Re: Error : virHostCPUGetKVMMaxVCPUs: KVM is not supported on this platform: Function not implemented

wrote: > On 29 Aug 2023 23:48, Mario Marietto wrote: > > > I'm running Debian bookworm [...] > > No you're not. > > You're running a MODIFIED Debian version with a (rather old) MODIFIED > kernel : > > > $ uname -r > > 5.4.244-stb-cbe > > > >

Re: How to install the kernel 5.4.14 (source and headers) packages on Debian buster.

ggestions to fix it ? thanks. On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 5:10 AM Max Nikulin wrote: > On 02/09/2023 04:15, Mario Marietto wrote: > > I've got a crazy idea : I see that Ubuntu has a 5.4 kernel source and > > header package. Is there a method or tool to convert these packages to > > d

Re: Failed to acquire pid file : /var/local/run/libvirt/qemu/driver.pid

kvm ; you can even use 6.x. The image that I've used there is the 6.x onboard,but I have recompiled 5.4. On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 7:10 PM Christian Britz wrote: > On 28.08.23, 18:44, zithro wrote: > > On 27 Aug 2023 12:09, Mario Marietto wrote: > >> $ uname -a > >> Lin

mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: CMD_RESP: cmd 0x23f error, result=0x2 on your image Debian Bookworm for the ARM Chromebook.

Hello. I'm playing with my old ARM Chromebook,model xe303c12. I've recompiled the kernel to enable KVM,such as qemu 5.1 and libvirt from source code because I want to virtualize FreeBSD 13.2 arm 32 bit. As default OS I've installed Debian 12. So now my system sounds like this : $ lsb_release -a

How to install the kernel 5.4.14 (source and headers) packages on Debian buster.

Hello to everyone. I've just installed Debian Buster on my ARM Chromebook,using this image : https://github.com/hexdump0815/imagebuilder/releases?page=12 He says that the image is based on the kernel 5.4 and it is. Infact the default running kernel is 5.4.14. But for the project that I'm

Re: How to install the kernel 5.4.14 (source and headers) packages on Debian buster.

. Cater wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 01:16:31PM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote: > > Hello to everyone. > > > > I've just installed Debian Buster on my ARM Chromebook,using this image : > > > > https://github.com/hexdump0815/imagebuilder/releases?page=12 > &

Error : virHostCPUGetKVMMaxVCPUs: KVM is not supported on this platform: Function not implemented

Hello. I'm running Debian bookworm on my ARM Chromebook,model "xe303c12" and I've recompiled the kernel (5.4) to enable KVM,so now my system sounds like this : $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) Release:

Re: Error : virHostCPUGetKVMMaxVCPUs: KVM is not supported on this platform: Function not implemented

thing in e-mail? > > On 30 Aug 2023 10:50, Mario Marietto wrote: > > Not a useful suggestion for me. I'm not a coder,such as I'm not a pro > > system admin : this is only a hobby for me. I try to do the best I > can,but > > I can't solve bugs for which a solution has not b

Re: Virtualization under Bookworm

to get QEMU/KVM set up. Is it easier now? > On 8/26/23 14:53, Mario Marietto wrote: > > For sure you can't miss qemu + kvm,they are the most powerful tools for > virtualization. With qemu and kvm you can pass through to the guest OS even > your gpu. With virtualbox or vmware you can'

Re: Virtualization under Bookworm

For sure you can't miss qemu + kvm,they are the most powerful tools for virtualization. With qemu and kvm you can pass through to the guest OS even your gpu. With virtualbox or vmware you can't. On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 8:40 PM James Bloom wrote: > Carl: > > I use VirtualBox on Debian 12, and I

Re: Virtualization under Bookworm

So,surely go with virtualbox or vmware workstation. On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 1:20 AM Carl Fink wrote: > > On 8/26/23 16:01, Mario Marietto wrote: > > If you want a powerful tool,you should spend some of your time on it. > > If you want to use something easier,you will lose some

Failed to acquire pid file : /var/local/run/libvirt/qemu/driver.pid

Hello. I'm running Debian bookworm on my ARM Chromebook,model "xe303c12" and I've recompiled the kernel to enable KVM,so now my system sounds like this : $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) Release:12

Re: Failed to acquire pid file : /var/local/run/libvirt/qemu/driver.pid

23, 18:44, zithro wrote: > >> On 27 Aug 2023 12:09, Mario Marietto wrote: > >>> $ uname -a > >>> Linux chromarietto 5.4.244-stb-cbe > >>> #8 SMP PREEMPT Sat Aug 19 22:19:32 UTC 2023 armv7l GNU/Linux > >> > >> Is it normal to get this "

Re: Failed to acquire pid file : /var/local/run/libvirt/qemu/driver.pid

Anyway,I found it relevant that I have the error with the wi-fi driver in debian,but not with devuan. On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:19 PM Mario Marietto wrote: > Yes.thanks. I've already asked there. The author is busy with different > projects,so I tried to look for some help from dif

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

Thanks very much. It worked : https://ibb.co/GHHDQ3H ; I'm at a good point by creating this derivative debian distro. Il giorno dom 16 ott 2022 alle ore 10:50 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > echo logo_debian_dark.png | cpio -H newc -o -A -F >

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

Debian ISO that does it automatically,only with a little effort by the users. Il giorno mar 18 ott 2022 alle ore 14:38 Curt ha scritto: > On 2022-10-17, Mario Marietto wrote: > > > > Hello to everyone. > > > > I'm building my debian derivative distro not for business purposes,bu

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

re. > > I found > https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Guidelines > which Mario Marietto should check. > > Naming of files is not mentioned, afaics. > But there is much emphasis on not using "Debian" in the name of the > "business". This demand applies t

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

ibb.co/GCBFcpK Il giorno sab 22 ott 2022 alle ore 18:02 Andrew M.A. Cater < amaca...@einval.com> ha scritto: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 05:13:18PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > > I'm trying to change the pictures i

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

an-new/custom-root/boot/ Il giorno sab 22 ott 2022 alle ore 22:45 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > This is what I did. I gone into this folder : > /home/ziomario/Scrivania/PassT-Cubic/Debian-new/custom-disk/boot/ and I > have renamed the file "initrd.gz&q

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

lse Dunno if it is correct. Il giorno lun 24 ott 2022 alle ore 19:14 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Almost,but not fully. Because I've realized that as soon as a new kernel > has been installed by the user,logos and images should be added > automatically in

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

-amd64 So. What's my problem ? I hope you understood,because I'm getting tired of getting the same wrong result. I have burned the ISO image thousands of times. Il giorno sab 22 ott 2022 alle ore 09:09 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > echo /usr/s

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

bian-logo.png | cpio -H newc -o -A -F /boot/old/$CURRENT_KERNEL_VERSION_NO_GZ gzip /boot/old/$CURRENT_KERNEL_VERSION_NO_GZ cp /boot/old/$CURRENT_KERNEL_VERSION_GZ /boot } kernels-check Il giorno lun 24 ott 2022 alle ore 13:36 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > >

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

:04 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hello to everyone. > > I'm trying to understand the reasons why the kernel file that I generate > does not work correctly. Maybe I've understood something,but I don't have a > clear picture of the problem. I want to try

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

pictures,which are different from mine. I hope that I have been clear. Sorry I don't have another way to explain what happens other than my narrative. Il giorno mar 25 ott 2022 alle ore 22:50 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > You seem to understand well what

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

much. Il giorno gio 27 ott 2022 alle ore 01:01 David Wright < deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk> ha scritto: > On Thu 27 Oct 2022 at 00:21:50 (+0200), Mario Marietto wrote: > > Please,check the images below. The image 1 and 2 come from the kernel > file > > unpacked with the

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

-Cubic/kernels/unzipped/initrd.img-5.19.0-15.2-liquorix-amd64/usr/share/plymouth/debian-logo*.png I didn't issue those commands. I've copied and pasted them by mistake. Il giorno gio 27 ott 2022 alle ore 14:22 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I tried to follow your d

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

q9eqRIRVG02-JH?usp=sharing Il giorno gio 27 ott 2022 alle ore 06:59 David Wright < deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk> ha scritto: > On Thu 27 Oct 2022 at 01:48:44 (+0200), Mario Marietto wrote: > > Il giorno gio 27 ott 2022 alle ore 01:01 David Wright ha scritto: > > > On Thu 27 Oc

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

10.0-18-amd64 gzip initrd.img-5.10.0-19-amd64 gzip initrd.img-5.19.0-15.2-liquorix-amd64 Il giorno gio 27 ott 2022 alle ore 20:45 David Wright < deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk> ha scritto: > On Thu 27 Oct 2022 at 14:22:45 (+0200), Mario Marietto wrote: > > I tried to follow your direction

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

uspect that the first command misses the part " --format='newc' ". What do you think ? Do you confirm ? Il giorno gio 27 ott 2022 alle ore 23:26 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Maybe it won't boot because I should sign again the new kernel file > produced ? &

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

Maybe it won't boot because I should sign again the new kernel file produced ? Il giorno gio 27 ott 2022 alle ore 22:37 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > You are extremely technical or cpio is extremely technical. Or both,I > don't know. For sure I'm a hobbyis

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

pio -t | sort >/tmp/no_depth 554538 blocks # diff with_depth no_depth | less no difference. Il giorno ven 28 ott 2022 alle ore 12:46 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > There are some kb of difference between the files produced by the two >

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

0.0-18-amd64 Il giorno ven 28 ott 2022 alle ore 10:39 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > If I have understood correctly,is this the correct form ? > > find . -print -depth | cpio --create --format='newc' > > ../../initrd.img-5.10.0-18-amd64 > > >

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

ven 28 ott 2022 alle ore 11:34 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > There are some kb of difference between the files produced by the two > techniques : > > 79.3 MiB (83,106,001 byte) : find . -print -depth | cpio --create > --format='newc' > ../

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

If I have understood correctly,is this the correct form ? find . -print -depth | cpio --create --format='newc' > ../../initrd.img-5.10.0-18-amd64 Il giorno ven 28 ott 2022 alle ore 04:32 Max Nikulin ha scritto: > On 28/10/2022 07:07, Mario Marietto wrote: > > > > find . |

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

9 Greg Wooledge ha scritto: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 09:32:00AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > > On 28/10/2022 07:07, Mario Marietto wrote: > > > > > > find . | cpio --create > > I rarely use cpio, but recently there was a thread on tar and unwanted > hard >

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

any "-type f". Very much. Il giorno ven 28 ott 2022 alle ore 15:47 Charles Curley < charlescur...@charlescurley.com> ha scritto: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:32:00 +0700 > Max Nikulin wrote: > > > On 28/10/2022 07:07, Mario Marietto wrote: > > > > > &

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

omas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > I've realized that as soon as a > > new kernel has been installed by the user,logos and images > > should be added automatically inside the initrd.img* file. For > > this reason,I've created the bash script

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

giorno ven 28 ott 2022 alle ore 18:15 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Ok. Thanks to everyone for the valuable help. In the end I have developed > this elementary script. I feel like a dwarf on the shoulders of > giants,but that's it : > > #!/bi

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

nicorn.co.uk> ha scritto: > On Fri 28 Oct 2022 at 12:44:43 (+0200), Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > > There are some kb of difference between the files produced by the two > > > techniques : > > > 79.3 MiB (83,106,001 byte) : find . -print

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

mar 18 ott 2022 alle ore 15:36 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Your last comment does not seem to be properly nice,when you say "your > verbose thread". Anyway,this is what you missed : "I want to achieve (to > create a debian distro ready for p

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

have opened both files with "engrampa" and I saw that they are the same picture. I really don't understand this bizarre behavior : > https://ibb.co/CQgpHYm Il giorno sab 22 ott 2022 alle ore 01:02 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hello again to eve

Re: Creating a Debian derivative (WAS Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image).

of the mail changed to reflect a new subject and topic following > the suggestions in the FAQ and mailing list code of conduct.] > Forwarded to the list as I sent this only to Mario by mistake. > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 06:29:45PM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote: > > Hello to everyone. &g

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

e components locales=en_US.UTF-8 quiet splash "${loopback}" initrd /d-i/gtk/initrd.gz It works,but maybe it can work even if it is not the best way to do it. Il giorno mer 12 ott 2022 alle ore 12:04 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Actually I'm using only

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

ile=/cdrom/preseed/preseed.cfg auto=true video=vesa:ywrap,mtrr vga=788 "${loopback}" initrd /d-i/gtk/initrd.gz Does it make more sense ? Il giorno gio 13 ott 2022 alle ore 10:15 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > What I haven't understo

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

ymore from since I have added it on the grub.cfg file. Il giorno gio 13 ott 2022 alle ore 16:27 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > > > menuentry "Debian Custom Graphical Debian Installer" { > > > > linux /d-i/gtk/vmlinuz APP

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

ok. If you don't like to append,tell me what you would like to do because I didn't understand. Il giorno gio 13 ott 2022 alle ore 13:07 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > > menuentry "Debian Custom Graphical Debian Installer" { > > linux /d-i/gtk/vmlinuz APPEND

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

p,mtrr vga=788 Il giorno gio 13 ott 2022 alle ore 18:00 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > ... > menuentry "Debian Custom Graphical Debian Installer" { > > ... > linux /d-i/gtk/vmlinuz APPEND file=/cdrom/preseed/preseed.cfg > a

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

ile. Il giorno mer 12 ott 2022 alle ore 08:39 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > In the end I found the solution. > > Congrats. > > - > Some remarks on the way to success

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

 Il giorno gio 13 ott 2022 alle ore 22:35 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > anyway,using another append shouldn't be wrong because the debian > developers > > used,not me,in this way > > Oh. In this case we shoul

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

mas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > You are right. It works without using the APPEND option > > Yeah. Once again guessed right. :)) > > > > I don't know if it's correct to use something like this in the > ISOLINUX/menu.cfg file : >

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > I suppose that the ML debian-live is not > > active or it is a very very low level of activity. > > It's what exists in respect to Debian Live ISOs. > https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-live/ > mentions the bug tracking sys

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

:06 Tim Ye ha scritto: > I would recommend to put the preseed file on a HTTP/FTP server. Then the > file > is easier to edit, and it saves you the effort to customize an ISO. > > - Tim > On 2022-10-09 23:38+0200, Mario Marietto wrote: > >I have also tried this

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

question,this time more oriented to programming,so I know which is the right place to ask and what to ask. Il giorno mar 11 ott 2022 alle ore 17:24 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > Can you suggest some other nice places where I can post the >

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

2 alle ore 21:32 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I always choose "Graphical Debian Installer" ,but I have to curb your > enthusiasm. Yesterday I added the preseed.cfg file inside the > /d-i/gtk/initrd.gz file and it has been ignored as well. > >

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

I always choose "Graphical Debian Installer" ,but I have to curb your enthusiasm. Yesterday I added the preseed.cfg file inside the /d-i/gtk/initrd.gz file and it has been ignored as well. Il giorno mar 11 ott 2022 alle ore 21:16 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > i should have looked into

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

mod +w md5sum.txt I don't have that file. Do you know how to generate it ? Il giorno mar 11 ott 2022 alle ore 18:36 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > You entered in a kind of analysis that I'm not able to do without the help > of someone else more skilled than

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

Finally I found something that's very close to the solution : https://askubuntu.com/questions/1228909/preseed-config-using-cubic-is-ignored-during-installation Il giorno mar 11 ott 2022 alle ore 21:43 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Maybe we reach the goal fas

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

sure that it's correct,mostly because the grub.cfg file uses two command lines. The second one is "initrd /live/initrd.gz". I'm not sure if it should be there or if I should delete it. Il giorno mar 11 ott 2022 alle ore 22:35 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

initrd.gz boot=live components locales=en_US.UTF-8 quiet splash "${loopback}" initrd /live/initrd.gz } Il giorno mar 11 ott 2022 alle ore 23:35 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I've added the string in both config files (menu.cfg and grub.cfg) and > th

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

:55:56PM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote: > > What is "${loopback}" in the context below ? > [...] > > insmod play > > play 960 440 1 0 4 440 1 > > if [ ${iso_path} ] ; then > > set loopback="findiso=${iso_path}" > > export loopback > >

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

om/preseed/preseed.cfg auto=true initrd=/live/initrd.gz boot=live components locales=en_US.UTF-8 quiet splash "${loopback}" initrd /d-i/gtk/initrd.gz } and the preseed.cfg file has been taken into consideration. Imagination is more powerful than knowledge. Il giorno mer 12 ott 2022 alle ore

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

I've added the string in both config files (menu.cfg and grub.cfg) and then I have rebuilt the ISO with cubic but the preseed file has been ignored by the graphical debian installer. Il giorno mar 11 ott 2022 alle ore 23:17 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

' encountered 'FAILURE' Il giorno dom 9 ott 2022 alle ore 22:40 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Sorry,I didn't see that reply. Anyway,it didn't work. I need some other > support,please. I've replied on the ubuntuforums. > > Il giorno dom 9 ott 2022 alle ore 22:12 Th

Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don’t produce a bootable ISO image

Hello. I'm trying to extract all the files from a (bootable) Debian ISO and then re-generate a bootable ISO image. Below you can see the commands that I've issued. For some unknown reason,the generated ISO image does not boot. Can someone help me

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

Sorry,I didn't see that reply. Anyway,it didn't work. I need some other support,please. I've replied on the ubuntuforums. Il giorno dom 9 ott 2022 alle ore 22:12 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > i already saw your questions in the web and wrote on > >

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

t ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > I've replied on the ubuntuforums. > > The deficiency of your run in > > https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2479825=14115075#post14115075 > is that you did not give the options for creating EFI boot lures. > Your VM

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

a/PassT-Cubic/ISO/isohdpfx.bin \ -boot_image any next \ -boot_image any efi_path=boot/grub/efi.img \ -boot_image isolinux partition_entry=gpt_basdat Il giorno lun 10 ott 2022 alle ore 12:15 Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: > Hi, > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > Drive current: -outdev 'debian-

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

-password-weak boolean true so,do you know why it is totally ignored by Debian,according to the commands that I have issued ? Thank you very much. Il giorno lun 10 ott 2022 alle ore 12:30 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Finally,this version works as expected : &

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

orno sab 15 ott 2022 alle ore 20:48 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hello to everyone. > > I'm trying to customize the debian 11 and I'm creating a derivative distro > for debian 11. I've changed a lot of logos,images and pictures,but not > everything. For

Re: Some of the parameters used in my genisoimage command don't produce a bootable ISO image

://ibb.co/SvbvsyR ; thanks. Il giorno gio 13 ott 2022 alle ore 22:58 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >  > > Il giorno gio 13 ott 2022 alle ore 22:35 Thomas Schmitt > ha scritto: > >> Hi, >> >> Mario Marietto wrote: >> > anyway

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

or. To learn is more important than to respect a rule that sounds so un useful for the peoples inside the private home. I would agree to respect it for the compnanies and the projects which involves money and business, but that rules goes against the creativty and the willing to know how things

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

I used Linux most of the time for many years and I use it even today for a lot of time,but from two years ago I've started studying and learning FreeBSD and I should say that It satisfies me like linux. Il giorno mar 22 nov 2022 alle ore 15:23 Bret Busby ha scritto: > On 22/11/2022 21:44, hede

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

How much FreeBSD code is inside the MacOSX code today ? Il giorno mar 22 nov 2022 alle ore 16:49 Martin Smith < t...@smithproductions.co.uk> ha scritto: > On 22/11/2022 13:44, hede wrote: > > > >>> Whilst I had mistakenly believed that CentOS was a freeware, open > source > >>> kind of MacOS

Re: just saying

Why not ? Think about this : you can put the malicious code where there is the lowest chance for someone to look. A lot of eyes are pointed at the closed source,because there are less eyes that can look inside there (at least less eyes than the eyes which look on the source code) and for this

Re: just saying

For most users it makes no real difference using closed or open source code,because yes,they can look inside the code,but to understand what the code does they need a master degree. So,for all these users,maybe it's a better idea to use the closed source OS,at least they will be able to use the OS

Re: just saying

grow in quality and quantity. Il ven 25 nov 2022, 00:16 David ha scritto: > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 00:01, Mario Marietto > wrote: > > For most users it makes no real difference using closed or open source > code,because yes,they can look inside the code,but to understand

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

Sometime ago I've bought an old mac mini,so I have the Apple hardware,man. Please don't be rude. Il giorno mar 22 nov 2022 alle ore 13:04 Peter von Kaehne ha scritto: > > > Open your mind. > > Do as you like, but please do it elsewhere. > > > >> Most people don't read EULAs. >> >> I have long

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

The ravynOS developers should know about the existence of basilisk II. They could give a look under the hood to understand how to implement the compatibility for the Apple's applications :D Il giorno mar 22 nov 2022 alle ore 20:04 Cindy Sue Causey < butterflyby...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

Point is : how many chances have the ravynos to enable the compatibility with the apples apps ? from a technical and Legal point of view,I mean. Il mar 22 nov 2022, 21:44 mick.crane ha scritto: > On 2022-11-21 20:03, Kamil Jońca wrote: > > Tom Browder writes: > > > >> I'm going to try to run

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

I've found it : https://airyx.org/ Il giorno mar 22 nov 2022 alle ore 19:06 Mario Marietto < marietto2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > There is a fresh project, a couple of years old and in development, about > a linux distro,if I remember correctly,or maybe it is based on BSD,with the &

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

2022 alle ore 19:26 Andrew M.A. Cater < amaca...@einval.com> ha scritto: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 07:09:32PM +0100, Mario Marietto wrote: > > I've found it : https://airyx.org/ > > > > Which has just decided to write a new GUI for itself - because it can. > Withou

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

gt; ha scritto: > Well... that would basically be MacOS, or a GUI that looks like MacOS > running on another BSD. > > > > Mario Marietto wrote: > > How difficult will it be to create a BSD system with the look and feel of > the MacOSX ? I mean,not only based on aesthetics

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

022 at 11:10 AM Mario Marietto > wrote: > > > > How much FreeBSD code is inside the MacOSX code today ? > > That's a good question. The Darwin kernel is XNU. But a lot of > userland code is BSD. In fact, a lot of Apple's man pages say (or used > to say) they are for BSD. See

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

Hello. What's the problem ? It's not hard at all. You can use a lot of techniques. You can use virtualbox or vmware or qemu+kvm + sosumi... Il giorno lun 21 nov 2022 alle ore 20:36 Tom Browder ha scritto: > I'm going to try to run Win 10 as a VM on my new Deb box following > instructions I've

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

https://snapcraft.io/install/sosumi/debian Il giorno lun 21 nov 2022 alle ore 21:11 Tom Browder ha scritto: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 14:01 Mario Marietto > wrote: > >> Hello. What's the problem ? It's not hard at all. You can use a lot of >> techniques. You can use

Re: MacOS VM on Debian: is it reasonably possible?

Hello Tom. If you want to have all the best features all around when you want to virtualize an OS,don't use virtualbox or vmware. Qemu + kvm will give you the better options. Depending on your graphic card,with the proper settings (on debian and on the qemu-kvm side) you can passthru one of your

Re: just saying

that you didnt understood what I mean with "socialyze' ; please read again. Il ven 25 nov 2022, 01:05 David ha scritto: > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 00:51, Mario Marietto > wrote: > > you missed the fact that Im not Talking about you or about the users that > are very

Fwd: just saying

Its not totally wrong to think that the software do what it wants to do even if you dont want. A software is a piece of code that respect the directives of the creator, so its easy that it did what he wants and not what you want. At least partially. -- Forwarded message - Da: Andy

Re: OpenSolaris Boot Environements equivalent

Hello Yassine, I think you want nixos.org. Il giorno gio 19 gen 2023 alle ore 12:28 Yassine Chaouche < a.chaou...@algerian-radio.dz> ha scritto: > Hello all, > > I was wondering if there was anyone working on an equivalent of > OpenSolaris BE? > Basically, > It automatically creates ZFS

Re: OpenSolaris Boot Environements equivalent

e 1/19/23 à 3:41 PM, Mario Marietto a écrit : > > The question asked by Yassine is interesting for me. I've been a FreeBSD > user for some years. After having used Linux for 20 years, I took the > decision to stop using it a little bit because of some technical > reasons,mainly tied to th

Re: OpenSolaris Boot Environements equivalent

The question asked by Yassine is interesting for me. I've been a FreeBSD user for some years. After having used Linux for 20 years, I took the decision to stop using it a little bit because of some technical reasons,mainly tied to the package management. Now that I'm using FreeBSD,I don't regret

Re: OpenSolaris Boot Environements equivalent

I still do not understand why,when I remove files on a ZFS disk using commands like (rm and rm -r),the left space does not increase,but it decreases. I would like to know what I can do to free some space if removing files does not work. And I don't understand why a ZFS disk goes fast out of space.

Re: OpenSolaris Boot Environements equivalent

Yassine,if you think that you will not love FreeBSD only because you have seen your friend put his hands in his hair,you are interpreting the situation too severely. FreeBSD is a good OS,easier than Linux and which doesn't have all the unnecessary superstructure that Linux has, but offers almost

Re: Grub bug on Debian 11

from the original ISO. 5.10.0-18-amd64 Thanks. On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 8:28 PM Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > [Copying to the list - private replies are discouraged > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 07:57:35PM +0100, Mario Marietto wrote: > > Hello to everyone. > > > > I'm tryi

Re: Grub bug on Debian 11

to understand what happens : https://ibb.co/album/S49Wgc I'm groping in the dark. Please help me to debug this error. thanks. On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 8:48 PM davidson wrote: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 Mario Marietto wrote: > > Hello to every Debian user. > [elided: Mario Marietto's apology

Re: Grub bug on Debian 11

100, Mario Marietto wrote: > > --> *Which* Debian .iso did you install with ? > > > > debian-live-11.5.0-amd64-xfce.iso. Is there a way to upgrade this to the > > version that you have suggested ? I prefer to learn how to upgrade it > than > > to make a fresh install

Grub bug on Debian 11

Hello to every Debian user. excuse me if previously I sent this message quoting the wrong user. It was a mistake. I don't know where that message has gone. It will be lost in the space. Anyway,I want to send it again in the correct format : "I've just installed Debian 11 and I see that it is

Re: Debian Installer: Specifying the preseed file device?

Hello to every Debian user. I've just installed Debian 11 and I see that it is affected by the bug explained here : https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1842320 I see that the bug has been fixed on Ubuntu. Do you confirm that,to fix it,I just need to install the package

Re: Debian installer chooses the wrong NVidia driver

If I dont get wrong,nvidia created one single driver which works for every gpu or almost ? it means that if I install the 525 driver for my RTX 2080 ti will it work also for my old gpu,GTX 1060 ? Il mar 21 feb 2023, 22:28 Georgi Naplatanov ha scritto: > On 2/21/23 23:16, Van Snyder wrote: > >

Re: Debian installer chooses the wrong NVidia driver

tried to use the 525 for both. I cant use the 390 for both the GPU. Il mar 21 feb 2023, 23:27 Mario Marietto ha scritto: > its not easy for me,because I have those GPUs on a single system. The OS > that im running is freebsd and I tried to virtualize debian 11 with bhyve > (hypervisor fo

  1   2   >