François Boisson a écrit :
Le Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:38:02 +0200
Raphaël RIGNIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Bonjour,
dans ma zone de domaine j'ai cet enregistrement :
.rignier.com. MX 10 mail.rignier.com.
J'ai la possibilité contre une somme modique d'avoir des comptes mails chez
mon
Le Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:07:39 +0200
Raphaël RIGNIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Je n'ai pas la possibilité de configurer le serveur du registar pour
relayer les mails vers le principal mais est-ce qu'une redirection
sur les comptes concernés peut suffire (un .forward?)
Non parce que dans ce
Title: Message
Bonjour,
dans ma zone de
domaine j'ai cet enregistrement :
.rignier.com. MX 10
mail.rignier.com.
J'ai la possibilité
contre une somme modique d'avoir des comptes mails chez mon
registar.
Ceux ci pourraint
être une destination de secrours si mon serveur ou ma connexion
Raphaël RIGNIER a écrit :
Bonjour,
dans ma zone de domaine j'ai cet enregistrement :
.rignier.com. MX 10 mail.rignier.com.
J'ai la possibilité contre une somme modique d'avoir des comptes mails
chez mon registar.
Ceux ci pourraint être une destination de secrours si mon serveur ou
ma
-- -Message d'origine-
-- De : Sébastien CRAMATTE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Envoyé : jeudi 15 juin 2006 11:47
-- À : Raphaël RIGNIER
-- Cc : debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
-- Objet : Re: [DNS] Question sur le Enregistrements MX
--
--
-- Raphaël RIGNIER a écrit :
-- Bonjour
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:38:02PM +0200,
Raphaël RIGNIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 124 lines which said:
J'ai la possibilité contre une somme modique d'avoir des comptes
mails chez mon registar.
Il faut choisir : les comptes sur chez le prestataire ou bien chez
vous.
Ceux ci
Le Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:38:02 +0200
Raphaël RIGNIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Bonjour,
dans ma zone de domaine j'ai cet enregistrement :
.rignier.com. MX 10 mail.rignier.com.
J'ai la possibilité contre une somme modique d'avoir des comptes mails chez
mon registar.
Ceux ci pourraint
Bonjour,
Ayant acheté un nom de domaine, je me suis mis en tête de vouloir le
gérer. Après lecture de plusieurs documents sur le net et de DNS et
Bind de O'Reilly (pas en entier, mais quand même... ) et de quelques
tests, certaines choses, sûrement de base, m'intriguent.
Config:
Une passerelle
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bon, et bien je me réponds aussitôt: je devais quand même avoir un
problème de cache, car le temps d'écrire mon mail, et je n'accède plus
à linuxorable.net depuis CLW$.
J'avais pourtant pris la peine de vider plusieurs fois le cache de FF
pour être tout à fait sûr
@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: DNS: question de base
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bon, et bien je me réponds aussitôt: je devais quand même avoir un
problème de cache, car le temps d'écrire mon mail, et je n'accède plus
à linuxorable.net depuis CLW$.
J'avais
Tu peux etre un peu plus claire :
copie-colle le contenue de resolv.conf de ta passerelle, les routes de
la passerelles...
as tu un firewall ?
Si j'ai bien compris le client ne peut aller que sur linuxorable.net
quand tu arretes bind ? essaye de flusher rndc
mika.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: DNS: question de base
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bon, et bien je me réponds aussitôt: je devais quand même avoir un
problème de cache, car le temps d'écrire mon mail
Quoting michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bien: je précise pour les questions à venir que je n'ai pas de firewall.
Merci pour vos réponses. Je ne connaissais pas ipconfig /flushdns ni
rndc flush (rndc --help)
Comme je l'ai indiqué dans ma réponse tout est correcte lorsque je stop
Bind: CLW$ ne sort
Hey Folks,
What do I need to do to get a new site to show up in DNS? This is the
scenario: I've just connected a pc via satalite to the net, now I want
it to show up as a sub-part (is that the right term?) on our domain.
ie our domain is foo.net
and we want it to show up as 104.foo.net
we
At 2004-01-17T15:23:12Z, Mac McCaskie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do I need to do to get a new site to show up in DNS? This is the
scenario: I've just connected a pc via satalite to the net, now I want it
to show up as a sub-part (is that the right term?) on our domain.
Do you want that
Sometime near Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 09:23:12AM -0600, Mac McCaskie wrote:
Hey Folks,
What do I need to do to get a new site to show up in DNS? This is the
scenario: I've just connected a pc via satalite to the net, now I want
it to show up as a sub-part (is that the right term?) on our
Like I said, I'm new and working a new job. Named is running on Red Hat
(either pc1 w/7.3 or pc2 w/9.x, I'm not sure). Regardless, I think you
gave me enough to start with come monday, well at least I have a
direction to head, anyway.
thanks -mac
Ryan Mackay wrote:
Sometime near Sat, Jan
Ahh, well if you get stuck then i recommend you check out
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/other-formats/html_single/DNS-HOWTO.html
--
Cheers,
rinmak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comme il a une adresse IP privée, je suppose qu'il s'agit de
domaines purement
locaux genre tony.local ?
Non, il s'agit de .com achetés, et j'ai mis l'IP publique dans la config du
DNS.
Quels sont les serveurs DNS que je dois declarer sur mes
machines windows
pour que tout fonctionne
On Friday 14 November 2003, at 9 h 13, the keyboard of Tony Accardo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IPCOP fait DNS cache et mon serveur Debian est cense heberger plusieurs noms
de domaines.
Comme il a une adresse IP privée, je suppose qu'il s'agit de domaines purement
locaux genre tony.local ?
Bonjour tous,
J'ai
chez moi un rseau qui ressemble a:
Internet
|
|
ADSL| IP FIXE:
81.56.230.72
|
Firewall (IPCOP) Orange
(192.168.69.1)|
| Green
(192.168.99.1)|
||
||
||
|
192.168.69.9||
DHCP (192.168.99.50 -
60)Serveur
Debian Postes Windows
IPCOP
fait DNS cache
Hello!!
I need to make up a dominium, but with only a server. I will like to
use some DNS server not on my site, ¿can somebody help me? Of course I
have static IP. And if I have to put DNS server on my machine, what can
I use to make it?
Thank you for all!!!
Angel wrote:
Hello!!
I need to make up a dominium, but with only a server. I will like to
use some DNS server not on my site, ¿can somebody help me? Of course I
have static IP. And if I have to put DNS server on my machine, what can
I use to make it?
Thank you for all!!!
Art Lemasters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Does anyone here know how to do this with the most recent sendmail
in potato (8.9.3) to receive mail for both domain.com and machine.domain.com,
etc.?
Make sure all the domains for which you wish to receive mail are defined
in the 'w' (or is it
How can I set up two completely different FQDNs (two totally
different hostnames) on one box (e.g., my.domain.net
alsomy.otherdomain.net) so that this machine accepts traffic
on my.domain.net while appearing to be alsomy.otherdomain.net
to anyone who accesses it via the webserver or
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Art Lemasters wrote:
How can I set up two completely different FQDNs (two totally
different hostnames) on one box (e.g., my.domain.net
Point both DNS entries at your IP address. You can only have your IP map
to one of them in reverse DNS, though. If you absolutely
yeah that would work fine, point 1 domain at 1 ip, or point a million
domains at 1 ip ..its all the same ..now if your doing it for web
hosting, e.g.
http://www.aphroland.org and http://yahoo.aphroland.org and
http://comedy.aphroland.org are all the same ip (208.222.179.35)
however they are all
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Art Lemasters wrote:
How can I set up two completely different FQDNs (two totally
different hostnames) on one box (e.g., my.domain.net
alsomy.otherdomain.net) so that this machine accepts traffic
on my.domain.net while appearing to be alsomy.otherdomain.net
to
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 12:01:29AM -0500, William T Wilson wrote:
Yes, you can point A records from two domains to the same IP address.
You can also use a CNAME record. I'm not sure when one approach would
be preferred over the other.
You can also use virtual hosting to have the same machine
Bob Nielsen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 12:01:29AM -0500, William T Wilson wrote:
Yes, you can point A records from two domains to the same IP address.
You can also use a CNAME record. I'm not sure when one approach would
be preferred over the other.
This is true however the rfc (not
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 12:01:29AM -0500, William T Wilson wrote:
Yes, you can point A records from two domains to the same IP address.
You can also use a CNAME record. I'm not sure when one approach would
be preferred over the other.
You
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
Yes, you can point A records from two domains to the same IP address.
You can also use a CNAME record. I'm not sure when one approach would
be preferred over the other.
The answer is simple: Use A records for everything and forget about
CNAMEs. :}
I
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 01:09:32PM -0500, William T Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
Yes, you can point A records from two domains to the same IP address.
You can also use a CNAME record. I'm not sure when one approach would
be preferred over the other.
The
Hi guys,
I know this isn't strictly debian related but i'm sure someone can help me
quickly.
If i've got BIND 8.1.2 running (debian 2.0) i've noticed that all zone
transfers to anywhere are blocked.
With the xfernets command I know I can allow certain hosts to do zone
tranfers, but all over the
Another one.
If a name server is open to the public (in terms of zone transfers).
Is it possible to do something like...
nslookup
server nameserver.in.question
ls -t any *.com
?
I know you can pick a specific domain and get the db information for it, but
is there anyway to query
a DNS server
Hello,
Is it possible to create a new domain on a subnet that is already
registered? Here is my situation. Let's have subnet 111.111.111.255
which has domainname `university.edu'. Now I want to take one address
from the subnet, let's say 111.111.111.254, and register it as a
new domain (outside
You can do what you suggest.
When you register a domain name (xyz.org), you
just tell the InterNic (or whomever) the primary
and secondary name servers (provided by your
ISP, usually) for names in that domain. The
name servers answer the specific host address
for each such host (you have to tell
I was under the impression that the use of CNAME was not smiled on. Is
this the case? If so, what is the preferred way to handle CNAMEs?
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null
On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 05:20:27PM -0400, Shaleh wrote:
I was under the impression that the use of CNAME was not smiled on. Is
this the case? If so, what is the preferred way to handle CNAMEs?
I just talked to our sysadmin at work -- he says CNAMEs are ok 'cept
when you're talking about mail
Not so. What's frowned upon are CNAMEs that point to other CNAMEs.
Shaleh wrote:
I was under the impression that the use of CNAME was not smiled on. Is
this the case? If so, what is the preferred way to handle CNAMEs?
--
Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s
Hello ,
I have a problem getting dns to start on the linux
server.
When i try to run named it says '/etc/named.conf'
cannot be opened.
I could not find such a file anywhere in the system.
Any help in this matter will be deeply appreciated.
Much Obliged,
Regards,
Eugene
Run bindconfig
On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, eugene mendoza wrote:
Hello ,
I have a problem getting dns to start on the linux
server.
When i try to run named it says '/etc/named.conf'
cannot be opened.
I could not find such a file anywhere in the system.
Any help in this matter will be deeply
Rick Jones wrote:
I should have been more specific, sorry. I wanted to know if this
secondary that is behind the firewall, IP masq'd, can be used as far as
internic is concerned, or if they will reject it because of the IP
masqing?
No, Internic will not allow two name servers with the same IP
A. M. Varon wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 1997, Rick Jones wrote:
I think I know the answer to this already, BUT is it possible to run a
secondary DNS through an IP masq firewall?
Just wondering since I'm about to network my home systems via an IP masq
firewall and would rather use one of my
I set up a DNS on my FreeBSD box which is behind my Debian box
and it worked fine. At the time I didn't think to ask the question I
just added the secondary line to my named.boot for my ISP and
restarted named.
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian User List
I should have been more specific, sorry. I wanted to know if this
secondary that is behind the firewall, IP masq'd, can be used as far as
internic is concerned, or if they will reject it because of the IP
masqing?
Does any body know? I have solved my need for a secondary but am still
curious
On Fri, 9 May 1997, Rick Jones wrote:
I think I know the answer to this already, BUT is it possible to run a
secondary DNS through an IP masq firewall?
Just wondering since I'm about to network my home systems via an IP masq
firewall and would rather use one of my other systems as secondary.
I think I know the answer to this already, BUT is it possible to run a
secondary DNS through an IP masq firewall?
Just wondering since I'm about to network my home systems via an IP masq
firewall and would rather use one of my other systems as secondary.
I haven't researched IP masq firewalling
Rick Jones wrote:
I think I know the answer to this already, BUT is it possible to run a
secondary DNS through an IP masq firewall?
Just wondering since I'm about to network my home systems via an IP masq
firewall and would rather use one of my other systems as secondary.
I haven't
49 matches
Mail list logo
