Re: Is procmail orphaned again?

Op Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:07:46 +0100 mailingli...@vanwingerde.net schreef: > The site is down, the mailinglist is not reachable. Via https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/procmail I found the new maintainer and git: https://github.com/BuGlessRB/procmail Procmail.org is already down since 2015-11: ht

Is procmail orphaned again?

The site is down, the mailinglist is not reachable.

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

, Jun 20, 2023 at 07:52:24AM +0200, BASSAGET Cédric wrote: > > Hello > > I'm using fetchamil / procmail to fetch mails from an POP server and > parse > > it then launch a script or system call : > > > > > > # cat .fetchmailrc > > set logfile fetchm

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 07:52:24AM +0200, BASSAGET Cédric wrote: > Hello > I'm using fetchamil / procmail to fetch mails from an POP server and parse > it then launch a script or system call : > > > # cat .fetchmailrc > set logfile fetchmail.log > poll imaps

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

BASSAGET Cédric (12023-06-21): > Same result : log seems fine, but /tmp/test.txt still does not exist : > > procmail: Executing " echo "whoami" > /tmp/test.txt" > procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER= echo "whoami" > /tmp/test.txt" > Su

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

Hello Tomas, Same result : log seems fine, but /tmp/test.txt still does not exist : procmail: Executing " echo "whoami" > /tmp/test.txt" procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER= echo "whoami" > /tmp/test.txt" Subject: test Folder: echo "whoami"

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

Am Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 07:52:24AM +0200 schrieb BASSAGET Cédric: Bonjour Cédric, > Hello > I'm using fetchamil / procmail to fetch mails from an POP server and parse > it then launch a script or system call : [...] > This work fine when calling fetchamil as root w

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 07:52:24AM +0200, BASSAGET Cédric wrote: > Hello > I'm using fetchamil / procmail to fetch mails from an POP server and parse > it then launch a script or system call : > > > # cat .fetchmailrc > set logfile fetchmail.log > poll imaps

fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

Hello I'm using fetchamil / procmail to fetch mails from an POP server and parse it then launch a script or system call : # cat .fetchmailrc set logfile fetchmail.log poll imaps.dom.tld proto POP3 user "u...@dom.tld" pass "xx" preconnect "date >> ~/fetchma

Re: Gnus/procmail doesn't read new mails

Eric S Fraga writes: > Just in case, what happens if you expand "~" in the path to PROCMAIL? That was one of the first things I've tested but that didn't change anything. urs

Re: Gnus/procmail doesn't read new mails

Just in case, what happens if you expand "~" in the path to PROCMAIL? -- Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 29.0.50 2022-11-10) on Debian 11.4

Gnus/procmail doesn't read new mails

I want to move my mail server and Gnus MUA from a very old machine (emacs 20.7.1 and gnus 5.8.8) to a Debian bullseye machine with emacs and Gnus 5.13. The mail is filtered by procmail into several files in the ~/PROCMAIL directory. From there it should be read by Gnus and stored in mail groups

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

r 06, 2017 at 09:59:16PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > > On Monday 06 March 2017 21:47:42 Andy Smith wrote: > > > > > > Hi Gene, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > &

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Monday 06 March 2017 21:47:42 Andy Smith wrote: > > > > > Hi Gene, > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > > > > > > >

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

gt; > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > > > > > > > > procmail is still in Debian stretch and if it still works for > > > > you then it shou

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

formail can also force correct formatting on incoming email. On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Henning Follmann wrote: Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:43:17 From: Henning Follmann To: Gene Heskett Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered? Resent-Date: Tue, 7

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > > > > > > procmail is still in Debian stretch and if it still works for you > > > then it should continue to work for you. > > > > > I wanted to add a formail line but the do

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:59:16PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 06 March 2017 21:47:42 Andy Smith wrote: > > > Hi Gene, > > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > > > >

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? I still use procmail myself, but I do think about moving away one day. If you are using Exim, and if your mail arrival route is via your Exim (you mention fetchmail in follow-up email but I

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Monday 06 March 2017 21:54:26 Andy Smith wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:47:42AM +, Andy Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > > Oh, and procmail is not an MTA (and neither

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Monday 06 March 2017 21:47:42 Andy Smith wrote: > Hi Gene, > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > > procmail is still in Debian stretch and if it still works for you > then it should continue to wor

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:47:42AM +, Andy Smith wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? Oh, and procmail is not an MTA (and neither is maildrop…), but more correctly a Mail Delivery Agent, but I got what

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

Hi Gene, On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? procmail is still in Debian stretch and if it still works for you then it should continue to work for you. More modern alternatives include Sieve: http://sieve.info/clients

procmail, when were the last rights administered?

And what replaces it in the MTA dept? Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page

Re: postfix or procmail

Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android

Procmail them out of your life: was how to auto-configure network adapter (ie. enable internet access)?

e > him enough to choose another community to bring down, or better still > to have him go offline completely! Seriously, Andrew (and everyone else), why not make Debian-Users life more pleasant for yourself, and simply procmail those you consider a waste of bandwidth out of your life. I've pr

Re: postfix or procmail

Things like that, with procmail, could cause several loops, especially when is flavored with the "c" flag. You should consider use a solution at postfix's level only. Anyway, you could also do something with isabel's procmailrc, example: /home/isabel/.procmailrc And wri

Re: postfix or procmail

t; be forwarded to other users on my domain and maria pepe. > > I use Debian 6 and postfix 2.7 > > I tried aliases and postfix, also with procmail something like this > > echo multiples: pepe maria >> /etc/aliases > postalias /etc/aliases > > echo '/^From:.us

postfix or procmail

Hi All day I receive an email from external account u...@external.com it reaches a user of my local domain isabel@mydomain, need to automatically be forwarded to other users on my domain and maria pepe. I use Debian 6 and postfix 2.7 I tried aliases and postfix, also with procmail something

Re: postfix o procmail

That reminds me of "awesome people hanging out together", Simone de Beauvoir, Jean Paul Sartre and Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara (Cuba, 1960): http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmul2aM3m71qearaqo1_1280.jpg _But_ the international mailing list for Debian is an English language mailing list. http://lists.

postfix o procmail

xp:/etc/postfix/encabezados' >> /etc/postfix/main.cf Con procmail he probado y tampoco sin resultado con Procmail hize esto :0 c * ^From.*cuentaexte...@abc.com ! p...@midominio.com ma...@midominio.com o sea todo lo que entre de la cuentaexte...@abc.com sea renviado a

[Fwd: Re: Procmail does not work]

Hi David I did exactly as you said but still not working with the line mailbox_command = procmai -a "$EXTENSION" in Postfix and the configuration file in /etc/promailrc check this out $ cat /etc/procmailrc SHELL=/bin/bash SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -t" LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log MAI

Re: Procmail does not work

co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu grabbed a keyboard and wrote: > Hi > > Someone who has been running the procmail that could give a > hand, there is no way that I work with postfix, I know I'm doing > wrong. > > /etc/procmailrc? Because you must go to the configuration file?

Procmail does not work

Hi Someone who has been running the procmail that could give a hand, there is no way that I work with postfix, I know I'm doing wrong. /etc/procmailrc? Because you must go to the configuration file? Example how to make incoming messages are not duplicated or triple, etc.. To work on c

Re: procmail filtering

On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:14:57AM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: > lee: > > > > I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox > > format which I dont want. > > Formail doesn't actually save the mailboxes anywhere, procmail does >

Re: procmail filtering

On 07/05/2012 09:59 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: > lee wrote: >> I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox >> format which I dont want. > With Maildir format you don't need formail. Just pipe each individual > message to procmail. > &g

Re: procmail filtering

On 07/05/2012 02:41 PM, Jon Dowland wrote: > You can run procmail in "filter mode" and pipe it each mail that you wish to > filter individually, but you must keep track of which mails have been piped to > procmail and remove them/mark them 'processed' yourself, via s

Re: procmail filtering

lee wrote: > I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox > format which I dont want. With Maildir format you don't need formail. Just pipe each individual message to procmail. Of the top of my head and untested: for m in Maildir/new/* Maildir/cur/*;

Re: procmail filtering

You can run procmail in "filter mode" and pipe it each mail that you wish to filter individually, but you must keep track of which mails have been piped to procmail and remove them/mark them 'processed' yourself, via shell scripts etc. Make sure your procmail recipe(s) d

Re: procmail filtering

lee: > > I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox > format which I dont want. Formail doesn't actually save the mailboxes anywhere, procmail does that. And if you append a slash to the mailbox name, procmail generates maildirs. Example: MA

procmail filtering

Hi. probably not the best list to ask, but i've been trying and searching for awhile now, with not much success. I'm looking for a way to run my procmail filters on a directory containing emails I would like to filter. I'm using a Maildir email directory setup. I've looked a

Re: procmail, problem with this delivering recipe

e, that there can only be exactly one action line, but that doesn't prevent me from concatenating consequent lines together with a trailing '\', just like what I'm doing in make as well. All those complicated piping will form a *single* action line. I've checked the log, proc

Re: procmail, problem with this delivering recipe

u can only have exactly one action line. :-) > there were actually more piping commands between formail & $SENDMAIL > in my rcfile. Yes. But as noted that is incorrect. Only one action line is allowed there. If I need to do something more complicated then normally I create a script an

Re: procmail, problem with this delivering recipe

T o n g wrote: > :0 Hfhwi > * ^Subject: \/.* > | formail -b -c -X From: -X To: -X Subject: -X Date: . . . > | $SENDMAIL $SENDMAILFLAGS . . . You need to create another recipe for the second pipe. :0 Hfhwi * ^Subject: \/.* | formail -b -c -X From: -X To: -X Subject: -X Date: . . .

Re: procmail, problem with this delivering recipe

On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 03:40:24 +, T o n g wrote: > # send header only [ . . . ] > I.e., having processed it, procmail went on with the following recipes > instead of considering the mail delivered and cease processing the > rcfile. Hmm... looks like procmail considered the

Re: Procmail regular expression: word end boundary matching

T o n g wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > I think it is a bug in the \< expansion. > > OMG, I thought it would be very hard for anyone to find out the answer. > > THANKS A LOT. works like a charm. That seems to be an okay workaround but it still looks like a bug. Since

Re: Procmail regular expression: word end boundary matching

T o n g wrote: > I seems not able to get the word end boundary matching for procmail > works. Here is my test rc file: > > :0 HB > * 1^0 \ > * 1^0 test > /dev/null > > and there is a ' test ' in my test email. > > However, from the dry run log, I

Re: Procmail question/puzzle

Hello Paul E Condon, Am 2011-04-24 14:13:26, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > ## 'unreadable' mail > :0: > * 1^0 > ^\/Subject:.*=\?(.*big5|iso-2022-jp|ISO-2022-KR|euc-kr|gb2312|ks_c_5601-1987|windows-1251|windows-1256)\? > * 1^0 > ^\/Content-Type:.*charset="(.*big5|iso-2022-jp|ISO-2022-KR|euc-k

Procmail question/puzzle

The following procmail recipe was copied form a blog about how to set up Debian/Exim/Procmail/Mutt to use Bogofilter. It is intended to do a first cut at getting rid of junk that confuses Bogofilter, and appears just before the recipe that pipes incoming mail through Bogofilter. But I can't f

Re: system-wide bogofilter, procmail, fetchmail

On 04/05/2011 03:52 PM, Rob Owens wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:42:55PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: [snip] I set fetchmail to run from each user's crontab. Thus, each user feeds their own mail to postfix/spamassassin and then into maildrop automagically in each user's Maildir. That's an

Re: system-wide bogofilter, procmail, fetchmail

On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:42:55PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 04/04/2011 07:43 PM, Rob Owens wrote: > >I'm successfully using fetchmail, procmail, and bogofilter as my user, > >but I'm looking to set it up system-wide and have some questions. > > > >I'

Re: system-wide bogofilter, procmail, fetchmail

On 04/04/2011 07:43 PM, Rob Owens wrote: I'm successfully using fetchmail, procmail, and bogofilter as my user, but I'm looking to set it up system-wide and have some questions. I'm running an IMAP server with accounts for several family members. I'd like to scan for spam an

system-wide bogofilter, procmail, fetchmail

I'm successfully using fetchmail, procmail, and bogofilter as my user, but I'm looking to set it up system-wide and have some questions. I'm running an IMAP server with accounts for several family members. I'd like to scan for spam and file the spam in a "spam" fold

Re: procmail and Unicode header lines (RFC 2047)

On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:46:45 +0100, Stanisław Findeisen wrote: > On 2010-10-29 10:39, Camaleón wrote: >> Mmm, procmail is a delivery agent, it does not render the messages. >> >> What e-mail client are you using for displaying e-mails? I have not >> problems with enco

Re: procmail and Unicode header lines (RFC 2047)

On 2010-10-29 10:39, Camaleón wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:19:30 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote: > >> Is there any support in Debian for Unicode e-mail header lines >> processing, e.g. with procmail? >> >> Those header lines look like this:

Re: procmail and Unicode header lines (RFC 2047)

Stanisław Findeisen wrote: > >> Is there any support in Debian for Unicode e-mail header lines > >> processing, e.g. with procmail? > >> Subject: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCNEE7eiROJTUlViU4JSclLyVIGyhC?= > ... > Hm I wrote this little script: > > http://peop

Re: procmail and Unicode header lines (RFC 2047)

On 2010-10-29 21:35, Bob Proulx wrote: > Stanisław Findeisen wrote: >> Is there any support in Debian for Unicode e-mail header lines >> processing, e.g. with procmail? >> Subject: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCNEE7eiROJTUlViU4JSclLyVIGyhC?= >> >> so they need to be decoded

Re: procmail and Unicode header lines (RFC 2047)

Stanisław Findeisen wrote: > Is there any support in Debian for Unicode e-mail header lines > processing, e.g. with procmail? > Subject: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCNEE7eiROJTUlViU4JSclLyVIGyhC?= > > so they need to be decoded before doing anything useful with them. (See: > http://

Re: procmail and Unicode header lines (RFC 2047)

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:19:30 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote: > Is there any support in Debian for Unicode e-mail header lines > processing, e.g. with procmail? > > Those header lines look like this: > > Subject: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCNEE7eiROJTUlViU4JSclLyVIGyhC?= >

procmail and Unicode header lines (RFC 2047)

Hi Is there any support in Debian for Unicode e-mail header lines processing, e.g. with procmail? Those header lines look like this: Subject: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCNEE7eiROJTUlViU4JSclLyVIGyhC?= so they need to be decoded before doing anything useful with them. (See: http://www.debian.org/doc

Re: Procmail: re-sort all messages

On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:30:06PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > You can invoke procmail by piping an email to it. > > find $LOCAL_MAIL_DIR -type f | while read mail; do procmail < "$mail"; done That's it! Thank you very much! Thank you Monique Y. Mudama and Chris Ba

Re: Procmail: re-sort all messages

On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 03:38:51PM +0300, Alexander Batischev wrote: > Hi, > > I've just installed fetchmail → procmail → mutt → msmtp chain and want > to configure procmail properly. Of course, I can't write all the rules > in the right way from scratch, so there must

Re: Procmail: re-sort all messages

On Fri, May 7 at 15:38, Alexander Batischev penned: > Hi, > > I've just installed fetchmail ??? procmail ??? mutt ??? msmtp chain > and want to configure procmail properly. Of course, I can't write > all the rules in the right way from scratch, so there must be some &

Re: Procmail: re-sort all messages

On 07/05/10 13:38, Alexander Batischev wrote: > So here is what I'm looking for: is there a way to run procmail on > already downloaded messages? Maybe I should download them to separate > directory and run procmail on it? Maybe I can just pass existing > (already sorted)

Procmail: re-sort all messages

Hi, I've just installed fetchmail → procmail → mutt → msmtp chain and want to configure procmail properly. Of course, I can't write all the rules in the right way from scratch, so there must be some testing. The only way to check how rules works is actually run procmail and see what hap

Re: Re: Found: excellent procmail HOWTO

G. Peluso SUDPROGETTI S.p.A. 96100 - Siracusa Via Stentinello, 1 - Contrada Targia tel. 0931-409211 / Fax 0931-491101 E-mail : giuseppe.pel...@sudprogettigroup.it -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists

Re: maildrop: (aas: ProcMail ...)

On Wed,02.Sep.09, 00:38:33, Chris Bannister wrote: > > The rule above will actually create an mbox if the folder doesn't exist > > (tested). Yesterday I just added a trailing "/" to indicate a Maildir, > > but the debian-mips list didn't get any messages since I subscribed, so > > I don't know

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 05:51:49 -0400 Paul Cartwright wrote: > On Tue August 25 2009, Micha wrote: > > > what benefit would I get from procmail? > > > > 1. The ability to move from kmail to something else if you want without > > rewriting your rules. > > good

Re: maildrop: (aas: ProcMail ...)

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:38:05PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Wed,26.Aug.09, 21:02:48, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > # These are the lists.debian.org lists > > > if (/^List-Id:.*/) > > > { > > > to Maildir/.debian.$MATCH1 > > > } > The rule above will actually create an mbox if the folder

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On 2009-09-01 05:19, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Tue September 1 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: If your "person message store" is an mbox file, then I'd: this is the part I can't figure out.. I don't have an mbox setup on kmail, I don't see a way for it to read an mbox folder.. I tried to create an m

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On Tue September 1 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: > If your "person message store" is an mbox file, then I'd: this is the part I can't figure out.. I don't have an mbox setup on kmail, I don't see a way for it to read an mbox folder.. I tried to create an mbox folder in an account, but I don't see any

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On 2009-09-01 04:51, Paul Cartwright wrote: [snip] right now, on my system I have icedove, evolution, kmail, and claws, all setup for my local user. procmail seems to move the mail into an mbox file, and I haven't figured out how to get any email program to read an mbox folder. But yo

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On 2009-09-01 04:45, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Tue August 25 2009, Chris Jones wrote: but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about my 200 kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task.. As another poster hinted, this is another example of the hidden benefits of c

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On Tue August 25 2009, Micha wrote: > > what benefit would I get from procmail? > > 1. The ability to move from kmail to something else if you want without > rewriting your rules. good idea.. I like that, especially when testing different email programs. > 2. The ability to

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On Tue August 25 2009, Chris Jones wrote: > > but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about > > my 200 kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task.. > > As another poster hinted, this is another example of the hidden benefits > of cloning the Microsoft model. I'm n

Re: maildrop: (aas: ProcMail ...)

On Wed,26.Aug.09, 21:46:43, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:38:05PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > On Wed,26.Aug.09, 21:02:48, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > > The rule above will actually create an mbox if the folder doesn't exist > > (tested). Yesterday I just added a trailing "/" to

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

under > > $HOME/.sylpheed-2.0. > > Nice.. > > So it should be fairly straightforward to generate a procmail .rc file > and move the filters where they rightly belong.. > > :-) :/ Actually not too difficult; I did once write a perl script that uses XML::Parser to convert Sy

Re: maildrop: (aas: ProcMail ...)

On Wed,26.Aug.09, 21:31:45, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Besides, I tend to use Maildir/debian-*/ as folder name. I may do >maildirmake Maildir/debian-$MATCH1 I'm using a Maildir++ style structure. If I use some GUI client via IMAP the hierarchy is preserved ;) Regards, Andrei -- If you can't exp

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

under > > $HOME/.sylpheed-2.0. > > Nice.. > > So it should be fairly straightforward to generate a procmail .rc file > and move the filters where they rightly belong.. hmmm... that would be a lovely little bit of transformation code to write... if I only had the time. A signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: maildrop: (aas: ProcMail ...)

ivering the message to a maildir, otherwise maildrop will deliver mail to a mailbox file, creating a new file if necessary. maildrop does not deliver mail to flat directory, like procmail. If you need to save messages in a directory, use the included program, maildirmake, to create a maildir director

Re: maildrop: (aas: ProcMail ...)

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:38:05PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Wed,26.Aug.09, 21:02:48, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > The rule above will actually create an mbox if the folder doesn't exist > (tested). Yesterday I just added a trailing "/" to indicate a Maildir, > but the debian-mips list didn't g

Re: maildrop: (aas: ProcMail ...)

Hi, On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:02:48PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > # These are the lists.debian.org lists > > if (/^List-Id:.*/) > > { > > to Maildir/.debian.$MATCH1 > > } > > Nice. But what happens if maildir folder does not exst in advance. >

Re: maildrop: (aas: ProcMail ...)

pens if maildir folder does not exst in advance. > Procmail used to create it on the fly but maildrop does not. > > Any nice tip to for this one? The rule above will actually create an mbox if the folder doesn't exist (tested). Yesterday I just added a trailing "/" to indica

maildrop: (aas: ProcMail ...)

Hi, On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:28:39PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Mon,24.Aug.09, 20:56:27, Paul Cartwright wrote: > > > but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about my > > 200 > > kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

Sylpheed fanboy, I must point out that Sylph stores all its configuration, including its filter rules (which can utilize regex's), in fairly easy to understand XML files under $HOME/.sylpheed-2.0. Nice.. So it should be fairly straightforward to generate a procmail .rc file and move the fi

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On Tue, Aug 25 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Mon,24.Aug.09, 20:56:27, Paul Cartwright wrote: > >> but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about my 200 >> kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task.. > > maildir (and procmail to

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

y, I must point out that Sylph stores > all its configuration, including its filter rules (which can utilize > regex's), in fairly easy to understand XML files under > $HOME/.sylpheed-2.0. Nice.. So it should be fairly straightforward to generate a procmail .rc file and move

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:44:57 +0300 Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Ma,25.aug.09, 13:32:21, Micha wrote: > > > On the downside, if you want to explicitly pull mail now, pulling > > mail from kmail doesn't pull the mail off your accounts, you need to > > do that explicitly from the command line > > N

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:32:21 +0300 Micha wrote: > On 8/24/2009 11:34 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: > > On Mon August 24 2009, Micha wrote: > >> Personally I use fetchmail + procmail to fetch and filter my mail > > > > I use fetchmail to pull in my mail for all m

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On 2009-08-25 18:29, Chris Jones wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:02:44PM EDT, Ron Johnson wrote: On 2009-08-25 13:55, Chris Jones wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:56:27PM EDT, Paul Cartwright wrote: [..] but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about my 200 kmail f

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:02:44PM EDT, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 2009-08-25 13:55, Chris Jones wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:56:27PM EDT, Paul Cartwright wrote: >> >> [..] >>> but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking >>> about my 200 kmail filters, I'm not sure I could

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On 2009-08-25 13:55, Chris Jones wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:56:27PM EDT, Paul Cartwright wrote: [..] but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about my 200 kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task.. As another poster hinted, this is another example of

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:56:27PM EDT, Paul Cartwright wrote: [..] > but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about > my 200 kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task.. As another poster hinted, this is another example of the hidden benefits of cloning the Micr

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

heed too?) has configurable "Actions" which you can use to run external programs/scripts. > I played around a lot at the time looking for a mail client I'd be > happy with (Still haven't found one) and worked quite a bit with > mutt (I'm not sure if it even supports pu

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On 8/24/2009 11:34 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Mon August 24 2009, Micha wrote: Personally I use fetchmail + procmail to fetch and filter my mail I use fetchmail to pull in my mail for all my domain accounts. Kmail pulls it all in via my local user. From there I have many, MANY filters to

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On Mon,24.Aug.09, 20:56:27, Paul Cartwright wrote: > but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about my 200 > kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task.. maildir (and procmail too as I hear, but I don't like its syntax) is *very* powerful.

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On 2009-08-24 19:56, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Mon August 24 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: But if Paul is asking the benefit of procmail over competing MDAs like maildrop, then the benefit is cryptic line noise a la Perl. what I'm asking is.. will it benefit me to change the way I do email an

RE: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

> From: Paul Cartwright [mailto:a...@pcartwright.com] > Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 5:56 PM > > On Mon August 24 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: > > But if Paul is asking the benefit of procmail over competing MDAs > > like maildrop, then the benefit is cryptic line noise

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On Mon August 24 2009, Ron Johnson wrote: > But if Paul is asking the benefit of procmail over competing MDAs > like maildrop, then the benefit is cryptic line noise a la Perl. what I'm asking is.. will it benefit me to change the way I do email and add another program into the mix.

Re: ProcMail, WAS: Re: Fetchmail and Gmail

On 2009-08-24 17:11, Kevin Ross wrote: From: Paul Cartwright [mailto:a...@pcartwright.com] Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:35 PM On Mon August 24 2009, Micha wrote: Personally I use fetchmail + procmail to fetch and filter my mail I use fetchmail to pull in my mail for all my domain accounts

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >