On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 04:54:26PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>
> Wasn't sudo echo the name of a pop group?
>
> :)
If it wasn't it should've been one.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Wasn't sudo echo the name of a pop group?
:)
Bret Busby
Armadale
Western Australia
(UTC+0800)
.
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 08:37:16PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 13/05/2024 à 19:45, Stefan Monnier a écrit :
[...]
> > % sudo zsh -l
> > # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > # ^D
> > logout
> > %
> >
> >
&
Le 13/05/2024 à 19:45, Stefan Monnier a écrit :
$ su -
Password:
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# ^D
logout
$
I don't need no stinkin' sudo :-)
And if you only have `sudo`, but not the root password, of course:
% sudo zsh -l
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_f
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:45:40PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > $ su -
> > Password:
> > # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > # ^D
> > logout
> > $
> >
> > I don't need no stinkin' sudo :-)
>
> And if you only have `sudo`, but
> $ su -
> Password:
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> # ^D
> logout
> $
>
> I don't need no stinkin' sudo :-)
And if you only have `sudo`, but not the root password, of course:
% sudo zsh -l
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/
On 5/13/24 18:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Now share your ideas :-)
$ su -
Password:
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# ^D
logout
$
I don't need no stinkin' sudo :-)
regards,
chris
Since this happens so often, I'm trying to offer a recap.
As others have noted, the above
sudo echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
won't work, since it runs echo under sudo, but the file opening
(that pesky ">") happens in your shell, which is probably running
unprivileged
> The new minimum requirement is i686.
> Debian requires i686 compatibility - even when the arch is being
displayed as i386 due to compatibility reasons.
Thank you for your insights. I'll have to pay more attention to the release
notes in the future. I have mourned the loss of my Soekris boxes
Am 25.04.2024 schrieb Vic tor :
> On a fresh installation of Debian 12.5, i386 I receive "Illegal
> instruction" when executing sudo. Is there any way to debug and
> workaround this; should I take this to another list as a bug?
Here it is described with gdb:
https://stackove
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 09:54:17AM -0400, Vic tor wrote:
> On a fresh installation of Debian 12.5, i386 I receive "Illegal instruction"
> when executing sudo. Is there any way to debug and workaround this; should I
> take this to another list as a bug?
>
> This is on
On a fresh installation of Debian 12.5, i386 I receive "Illegal instruction"
when executing sudo. Is there any way to debug and workaround this; should I
take this to another list as a bug?
This is on a Soekris net5501 powered by an AMD Geode LX which is the only
oddball factor. I've be
n 19/02/2024 11:26, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 18 Feb 2024 at 12:41:29 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote:
> > > On 18/02/2024 11:40, David Wright wrote:
> > > > $ udisksctl unlock --block-device /dev/disk/by-partlabel/Nokia01
> >
> > > When sudo is
> >
Nikulin wrote:
On 18/02/2024 11:40, David Wright wrote:
$ udisksctl unlock --block-device /dev/disk/by-partlabel/Nokia01
When sudo is
involved, I still do not see any advantage of udisk[s]ctl over
"cryptsetup open".
I'd be more worried about disadvantages. About the only differ
iguration,
desirable in multiuser systems, comes with a learning curve that
I'm not interested in climbing.
> When sudo is
> involved, I still do not see any advantage of udisk[s]ctl over
> "cryptsetup open".
I'd be more worried about disadvantages. About the only difference
I see is
(/dev/sdc1)
It should be possible to modify policy to allow a specific user or a
group to perform disk operations, see polkit(8). When sudo is involved,
I still do not see any advantage of udiskctl over "cryptsetup open". As
third option, if I remember it correctly, pmount relie
On Sun 18 Feb 2024 at 10:23:52 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote:
> I have decided to ask the following in a separate thread.
>
> On 17/02/2024 02:59, David Wright wrote
> (Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive):
> > lulu () { sudo udisksctl unlock --block-device
> >
I have decided to ask the following in a separate thread.
On 17/02/2024 02:59, David Wright wrote
(Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive):
lulu ()
{
sudo udisksctl unlock --block-device /dev/disk/by-partlabel/Lulu01 && mount /media/lulu01
}
I am evaluating if udisks2 D
do use an old kernel.
>>
>> Can LINUX update a kernel?
>>
>> Regards
>> Sophie
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Von:* chris
>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2024 19:35
>> *An:* Schwibinger Michael
>> *Betr
> *Von:* chris
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2024 19:35
> *An:* Schwibinger Michael
> *Betreff:* Re: AW: AW: su su- sudo dont work
>
> Very helpful ty
>
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024, 1:57 PM Schwibinger Michael wrote:
>
> Good afternoon.
>
&g
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 01:21:55PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Yes.
>
>
> I found out
> I do use an old kernel.
>
> Can LINUX update a kernel?
>
Hi Sophie,
Yes, of course. As root/sudo user, apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade
But you still don't give any
Yes.
I found out
I do use an old kernel.
Can LINUX update a kernel?
Regards
Sophie
Von: chris
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2024 19:35
An: Schwibinger Michael
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: su su- sudo dont work
Very helpful ty
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024, 1:57 PM
M.A. Cater
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2024 20:36
> *An:* debian-user@lists.debian.org ;
> Schwibinger Michael
> *Betreff:* Re: AW: AW: su su- sudo dont work
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 01:58:41PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> > Good afternoon
> > I thin
Very helpful ty
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024, 1:57 PM Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good afternoon.
>
> The bug report
>
> sudo ...
> You are not in the sudoers file.
> Regards
> Sophie
>
>
> --
> *Von:* Hans
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 26
gt; Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2024 20:36
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org ; Schwibinger
> Michael
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: su su- sudo dont work
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 01:58:41PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> > Good afternoon
> > I think
> > maybe
Good afternoon
I did send the bugreport.
Thank You.
Did anybody use the rescue mode?
Regards Sophie
Von: Andrew M.A. Cater
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2024 20:36
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org ; Schwibinger
Michael
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: su su- sudo
: AW: AW: su su- sudo dont work
Hi Hans,
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 10:23:09AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> I see this exactly as you and are watching this list for may years.
I'm not sure who you're replying to as you've removed those details,
though I may guess from your In-Reply-To header which does
Good afternoon.
The bug report
sudo ...
You are not in the sudoers file.
Regards
Sophie
Von: Hans
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Januar 2024 18:44
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: su su- sudo dont work
Am Freitag, 26. Januar 2024, 17:23:07 CET
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 7:17 PM Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good afternoon
>
> Before there was panic
>
> su
> su -
> sudo
> did work.
>
> Somebody does have experience with
> rescue mode?
>
If you are in Single User Mode you are already root and do not nee
Good afternoon
Before there was panic
su
su -
sudo
did work.
Somebody does have experience with
rescue mode?
Regards
Sophie
Von: Greg Wooledge
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Januar 2024 17:45
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: su su- sudo dont
Am 27.01.24 um 10:23 schrieb Hans:
I see this exactly as you and are watching this list for may years.
However, I wanted not to be so directly because I want not to blame anyone on
this list.
But since the beginning, I had the suspicion, that someone just wants to make
fun with us.
Aleady
>> > PC does have only one user=admin.
>> >
>> > Regards Sophie
>> > Is it the rescue mode?
>>
>> Explain, please.
>>
>> Your Subject: header says "su su- sudo dont work". What does this MEAN?
>>
>> Please show us your attempts
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 01:58:41PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good afternoon
> I think
> maybe Im sure
> it is because of rescue mode.
>
Hi Sophie,
Once again: we need to you to show us what commands you run.
We need to see error messages.
if you cannot run sudo or
@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: AW: su su- sudo dont work
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:53:10PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good afternoon
> Why do I have to open a group?
>
This is to *tell* us information about why you're having problems with su
and sudo
Running the
id
command should
Good afternoon
Thank You
There is only one password.
The problem was created until
the update to DEBIAN 11 created panic.
Before
sudo
su
su -
did work.
Regards
Sophie
Von: Gareth Evans
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2024 04:31
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
ss stream of mispastes and
misunderstandings about "sudo" and "su".
But I guess what one finds amusing can have a very wide variability…
Thanks,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Hi,
Andy Smith wrote:
> It is hard to understand how what Michael/Sophie/Tobias does can in
> any way be "fun" for them, though maybe that is just our lack of
> understanding.
I expressed my suspicion of a "Hurz" performance in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/05/msg00100.html
Have
Hi Hans,
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 10:23:09AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> I see this exactly as you and are watching this list for may years.
I'm not sure who you're replying to as you've removed those details,
though I may guess from your In-Reply-To header which doesn't point
to a list message. You
I see this exactly as you and are watching this list for may years.
However, I wanted not to be so directly because I want not to blame anyone on
this list.
But since the beginning, I had the suspicion, that someone just wants to make
fun with us.
Aleady from the beginning I checked after the
an.org/debian-user-german/[1]
Good luck!
Hans
> Sorry
> it was my mistake
>
> It is
>
> su -
> su
> or sudo.
>
> Sorry.
>
> Is su -
> the best for install?
>
> Regards
>
> Sophie
>
>
>
>
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:23:07PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> su -
> su
> or sudo.
>
> Is su -
> the best for install?
Whatever works best for *you* is best. "su -" is quite popular.
If it does what you need, and is convenient for you, then there's
your answer.
Sorry
it was my mistake
It is
su -
su
or sudo.
Sorry.
Is su -
the best for install?
Regards
Sophie
Von: Hans
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Januar 2024 18:29
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: AW: su su- sudo dont work
Am Dienstag, 23. Januar 2024
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:53:10PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good afternoon
> Why do I have to open a group?
>
This is to *tell* us information about why you're having problems with su
and sudo
Running the
id
command should give you information like
uid=1000(amacater)
Good afternoon
Why do I have to open a group?
2 years ago
sudo was no problem.
Regards
Sophie
Thank You
Von: Timothy M Butterworth
Gesendet: Montag, 22. Januar 2024 00:07
An: Schwibinger Michael
Cc: Greg Wooledge ; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re
Wooledge
Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. Januar 2024 14:40
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: AW: su su- sudo dont work
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:57:17PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> sudo apt-get install firefox
> Reaction LINUX
> This is not allowed we send a message to the admin.
> On 23 Jan 2024, at 18:30, Hans wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, 23. Januar 2024, 13:54:25 CET schrieb Schwibinger Michael:
> For gvetting root as normal user, best is use "su -".
>
> Note: It is not "su-", but "su -", with a space between su and the minus sign.
Also su requires root's password,
Am Dienstag, 23. Januar 2024, 13:54:25 CET schrieb Schwibinger Michael:
For gvetting root as normal user, best is use "su -".
Note: It is not "su-", but "su -", with a space between su and the minus sign.
Good luck!
Hans
> Thank You.
>
> 2 questions
> 1
> Is the best to use su-
> for ding
Thank You.
2 questions
1
Is the best to use su-
for ding install?
2
All 4 dont work.
What do I do wrong?
Regards
Sophie
Von: Hans
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Januar 2024 14:23
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: su su- sudo dont work
Am Samstag, 20
2024 14:34
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: su su- sudo dont work
On Sat 20 Jan 2024 at 09:14:30 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 01:26:06PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> > Good afternoon.
> > Root terminal is fine.
> > What do I do
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 4:07 PM Schwibinger Michael
wrote:
> Thank You
> Example
> I say
>
> sudo apt-get install firefox
> Reaction LINUX
> This is not allowed we send a message to the admin.
>
This error message means that your account is not in the sudo group.
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:57:17PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> sudo apt-get install firefox
> Reaction LINUX
> This is not allowed we send a message to the admin.
>
> I do open root terminal
> there its working.
It sounds like you are not authorized to use "
Thank You
Example
I say
sudo apt-get install firefox
Reaction LINUX
This is not allowed we send a message to the admin.
I do open root terminal
there its working.
Regards
Sophie
Von: Greg Wooledge
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Januar 2024 14:14
An: debian-user
On Sat, 2024-01-20 at 13:26 +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
>
> Good afternoon.
> Root terminal is fine.
> What do I do wrong?
> What did I destroy?
>
>
> PC does have only one user=admin.
>
>
> Regards Sophie
> Is it the rescue mode?
Hellow Sophie,
English is not my native language.
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 02:30:43PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good afternoon
> I destroyed DEBIAN
> now 2 years agon.
> I asked here for help
> no solution.
> So every morning
> I interrupt booting
> change to rescue mode.
>
> "Normal" booting does create panic.
>
> Regards
> Sophie
>
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 01:26:06PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good afternoon.
> Root terminal is fine.
> What do I do wrong?
> What did I destroy?
h-boy, strap yourselves in for another epic Sophie/Michael
thread. A bit like the Gene ones, though tend to be circular across
a
_
Von: Dan Ritter
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Januar 2024 14:09
An: Schwibinger Michael
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: su su- sudo dont work
Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good afternoon.
> Root terminal is fine.
> What do I do wrong?
> What did I destroy?
>
> PC d
one user=admin.
> >
> > Regards Sophie
> > Is it the rescue mode?
>
> Explain, please.
>
> Your Subject: header says "su su- sudo dont work". What does this MEAN?
>
> Please show us your attempts to USE each of these commands, and the
> re
Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good afternoon.
> Root terminal is fine.
> What do I do wrong?
> What did I destroy?
>
> PC does have only one user=admin.
>
> Regards Sophie
> Is it the rescue mode?
Please tell us:
exactly what rescue mode you were using
exactly what the prompt was
exactly
Am Samstag, 20. Januar 2024, 14:26:06 CET schrieb Schwibinger Michael:
There is not "su su-", but there is
su = change to root, envirenmont of former user without changing of X
environment (hope, this is corect said)
su -= change to root, environment of user root
su -p = change to
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 01:26:06PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good afternoon.
> Root terminal is fine.
> What do I do wrong?
> What did I destroy?
>
> PC does have only one user=admin.
>
> Regards Sophie
> Is it the rescue mode?
Explain, please.
Your Subjec
Good afternoon.
Root terminal is fine.
What do I do wrong?
What did I destroy?
PC does have only one user=admin.
Regards Sophie
Is it the rescue mode?
:
Defaults pwfeedback
then consulting the sudo manpage convinced me, it was the 'use_pty' flag (in
section SUDOERS OPTIONS). after removing that flag everything works as
'expected':
Well, that is quite the find.
Indeed! Many thanks Michael.
8< snip >8
Anyway, for my personal purposes, th
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:15:26PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 05:20:58PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > I see that in the logs the VALUE of the env variable is loggued.
> > How to change this ?
>
> I don't think there is a way to stop th
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 11:22:00AM -0400, Erwan David wrote:
> I use a script to run borg backup. For it to be able to backup files that
> only root may read, i use sudo --preserv-env=BORG_REPO,BORG_PASSPHRASE.
>
> However I see that in the logs the VALUE of the env variable is
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 05:20:58PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> I use a script to run borg backup. For it to be able to backup files that
> only root may read, i use sudo --preserv-env=BORG_REPO,BORG_PASSPHRASE.
>
> However I see that in the logs the VALUE of the env variable is
I use a script to run borg backup. For it to be able to backup files
that only root may read, i use sudo --preserv-env=BORG_REPO,BORG_PASSPHRASE.
However I see that in the logs the VALUE of the env variable is loggued.
How to change this ?
David Wright writes:
> You'd have to specify a set of criteria to test. I just treat
> /media/samsungd like any other filesystem, copying files in the
> usual manner.
Well, when I last tried MTP in Linux I got maybe half of a directory
listing and then it hung there. Concluded it doesn't work
gt;>
> >> What do you functionally mean? I need for you to talk to me like
> >> this: a) go "Settings"; b) ...
> >
> > On bullseye I have android-file-transfer installed. I connect the
> > phone to the PC with USB, and run this function:
> >
me exact one being advertised as doubling
> as a data cable, but running:
> $ sudo lsusb
> Before and after plugging in the phone doesn’t show any difference.
> Is there a way to test for sure that cable is the right one?
You should see lines appear in the kern.log (or wherever you h
USB cable I have been using to charge the battery of that phone
> > visually seems to be the same exact one being advertised as doubling
> > as a data cable, but running:
> > $ sudo lsusb
> > Before and after plugging in the phone doesn’t show any difference.
> > Is there a
same exact one being advertised as doubling
> as a data cable, but running:
> $ sudo lsusb
> Before and after plugging in the phone doesn’t show any difference.
> Is there a way to test for sure that cable is the right one?
It sounds like you are using a charging cable, or a cheap data
On 2023-09-25, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> Is there a way to test for sure that cable is the right one?
Usually the original cable furnished with the phone is a data cable. My
only test was to successfully use adb then change cable and see that I
have some power only cables.
On 2023-09-25, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> Android awakens when I unplug the cable from the computer; so,
> something is being somehow detected.
android also awakens on power on/off
David Wright (12023-09-25):
> On bullseye I have android-file-transfer installed. I connect the
> phone to the PC with USB, and run this function:
If we are sharing how we do file transfer to and from an Android phone:
My favorite solution is tu install Termux and run sshd in it. Then I can
use
On 9/25/23, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> Most probably there is a setting in that phone I haven’t been able to
> find.
Android awakens when I unplug the cable from the computer; so,
something is being somehow detected.
lbrtchx
>> this: a) go "Settings"; b) ...
>
> On bullseye I have android-file-transfer installed. I connect the
> phone to the PC with USB, and run this function:
>
> samsungd ()
> {
> sudo mkdir -p /media/samsungd || true;
> sudo chown &quo
On 9/24/23, Michel Verdier wrote:
> If you use USB you need a cable allowing data, some allow only power.
The USB cable I have been using to charge the battery of that phone
visually seems to be the same exact one being advertised as doubling
as a data cable, but running:
$ sudo lsusb
Bef
On bullseye I have android-file-transfer installed. I connect the
phone to the PC with USB, and run this function:
samsungd ()
{
sudo mkdir -p /media/samsungd || true;
sudo chown "$USER" /media/samsungd;
aft-mtp-mount /media/samsungd
}
whereupon the phone w
As far as I remember adb requires debugging to be enabled on the Android
device.
For newer androids following - slighly obscure - process has to be used:
Enabling USB Debugging on an Android Device
- On the device, go to Settings > About .
- Tap the Build number seven times to make Settings >
Am 24.09.2023 22:13 schrieb Albretch Mueller:
> What do you functionally mean? I need for you to talk to me like
> this: a) go "Settings"; b) ...
According to the Google documentation:
With a USB cable, connect your device to your computer.
On your device, tap the "Charging this device via
On 9/24/23, Marco M. wrote:
> On most Android phones, you need to explicit allow data transfers.
What do you functionally mean? I need for you to talk to me like
this: a) go "Settings"; b) ...
Thank you,
lbrtchx
On 9/24/23, Marco M. wrote:
> Am 24.09.2023 um 19:45:11 Uhr schrieb Albretch
On 2023-09-24, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> Basically, I need to transfer selected data (whatsapp, messages,
> phone calls, ...) off my phone to my computer's hdd.
>
> How can you troubleshoot that problem or, do you know about any other
> way to transfer your data to a drive off your phone?
If
Am 24.09.2023 um 19:45:11 Uhr schrieb Albretch Mueller:
> How can you troubleshoot that problem or, do you know about any other
> way to transfer your data to a drive off your phone?
On most Android phones, you need to explicit allow data transfers.
Did you do?
$ uname -a
Linux debian 5.10.0-18-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.140-1 (2022-09-02)
x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ sudo apt-get update
...
$ date; sudo apt-get install android-tools-adb
Sun 24 Sep 2023 02:07:24 PM UTC
...
$ which adb
/usr/bin/adb
$ adb --version
Android Debug Bridge version 1.0.41
Version
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 06:42:42PM -0400, Karl Vogel wrote:
> If you're running bash, the safest way to find your current working
> directory is capturing the output from /bin/pwd. Symlinked directories
> can surprise you:
>
> me$ cd
>
> me$ ls -ldF today
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 me mis 18
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 12:09:57PM -0400, Tom Browder wrote:
> Excellent mind-reading, Greg! So to use your line I will put in that dir:
> "cd /required-dir || exit"
>
> Thanks so much. And thanks to all others who responded.
If you're running bash, the safest way to find your current
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 01:54:41PM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:42 wrote:
[...]
> > Basically it is not possible to find out [...]
> As I think I replied earier, I am now checking the script is in the
> required directory in order to be executed (by the root user)
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:42 wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 04:45:54PM +0200, DdB wrote:
> > Am 26.08.2023 um 16:25 schrieb Tom Browder:
> > > Is there a way to distinguish whether 'sudo -i' was used or not?
> > >
> > Sorry, i am not an expert on thi
* On 2023 26 Aug 11:10 -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:57 Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:49:45AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> > > I would like to know whether 'sudo -i' or 'sudo -s' was used.
>
> ...
>
> >
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 11:56:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:49:45AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> > I would like to know whether 'sudo -i' or 'sudo -s' was used.
>
> That's STILL an X-Y problem.
>
> > The reason is
> > to kn
On 26 Aug 2023 11:56 -0400, from g...@wooledge.org (Greg Wooledge):
> You don't actually need to know what was typed.
And even being able to answer the question "how was sudo executed"
doesn't solve the problem of ensuring that the script is executing
within a particular directory.
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:57 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:49:45AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> > I would like to know whether 'sudo -i' or 'sudo -s' was used.
...
> In fact, I suspect "I need to know if the cwd is /root" is STILL an X-Y
> proble
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:49:45AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> I would like to know whether 'sudo -i' or 'sudo -s' was used.
That's STILL an X-Y problem.
> The reason is
> to know if the cwd is set to '/root' or '.' It's critical for the script
> execution
Oh? Then just look at
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 09:32 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 09:25:10AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> >In a previous thread it was shown how to detect a SUDO_USER in a bash
> >shell.
> >Is there a way to distinguish whether 'sudo -i' was used o
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 04:45:54PM +0200, DdB wrote:
> Am 26.08.2023 um 16:25 schrieb Tom Browder:
> > Is there a way to distinguish whether 'sudo -i' was used or not?
> >
> Sorry, i am not an expert on this. But ... since years i am using this
> to check for it:
&g
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 09:25:10AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> In a previous thread it was shown how to detect a SUDO_USER in a bash shell.
>
> Is there a way to distinguish whether 'sudo -i' was used or not?
I have not tested this but if bash was interactive you will find a
.bash_his
Am 26.08.2023 um 16:25 schrieb Tom Browder:
> Is there a way to distinguish whether 'sudo -i' was used or not?
>
Sorry, i am not an expert on this. But ... since years i am using this
to check for it:
> # if `echo $HOME` is not "/root" or the working dir
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 09:25:10AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
>In a previous thread it was shown how to detect a SUDO_USER in a bash
>shell.
>Is there a way to distinguish whether 'sudo -i' was used or not?
>Thanks.
>-Tom
The SUDO_COMMAND environment variable wo
In a previous thread it was shown how to detect a SUDO_USER in a bash shell.
Is there a way to distinguish whether 'sudo -i' was used or not?
Thanks.
-Tom
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 08:11 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 07:56:22AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> > For Greg: I'm trying to get my muscle memory to use "sudo -i" and "sudo
> -s"
> > as you said to become root user for more work
1 - 100 of 2235 matches
Mail list logo
