Am 2006-06-21 17:03:23, schrieb Johannes Wiedersich:
> For users of virus-ridden OSes that also means that e-mail viruses
> remain on the system until they are deleted, expunged and compacted
> (yes, three individual manual steps!)
...and if you have had no Virus-Scanner installed, a new AV-Sof
On 24.06.06 14:05, David E. Fox wrote:
> But at this job, everything was top post. The emailer pretty much
> forced you to edit that way - I recall spending time tryiing to
> reformat the emails to look like what I'm used to, but eventually gave
> up. After all, it's a different environment, and ju
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 07:42 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Le samedi 24 juin 2006 à 21:18 -0500, Default User a écrit :
> > Gee, I almst hate to ask, but:
> >
> > I use the defult Evolution email client in Debian stable. When I choose
> > "reply to list" when replying to a post on debian-user@li
Le samedi 24 juin 2006 à 21:18 -0500, Default User a écrit :
> Gee, I almst hate to ask, but:
>
> I use the defult Evolution email client in Debian stable. When I choose
> "reply to list" when replying to a post on debian-user@lists.debian.org
> instead of putting that in the to: field, it puts t
Gee, I almst hate to ask, but:
I use the defult Evolution email client in Debian stable. When I choose
"reply to list" when replying to a post on debian-user@lists.debian.org
instead of putting that in the to: field, it puts the word
Debian
underlined in the to: field instead. How can I chang
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-24 05:00:28 -0500]:
> What problem do you see with Tbird?
Nothing, really, for quick basic setup, it's terrific, and using imap mailboxes
does indeed let you switch between mua's at will..
Tbird out of the box, though, does not let me sort mailboxes t
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:36:15 +
"Lynn Kilroy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use MSN Hotmail. Seems MSN Hotmail doesn't work quite the same way your
> cludgy e-mail clients {oft mentioned in your article} do.
I've never liked web-based email. Enough said. :)
> Furthermore, most common user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Patterson wrote:
> * Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-23
> 13:13:50 -0700]:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:30:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>>>
>
>> yes. bring on the brick-bats!
>>
> Hear,
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 08:19:55AM +0700, Dave Patterson wrote:
> * Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-23 13:13:50 -0700]:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:30:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > >
>
> > yes. bring on the brick-bats!
> >
> Hear,
* s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-24 01:35:42 +]:
> For Steve Lamb? Essentially the moon.
Heh,heh...
--
Cheers,
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> also sprach Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.23.2202 +0200]:
> > > Anyway, for multiple personalities, check out hooks and muttprofile.
> > > Works fine for me and many others.
> >
> > I am well aware of those and they are not nearly enough.
>
* Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-23 13:13:50 -0700]:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:30:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> yes. bring on the brick-bats!
>
Hear, here.
I've used Mutt/Getmail/Exim/Procmail for a long time. Tried T-bird about
t
also sprach Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.23.2202 +0200]:
> > Anyway, for multiple personalities, check out hooks and muttprofile.
> > Works fine for me and many others.
>
> I am well aware of those and they are not nearly enough.
What else do you need? I am curious...
--
Please d
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:30:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > There seem to be two ways to handle it, bludgeon them for their
> > lack of knowledge and drive them away, or be a gentle persuader
> > and convert them over time.
>
> But it's so much more satisfyin
Derek Martin wrote:
> I have about two dozen e-mail addresses, and I find Mutt does an excellent
> job of dealing with them. Perhaps you are just not yet familiar enough
> with Mutt's features to know how powerful it can be for managing
> this...
I am quite familiar with mutt's lack of feat
martin f krafft wrote:
> Anyway, for multiple personalities, check out hooks and muttprofile.
> Works fine for me and many others.
I am well aware of those and they are not nearly enough.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 |
Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> You will of course note that the "Debianistas" can point the Reply-To
> header to the list themselves if they feel so inclined.
Actually I got myself in trouble on another list when they told me that if
I wanted a sane list policy when it came to posting to the list (n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:04:40PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
> [...]
>> So getting back to the topic of this thread, insisting that
>> "all competent mailers" have a 'Reply to List' function, when
>> none of the most co
There is nothing wrong with telling people that their is [broken|not-standards-compliant|...] but the
reality is that we can only do that gently as a way to begin educating
others. Case in point: my sister uses hotmail and insists on
top-posting. I pointed out once how this didn't work so well,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:04:40PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
[...]
> So getting back to the topic of this thread, insisting that "all
> competent mailers" have a 'Reply to List' function, when none of the
> most common mailers for people trapped in the most widely used operating
> system have the
Le vendredi 23 juin 2006 à 09:48 -0500, Seth Goodman a écrit :
> > > I'd say it's quite a stretch to say that Elm is at the forefront
> > > of MUA technology.
> >
> > But who was talking elm? Last I checked we had references to
> > mutt and Thunderbird. Both of which do innovative things with
Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 à 11:50 -0500, Mike McCarty a écrit :
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
It's not a FAQ, it's a FFF (Frequent Flame Fest) around here.[...]
Well, an argument get
On Thursday, June 22, 2006 5:53 PM -0500, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Seth Goodman wrote:
> > I'd say it's quite a stretch to say that Elm is at the forefront
> > of MUA technology.
>
> But who was talking elm? Last I checked we had references to
> mutt and Thunderbird. Both of which do innovative t
Ron Johnson wrote:
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
A final question: as I need to share the printers, both USB
connected to my Etch machine, with a Sarge system, is the right
way forward to use lpd, or is CUPS viable?
CUPS is good at this. You've got to fiddle with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>
> A final question: as I need to share the printers, both USB
> connected to my Etch machine, with a Sarge system, is the right
> way forward to use lpd, or is CUPS viable?
CUPS is good at th
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:07:13PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Derek Martin wrote:
> > It is probably the most configurable and most powerful MUA in
> > existence today, making easy many things which should be and making
> > possible many things which are hard or impossible using other clients.
>
>
also sprach Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.23.0807 +0200]:
> > It is probably the most configurable and most powerful MUA in
> > existence today, making easy many things which should be and making
> > possible many things which are hard or impossible using other clients.
>
> While mak
Ron Johnson wrote:
What printer(s) do you use?
HP DeskJet 970Cxi and Canon PIXMA MP780
You probably already found these links in Google.
Too bad it's not the 970Cxi ...
http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?recnum=HP-DeskJet_970C
http://www.turboprint.info/printers.html
http://www.li
Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 à 11:50 -0500, Mike McCarty a écrit :
> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> > If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
> > the address headers?
>
> It's not a FAQ, it's a FFF (Frequent Flame Fest) around here.[...]
Well, an argument gets faster when yo
Let's kick it up a notch.
cmr
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Juha Tuuna wrote:
On Wednesday, 21. June 2006 15:55, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response t
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> I wouldn't call Thunderbird incompetent, but your point is well taken.
I would.
--
Marc Wilson | All of the animals except man know that the principal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | business of life is to enjoy it.
--
To UN
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:32:18PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> Not real relevant until CUPS gets fixed.
Have you tried tonight's CUPS packages yet? Apparently the maintainer has
decided after all that multiple configuration files is a bad idea.
Myself, I decided not to bother just yet.
--
Marc
Derek Martin wrote:
> It is probably the most configurable and most powerful MUA in
> existence today, making easy many things which should be and making
> possible many things which are hard or impossible using other clients.
While making hard what other clients make trivial and makes it an
e
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:04:40PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
> So getting back to the topic of this thread, insisting that "all
> competent mailers" have a 'Reply to List' function, when none of the
> most common mailers for people trapped in the most widely used operating
> system have the requir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> [cut]
>
>>> NB The headers in my original post show that I'm still a prisoner
>>> of Windows and rc scripts are not an option. If I ever get my
>>> printers working under Debian then I'll consider the
On (22/06/06 23:20), Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> [cut]
>
> >>NB The headers in my original post show that I'm still a prisoner
> >>of Windows and rc scripts are not an option. If I ever get my
> >>printers working under Debian then I'll consider the final
> >>switch.
> >
> >W
Seth Goodman wrote:
> I'd say it's quite a stretch to say that Elm is at the forefront of MUA
> technology.
But who was talking elm? Last I checked we had references to mutt and
Thunderbird. Both of which do innovative things with mail and both of which,
admittedly, have serious warts.
--
Ron Johnson wrote:
[cut]
NB The headers in my original post show that I'm still a prisoner
of Windows and rc scripts are not an option. If I ever get my
printers working under Debian then I'll consider the final
switch.
What printer(s) do you use?
HP DeskJet 970Cxi and Canon PIXMA MP780
Pet
On Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:02 PM -0500, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Lynn Kilroy wrote:
> > I use MSN Hotmail. Seems MSN Hotmail doesn't work quite the same
> > way your cludgy e-mail clients {oft mentioned in your article} do.
>
> Cludgy? Actually these are quite on the forefront.
I'd say it's qu
Lynn Kilroy wrote:
> I use MSN Hotmail. Seems MSN Hotmail doesn't work quite the same way
> your cludgy e-mail clients {oft mentioned in your article} do.
Cludgy? Actually these are quite on the forefront. Cludgy would be
Hotmail, Y!Mail, Outlook. Most of which are stuck in the stone age w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl Fink wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:10:51AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
>
>>> NB The headers in my original post show that I'm still a prisoner
>>> of Windows and rc scripts are not an option. If I ever get my
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 05:09:06 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Lynn Kilroy wrote:
> > I am going to be a little nasty on this one, fellas, by breaking
> > all your perfectly held and highly valued netiquette.
> >
> [snip vituperation]
> > with consumer model clients must do} I'm sure your opinions w
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
It's not a FAQ, it's a FFF (Frequent Flame Fest) around here. There
are three ways of doing things in this world: the Right Way, the Wrong
Way, and the Debian Way. Welcome to th
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:10:51AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> > NB The headers in my original post show that I'm still a prisoner
> > of Windows and rc scripts are not an option. If I ever get my
> > printers working under Debian then I'll consider the final
> > swit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> Juha Tuuna wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 21. June 2006 15:55, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
[snip]
> I didn't wish for it: I asked a question and seem to have started
> WW3:-)
Hah! This isn't even a minor border skirmish...
> NB
Juha Tuuna wrote:
On Wednesday, 21. June 2006 15:55, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to the
originator, rather than the list - for which I apologis
Lynn Kilroy wrote:
I am going to be a little nasty on this one, fellas, by breaking all
your perfectly held and highly valued netiquette.
I recommend you just stick to M$ Outlook. At some 250 Euros/US$ per
licence for Outlook and XP-Pro it is a bargain and it seems to contain
all the features
On Wednesday, 21. June 2006 15:55, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
> the address headers?
>
> A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to the
> originator, rather than the list - for which I apologise. All other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lynn Kilroy wrote:
> I am going to be a little nasty on this one, fellas, by breaking
> all your perfectly held and highly valued netiquette.
>
[snip vituperation]
> with consumer model clients must do} I'm sure your opinions will
> change PDQ!
>
> L
If you have to do it manually {as those of us with
consumer model clients must do} I'm sure your opinions will change PDQ!
Love & Friendship & Blessed Be!
Lynn Erika Kilroy
From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Replying to list
Date: W
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
I would rather say: the inability to keep and save all your mails in
mbox files is another aggravating area of incompetence.
It is rather annoying and a possible threat to mail-archive-integrity
that Tbird stores all mails of a folder in a single file. The user has
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> Interesting document, but somewhat religious in tone. If I Reply to All
> the original poster will probably receive 2 copies of the reply
Take it further. If everyone on the list slapped reply-to-all on a thread
where everyone participated we wouldn't have much u
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:34:24PM +0100 or thereabouts, Peter Hillier-Brook
wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> [cut]
>
> >>A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to
> >>the originator, rather than the list - for which I apologise. All
> >>other
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 09:20, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Le mercredi 21 juin 2006 à 13:55 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook a écrit :
> > If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
> > the address headers?
> >
> > A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
Competent MUAs (like Mutt/elm and Evolution) have a
Reply-to-List command.
>>> I wouldn't call Thunderbird incompetent, but your point is
>>> well taken.
>>
>> Tbird is lacking in specific co
Ron Johnson wrote:
Competent MUAs (like Mutt/elm and Evolution) have a
Reply-to-List command.
I wouldn't call Thunderbird incompetent, but your point is well
taken.
Tbird is lacking in specific competence.
Being able to import mbox files is another aggravating area of
incompetence.
I would
> Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> >I suppose the reason is:
> >http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On 21.06.06 15:46, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> Interesting document, but somewhat religious in tone. If I Reply to All
> the original poster will probably receive 2 copies of the reply, unless
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> [cut]
>
>>> A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response
>>> to the originator, rather than the list - for which I
>>> apologise. All other - non-Debian -
Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le mercredi 21 juin 2006 à 13:55 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook a écrit :
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to the
originator, rather than the list - for w
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
[cut]
A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to
the originator, rather than the list - for which I apologise. All
other - non-Debian - lists to which I subscribe use this field and
it enables one to concentrate on the messa
Le mercredi 21 juin 2006 à 13:55 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook a écrit :
> If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
> the address headers?
>
> A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to the
> originator, rather than the list - for which I apologise
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to"
> field in the address headers?
http://www.google.com/search?q=munge+reply-to
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> A couple of times recently I've
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to the
originator, rather than the list - for which I apologise. All other -
non-Debian - lists to which I subscribe use this field and it en
Hello Jon,
Am 2006-02-02 22:17:41, schrieb Jon Miller:
> Is there a simple way to reply to the list when using the digest form. It
> just that I do not want a lot of email floating around so I selected to have
> the digest only come to me. But I find it difficult to reply to an
> individual
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:53:13AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>On Thursday 02 February 2006 06:17, Jon Miller wrote:
>> Is there a simple way to reply to the list when using the digest form.
>
>You have to split the digest back into it's individual messages, then
>hit reply-to-list on the appropria
On Thursday 02 February 2006 06:17, Jon Miller wrote:
> Is there a simple way to reply to the list when using the digest form.
You have to split the digest back into it's individual messages, then hit
reply-to-list on the appropriate message. The only thing digest gets you is
all the day's mess
Jon Miller a écrit :
>Is there a simple way to reply to the list when using the digest form. It
>just that I do not want a lot of email floating around so I selected to have
>the digest only come to me. But I find it difficult to reply to an individual
>from the digest. anyone know of a bett
Is there a simple way to reply to the list when using the digest form. It just
that I do not want a lot of email floating around so I selected to have the
digest only come to me. But I find it difficult to reply to an individual from
the digest. anyone know of a better way to doing this?
Tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 11:39:02PM +, Gavin Henry wrote:
> It appears that with some of my mailing list subscriptions, when I click
> 'reply', they reply to the originator, not the list. Why is this?
Because you are clicking "Reply," and not "Rep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 26 Dec 2003 11:43 pm, Rafael Alexandre Schmitt wrote:
> Gavin Henry wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Hi all,
> >It appears that with some of my mailing list subscriptions, when I click
> >'reply', they reply t
Gavin Henry wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
It appears that with some of my mailing list subscriptions, when I click
'reply', they reply to the originator, not the list. Why is this?
Is it in correct headers from this list? Or most likely my settings?
Gavin.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
It appears that with some of my mailing list subscriptions, when I click
'reply', they reply to the originator, not the list. Why is this?
Is it in correct headers from this list? Or most likely my settings?
Gavin.
- --
Regards
http://www
72 matches
Mail list logo
