On 6/3/24 10:34, Dan Ritter wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
(Debian sid)
Can alt-~ in XFCE switch windows of the same application?
Settings -> Window Manager -> Keyboard
Find "Switch window for same application".
Tap "Edit"
Type alt ~
Try it out.
Ah, by default it&#
Paul Scott wrote:
> (Debian sid)
>
> Can alt-~ in XFCE switch windows of the same application?
Settings -> Window Manager -> Keyboard
Find "Switch window for same application".
Tap "Edit"
Type alt ~
Try it out.
-dsr-
On 6/3/24 02:50, Paul Scott wrote:
(Debian sid)
Can alt-~ in XFCE switch windows of the same application?
alt-tilde in XFCE does nothing, at least in my installation (XFCE 4.18)
--
Driscoll's Observation: The product of the IQs of each member
of a tech-support conversation
(Debian sid)
Can alt-~ in XFCE switch windows of the same application?
TIA,
Paul
--not-show-in=GNOME,GNOME-Classic:GNOME may affect XFCE.
On Thu, 16 May 2024 14:09:33 -0600
Charles Curley wrote:
> Onboard is not showing up in the XFCE system tray. Bookworm as
> updated. I don't see any Debian bug reports or questions on the home
> page. I believe I am not running Wayland.
>
> Has anyone else seen this? Fix/Wo
On Fri, 17 May 2024 20:42:10 +0200
Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:09:33PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> > Onboard is not showing up in the XFCE system tray. Bookworm as
> > updated. I don't see any Debian bug reports or questions on the
> > hom
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:09:33PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> Onboard is not showing up in the XFCE system tray. Bookworm as updated.
> I don't see any Debian bug reports or questions on the home page.
> I believe I am not running Wayland.
>
> Has anyone else seen
Onboard is not showing up in the XFCE system tray. Bookworm as updated.
I don't see any Debian bug reports or questions on the home page. I
believe I am not running Wayland.
Has anyone else seen this? Fix/Workaround?
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
=
>> ii network-manager 1.30.6-1+deb11u1 amd64network management
>> framework (daemon and userspace tools)
>> ii network-manager-gnome 1.20.0-3 amd64network management
>> framework (GNOME frontend)
>> ii xfce4
management framework (GNOME frontend)
ii xfce4 4.16 all Meta-package for
the Xfce Lightweight Desktop Environment
I have used the Xfce panel Network Manager applet for many years.
Tonight, I noticed that it has disappeared (!).
I compared the problem
On 4/19/24 00:16, Florent Rougon wrote:
Another thing: did you look into ~/.xsession-errors?
(Sorry if this was already mentioned and I missed it.)
Please see attached copy of ~/.xsession-errors, taken immediately after
system restart and login.
"nm-applet" does not appear in .xsession-err
Hi,
Le 18/04/2024, David Christensen a écrit:
> 2024-04-18 02:27:18 root@laalaa ~
> # df `which nm-applet`
> Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/sdb3_crypt12084M 8927M 2522M 78% /
Not sure this command is super-useful:
% df $(which awk)
F
On 4/18/24 09:46, Gareth Evans wrote:
On Thu 18/04/2024 at 11:05, David Christensen wrote:
Move aside the ~/.config/xfce4 directory:
...
Restart -- screen with wallpaper alone.
...
Hi David,
Starting from Mate DE only and some old (bookworm) XFCE config files, if I:
$ sudo apt install
On 4/18/24 07:28, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 18/04/2024 17:05, David Christensen wrote:
$ mv .config/xfce4-20240418-180045/ .config/xfce4
Restart -- back to Xfce panel with no Network Manager.
Try to create a new system user and log in. Is nm-applet present?
Logging in using another previously
On 4/18/24 05:34, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 4/18/24 05:27, David Christensen wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:37, Richmond wrote:
What are the permissions on the nm-applet binary? maybe it doesn't have
permission to execute, or the process which starts it doesn't have
permission.
2024-04-18 02:24:20 root@la
On Thu 18/04/2024 at 11:05, David Christensen wrote:
> Move aside the ~/.config/xfce4 directory:
> ...
> Restart -- screen with wallpaper alone.
> ...
Hi David,
Starting from Mate DE only and some old (bookworm) XFCE config files, if I:
$ sudo apt install task-xfce-desktop
then
On 18/04/2024 17:05, David Christensen wrote:
$ mv .config/xfce4-20240418-180045/ .config/xfce4
Restart -- back to Xfce panel with no Network Manager.
Try to create a new system user and log in. Is nm-applet present?
On 4/18/24 05:27, David Christensen wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:37, Richmond wrote:
David Christensen writes:
What are the permissions on the nm-applet binary? maybe it doesn't have
permission to execute, or the process which starts it doesn't have
permission.
2024-04-18 02:24:20 root@laalaa ~
#
On 4/17/24 12:07, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:41:24 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
My WAG is that nm-applet is failing to start, but I have been unable
to find if and where any error message is reported.
My instance of nm-applet does run, and I see this as part of the boot
p
, Gareth Evans wrote:
On Sun 14/04/2024 at 13:29, David Christensen wrote:
...
I have used the Xfce panel Network Manager applet for many years.
Tonight, I noticed that it has disappeared (!).
...
There is apparently a long history of nm-applet/XFCE panel-related issues (and
not many great
On 4/17/24 13:56, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 4/17/24 15:37, Richmond wrote:
David Christensen writes:
My WAG is that nm-applet is failing to start, but I have been unable to
find if and where any error message is reported.
What are the permissions on the nm-applet binary?
And is its filesystem m
On 4/17/24 12:37, Richmond wrote:
David Christensen writes:
On Sun 14/04/2024 at 13:29, David Christensen wrote:
...
I have used the Xfce panel Network Manager applet for many years.
Tonight, I noticed that it has disappeared (!).
...
What are the permissions on the nm-applet binary? maybe it
On Wed 17/04/2024 at 19:41, David Christensen wrote:
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: Re: Debian 11 Xfce panel Network Manager applet has disappeared
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:38:49 -0700
> From: David Christensen
> To: Gareth Evans
>
> On 4/17/24 03:4
On 4/17/24 15:37, Richmond wrote:> David Christensen
writes:
>
>> My WAG is that nm-applet is failing to start, but I have been unable to
>> find if and where any error message is reported.
>
> What are the permissions on the nm-applet binary?
And is its filesystem mounted with noexec?
> maybe
David Christensen writes:
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: Re: Debian 11 Xfce panel Network Manager applet has disappeared
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:38:49 -0700
> From: David Christensen
> To: Gareth Evans
>
> On 4/17/24 03:47, Gareth Evans wrote:
>&
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:41:24 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> My WAG is that nm-applet is failing to start, but I have been unable
> to find if and where any error message is reported.
My instance of nm-applet does run, and I see this as part of the boot
process:
root@hawk:~# journalctl -b | gr
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Debian 11 Xfce panel Network Manager applet has disappeared
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:18:34 -0700
From: David Christensen
To: Gareth Evans
On 4/16/24 08:56, Gareth Evans wrote:
On 16 Apr 2024, at 00:18, David Christensen wrote:
On 4/15/24 09
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Debian 11 Xfce panel Network Manager applet has disappeared
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:38:49 -0700
From: David Christensen
To: Gareth Evans
On 4/17/24 03:47, Gareth Evans wrote:
On Wed 17/04/2024 at 09:18, David Christensen wrote:
On 4/16/24
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 01:39:34PM -, Curt wrote:
[...]
> It would've been clearer to have advised using another mail application,
> period [...]
> But no harm, no foul, and all is well. The only real mystery is how
> Tomas resisted getting yet another lick in against Gmail and Google, et
>
On 2024-04-16, John Crawley wrote:
>
> If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> that supports IMAP.
>
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
>>>
>>> AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading mail, but with mail
>>> submission of a
On 2024-04-16, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> that supports IMAP.
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
>>>
>>> AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading mail, but with mail
>>> submission of attachme
On Mon 15 Apr 2024 at 18:52:33 (-), Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
> >> On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
> >> >
> >> > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> >> > that supports IMAP.
On 16/04/2024 01:52, Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
that supports IMAP.
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever
On 16/04/2024 03:52, Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
that supports IMAP.
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less fore
On 4/15/24 09:21, Gareth Evans wrote:
On Sun 14/04/2024 at 13:29, David Christensen wrote:
...
I have used the Xfce panel Network Manager applet for many years.
Tonight, I noticed that it has disappeared (!).
...
Hi David,
I can't speak for XFCE, but certainly for Mate there was a time
On 2024-04-15, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
>> On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
>> >
>> > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
>> > that supports IMAP.
>> >
>>
>> Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
>
>
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 14:24:29 (-), Curt wrote:
> On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
> >
> > If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> > that supports IMAP.
> >
>
> Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
AIUI the OP's problem was not when reading mail,
agement framework (daemon and userspace tools)
> ii network-manager-gnome 1.20.0-3 amd64network
> management framework (GNOME frontend)
> ii xfce4 4.16 all Meta-package
> for
> the Xfce Lightweight Desktop Environment
>
>
On 2024-04-04, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> If you do not trust Gmail as a web application, use a mail application
> that supports IMAP.
>
Gmail supports IMAP since more or less forever.
xfce4 4.16 all Meta-package for
the Xfce Lightweight Desktop Environment
I have used the Xfce panel Network Manager applet for many years.
Tonight, I noticed that it has disappeared (!).
But, the machine is connected to my LAN:
2024-04-14 05:24:10 root
On 31/03/2024 22:35, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 31 Mar 2024 at 09:42:37 (+0300), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefox is capable of stealing
files off my USB stick.
I've no answer for that, particularly in view of Max's reply
to my previous post.
I've always copied f
I filed bug report 1068122. I feel fine, despite my concern over my data.
Heartfelt thanks for all the advice!
On Sun 31 Mar 2024 at 09:42:37 (+0300), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> I'm mounting and unmounting through the stick icon's menu on Xfce desktop.
> Maybe a fancy file chooser dialogue stays around analyzing the directory,
> as you suspect? But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefo
I'm mounting and unmounting through the stick icon's menu on Xfce desktop.
Maybe a fancy file chooser dialogue stays around analyzing the directory,
as you suspect? But I'm worried my Gmail in Firefox is capable of stealing
files off my USB stick.
On 31/03/2024 11:46, David Wright wrote:
Double-clicking on the directory
mounts it and displays the files in it. Opening a text file
displays it. At least for a small file, FF does not hold the
file open, so I can immediately unmount the stick.
Gmail may do something more fancy
- https://devel
On Sat 30 Mar 2024 at 21:06:27 (+0200), Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> I was able to replicate this, by trying to send gmail to myself in Firefox,
> attaching a binary on a mounted USB stick.
Did you mount the stick yourself as a user (ie there's an
fstab entry for it), or as root, or does an automo
On 3/30/24 08:17, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting a
stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry about my
stick security. Thanks.
Linux knows what files are open on each file system. If you try to
unmount a
I'd just like to add that I have seen the problem despite reinstalls with
Debian stable minor versions. Thanks!
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 07:32:16PM +0200, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> Yes, closing Firefox does allow the stick to unmount cleanly, but I still
> worry.
To get an idea of what's going on, you can use "lsof":
tomas@trotzki:~$ lsof /dev/sda1
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE
I can replicate this, by trying to send Gmail to myself in Firefox,
attaching a binary on a mounted USB stick. After the attachment supposedly
was uploaded, I tried to unmount the stick, but it blocked. "lsof | grep -i
KINGSTON" then shows a total of 129 lines from "x-www-browser". This lasted
for
I was able to replicate this, by trying to send gmail to myself in Firefox,
attaching a binary on a mounted USB stick. After the attachment supposedly
was uploaded, I tried to unmount the stick, but it blocks. "lsof | grep -i
KINGSTON" then shows a total of 129 lines from "x-www-browser". This last
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:17:52 +0200
Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting
> a stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry
> about my stick security. Thanks.
It sounds like Firefox has a file open on the stick. To c
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 1:19 PM gene heskett wrote:
>
> On 3/30/24 11:36, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
> > What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting a
> > stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry about
> > my stick security. Thanks.
>
> Since this
Yes, closing Firefox does allow the stick to unmount cleanly, but I still
worry.
On 3/30/24 11:36, Antti-Pekka Känsälä wrote:
What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting a
stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry about
my stick security. Thanks.
Since this is normally a root operation, I'm confused. Likely what it
means i
What could be the deal, when Firefox tries to stop me from unmounting a
stick, after I've accessed files on it through Firefox? I worry about my
stick security. Thanks.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 06:31:38PM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 13/01/2024 14:16, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > Some days I'm glad I stuck to the most primitive window manager
> > I could get.
>
> XFree86 (X11 server) had a similar feature a quarter of century ago and it
> worked in any windo
On 13/01/2024 14:16, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Some days I'm glad I stuck to the most primitive window manager
I could get.
XFree86 (X11 server) had a similar feature a quarter of century ago and
it worked in any window managers. If an application had overloaded GUI
that did not fit to support
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:41:47PM -0500, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> On 1/8/24, mick.crane wrote:
[...]
> > I get this effect if pressing Alt and moving the mouse wheel.
>
>
> Me, too, in LXQt. It's HARD finding the fix until you can finally
> remember it. It's easy to hit a wall of misses when
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:41:47PM -0500, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
On 1/8/24, mick.crane wrote:
On 2024-01-07 04:00, Russell L. Harris wrote:
system: amd64 desktop, debian 12, xfce, NEC MultiSync EA192M monitor
I don't know precisely how to describe the problem, other than
"
On 1/8/24, mick.crane wrote:
> On 2024-01-07 04:00, Russell L. Harris wrote:
>> system: amd64 desktop, debian 12, xfce, NEC MultiSync EA192M monitor
>>
>> I don't know precisely how to describe the problem, other than
>> "detachment". About every week o
On 2024-01-07 04:00, Russell L. Harris wrote:
system: amd64 desktop, debian 12, xfce, NEC MultiSync EA192M monitor
I don't know precisely how to describe the problem, other than
"detachment". About every week or so, when using the rodent, the
entire screen -- borders and al
On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 09:32:55PM -0800, Mike Kupfer wrote:
Dan Ritter wrote:
Russell L. Harris wrote:
> system: amd64 desktop, debian 12, xfce, NEC MultiSync EA192M monitor
[...]
That sounds something like having an X11 screen larger than the
monitor it is on, and X panning around t
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Russell L. Harris wrote:
> > system: amd64 desktop, debian 12, xfce, NEC MultiSync EA192M monitor
[...]
> That sounds something like having an X11 screen larger than the
> monitor it is on, and X panning around that. Typically, though,
> panning requires th
Russell L. Harris wrote:
> system: amd64 desktop, debian 12, xfce, NEC MultiSync EA192M monitor
>
> I don't know precisely how to describe the problem, other than
> "detachment". About every week or so, when using the rodent, the
> entire screen -- borders and al
system: amd64 desktop, debian 12, xfce, NEC MultiSync EA192M monitor
I don't know precisely how to describe the problem, other than
"detachment". About every week or so, when using the rodent, the
entire screen -- borders and all -- moves with respect to the monitor
screen as I
On 16/09/2023 10:09, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Altering the contents of an existing file in ~/.config/ upon login
sounds incredibly wrong to me, to the point where I have a hard time
believing it's a default behavior.
user-dirs.dirs(5)
The $HOME/.config/user-dirs.dirs file is a text file that conta
David Wright composed on 2023-09-15 22:22 (UTC-0500):
> On Fri 15 Sep 2023 at 21:24:53 (-0400), Curt Howland wrote:
>> On Friday 15 September 2023, Curt Howland was heard to say:
>>> I'm not interested in having directories like "Public" and
>>> "Videos", but every time I delete them something r
On Fri 15 Sep 2023 at 21:24:53 (-0400), Curt Howland wrote:
> On Friday 15 September 2023, Curt Howland was heard to say:
> > I'm not interested in having directories like "Public" and
> > "Videos", but every time I delete them something recreates those
> > directories.
>
> Found /etc/xdg/user-dir
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 09:24:53PM -0400, Curt Howland wrote:
> Found $/.config/user-dirs.dirs, commented out the ones I didn't want,
> no change. File $/.config/user-dirs.dirs reverted to original on
> logout/login.
Is that *normal* behavior of XFCE? I would look into that, pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Friday 15 September 2023, Curt Howland was heard to say:
> I'm not interested in having directories like "Public" and
> "Videos", but every time I delete them something recreates those
> directories.
Found /etc/xdg/user-dirs.conf, changed to "ena
On 16/09/23 12:19, Curt Howland wrote:
Good evening. Did a fresh install of Bookworm, installing desktop with
XFCE.
I'm not interested in having directories like "Public" and "Videos",
but every time I delete them something recreates those directories.
I can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Good evening. Did a fresh install of Bookworm, installing desktop with
XFCE.
I'm not interested in having directories like "Public" and "Videos",
but every time I delete them something recreates those directories.
I c
`The situation here is with Chromium on a SID laptop, while Chromium on
a Stable desktop is just fine.
Starting from a terminal gives:
Gtk-Message: 06:46:36.954: Failed to load module "appmenu-gtk-module"
libva error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/iHD_drv_video.so init failed
[12968:12968:0913/064
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 07:04:50 +
Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2023 13:14 -0400, from cele...@gmail.com (Celejar):
> > The truth is, however, that although I thought I had fully investigated
> > the problem, I was wrong. Upon further investigation, it seems that it
On 13 Sep 2023 13:14 -0400, from cele...@gmail.com (Celejar):
> The truth is, however, that although I thought I had fully investigated
> the problem, I was wrong. Upon further investigation, it seems that it's
> my uBlock Origin settings that are causing the problem - disabling it
> entirely (as o
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 01:14:34PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:16:15 -0500
> David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Wed 13 Sep 2023 at 08:24:27 (-0400), Celejar wrote:
> >
> > > I have no choice - there's at least one important site (of a major
> > > financial institution) that I need t
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 06:35:12AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 08:09:48PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > The OP was on Stable; with Sid, we're hitting this:
>
> Yes.
>
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051355
>
> In the OP's case, Curt's
On Wed Sep 13 10:22:29 2023 David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 13 Sep 2023 at 08:24:27 (-0400), Celejar wrote:
>
>> I have no choice - there's at least one important site (of a major
>> financial institution) that I need that simply doesn't work with
>> Firefox.
Tell me about it. I normally use Seam
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:16:15 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 13 Sep 2023 at 08:24:27 (-0400), Celejar wrote:
>
> > I have no choice - there's at least one important site (of a major
> > financial institution) that I need that simply doesn't work with
> > Firefox.
>
> Usual question: what doe
On Wed 13 Sep 2023 at 08:24:27 (-0400), Celejar wrote:
> I have no choice - there's at least one important site (of a major
> financial institution) that I need that simply doesn't work with
> Firefox.
Usual question: what does "doesn't work" mean?
Cheers,
David.
Celejar wrote:
> I have no choice - there's at least one important site (of a major
> financial institution) that I need that simply doesn't work with
> Firefox.
If I had anything to do with any financial institution, major or not,
that was so incompetent that their website wasn't browser agnos
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 06:35:12 +0200
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 08:09:48PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > The OP was on Stable; with Sid, we're hitting this:
>
> Yes.
>
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051355
>
> In the OP's case, Curt's proposal
>
> https
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 08:09:48PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
[...]
> The OP was on Stable; with Sid, we're hitting this:
Yes.
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051355
In the OP's case, Curt's proposal
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039037
fits things bett
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 06:55:40AM +1000, David wrote:
[...]
> Similar situation to mine, although specifics vary.
> The situation here is with Chromium on a SID laptop, while Chromium on
> a Stable desktop is just fine.
> Starting from a terminal gives:
>
> Gtk-Message: 06:46:36.954: Failed to
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 20:09 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 06:55:40 +1000
> David wrote:
>
>
> > Similar situation to mine, although specifics vary.
> > The situation here is with Chromium on a SID laptop, while Chromium
> > on
> > a Stable desktop is just fine.
> > Starting from a
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 06:55:40 +1000
David wrote:
> Similar situation to mine, although specifics vary.
> The situation here is with Chromium on a SID laptop, while Chromium on
> a Stable desktop is just fine.
> Starting from a terminal gives:
>
> Gtk-Message: 06:46:36.954: Failed to load module
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 15:25 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2023-09-12, wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > it seems I can't start chromium. Pretty straight net install,
> > Xfce desktop environment (no specialties, just the "normal"
> > install), then &quo
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 03:25:35PM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2023-09-12, wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > it seems I can't start chromium. Pretty straight net install,
> > Xfce desktop environment (no specialties, just the "normal"
> > install), th
On 2023-09-12, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it seems I can't start chromium. Pretty straight net install,
> Xfce desktop environment (no specialties, just the "normal"
> install), then "apt-get install chromium".
>
> Issuing "chromium" in a term
Hi,
it seems I can't start chromium. Pretty straight net install,
Xfce desktop environment (no specialties, just the "normal"
install), then "apt-get install chromium".
Issuing "chromium" in a terminal seems to hang, top shows
four processes running (and
I once used this configuration. As I was using it, I realized that it
was of no use. Here and there, ugly bugs (I don't remember which ones
anymore) came out. While using it, I realized one simple truth - it is
better to use with what XFCE is designed to be used with.
2023-08-27, sk, 21:05 T
Hello again, dear debian user comunity! I just wanna ask you, will any
problems be if i use XFCE and Awesome wm on my Debian Linux? 2 actions can
be:
I use Awesome WM as defautl WM of XFCE insted of xfwm4.
I use Awesome WM and XFCE in differents sessions.
Can I get errors or problems with these 2
|WLAN checked
|Bluetooth checked
+ Wireless Device Enable
WWAN checked
WLAN checked
Bluetooth checked
* Network Manager settings:
Xfce panel
-> right click NetworkManager Applet
->
On 05 May 2023 15:46, Charles Curley wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 12:29:53 +0200
zithro wrote:
That would be nice for them to tell you what THEY consider a valid
MAC addr, as I don't think Debian produces MACs with z or x in it ...
Maybe they check against a valid manufacturer (which is the 1st h
On Fri, 5 May 2023 12:29:53 +0200
zithro wrote:
> That would be nice for them to tell you what THEY consider a valid
> MAC addr, as I don't think Debian produces MACs with z or x in it ...
> Maybe they check against a valid manufacturer (which is the 1st half
> of the MAC addr, iirc called OUI) ?
On Thu, 4 May 2023 21:08:07 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> A further problem -- Debian
Well, it isn't really Debian, it's Network Manager.
> is changing the MAC address of the Wi-Fi
> adapter ("MAC address spoofing", a security "feature") to MAC
> addresses
This is a security feature for ro
On 5/5/23 03:25, zithro wrote:
On 05 May 2023 04:52, David Christensen wrote:
I was going to surf eBay and find another Wi-Fi card, but then I had
one last idea -- double-checking the the CMOS/NVRAM settings via
Setup. I cut the settings down to the bare minimum for Wi-Fi:
Settings
+ W
On 05 May 2023 06:08, David Christensen wrote:
On 5/4/23 19:52, David Christensen wrote:
That said, Wi-Fi does not work with my Ubuiquitti Networks UniFi setup
-- it doesn't like the MAC address.
A further problem -- Debian is changing the MAC address of the Wi-Fi
adapter ("MAC address spoof
1 - 100 of 1916 matches
Mail list logo
