of curiosity, I'd like to see what's involved in
> switching a Debian buster system from systemd to sysv init.
The short version [1]:
apt-get install -y sysvinit-core
> Please, I don't want to restart or
Purely out of curiosity, I'd like to see what's involved in switching a Debian
buster system from systemd to sysv init. Please, I don't want to restart or get
involved in any of the existing systemd/sysv flame wars. I'm *just curious* to
see if it would work?
First of all, is this even
migration to testing.
>
> A grave bug in the testing version of module-init-tools (3.12~pre2-1)
> was fixed several weeks ago, and the package was uploaded with
> urgency=high:
>
> module-init-tools (3.12~pre2-2) unstable; urgency=high
>
>* Fixed an init scripts dependency
Hi Reco,
On 02/14/18 14:55, Reco wrote:
True. There's one tiny bit though - try
pidof -o %PPID -x /usr/sbin/sshd
and watch it output several pids as well.
Yes, indeed. If pidofproc would rely upon the pidfile only, then
there is no reason to call pidof.
And you don't have to spawn yet
Hi.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 02:33:16PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi Reco,
>
> wrt "pgrep --ns 1 -f /usr/sbin/sshd":
>
> The executable path simply doesn't tell if this is the right service
> to stop. If I run 2 services in parallel (e.g. for different network
> interfaces), then
Hi Reco,
wrt "pgrep --ns 1 -f /usr/sbin/sshd":
The executable path simply doesn't tell if this is the right service
to stop. If I run 2 services in parallel (e.g. for different network
interfaces), then this approach is already broken. Sample:
# pgrep --ns 1 -f /usr/sbin/sshd
12602
# ps -ef |
Hi.
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 04:04:37PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi Reco,
>
> you mean this is a known issue???
Well, it's known to me (since then) at least as I merely read the
contents of /lib/lsb/init-functions in my Debian system.
Pinpointing the problem is easy, anyon
Hi Reco,
you mean this is a known issue???
Harri
Hi.
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 11:35:04AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I see a weird effect of pidofproc (defined in /lib/lsb/init-functions):
> If there is no local daemon with a given search path running, then it
> returns the PIDs the daemons running in the
Hi folks,
I see a weird effect of pidofproc (defined in /lib/lsb/init-functions):
If there is no local daemon with a given search path running, then it
returns the PIDs the daemons running in the LXC containers. AFAICT this
affects the startup scripts of
apache2
opensmtpd
❦ 2 octobre 2017 10:43 +0200, bernard.schoenac...@free.fr :
> et c'est dnscrypt-proxy qui prend le dessus ...
Du coup, soit le désinstaller, soit désactiver sa socket (systemctl
disable dnscrypt-proxy.socket).
--
The mind is its own place, and in itself
Can make a Heav'n of Hell, a Hell of
- Mail original -
> De: "Vincent Bernat" <ber...@debian.org>
> À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
> Envoyé: Lundi 2 Octobre 2017 08:41:06
> Objet: Re: conflit entre init et unbound
>
> ❦ 1 octobre 2017 11:24 +0200, bernard.schoenac...@free.
❦ 1 octobre 2017 11:24 +0200, bernard.schoenac...@free.fr :
>> > tcp0 0 127.0.2.1:530.0.0.0:*
>> > LISTEN 1/init
>> >
>> > merci pour vos lumières
>>
>
> apt-cache policy dnss
> dnss:
> Instal
- Mail original -
> De: "bernard schoenacker" <bernard.schoenac...@free.fr>
> À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
> Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Octobre 2017 11:24:15
> Objet: Re: conflit entre init et unbound
>
>
>
> - Mail original -
>
- Mail original -
> De: "Vincent Bernat" <ber...@debian.org>
> À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
> Envoyé: Dimanche 1 Octobre 2017 11:06:34
> Objet: Re: conflit entre init et unbound
>
> ❦ 30 septembre 2017 18:06 +0200, bernard.schoenac...@f
0 0 127.0.2.1:530.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> 1/init
>
> merci pour vos lumières
Si dnss est installé, le retirer.
--
Wrinkles should merely indicate where smiles have been.
-- Mark Twain
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
r la situation afin que unbound puisse prendre
>>>> la main sur le port 53 ?
>>>>
>>>> netstat -antp | grep :53
>>>> |
>>>> tcp0 0 127.0.2.1:530.0.0.
r le port 53 ?
>>>
>>> netstat -antp | grep :53
>>> |
>>> tcp0 0 127.0.2.1:530.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>>> 1/init
>>>
>>> merci pour vos lumière
>>|
>> tcp0 0 127.0.2.1:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>>1/init
>>
>> merci pour vos lumières
>>
>> slt
>> bernard
>>
>
> Euh pour quelle mauvaise raison init écouterait sur 53/tcp
> Voire même écoute sur le réseau ?
>
C'est quoi init ?
Ph. Gras
> tcp0 0 127.0.2.1:530.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> 1/init
>
> merci pour vos lumières
>
> slt
> bernard
>
Euh pour quelle mauvaise raison init écouterait sur 53/tcp
Voire même écoute sur le réseau ?
bonjour,
comment faire pour débloquer la situation afin que unbound puisse prendre
la main sur le port 53 ?
netstat -antp | grep :53
|
tcp0 0 127.0.2.1:530.0.0.0:* LISTEN
1/init
merci
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <j.deboynepollard-newsgro...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Sven Hartge:
>> systemd happily runs "legacy" LSB init scripts
>>
> ... except when its one-size-fits-all approach does not work, of
> course. Example:
> * https:/
Sven Hartge:
systemd happily runs "legacy" LSB init scripts
... except when its one-size-fits-all approach does not work, of
course. Example:
* https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/386846/
This is the problem with even Mewburn rc scripts (as I can attest from
personal
Tom Browder:
# systemctl enable postfix # systemctl daemon-reload
Minor note: enable incorporates a daemon-reload.
Christian Seiler <christ...@iwakd.de> wrote:
> Now, that doesn't mean that you should still write _new_ init scripts
> for custom services if you're going to use systemd anyway. There it
> will be a good idea to learn how to do that with native systemd
> service units.
Ex
Am 2017-08-21 11:52, schrieb Tom Browder:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 02:36 Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote:
Question: Why do you want to manually replace the init-script from
postfix in Jessie with a systemd.unit? What do you want to
accomplish by
doing so (other than creating a po
> So the question I have is how does it all work? There is no init.d,
>>> but there seems to be some convoluted handling that I haven't
>>> figured out yet. Surely some expert can write a postfix.service
>>> file that drives postfix commands.
>> Question: Why do you wa
it.d,
> > but there seems to be some convoluted handling that I haven't figured
> > out yet. Surely some expert can write a postfix.service file that
> > drives postfix commands.
...
> Question: Why do you want to manually replace the init-script from
> postfix in Jessie wi
emplate. This
is coupled with a generator, "postfix-instance-generator" which creates
new instances on the fly, based on the output of "postmulti -l -a".
I don't know if you could transplant this mechanism from postfix3
(version in Stretch) to postfix2 (version in Jessie).
Questi
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 12:30 Sven Hartge wrote:
> Tom Browder wrote:
>
> > The contents of the postfix.service file are;
>
...
> That unit file does effectivly nothing. It just starts "/bin/true" and
> exits.
>
> What it *not* does is starting
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 12:30 Sven Hartge wrote:
> Tom Browder wrote:
>
> > The contents of the postfix.service file are;
>
...
>
> That unit file does effectivly nothing. It just starts "/bin/true" and
> exits.
>
> What it *not* does is starting
Tom Browder wrote:
> The contents of the postfix.service file are;
> [Unit]
> Description=Postfix Mail Transport Agent
> Conflicts=sendmail.service exim4.service
> ConditionPathExists=/etc/postfix/main.cf
> [Service]
> Type=oneshot
> RemainAfterExit=yes
>
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
>> So "disabled" is normal?
>
> Indeed. See:
>
>
Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
> So "disabled" is normal?
Indeed. See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Deployment_Guide/ch-Services_and_Daemons.html#s3-services-configuration-enabling
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
>> > # systemctl start postfix
>> > # systemctl status postfix
>> >
>> > and got several lines basically saying posfix.service was disabled.
>
>> The exact message
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:17 Nicolas George wrote:
> Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
> > > # systemctl start postfix
> > > # systemctl status postfix
> > >
> > > and got several lines basically saying posfix.service was disabled.
>
> > The exact
Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
> > # systemctl start postfix
> > # systemctl status postfix
> >
> > and got several lines basically saying posfix.service was disabled.
> The exact message is:
>
> * postfix.service - Postfix Mail Transport Agent
>Loaded: loaded
Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
> I got a postfix.service file from a postfix developer and installed it in
> /etc/systemd/system as the docs mention.
>
> I then moved the /etc/init.d/postfix file away, reloaded the systemd
> daemon, and did:
>
> # systemctl start postfix
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> I got a postfix.service file from a postfix developer and installed it in
> /etc/systemd/system as the docs mention.
>
> I then moved the /etc/init.d/postfix file away, reloaded the systemd daemon,
> and did:
>
> #
I got a postfix.service file from a postfix developer and installed it in
/etc/systemd/system as the docs mention.
I then moved the /etc/init.d/postfix file away, reloaded the systemd
daemon, and did:
# systemctl start postfix
# systemctl status postfix
and got several lines basically
and does *not* have systemd
unit files, it falls back to the sysvinit scripts.
Thanks Greg
That makes sense. Does this mean init will disappear from Debian in a
future release?
It is interesting that you gave ssh as an example because we seem to
have encountered strange problems with mixed IDE
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 07:32:52PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> However, studying documentation on systemd v init, I'm a bit confused. I
> assumed the reinstall would implement systemd for all services and init
> wouldn't be visible although symlinks will use init where necessary.
s server_U is working after reinstallation, following much
exploration, we reinstalled jessie 8.3 on server_M and committed to
systemd to avoid potential progressive sysv-init problems we'd
learned of during our investigation. After a reinstall of the system
and subsequently samba (twice), w
; codificado no framework: /lib/init/init-d-script. A propósito, ele possui
> até mesmo uma man page: man init-d-script.
>
> O que causou estranheza foi o fato de observar que nenhum outro script que
> verifiquei (ex: bind9, apache, proftpd, exim4, cron, ...) utiliza-o. Fato
> que
Devido a necessidade de criar um script para inicializar um determinado
serviço, comecei por /etc/skeleton e descobri, através dele, que não
precisava codificar praticamente nada, pois tudo já estava
cuidadosamente codificado no framework: /lib/init/init-d-script. A
propósito, ele possui até
tema també m'ha servit
per començar a aprendre els bàsics de systemd.
Salut
Àlex
A 2016-06-05 21:30, Àlex escrigué:
Benvolguts/des debianites,
em podeu aconsellar sobre quin és el millor mètode per fer regles
d'iptables persistents ara que systemd substitueix init a Debian
Testing
Disculpeu la brevetat, enviat des del telèfon mobil
Oscar Osta Pueyo wrote:
>Bones,
>
>El dia 6 juny 2016 15:12, "Alex Muntada" va escriure:
>>
>> Àlex:
>>
>> > Encara he trobat una tercera manera,
>> >
>> > https://wiki.debian.org/iptables
>>
>>
Disculpeu la brevetat, enviat des del telèfon mobil
Oscar Osta Pueyo wrote:
>Bones,
>
>El dia 6 juny 2016 15:12, "Alex Muntada" va escriure:
>>
>> Àlex:
>>
>> > Encara he trobat una tercera manera,
>> >
>> > https://wiki.debian.org/iptables
>>
>>
Bones,
El dia 6 juny 2016 15:12, "Alex Muntada" va escriure:
>
> Àlex:
>
> > Encara he trobat una tercera manera,
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/iptables
>
> Jo utilitzo aquesta manera (if-pre-up.d) des de fa temps i no
> dóna gaires maldecaps (potser algun cop amb alguna
Àlex:
> Encara he trobat una tercera manera,
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/iptables
Jo utilitzo aquesta manera (if-pre-up.d) des de fa temps i no
dóna gaires maldecaps (potser algun cop amb alguna interfície
hotplug de la que no conec el nom i que no tinc a les iptables).
> Seria aquesta la
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 10:46:03PM +0200, Josep Ma. Ferrer wrote:
> El Diumenge 05 Juny 2016, a les 21:30:43, Àlex va escriure:
> > Benvolguts/des debianites,
> >
> > em podeu aconsellar sobre quin és el millor mètode per fer regles
> > d'iptables persistents ara q
El Diumenge 05 Juny 2016, a les 21:30:43, Àlex va escriure:
> Benvolguts/des debianites,
>
> em podeu aconsellar sobre quin és el millor mètode per fer regles
> d'iptables persistents ara que systemd substitueix init a Debian Testing?
>
> Sempre que he establert regles de talla
On 05/06/16 21:30, Àlex wrote:
> > Benvolguts/des debianites,
> >
> > em podeu aconsellar sobre quin és el millor mètode per fer regles
> > d'iptables persistents ara que systemd substitueix init a Debian Testing?
> >
> > Sempre que he establert regles de tallafocs, les escrivi
que systemd substitueix init a Debian Testing?
>
> Sempre que he establert regles de tallafocs, les escrivia a un script
> dintre de /etc/init.d/regles_tallafocs.sh i feia un update-rc.d
> regles_tallafocs.sh defaults i tot funcionava.
>
> Però els temps canvien i avui no m'ha f
Benvolguts/des debianites,
em podeu aconsellar sobre quin és el millor mètode per fer regles
d'iptables persistents ara que systemd substitueix init a Debian Testing?
Sempre que he establert regles de tallafocs, les escrivia a un script
dintre de /etc/init.d/regles_tallafocs.sh i feia un update
.
>
> ¿Pero cuál demonio?, gnokii no lo arranco como demonio.
Pues a mano, como sea que lo inicies :-)
>> http://wiki.gnokii.org/index.php/Debug_output
>
> En este caso añadi las lineas siguientes al final de mi archivo de
> configuracion .gnokiirc
>
> [logging]
> debug
al arrancar el sistema, gnokii me lanza un error.
>>>
>>> Telephone interface init failed: Command timed out.
>>>
>>> Ya verifique el archivo de configuracion y se encuentra en perfecto
>>> estado, pero por la IMPORTANCIA de su funcion, recurro a ustedes para
&
2016-03-29 7:50 GMT-06:00 Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com>:
> El Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:49:00 -0600, Debia Linux escribió:
>
> (...)
>
>> El problema es que al arrancar el sistema, gnokii me lanza un error.
>>
>> Telephone interface init failed: Command timed o
El día 29 de marzo de 2016, 8:50, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> escribió:
> El Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:49:00 -0600, Debia Linux escribió:
>
> (...)
>
>> El problema es que al arrancar el sistema, gnokii me lanza un error.
>>
>> Telephone interface init failed: Comm
El Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:49:00 -0600, Debia Linux escribió:
(...)
> El problema es que al arrancar el sistema, gnokii me lanza un error.
>
> Telephone interface init failed: Command timed out.
>
> Ya verifique el archivo de configuracion y se encuentra en perfecto
> e
funcionando.
El problema es que al arrancar el sistema, gnokii me lanza un error.
Telephone interface init failed: Command timed out.
Ya verifique el archivo de configuracion y se encuentra en perfecto
estado, pero por la IMPORTANCIA de su funcion, recurro a ustedes para
encontrar una solucion mas
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:26:54 +0100
Aldo Maggi <aldoma...@katamail.com> wrote:
> Yesterday while updating my system via dselect (I'm using testing)
> I've received the warning that "init and systemd-sysv" were going to
> be uninstalled and I had to approve or de
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 12:00:02 +0100, Aldo Maggi wrote:
> Yesterday while updating my system via dselect (I'm using testing) I've
> received the warning that "init and systemd-sysv" were going to be
> uninstalled and I had to approve or deny that action.
> I've thought tha
Yesterday while updating my system via dselect (I'm using testing) I've
received the warning that "init and systemd-sysv" were going to be
uninstalled and I had to approve or deny that action.
I've thought that as in previous cases (to be frank not recently but
many
Yesterday while updating my system via dselect (I'm using testing) I've
received the warning that "init and systemd-sysv" were going to be
uninstalled and I had to approve or deny that action.
I've thought that as in previous cases (to be frank not recently but
many
, 04 aug 14, 13:30:54, Martin T wrote:
>>
>> As a next step, I made the /etc/init.d/test-script file executable and
>> added a symlink to /etc/rc3.d/("ln -s ../init.d/test-script
>> /etc/rc3.d/S23test-script") directory and changed my runlevel from
>> 2(def
On 2015-08-31, wrote:
>
>> I understand the whole "oh noes, firmware is a binary blob with unknown
>> contents [...]
>
> It seems you don't :-)
>
>> By not installing the firmware package, you are just making your life
>> harder without gaining anything but a
1 - 100 of 2215 matches
Mail list logo