Hi all!
A few minutes ago I just experienced a horrible crash on one of my
computers with Debian Jessie:
---
Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.832919] general protection fault:
[#1] SMP
Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01
[10756.194057] firefox: Corrupted page table at address 7f0fc100d3b8
[10756.194061] PGD 4d55f067 PUD 4d551067 PMD 5e346067 PTE 807b43e44067
[10756.194064] Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP
[10756.194066] last sysfs file:
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:04.0/:02:00.0/class
[10756.194069] CPU 0
firefox got freeze, not responding.
[quote]
$ dmesg
[10756.194057] firefox: Corrupted page table at address 7f0fc100d3b8
[10756.194061] PGD 4d55f067 PUD 4d551067 PMD 5e346067 PTE 807b43e44067
[10756.194064] Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP
(...)
I use xfce as the windows manager and gdm
[10756.194061] PGD 4d55f067 PUD 4d551067 PMD 5e346067 PTE
807b43e44067
[10756.194064] Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP
(...)
I use xfce as the windows manager and gdm as the display manager. my
kernel: Linux hostname 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:00:17 UTC 2012
x86_64 GNU/Linux
syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ...
kernel:[1202001.893158] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP
(...)
Being a kernel oops, I would report it in Debian BTS.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ...
kernel:[1202001.893158] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP
(...)
Being a kernel oops, I would report it in Debian BTS.
okay, will do. thanks
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP
Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ...
kernel:[1202001.893165] last sysfs file:
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/usb3/3-1/3-1.3/3-1.3:1.0/host8/target8:0:0/8:0:0:0/block/sdc/uevent
Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ...
kernel:[1202001.893435] Stack
Opteron CPU. When we tried
to boot the system with the SMP kernel it gave the following messages
just after the login prompt and hung:
Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI
hang ?
Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI
hang ?
Nov
Hi,
I would like to know if I can choose a smp kernel when I going to install
DEBIAN 6.0
Regards.
Alex PADOLY
2011-04-19 15:29, alex.padoly skrev:
I would like to know if I can choose a smp kernel when I going to
install DEBIAN 6.0
I believe there is no choice. All kernels are smp-kernels.
A related bug report was closed in 2007 with the comment:
As recent Linux kernels in Debian all have SMP
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Arthur Machlas put forth on 7/29/2010 12:01 PM:
Things are running nicely, but the problem I hoped
to resolve hasn't been. Namely, the lowest frequency my cpu can reach
is 1Ghz... instead of the 800Mhz that it
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Christian Jaeger chr...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you read the possible cpu frequencies?
Your kernel needs cpufreq support and ondemand, powersave, etc.
governors; check with
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
cat
Arthur Machlas put forth on 7/30/2010 9:04 AM:
BTW, I'm curious as to your motivations for this. Is this basically a
Windows can do 800MHz, so $deity dammit, Linux should be able to do it as
well! thing?
Not as such. More like a my processor is supposed to scale from 800Mhz
to 1.6Ghz, and
or doesn't have the tables
for Atom CPUs, or both. This is a kernel config option.
r...@hpm210:/home/arthur/Misc/Linux/2.6.34-1# linuxinfo
Linux HPm210 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:59:47 UTC 2010
Two Intel Unknown 1666MHz processors, 6650.42 total bogomips, 1011M RAM
Strangely, that's
checking SMP support.
In Power management and ACPI options
snip
You'll have to figure out all the other menu config settings on your own, as
most of us kernel monkeys have. ;) These are simply the ones that directly
relate to your questions.
Hope this helped get you closer.
Somewhat. All
How do you read the possible cpu frequencies?
Your kernel needs cpufreq support and ondemand, powersave, etc.
governors; check with
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors
cat
Arthur Machlas put forth on 7/29/2010 12:01 PM:
Things are running nicely, but the problem I hoped
to resolve hasn't been. Namely, the lowest frequency my cpu can reach
is 1Ghz... instead of the 800Mhz that it reaches on windows and in the
spec sheets.
Advice on how to proceed from here is
Greetings,
According to the spec sheet on the Atom N450 it has a single core,
though it does support two threads. However, linuxinfo (replaces
cpuinfo I suppose) says two unknown processors.
r...@hpm210:/home/arthur/Misc/Linux/2.6.34-1# linuxinfo
Linux HPm210 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:59
Hello there,
I am using the kernel in my subject. It seems as though this kernel
likes to lock up quite a bit when the CPu fan is at a higher rate of
speed due to other tasks being done in the background. I am using Lenny
and I never can remember before Debian being this unstable. Is there a
Scott Berry:
I am using the kernel in my subject. It seems as though this kernel
likes to lock up quite a bit when the CPu fan is at a higher rate of
speed due to other tasks being done in the background. I am using Lenny
and I never can remember before Debian being this unstable.
Sounds
Olá,
Estes dias reparei que o meu kernel apenas detecta um core do processador,
já revi a configuração do kernel e compilei várias vezes, as configurações
parecem-me correctas.
O processador é um AMD X2 3800, tenho esta configuração
#
# Processor type and features
#
CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y
Olá,
Estes dias reparei que o meu kernel apenas detecta um core do processador,
já revi a configuração do kernel e compilei várias vezes, as configurações
parecem-me correctas.
O processador é um AMD X2 3800, tenho esta configuração
#
# Processor type and features
#
CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y
nicely.
However I am a little concerned about the messages produced when apm
is loaded:
apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x03 (Driver version 1.16ac)
apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe (power off active).
This is a SMP motherboard with two cpu's installed:
Intel MultiProcessor
the server with a second Opteron CPU. When we tried
to boot the system with the SMP kernel it gave the following messages
just after the login prompt and hung:
Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI
hang ?
Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:04:12PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
I am hoping that there might be some kernel experts out there that can
offer some suggestions as to what might be going wrong with the 686
kernel, and which I might be able to try in order to resolve (or at least
explain) the
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse
bogomips: 896.10
I tried booting the 686 kernel with the 'nosmp' option to see if there was
a problem with the SMP implementation on this machine, but that made no
difference (other
that
supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of
cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel will support?
don't
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload
is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of
^^
No!, it is yet another
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:17:21PM -0400, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload
is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of
El vie, 12-10-2007 a las 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates escribió:
Hi all,
just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
SMP
, will the
SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of
cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel will support?
Thanks much,
Robert
don't expect things to go 16x faster
Ok, but 16x better? Or 16x more efficient? I know that if we're
talking about a 2GHz
. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of
cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel will support?
don't expect things to go 16x faster
Ok, but 16x better? Or 16x more efficient
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Robert Cates wrote:
Ok, but 16x better? Or 16x more efficient? I know that if we're talking
about a 2GHz quad core CPU we're not getting 8GHz of speed, but what exactly
is the (performance) advantage of SMP?
Not much, unless you can write software that can take
Hi all,
just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates wrote:
Hi all,
just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
SMP kernel
Brivaldo,
Isso eu tenho. 1GB de
ram. Vou deixar este kernel ento.
obrigado
--
Alexandre Pereira Bhler
Linux User 397546
Telefone: (41) 3039-5428
http://www.infobrindes.com.br
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E o tamanho da sua memria?? se tiver 1Gb vale a pena.. se for inferir
a
Em 24/09/07, Alexandre Pereira Bühler[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Isso eu tenho. 1GB de ram. Vou deixar este kernel então.
Interessante, veja lá no e-mail que você mandou que, segundo o cat
/proc/cpuinfo, o seu processador tem HT (tá lá no meio das flags) mas
segundo o everest, não tem, diz
Rodolfo,
É verdade! mas na Bios diz que não há HT e tenho ela atualizada. Minha
placa quando o processador tem ht coloca a opção de habilitar/desabilitar.
O engraçado é que meu processador é o mais pobre da versão prescot. Na
família prescot os mais ricos têm suporte a ht. pelo menos do que li
Hehhee.. é isso ae.
Manda bala.
[ ]'s
Brivaldo Jr (condector)
Em 24/09/07, Alexandre Pereira Bühler[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Rodolfo,
É verdade! mas na Bios diz que não há HT e tenho ela atualizada. Minha
placa quando o processador tem ht coloca a opção de habilitar/desabilitar.
O
Tenho um Intel Pentium 4, 2800 MHz, Prescott, G1, com conujnto de
intruções x86, x86-64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3.
Segue abaixo uma tabela completa. A pergunta é porque o Debian sempre
instala por padrão um Kernel SMP para esse processador?
É por causa do CMP? A vantangem em deixar este kernel
Se o seu processador tem HT ou é duplo núcleo é muita vantagem usar o SMP.
2007/9/23, Alexandre Pereira Bühler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tenho um Intel Pentium 4, 2800 MHz, Prescott, G1, com conujnto de
intruções x86, x86-64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3.
Segue abaixo uma tabela completa. A pergunta é porque
Hello!
Debian Etch system with linux-image-2.6.18-5-686.
How can I turn off SMP and then disable local APIC with this kernel?
Any advices will be appreciated!
--
Regards, Paul Csanyi
http://www.freewebs.com/csanyi-pal/index.htm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On 09/23/2007 10:50 AM, Pál Csányi wrote:
How can I turn off SMP and then disable local APIC with this kernel?
For the options to persist across kernel updates/upgrades, add the
options 'nosmp' and 'noapic' to /boot/grub/menu.lst on the kopt= line,
then run 'update-grub'. This works for all
2007/9/23, Pál Csányi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/9/23, Curt Howland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One thing I forgot to mention, there is little or no performance hit
for using an SMP kernel with a single-CPU machine. So I wouldn't
worry about that.
I have a Dual 2 Core CPU.
I must to disable SMP
I've been trying to help someone on the list with acpi related shutdown
problems, with no success up to now.
When I had shutdown problems with FC5 (fixed with using acpi=force), someone
on the Fedora list suggested that it could be a problem with SMP kernels.
I Googled a bit the other day
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Nigel Henry wrote:
I've been trying to help someone on the list with acpi related shutdown
problems, with no success up to now.
When I had shutdown problems with FC5 (fixed with using acpi=force), someone
on the Fedora list suggested that it could be a problem with SMP
list suggested that it could be a problem with SMP
kernels.
I Googled a bit the other day, and found stuff about recompiling the
kernel, and disabling SMP in it, but is there a way to disable SMP by
appending the kernel line in GRUB?
I read one comment that said:
To disable SMP
Hi,
In debian stable/testing system, how to force mysql to use multiple CPU (I
have Core2 Duo)?
I host a Database and all queries are issued by a single user/pass (the
frontend).
When monitoring the server, mysql never span to the second core...
How to?
Thank you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hello,
On dual proc Xeon with dual ethernet Intel e1000, when I run a tcpdump,
according to network traffic my system freezes.
The console is dead, the only way to restore the system is an electric power
restart.
My configuration is :
# uname -a
Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp #1 SMP Tue Aug 16 12:08:30
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Hi all,
might be the wrong NG for such request but I'm not willing to get into a
MSFT one!
Problem:
Using a recent Vista Family premium, I could not see the content on a
Samba shared folder
Hi all,
might be the wrong NG for such request but I'm not willing to get into a
MSFT one!
Problem:
Using a recent Vista Family premium, I could not see the content on a
Samba shared folder (folder could be opened but i's empty...). Same
works when used by other XP or NT Windows based PC.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Hi all,
might be the wrong NG for such request but I'm not willing to get into a
MSFT one!
Problem:
Using a recent Vista Family premium, I could not see the content on a
Samba shared folder (folder could be opened but
not...
Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or am I doing something
wrong?
Did you assigne the guest to more than one CPU in your configuration?
Is the guest running an SMP kernel?
Regards,
-Roberto
Hmmm, I just used the standard scripts with Etch, thanx a lot though, I
had overlooked
Hi list.
I'm running Xen under Etch and running an instance of Etch under Xen, the
host is showing two cpu's but the guest does not...
Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or am I doing something
wrong?
Thanx
Sturla
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:15:56PM +0100, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote:
Hi list.
I'm running Xen under Etch and running an instance of Etch under Xen, the
host is showing two cpu's but the guest does not...
Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or am I doing something
wrong?
Did you
Roberto C. Sanchez skrev:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:15:56PM +0100, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote:
Hi list.
I'm running Xen under Etch and running an instance of Etch under Xen, the
host is showing two cpu's but the guest does not...
Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or am I doing
if bz2 is
multithreaded but even if it's not I would expect a slight speed
increase but in fact with a SMP 2.6 kernel it take 13 ~ 15m, with a SMP
2.4 kernel it takes 1m 28s and with a 2.4 UP 1m 35s.
with 2.6.18 from sid I get
nas:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads:40
but it's displaying the same problems.
As a test of CPU power I've been decompressing the kernel tree, with a
UP 2.6 kernel this takes about 1m 15s, I don't know if bz2 is
multithreaded but even if it's not I would expect a slight speed
increase but in fact with a SMP 2.6 kernel it take 13 ~ 15m
Merhaba arkadaşlar,
Daha önce Dual P3 bir bilgisayara smp kernel yüklemeden 2 cpu
görmemişti. Şimdi elimde Xeon 5110 işlemcili bir bilgisayar var.
Testingde standart gelen 2.6.17-2-686 kernel ile iki cpu görüyorum (cat
/proc/cpuinfo)
Sorum, acaba smp kernel yüklesem cpu 4 mü olacak, bu
Yılmaz Bilgili yazmış:
Merhaba arkadaşlar,
Merhaba,
Daha önce Dual P3 bir bilgisayara smp kernel yüklemeden 2 cpu
görmemişti. Şimdi elimde Xeon 5110 işlemcili bir bilgisayar var.
Testingde standart gelen 2.6.17-2-686 kernel ile iki cpu görüyorum
(cat /proc/cpuinfo)
Sorum, acaba smp
Hallo,
wg. eines Treibers sollte ich folgendes machen.
Troubleshooting Tips for rt2570
1. Stability issues can be addressed by disabling USB2.0 (ehci) and
dropping back to USB1.1 (ohci). You can do this by blacklisting the ehci
module
2. If you have SMP enabled, turn it off
3. If you
Am Mittwoch 15 November 2006 11:34 schrieb Wolfgang.friedl:
2. If you have SMP enabled, turn it off
Kernel-Parameter nosmp (siehe auch
pfad-zu-deinen-kernel-quellen/Documentation/kernel-parameter.txt)
3. If you have PREEMPT enabled, turn it off
Muss (zumindes bei einem 2.6er Kernel
Gruesse!
* Daniel Haensse [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [11.11.06 13:22]:
Hallo liste,
habe Probleme beim Booten von einem SMP Kernel unter Etch. Das System ist ein
AMD
Dual Core Prozessor, der in einem ASUS M2NPV-VM steckt (NVIDIA GeForce
6150 und NVIDIA nForce 430 Chipsatz und 2GB
Hallo liste,
habe Probleme beim Booten von einem SMP Kernel unter Etch. Das System ist ein
AMD
Dual Core Prozessor, der in einem ASUS M2NPV-VM steckt (NVIDIA GeForce
6150 und NVIDIA nForce 430 Chipsatz und 2GB Speicher).
Wenn ich das Kernel 2.6.16-2-amd64-generic boote, dann bekomme ich
the optional flag in lilo,
you may need to re-run lilo
Lösche Konfigurationsdateien von linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp ...
Running postrm hook /sbin/update-grub .
Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub
Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst
cache exists, no 3rd-level
cache
70: Trace cache: 12K-micro-op, 4-way set assoc
7d: unknown TLB/cache descriptor
Processor serial: -0F4A----
Auf die 2 CPUs bei top, xen, etc. kommt man nur wenn der kernel smp kann
sonst bleibt es immer nur eine.
Offensichtlich hat das
hier wie folgt ausgegeben:
Linux Knoppix 2.6.17 #4 SMP PREEMPT Wed May 10 13:53:45 CEST 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
...
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
...
...
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 1
cpu cores : 2
...
Paul
Ich
Hallo,
Matthias Haegele wrote:
Christoph Schaman schrieb:
Hallo,
Christoph Marcel Hilberg wrote:
Hallo Liste,
[...]
[c.]
Kann man das nicht *irgendwie* auslesen die Modellbezeichnung z.B. und
daraus dann Rückschlüsse ziehen,
ansonsten müsste er sich die Wärmeleitpaste auf jeden Fall
, vielleicht hatte ich's unklar formuliert.
Ein Intel Core 2 Duo (T7200) wird hier wie folgt ausgegeben:
Linux Knoppix 2.6.17 #4 SMP PREEMPT Wed May 10 13:53:45 CEST 2006 i686
GNU/Linux
...
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
...
...
physical id
Prozessoren. Was ja auch
teilweise richtig ist, da einige Teile des Prozessors doppelt sind.
aber /proc/cpuinfo sollte dann auch 2 Prozessoren liefern und nicht
nur einen.
Wenn du bei (im Bios) aktiviertem HT einen SMP-Kernel lädst, sollten
zwei CPU angezeigt werden. Bei einem normalen Kernel halt nur
erkannt werden, sondern gleich
einen eigenen Kernel kompiliert, weiss also nicht ob SMP die Anzahl der
CPUs fuer top aendert, weil z.B. dann SMP zwischen echtem dual core und
HT unterscheiden kann.
Damit kann ich laut top 200% der CPU auslasten, aber die wird mir nur
als einzelne angezeigt, da selbe
Christoph Schaman schrieb:
Hallo,
Christoph Marcel Hilberg wrote:
Hallo Liste,
[...]
Ich haenge Dir ein vollstaendiges /proc/cpuinfo an, damit Du vergleichen
kannst; acpi sagt mir, es gaebe nur eine CPU, xen laeuft hier nicht.
Irgenwo solltest Du auch (vom Kauf) die Info ueber das Modell
HT;
Ich würde hier eher sagen _weil_ es ht ist, hat er nur eine Id.
Ein Intel Core 2 Duo (T7200) wird hier wie folgt ausgegeben:
Linux Knoppix 2.6.17 #4 SMP PREEMPT Wed May 10 13:53:45 CEST 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model
Hallo Liste,
ich habe hier neu erworben einen HP Server mit einem P4 Prozessor.
Meines Wissens habe ich keinen Dualcore gekauft sondern einen ganz
einfachen P4. Es wir einen CPU in /proc/cpuinfo gemeldet.
Jedoch acpi, xen und top melden zwei cpus wie kommt das? Wenn ich zwei
rechenintensive
On 16.10.06 22:47:27, Christoph Marcel Hilberg wrote:
ich habe hier neu erworben einen HP Server mit einem P4 Prozessor.
Meines Wissens habe ich keinen Dualcore gekauft sondern einen ganz
einfachen P4. Es wir einen CPU in /proc/cpuinfo gemeldet.
Jedoch acpi, xen und top melden zwei cpus wie
Hi!
Im running sid with kernel 2.6.16-1-686-smp
I want to upgrade the kernel.
The question is:
Does the package linux-image-2.6.18-1-686-bigmem is
smp?
or where are the 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 smp images?
Thanks.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam
Enrique Morfin wrote:
Does the package linux-image-2.6.18-1-686-bigmem is
smp?
Linux supports smp-alternatives since 2.6.17. This means, that
additional processors can be added dynamically while the boot process of
the kernel.
Or in other words: all Debians kernel images do support smp (i386
Linux supports smp-alternatives since 2.6.17. This
means, that additional processors can be added
dynamically while the boot process of the kernel.
Or in other words: all Debians kernel images do
support smp (i386,powerpc and some other archs).
Thanks for the info.
can a procesor be stoped
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Madden wrote:
[[snip]]
I don't have an answer.I thought ACPI was for power management, esp
laptops, a heavily used server doesn't seem to me to need power
management. I have a smp PIII Gz that gives me fits, IRQ allocation on
the pci slots
Hi all...
I have a dual Xeon machine that was running fine on all four cores,
but then I started getting some filesystem corruption because of dodgy
RAID drivers. I disabled ACPI, which fixed this, but now I am down to
running on two cores.
My question is, is there any way to run SMP
on two cores.
My question is, is there any way to run SMP (that will give me all
four cores) without ACPI?
If you are running on two cores, and you see both in /proc/cpuinfo, then
you have SMP enabled.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
.
My question is, is there any way to run SMP (that will give me all
four cores) without ACPI?
If you are running on two cores, and you see both in /proc/cpuinfo, then
you have SMP enabled.
I can see two cores in /proc/cpuinfo, but I used to see four, since
the processors are both dual core (sorry
disabled ACPI, which fixed
this, but now I am down to running on two cores.
My question is, is there any way to run SMP (that will give me all
four cores) without ACPI?
If you are running on two cores, and you see both in /proc/cpuinfo,
then you have SMP enabled.
I can see two
On 10/5/06, Greg Madden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have an answer.I thought ACPI was for power management, esp
laptops, a heavily used server doesn't seem to me to need power
management. I have a smp PIII Gz that gives me fits, IRQ allocation on
the pci slots. This is a APIC issue
Hallo allerseits,
ich habe gerade den oben genannten Kernel deinstalliert und als Antwort kam:
apt-get --purge remove linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig
Die folgenden Pakete werden ENTFERNT:
linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp
Witam
używam debiana sarge mam zainstalowane jadro 2.6.8-3-686-smp i wszystko
chodzi jak trzeba ale zachciało mi kompilowac własne więcv skompilowałem
sobie jądro 2.6.17.13 z smp. problem w tym że nie mam sieci. w czasie
bootowania pisze że eth0 zasoby są zajęte przez inny proces czy coś w
Am 2006-09-12 19:16:54, schrieb Sven Hartge:
Mag sein. Ich sehe nur nicht den Sinn darin, wenn man von ein Gerät
weniger mal absieht. Allerdings sehe ich mehr Probleme, die durch so
eine Karte entstehen (Software-unabhängig) als man damit lösen könnte.
Es gibt ADSL-(PCI)Karten die Router
Hallo Uwe,
habe gerade Deine Message gefunden und...
Am 2006-09-10 20:36:31, schrieb Uwe Kerstan:
Das wollte ich vermeiden. Ich warte jetzt bis Dezember, mal sehen
ob dann noch SMP im normalen Kernel aktiviert ist. Dann kann ich
???
Der NORMALE Kernel ist OHNE SMP.
Ich habe hier einen
Am 2006-09-10 10:26:06, schrieb Uwe Kerstan:
linux-image-2.6.17-2-k7_2.6.17-8_i386.deb ist HIER mit SMP!
Ups... Da ich Off-Line bin, habe ich noch nicht upgedated...
Bin ein paar -* Revisionen im rückstand, und meiner hat KEIN SMP.
Der SMP-Kernel startet nicht auf meinem Athlon MP 1900
* Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [11-09-2006 12:34]:
_Ich_ habe das in größerem Stil getan, bzw. bei der Neuanschaffung
gleich auf Karten mit z.B. HFC-Chip gesetzt.
Okay, ich werde meine Karte auch entsorgen.
Bei Ubuntu sind die Kernel mittlerweile alle mit SMP kompiliert, weil
der Kernel
benutzt. Hier gibt es kein
Equivalent, aber ich rate dir eh, ein externes Modem und eine normale
Ethernetkarte zu benutzen. Das ist schmerzfreier und flexibler.
Bei Ubuntu sind die Kernel mittlerweile alle mit SMP kompiliert, weil
der Kernel automatisch erkennt, ob es nur ein UP-System ist und dann
* Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-09-2006 15:28]:
Wobei ich gerade sehe, das du eine DSL-Karte benutzt. Hier gibt es kein
Equivalent, aber ich rate dir eh, ein externes Modem und eine normale
Ethernetkarte zu benutzen. Das ist schmerzfreier und flexibler.
Es gibt schon noch ein paar
Uwe Kerstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-09-2006 15:28]:
Wobei ich gerade sehe, das du eine DSL-Karte benutzt. Hier gibt es
kein Equivalent, aber ich rate dir eh, ein externes Modem und eine
normale Ethernetkarte zu benutzen. Das ist schmerzfreier und
flexibler.
Uwe Kerstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 13:41]:
Alternativ könntest du natürlich auch einen eigenen Kernel bauen.
Das wollte ich vermeiden. Ich warte jetzt bis Dezember, mal sehen ob
dann noch SMP im normalen Kernel aktiviert ist. Dann kann ich mir
Von: Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uwe Kerstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 13:41]:
Alternativ könntest du natürlich auch einen eigenen Kernel bauen.
Das wollte ich vermeiden. Ich warte jetzt bis Dezember, mal sehen ob
dann noch SMP im normalen
Uwe Kerstan schrieb:
Hallo,
ich habe ein kleines Problem mit dem Kernel in Etch.
Zur Vorgeschichte: ich habe mit Kernel 2.6.16-2-k7 kein Problem.
Ich kann den Treiber für meine Fritzcard DSL problemlos damit
compilieren und benutzen. Dieser Kernel ist ohne SMP.
Update heute auf Kernel 2.6.17-2
* Christian Fröse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 09:01]:
... Ich brauche kein SMP für meine Single-CPU-Maschine,
von SMP steht auch nichts in der Paketbeschreibung.
definitiv brauchst du keinen Kernel mit SMP.
DAS weiß ich selber.
Es ist ein Kernel im APT
haben, der einfach nur 2.6.17-2
* Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 02:17]:
Karte wegwerfen, denn der Hersteller hat den Treiber explizit so
erstellt, damit er nicht mit SMP funktioniert.
Du meinst, ich soll meine Hardware wegschmeißen,
nur weil der normale K7-Kernel jetzt per default mit SMP kommt?
Soll ich mir
Uwe Kerstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 02:17]:
Karte wegwerfen, denn der Hersteller hat den Treiber explizit so
erstellt, damit er nicht mit SMP funktioniert.
Du meinst, ich soll meine Hardware wegschmeißen,
nur weil der normale K7-Kernel jetzt per
* Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 13:41]:
Alternativ könntest du natürlich auch einen eigenen Kernel bauen.
Das wollte ich vermeiden. Ich warte jetzt bis Dezember, mal sehen
ob dann noch SMP im normalen Kernel aktiviert ist. Dann kann ich
mir immer noch was überlegen. Du glaubst doch
1 - 100 of 857 matches
Mail list logo
