On Thu 02 Dec 2021 at 05:15:26 (-0600), Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2021 02 Dec 01:07 -0600, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:31:43PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > > As for the firefox version, it manages to combine them, but
> > > throws the emphasis onto the face, and just
* On 2021 02 Dec 01:07 -0600, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:31:43PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > As for the firefox version, it manages to combine them, but
> > throws the emphasis onto the face, and just looks like a
> > mischievous kid's cartoon character.
>
> That's
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:31:43PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
As for the firefox version, it manages to combine them, but
throws the emphasis onto the face, and just looks like a
mischievous kid's cartoon character.
That's exactly what I look like ;)
--
Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to
On Tue 30 Nov 2021 at 10:47:07 (+), Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 11:54:16AM -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> > eagerly leaving behind the originally all-text form of e-mail
>
> Unicode *is* text, as far as I'm concerned. I don't see the point in
> limiting what I write to a
On 2021-12-01, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Speaking of colour, I work at Red Hat and I have had (U+1F3A9 TOP
> HAT) as the shell prompt character for the main RHEL virtual machine I
> use for work. At that time, my terminal did not support colour glyphs,
> and the font that was used to render
Le 01-12-2021, à 09:26:00 +0100, l0f...@tuta.io a écrit :
Hi,
Hi, nice to see someone not hijacking my thread :)
It seems like /etc/fstab in not read when plugging in the device.
I know you've solved your issue with another way but, just out of
curiosity, could the following command
Hi,
25 nov. 2021, 09:28 de dl...@bluewin.ch:
> Le 24-11-2021, à 20:29:19 +1100, Keith Bainbridge a écrit :
>
>> I use a line in /etc/fstab like this for just this purpose:
>>
>> UUID= /mount/point/you/want ext4defaults,noexec,noauto 0
>> 2
>>
>
> Well, the partition still mounts
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 09:49:15PM -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
My signature includes an emoji which is configured to be a reasonable
approximation of my appearance.
That does sound like fun, even though curmudgeons like me might consider
it frivolous. I doubt I'll have a hardware/software
On Tue Nov 30 11:54:48 2021 Jonathan Dowland
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 11:54:16AM -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
>> Am I the only one who sees the irony in all this? We're living
>> in an era where the so-called "woke" generation is taking offence
>> at every perceived slight or sign of
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 11:54:16AM -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
Am I the only one who sees the irony in all this? We're living
in an era where the so-called "woke" generation is taking offence
at every perceived slight or sign of racial or sexual discrimination,
however minor. Yet these same
On Sun 28 Nov 2021 at 11:54:16 (-0800), Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On Sun Nov 28 11:38:54 2021 Celejar wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 22:58:58 -0600 David Wright wrote:
> >> On Sat 27 Nov 2021 at 07:22:45 (-0600), John Hasler wrote:
> >>> Celejar writes:
> >>>
> I'm curious: do most users of
On Sun 28 Nov 2021 at 15:43:52 (-0500), Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 14:11:27 -0600 John Hasler wrote:
> > Celejar writes:
> > > ...or even "recommends" that one...
> >
> > I wrote:
> > > How do you know?
> >
> > Celejar writes:
> > > $ apt-cache rdepends fonts-recommended
> > >
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 14:11:27 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> > ...or even "recommends" that one...
>
> I wrote:
> > How do you know?
>
> Celejar writes:
> > $ apt-cache rdepends fonts-recommended
> > fonts-recommended
> > Reverse Depends:
>
> That doesn't show recommends.
Yes,
On Sun Nov 28 11:38:54 2021 Celejar wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 22:58:58 -0600
> David Wright wrote:
>
>> On Sat 27 Nov 2021 at 07:22:45 (-0600), John Hasler wrote:
>>
>>> Celejar writes:
>>>
I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
software, as opposed to
Celejar writes:
> ...or even "recommends" that one...
I wrote:
> How do you know?
Celejar writes:
> $ apt-cache rdepends fonts-recommended
> fonts-recommended
> Reverse Depends:
That doesn't show recommends.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:38:19 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Do you have the "fonts-recommended" package installed?
>
> Celejar writes:
> > No, I had never heard of it. Do you?
>
> Yes.
>
> > No, I had never heard of it. Do you? No package depends on [it]...
>
> True.
>
> > ...or
On Sat 27 Nov 2021 at 21:50:22 (-0600), John Hasler wrote:
> Do you have the "fonts-recommended" package installed?
Obviously I'm doing something wrong (or not doing it),
as I have just installed all the fonts available in
buster that match fonts-recommended/bullseye, including
I wrote:
> Do you have the "fonts-recommended" package installed?
Celejar writes:
> No, I had never heard of it. Do you?
Yes.
> No, I had never heard of it. Do you? No package depends on [it]...
True.
> ...or even "recommends" that one...
How do you know?
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 22:58:58 -0600
David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 27 Nov 2021 at 07:22:45 (-0600), John Hasler wrote:
> > Celejar writes:
> > > I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> > > software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> > > installed, or
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:50:22 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> Do you have the "fonts-recommended" package installed?
No, I had never heard of it. Do you? No package depends on or even
"recommends" that one, so I'm not sure how you would have ended up with
it insofar as you "never manually installed
On 2021-11-28 at 10:45, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2021 27 Nov 20:09 -0600, Celejar wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure Droid Sans Mono Slashed doesn't have the glyphs in
>> question, and that you must actually have the noto or similar fonts
>> installed, with some part of the Gnome infrastructure
* On 2021 27 Nov 20:09 -0600, Celejar wrote:
> I'm pretty sure Droid Sans Mono Slashed doesn't have the glyphs in
> question, and that you must actually have the noto or similar fonts
> installed, with some part of the Gnome infrastructure finding them when
> you select the glyphs. What does
On 2021-11-27 at 22:36, Celejar wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:28:05 -0500
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2021-11-27 at 21:08, Celejar wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure Droid Sans Mono Slashed doesn't have the glyphs in
>>> question, and that you must actually have the noto or similar fonts
>>>
On Sat 27 Nov 2021 at 07:22:45 (-0600), John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> > I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> > software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> > installed, or do they see tofu?
>
> I use Gnus. I've never manually installed
Do you have the "fonts-recommended" package installed?
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:00:35 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> > What does fc-list | grep noto return?
>
> 272 lines.
Sorry - see my other message in this thread. So you clearly have the
Noto fonts installed. They're not essential packages, so something you
installed must have
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:28:05 -0500
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-11-27 at 21:08, Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:50:29 -0600
> > Nate Bargmann wrote:
> >
> >> * On 2021 26 Nov 11:36 -0600, Celejar wrote:
>
> >>> I finally got tired of seeing tofu for some of the glyphs in your
Celejar writes:
> What does fc-list | grep noto return?
272 lines.
(No need to cc me)
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 2021-11-27 at 21:08, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:50:29 -0600
> Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
>> * On 2021 26 Nov 11:36 -0600, Celejar wrote:
>>> I finally got tired of seeing tofu for some of the glyphs in your sig,
>>> so I looked up their Unicode codepoints:
>>
>> Interestingly, I
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:50:29 -0600
Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2021 26 Nov 11:36 -0600, Celejar wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
> > Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Jonathan Dowland
> > > ✎ j...@debian.org
> > > https://jmtd.net
> >
> > I finally got
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 01:32:51 +0100
Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:36:04 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> (...)
> > I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> > software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> > installed, or do they
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 07:22:45 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> > I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> > software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> > installed, or do they see tofu?
>
> I use Gnus. I've never manually installed any
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 23:41:37 +0100
Linux-Fan wrote:
> Nate Bargmann writes:
>
> > * On 2021 26 Nov 11:36 -0600, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
> > > Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > Jonathan Dowland
> > > > ✎j...@debian.org
> > > >
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 12:29:33 +0100
"Sijmen J. Mulder" wrote:
> Celejar :
> > I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> > software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> > installed, or do they see tofu?
>
> I too use Sylpheed and get tofu. I must have
Nate Bargmann writes:
* On 2021 26 Nov 11:36 -0600, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Jonathan Dowland
> > ✎ j...@debian.org
> > https://jmtd.net
>
> I finally got tired of seeing tofu for some of the glyphs in your
Celejar writes:
> I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> installed, or do they see tofu?
I use Gnus. I've never manually installed any emoji fonts (or any other
fonts) but I see the glyphs, not the
Celejar :
> I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> installed, or do they see tofu?
I too use Sylpheed and get tofu. I must have mistakenly assumed emoji
fonts would be installed by default hence this
* On 2021 26 Nov 11:36 -0600, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Jonathan Dowland
> > ✎j...@debian.org
> > https://jmtd.net
>
> I finally got tired of seeing tofu for some of the glyphs in your sig,
> so I looked up their
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:36:04 -0500
Celejar wrote:
(...)
> I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> installed, or do they see tofu?
no idea what "most users" do; I am actually using sylpheed too, and
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:06:01 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
> On 27/11/21 2:11 am, Tixy wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:36 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> >> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
> >> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> Jonathan Dowland
> >>> ✎ j...@debian.org
> >>>
On Sat 27 Nov 2021 at 03:06:01 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 27/11/21 2:11 am, Tixy wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:36 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
> > > Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > Jonathan Dowland
> > > > ✎
On 27/11/21 2:11 am, Tixy wrote:
On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:36 -0500, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
...
Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
https://jmtd.net
[...]
I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who
On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:36 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Jonathan Dowland
> > ✎j...@debian.org
> > https://jmtd.net
>
[...]
>
> I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> software, as
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
...
> Jonathan Dowland
> ✎ j...@debian.org
> https://jmtd.net
I finally got tired of seeing tofu for some of the glyphs in your sig,
so I looked up their Unicode codepoints:
Le 25-11-2021, à 10:43:16 +, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 09:28:03AM +0100, steve wrote:
It seems like /etc/fstab in not read when plugging in the device.
What's wrong?
The thing doing the mounting is udisks (8). Checking that man-page, one
thing you can do to hint
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 09:28:03AM +0100, steve wrote:
It seems like /etc/fstab in not read when plugging in the device.
What's wrong?
The thing doing the mounting is udisks (8). Checking that man-page, one
thing you can do to hint udisks to ignore a device is to have udev set a
property
Le 24-11-2021, à 20:29:19 +1100, Keith Bainbridge a écrit :
Steve
I use a line in /etc/fstab like this for just this purpose:
UUID= /mount/point/you/want ext4defaults,noexec,noauto 0
2
Well, the partition still mounts to /media/steve/Samsung_T5 when plugged in.
I put this in
Thanks to you Felix and Keith for the answers. I will try.
Have a nice day
steve
Le 24-11-2021, à 12:00:31 -0500, Felix Miata a écrit :
steve composed on 2021-11-24 09:57 (UTC+0100):
So is there a way to automatically mount /dev/sdh2 but not /dev/sdh1?
steve composed on 2021-11-24 09:57 (UTC+0100):
> So is there a way to automatically mount /dev/sdh2 but not /dev/sdh1?
Create a LABEL on that FAT partition, then create a noauto by-label fstab entry
for it.
Steve
I use a line in /etc/fstab like this for just this purpose:
UUID= /mount/point/you/want ext4defaults,noexec,noauto 0
2
Rememer to mkdir -p the mount point you want. And it doesn't have to
be /media.
The noexec means nothing can run from the device - not even root. You
Hi,
I have an external ssd with two partitions. One is for Windows and the
other one is an ext4 partition for data.
Every time I plug in this ssd (via usb3), both partitions are mounted
automatically.
mount command gives:
/dev/sdh1 on /media/steve/Samsung_T5 type fuseblk
51 matches
Mail list logo
