secure boot
> > gets enabled (hence bios and everything else seems to be fine with the
> > same UEFI loader).
> > However, when I boot the compiled kernel I get
> >
> > $ dmesg | grep -i secure
> > [0.007085] Secure boot could not be determined
> >
&g
someone tell me what am I doing wrong please ?
>
> Below is the status (I am using loader.efi from linuxfoundation)
> When i boot debian stock kernel signed, i see that the secure boot
> gets enabled (hence bios and everything else seems to be fine with the
> same UEFI load
boot
gets enabled (hence bios and everything else seems to be fine with the
same UEFI loader).
However, when I boot the compiled kernel I get
$ dmesg | grep -i secure
[0.007085] Secure boot could not be determined
$ sbverify --list bootx64.efi
warning: data remaining[91472 vs 101160]: gaps
Le 28/05/2024, Harald Dunkel a écrit:
> Full thread is on debian-boot mailing list.
I've read it now, thanks for the info, Harald!
Regards
--
Florent
Full thread is on debian-boot mailing list.
Hi,
Le 24/05/2024, Harald Dunkel a écrit:
> if I migrate from grub-pc to grub-uefi, then grub-pc.postrm
> removes /etc/default/grub on the final purge.
I confirm the behavior, have been bitten by this. IMHO, it is a nasty
bug: suppose your rely on your kernel command line to disabl
Hi folks,
if I migrate from grub-pc to grub-uefi, then grub-pc.postrm
removes /etc/default/grub on the final purge.
grub2 doesn't provide much information in its man pages, but
AFAICT /etc/default/grub is still processed for UEFI, so why
is it deleted?
Regards
Harri
On 03/12/2023 02:15, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Interesting. I have memtest86+ 6.10-4, for amd64, on the machine.
Then AFAIK it is not a known problem (IOW, it should work).
The package contains /boot/memtest86+x64.efi, so it is intended to work
with UEFI. I am less sure that it can work when
> Interesting. I have memtest86+ 6.10-4, for amd64, on the machine.
Then AFAIK it is not a known problem (IOW, it should work).
> Maybe I'll try a USB stick version.
IIRC the memtest86+ Debian package comes with .iso files which you can
(manually) put into /boot/images/ and which boot in a
> For the curious, I occasionally need to run Microchip MPLAB, the old
> pre-Java version which doesn't do Linux. It only just about does
> Windows... I used to think Serif software was buggy until I tried
> Microchip stuff.
Setting it up might take some work (especially if you need it to have
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:27:59 +0100
Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
> ... have you ever tried
>
> bcdedit /bootsequence
>
> In general, the built-in help of bcdedit is not bad, needs a bit of
> patience, though.
>
> And of course we lack the flexibility of tools such as awk or sed on
> Windows, to
On 30/11/2023 19:27, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Am 30.11.2023 um 12:52 schrieb Joe:
I have a
netbook which, left to its own devices, will always boot to Windows,
and cannot be made to boot to anything else from the UEFI part of
whatever we're supposed to call the BIOS these days.
... have you ever
Bit of a digression here, probably better not to pursue *this* on the
mailing list, but...
Am 30.11.2023 um 12:52 schrieb Joe:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 18:34:30 -0500
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
As I understand things, a well functioning UEFI system does not need
to use GRUB. The entries for Linux
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:45:10AM +0200, Dennis van Dok wrote:
> On 15-08-2023 12:13, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> > Het feit dat er vrij automatisch firmware wordt geïnstalleerd van de
> > fabrikant vind ik niet prettig. Maar dit is vast uit te zetten ;-)
>
> Welke systemen doen dit? Wij moeten
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:21:38AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> > > vind ik niet prettig.
> >
> > Als je dat die "auto firmware update by firmware" kunt aantonen,
> > ga dan ingesprek met je leverancier.
> Het is een "feature" van UEF
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:13:54PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> Wat is jullie mening over UEFI? Ik vind het nogal een complex gebeuren
> waarbij aardig wat dingen mee mis kunnen gaan. En wellicht ook minder veilig
> dan "legacy".
Dat lijkt me net het omg
Op 22-08-2023 om 23:01 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Oh ja, ook om te checken of er een voeding is.
Ik bedoelde: om te checken of er een voeding defect is.
De computers die ik gebruik hebben een dubbele voeding, als er eentje
defect is moet je dat wel weten om hem te kunnen vervangen.
n. Dat doen ze dan van de individule disk, niet
van de RAID.
Ja, legacy boot van een bootsector zal wel gaan denk ik.
UEFI met een EFI partitie ook, begrijp ik. Zelfs op LVM.
Nu heb ik het wel over RAID1, het bios heeft geen weet van RAID of LVM,
maar kan gewoon bij de data op de eerste dis
On 22-08-2023 11:54, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hallo Dennis en anderen,
Op 22-08-2023 om 10:45 schreef Dennis van Dok:
On 15-08-2023 12:13, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
We zijn (bij Nikhef, plusminus 500 systemen) al een paar jaar helemaal
over op EFI boot aangezien de nieuwere systemen legacy
Hallo Dennis en anderen,
Op 22-08-2023 om 10:45 schreef Dennis van Dok:
On 15-08-2023 12:13, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hallo,
Wat is jullie mening over UEFI? Ik vind het nogal een complex
gebeuren waarbij aardig wat dingen mee mis kunnen gaan. En wellicht
ook minder veilig dan "l
On 15-08-2023 12:13, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hallo,
Wat is jullie mening over UEFI? Ik vind het nogal een complex gebeuren
waarbij aardig wat dingen mee mis kunnen gaan. En wellicht ook minder
veilig dan "legacy".
Niet per se, maar moderne systemen hebben steeds meer management
Hallo Geert en anderen,
Op 16-08-2023 om 22:26 schreef Geert Stappers:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:13:54PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hallo,
Wat is jullie mening over UEFI?
Het is vooral een "bootloader"
Ik gebruik GRUB als bootloader, maar wellicht is dit een wat vaag
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:13:54PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> Wat is jullie mening over UEFI?
Het is vooral een "bootloader"
> Ik vind het nogal een complex gebeuren waarbij aardig wat dingen mee
> mis kunnen gaan. En wellicht ook minder veil
Hallo,
Wat is jullie mening over UEFI? Ik vind het nogal een complex gebeuren
waarbij aardig wat dingen mee mis kunnen gaan. En wellicht ook minder
veilig dan "legacy".
Het feit dat er vrij automatisch firmware wordt geïnstalleerd van de
fabrikant vind ik niet prettig. Maar dit i
Hola, Àlex:
> Ho he provat i confirmo que a instalacions UEFI+GPT, si a
> /etc/default/grub hi ha habilitada la línia
> "GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=false" , i a /etc/fstab hi ha muntada
> la partició UEFI de Bootloader "UUID=elquesigui /boot/efi
> vfat umask=0077
Així i tot, si hi tens algun Windows, aquest, amb l'excusa de qualsevol
actualització important, tot sovint aprofitarà per modificar l'ordre
d'arrencada a la UEFI, parlo per experiència personal.
Interessant, donar un cop d'ull a les cosetes que pot fer l'efibootmgr a
l'hora de gestionar el tema
Debian 12, i jo no he sabut interpretar
diferencies remarcables.
Bones,
jo mateix em responc a partir de coses que he aprés llegint sobre Grub
i UEFI, però que encara haig de provar i confirmar.
Sembla que estava mirant al lloc equivocat. El fet que Grub detecti bé
Windows a arrencades UEFI
diferencies remarcables.
Bones,
jo mateix em responc a partir de coses que he aprés llegint sobre Grub
i UEFI, però que encara haig de provar i confirmar.
Sembla que estava mirant al lloc equivocat. El fet que Grub detecti bé
Windows a arrencades UEFI a Linux Mint i Ubuntu però no a Debian
mateix em responc a partir de coses que he aprés llegint sobre Grub i
UEFI, però que encara haig de provar i confirmar.
Sembla que estava mirant al lloc equivocat. El fet que Grub detecti bé
Windows a arrencades UEFI a Linux Mint i Ubuntu però no a Debian, no té
a veure amb els fitxers de
Bon dia llista,
des de fa dues setmanes he intentat instal.lar la propera Debian 12 en
arrencada dual tant a la feina, on hi ha ordinadors amb arrencada per
UEFI i Windows, com a casa, on tinc algun ordinador amb arrencada UEFI i
MacOS.
La imatge la descarregava de
https
On 2/23/23 11:05, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, Nicolas George wrote:
Is there a solution to have a whole-disk RAID (software, mdadm) that is
also partitioned in GPT and bootable in UEFI?
I've wanted this ...
I think only hardware raid where the bios thinks it's a single disk
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, Nicolas George wrote:
Hi.
Is there a solution to have a whole-disk RAID (software, mdadm) that is
also partitioned in GPT and bootable in UEFI?
I've wanted this but settled for using dd to copy the start of the disk,
fdisk to rewrite the GPT properly then mdadm
Hello,
I have seen some installations with following setup:
GPT
sda1 sdb1 bios_grub md1 0.9
sda2 sdb2 efi md2 0.9
sda3 sdb3 /boot md3 0.9
sda4 sdb4 / md? 1.1
on such installations it's important, that grub installation is made
with "grub-install --removable"
I mean it was some grub bugs about
Am 22.02.2023 um 17:07 schrieb Nicolas George:
> Unfortunately, that puts the partition table
> and EFI partition outside the RAID: if you have to add/replace a disk,
> you need to partition and reinstall GRUB, that makes a few more
> manipulations on top of syncing the RAID.
Yes, i get it.
Nicolas George wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Is there a solution to have a whole-disk RAID (software, mdadm) that is
> also partitioned in GPT and bootable in UEFI?
Not that I know of. An EFI partition needs to be FAT32 or VFAT.
What I think you could do:
Partition the disks with GPT: 2 par
e to make an USB
stick that was bootable in legacy mode, bootable in UEFI mode and usable
as a regular USB stick (spoiler: it worked, until I tried it with
Windows.)
But it will not help for this issue.
> The only issue, i have had a look at, was the problem to have a raid,
> that is bootable
MBR
with pointers to up to four partitons, in order to make a system
bootable without UEFI. I understand, that your use case is somewhat
different. But maybe you can use the idea anyway. The hybrid formatting
has some restrictions, like you should not have standard MBR tools mess
this configuration
Hi.
Is there a solution to have a whole-disk RAID (software, mdadm) that is
also partitioned in GPT and bootable in UEFI?
What I imagine:
- RAID1, mirroring: if you ignore the RAID, the data is there.
- The GPT metadata is somewhere not too close to the beginning of the
drive nor too close
Hi hw,
Having followed through the steps I outlined:
> I'm about to try this on a VM with two disks. I'm going to initially partition
> as if I were using LVM and all in one partition on one disk, then on the other
> That should give me identically sized partitions.
> At that point, I'll
won't let me install on software
> > > RAID1
> > > on
> > > a server with an UEFI BIOS. I can't find any good guide about that,
> > > either.
> > >
> >
> > Hi hw
> >
> > You might want to *start* with using the expert install - found unde
On Sun, 2022-11-13 at 14:32 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 02:49:28PM +0100, hw wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the Debian installer is horrible. It won't let me install on software RAID1
> > on
> > a server with an UEFI B
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 02:32:06PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> If you partition both disks to have an EFI partition at the beginning, then
> a RAID partition, then 2 x 1G swap at the end.
>
> Then use the RAID manager to set up RAID1 and LVM over the top. I'm unsure how
> you would
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 02:49:28PM +0100, hw wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the Debian installer is horrible. It won't let me install on software RAID1
> on
> a server with an UEFI BIOS. I can't find any good guide about that, either.
>
Hi hw
You might want to *start* with usi
Hi,
the Debian installer is horrible. It won't let me install on software RAID1 on
a server with an UEFI BIOS. I can't find any good guide about that, either.
I want root on brtfs with RAID1. How do I get Debian installed?
The graphical version crashes with a kernel panic when booting from
Thanks a lot, this is very useful!
- vinceh121
On 9/18/22 13:42, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 03:07:29AM +0200, vinceh121 wrote:
Thanks, this works!
Is there a way to set this option during installation on a netinst image?
Yes! You can switch to expert mode for
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 03:07:29AM +0200, vinceh121 wrote:
>Thanks, this works!
>
>Is there a way to set this option during installation on a netinst image?
Yes! You can switch to expert mode for installation and then
grub-efi-$ARCH will ask you these questions. Or you can add these
options using
--no-nvram?
Yup. See
https://wiki.debian.org/UEFI#Firmware_does_not_support_setting_boot_variables
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rub-install with
>the --no-nvram option.
>
>However, the problem reappears when running apt upgrade.
>
>Is there a way to mitigate this problem? Maybe a way to tell
>grub-install to always use --no-nvram?
Yup. See
https://wiki.debian.org/UEFI#Firmware_does_not_support_settin
Am 16.09.2022 um 20:19 schrieb vinceh121:
> Is there a way to mitigate this problem?
Apart from the plan, you seem to be favoring, i would like to introduce
another option to you:
(BTW: I used it myself, and still do, while i was learning to
reconfigure to UEFI-Booting)
There is a sort of b
> Steve wrote:
>
> 3. Move the cursor to near the end of the line, before the "---"
> separator and add any extra command line options you need there.
>
After too many trials and errors I found that the following two variables /
kernel parameters do the trick:
auto=true
Hans wrote:
>Steve wrote:
>>
>> If you hit E, that will let you edit the currently-loaded grub
>> config so you can append preseed and other options.
>
>I thought about that since hit all keys trying to get to cmd prompt
>like when booting from BIOS. But I didn't find any documentation /
>example
tual goal to install Debian on a server / laptop
> > and I hit a problem... I don't know how
> > to start the Pressed installation on UEFI hardware.
> >
> > When I boot ISO on a BIOS virtual machine I get this screen:
> >
> > https://pasteboard.co/nnvxHDvOZP6C.p
> Then I continued with my actual goal to install Debian on a server / laptop
> > and I hit a problem... I don't know how to start the Pressed installation
> > on UEFI hardware.
> >
> > When I boot ISO on a BIOS virtual machine I get this screen:
> >
> >
op
>and I hit a problem... I don't know how
>to start the Pressed installation on UEFI hardware.
>
>When I boot ISO on a BIOS virtual machine I get this screen:
>
>https://pasteboard.co/nnvxHDvOZP6C.png
>
>I hit Esc and type "auto path-to-the-file":
>
>https:
a server / laptop
> and I hit a problem... I don't know how to start the Pressed installation on
> UEFI hardware.
>
> When I boot ISO on a BIOS virtual machine I get this screen:
>
> https://pasteboard.co/nnvxHDvOZP6C.png
>
> I hit Esc and type "auto path-to-the-fi
to start the Pressed installation on UEFI
hardware.
When I boot ISO on a BIOS virtual machine I get this screen:
https://pasteboard.co/nnvxHDvOZP6C.png
I hit Esc and type "auto path-to-the-file":
https://pasteboard.co/gXpsslGWHx9L.png
And it Debian gets installed.
But when I boot
On 5/13/2022 6:53 PM, David wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2022 at 10:57, Matt Ventura wrote:
On one box (Debian 11.3), my virt-install script works fine:
virt-install [...]
However, on another box, the same command (minus the final --network option)
gives me this:
[...]
Could not open
On Sat, 14 May 2022 at 10:57, Matt Ventura wrote:
> On one box (Debian 11.3), my virt-install script works fine:
> virt-install [...]
> However, on another box, the same command (minus the final --network option)
> gives me this:
[...]
> Could not open
l,bus=scsi,discard=unmap,cache=writeback,io=threads --disk
size=4,pool=vmvol-nobackup,bus=scsi,discard=unmap,cache=unsafe,io=threads \
--memory 8196 --initrd-inject=preseed.cfg --noautoconsole --boot uefi
--graphics spice --video virtio --controller=scsi,model=virtio-scsi
--network=bridge=virbr1,mo
members).
...
> Can ssomebody explain, what technically the grub installer did do? At one
> point it said "I have dicovered another EFI partition, shall I use it?" (or
> similar, it is from my remembers)
Grub's job starts differently with GPT and UEFI. The UEFI firmware
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 12:44:32PM +0200, Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> yesterday I installed debian bullseye besides a windows system. As UEFI could
> not switched off, I used gparted to make the windows partition smaller.
>
> Then used an usb-stick and installed
Hi folks,
yesterday I installed debian bullseye besides a windows system. As UEFI could
not switched off, I used gparted to make the windows partition smaller.
Then used an usb-stick and installed bullseye as usual.
However, the installer discovered UEFI and respected this, but atthe first
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 09:47:10PM -0500, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> rEFInd is a fork of the rEFIt boot manager. Like rEFIt, rEFInd can
> auto-detect your installed EFI boot loaders and it presents a pretty GUI
> menu of boot options. rEFInd goes beyond rEFIt in that rEFInd better
>
h
> efibootmgr.
> Likely update-grub and grub-install would do the same thing, but I've never
> given
> them the opportunity here. I say /should/ because some UEFI BIOS are finicky
> beasts that can't always be trusted to do as expected.
>
> I avoid the issue of priority us
as control either in the BIOS directly, or with
efibootmgr.
Likely update-grub and grub-install would do the same thing, but I've never
given
them the opportunity here. I say /should/ because some UEFI BIOS are finicky
beasts that can't always be trusted to do as expected.
I avoid the issue of priorit
With the threads on "Stupid question" and "Throw an hard drive"
in d-u at the moment, this seems timely:
I have a drive which contains two Debian installations, one of which
(B) was installed for BIOS booting, and the other (E) was installed
with EFI booting. I would like to convert B into a EFI
; >
> > The laptop is no more than two years old and it has an Intel Core
> i3-1005G1
> > processor.
> > Also, I checked the USB stick and it only has the 32-bit EFI program in
> the
> > EFI boot folder.
> >
> > I assume based on what Andrew said th
in the
> EFI boot folder.
>
> I assume based on what Andrew said that maybe the UEFI needs to be 64-bit.
> I guess I will take the thread to the debian-live mailing list and ask why
> there is no 64-bit UEFI program and their plans to add one.
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5
Hi,
Flacusbigotis wrote:
> The laptop is no more than two years old and it has an Intel Core i3-1005G1
> processor.
> Also, I checked the USB stick and it only has the 32-bit EFI program in the
> EFI boot folder.
In this case you probably got an "i386" ISO image for 32-bit systems.
Try one of
Thomas and Andrew, thanks for your reply.
The laptop is no more than two years old and it has an Intel Core i3-1005G1
processor.
Also, I checked the USB stick and it only has the 32-bit EFI program in the
EFI boot folder.
I assume based on what Andrew said that maybe the UEFI needs to be 64-bit
Hi,
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> I had a similar issue the other day with an old Intel Baytrail
> notebook where the UEFI is 32 bit and the processor is 64 bit - using a
> Debian multi-arch installer worked. I used the one with firmware.
This would match the observation that Knoppix 9.1
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 08:47:16PM -0600, Flacusbigotis wrote:
> I have followed Debian's instructions (
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstall#Creating_a_Bootable_Debian_USB_Flashdrive)
> for creating a bootable USB stick but it fails to boot on my UEFI laptop.
> In contrast, I am ab
Hi,
this problem is probably better served on debian-l...@lists.debian.org
(or on debian...@lists.debian.org if you tried also a Debian installation
ISO).
Whatever:
Flacusbigotis wrote:
> The debian instructions basically say to do a normal cp of the hybrid iso
> unto the raw USB device as
I have followed Debian's instructions (
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstall#Creating_a_Bootable_Debian_USB_Flashdrive)
for creating a bootable USB stick but it fails to boot on my UEFI laptop.
In contrast, I am able to create the same for Knoppix 9.1 following their
instructions. So not sure why
On Lu, 24 ian 22, 03:39:47, deloptes wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> is there a way to have a USB UEFI stick that works similar to the Debian
> installer - for example to boot into UEFI and recover the boot loader.
> One machine here seems a bit older and refuses to boot into UEFI from the
&g
On Mon 24 Jan 2022 at 17:26:13 (-0800), David Christensen wrote:
> On 1/24/22 2:55 AM, deloptes wrote:
> > I can boot from the CD/DVD into UEFI, but it seems I can not do the same
> > from the USB.
> > The USB which is UEFI can boot the newer notebook (has secure mode
On 1/24/22 2:55 AM, deloptes wrote:
Thank you for the response
YW. :-)
Ah 2011 seems right to match the one that refer to here.
I can boot from the CD/DVD into UEFI, but it seems I can not do the same
from the USB.
The USB which is UEFI can boot the newer notebook (has secure mode
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Hi deloptes,
>
> It depends very much on the machine. I've just saved a machine that has
> 32 bit UEFI implementation and a 64 bit Atom processor. It's an Intel
> Baytrail with a small amount of memory [2G] but required the Debian
> multi
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:55:20AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> Thank you for the response
>
> David Christensen wrote:
>
> > I have a computer with an Intel DQ67SW desktop motherboard (released Q1,
> > 2011). The Setup utility allows me to select BIOS/MBR mode or UEFI/
Thank you for the response
David Christensen wrote:
> I have a computer with an Intel DQ67SW desktop motherboard (released Q1,
> 2011). The Setup utility allows me to select BIOS/MBR mode or UEFI/GPT
> mode. d-i seems to detect if the computer is running in BIOS/MBR mode
> or in U
On 1/23/22 6:39 PM, deloptes wrote:
Hi all,
is there a way to have a USB UEFI stick that works similar to the Debian
installer - for example to boot into UEFI and recover the boot loader.
One machine here seems a bit older and refuses to boot into UEFI from the
USB - rendering USB obsolete
Hi,
On 2022-01-23 21:39, deloptes wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> is there a way to have a USB UEFI stick that works similar to the Debian
> installer - for example to boot into UEFI and recover the boot loader.
> One machine here seems a bit older and refuses to boot into UEFI from the
&g
Hi all,
is there a way to have a USB UEFI stick that works similar to the Debian
installer - for example to boot into UEFI and recover the boot loader.
One machine here seems a bit older and refuses to boot into UEFI from the
USB - rendering USB obsolete as recovery option. In BIOS USB says AUTO
Pero no es a usted al que le salen los mensajes al inicio de que le falta
ese firmware? Pues eso se resuelve instalando dicho paquete. Gracias por
los deseos y felicitaciones, les deseo igual a usted y a todos en esta lista
En 26 de diciembre de 2021 9:15:14 p. m. Aristobulo Pinzon
escribió:
No! El que instaló el paquete firmware-realtek fué el señor jerigondor.
Yo instalé firmware-amd-graphics Y empezo a aparecer la pantalla en negro y
hasta el teclado bloqueado.
En el grub le agrego al kernel: ro "single modeset=vga" y entonces iniciaba
muy lento y sin quedarse en modo rescate se
No instalaste el paquete firmware-realtek ?? Creo que era asi el nombre, el
cual provee los firmware o drivers que te faltan segun ese log que pones ahi
En 21 de diciembre de 2021 11:24:22 p. m. Aristobulo Pinzon
escribió:
Muchas gracias por responder.
Si. Ni siquiera funciona el teclado
O 22/12/21 ás 05:08, Aristobulo Pinzon escribiu:
Muchas gracias por responder.
Si. Ni siquiera funciona el teclado para loguearme a travès del
alt-control-f2 y entrar en modo rescate
Prueba a entrar desde el modo de recuperación (si no recuerdo mal,
añadiéndole al núcleo el parámetro
El mié, 22 dic 2021 a las 1:08, Aristobulo Pinzon (<
ristobulopin...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Muchas gracias por responder.
> Si. Ni siquiera funciona el teclado para loguearme a travès del
> alt-control-f2 y entrar en modo rescate
> para hacer la desinstalación. Solo aparecen las primeras cinco
Muchas gracias por responder.
Si. Ni siquiera funciona el teclado para loguearme a travès del
alt-control-f2 y entrar en modo rescate
para hacer la desinstalación. Solo aparecen las primeras cinco lineas del
boot y chao...
queda paralizado!...
Hay que "cacharriale" un poco por aprender. Si no se
El mar, 21 dic 2021 a las 22:06, Aristobulo Pinzon (<
ristobulopin...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Me acaba de suceder algo muy parecido.
> En base a las instrucciones que da Leonardo y siguendo lo que dice el
> enlace:
>
Si he sido yo no estoy seguro cuales instrucciones hayan sido,
>
>
Me acaba de suceder algo muy parecido.
En base a las instrucciones que da Leonardo y siguendo lo que dice el
enlace:
https://www.diversidadyunpocodetodo.com/debian-buster-10-guia-configuracion-instalacion-software/
decidí instalar el paquete:
firmware-amd-graphics_20190114-2_all.deb...
Y hasta ahì
negra debes intentar con Ctrl+Alt+F2 esto te
> > debería de abrir otra terminal donde te pedirá te loguees,
> > si eso pasa entonces si tienes un problema con el driver de video y no
> > está relacionado con uefi,
> >
> Es que ahí radica el problema, que no puedo hacer abs
pedirá te loguees,
> si eso pasa entonces si tienes un problema con el driver de video y no
> está relacionado con uefi,
>
> Es que ahí radica el problema, que no puedo hacer absolutamente nada. Ni
> Control+Alt+F2, ni nada. Y no puedo entrar como Root, ni como usuario. Así
> no pu
correo anterior que luego de iniciar y
estando en esa pantalla negra debes intentar con Ctrl+Alt+F2 esto te
debería de abrir otra terminal donde te pedirá te loguees,
si eso pasa entonces si tienes un problema con el driver de video y no
está relacionado con uefi,
Es que ahí radica el problema
pantalla negra debes intentar con Ctrl+Alt+F2 esto te debería de
abrir otra terminal donde te pedirá te loguees,
si eso pasa entonces si tienes un problema con el driver de video y no está
relacionado con uefi,
en caso de que el problema sea el driver de nouveau esta es la
configuracion que tengo par
.
Es un HP con un i5 de 11º generación. Por lo que he visto, este
procesador no tiene la opción de modo legacy, que he visto en varios
tutoriales aunque según creo Debian desde hace tiempo es compatible
con UEFI y Secure Boot (que esta desactivado por si acaso).
La idea es tener Dual Boot
si que lo instalo, pero no consigo que arranque.
> > despues del GRUB se queda en una pantalla en negro.
> >
> > Es un HP con un i5 de 11º generación. Por lo que he visto, este
> > procesador no tiene la opción de modo legacy, que he visto en varios
> > tutoriales au
que he visto, este
procesador no tiene la opción de modo legacy, que he visto en varios
tutoriales aunque según creo Debian desde hace tiempo es compatible con
UEFI y Secure Boot (que esta desactivado por si acaso).
La idea es tener Dual Boot. Por lo que he instalado Windows 11.
Después de la
n HP con un i5 de 11º generación. Por lo que he visto, este
> procesador no tiene la opción de modo legacy, que he visto en varios
> tutoriales aunque según creo Debian desde hace tiempo es compatible con
> UEFI y Secure Boot (que esta desactivado por si acaso).
>
> La idea es tener Dual B
Buenas,
yo he instalado debian con uefi, y el proceso fue el siguiente en su día:
1. utilizar la última versión de debian (supongo que es lo que haces).
2. cuando llegues al particionador y hagas las particiones, deberían
aparecer 4, que son:
/dev/sda=disco duro principal.
/dev/sda1
1 - 100 of 1149 matches
Mail list logo
