Un point important est de régulièrement vérifier ses propres
procédures de restauration (dans des conditions les plus réalistes
possibles).
Le dim. 30 juil. 2023 à 12:22, Sébastien Dinot
a écrit :
>
> Sébastien Dinot a écrit :
> > > Tu expliques bien les intérêts pour la sauvegarde, mais comment
Sébastien Dinot a écrit :
> > Tu expliques bien les intérêts pour la sauvegarde, mais comment se
> > passe une restauration ?
>
> Très bien. :)
Illustration pas plus tard que maintenant, suite à l'effacement
accidentel d'un message important reçu vendredi après-midi :
# export BORG_RSH="ssh -i
Michel Verdier a écrit :
> Est-ce que tu utilise la version 1 ou la version 2 ?
Version 2 sur les machines faisant tourner une Bookworm, version 1 sur
celle faisant encore tourner une Bullseye.
> Tu expliques bien les intérêts pour la sauvegarde, mais comment se
> passe une restauration ?
Très
Le 28 juillet 2023 Sébastien Dinot a écrit :
> La question n'a rien de stupide, tout au contraire ! Il faut commencer par se
> poser la question du besoin et des risques contre lesquels on veut se prémunir
> afin d'apporter une réponse pertinente et économiquement supportable. J'ai
> écrit un
Le 28/07/2023 à 13:42, Sébastien Dinot a écrit :
[...]
Borgbackup,
[...]
Vorta
[...]
A une époque, j'avais regardé ça (Vorta en utilisation principale GUI et
Borgbackup en utilisation dégradée CLI) ainsi que d'autres et je m'étais
fixé sur Déjà-Dup en GUI et Duplicity en CLI.
Mais ton
Le 28/07/2023 à 17:28, RogerT a écrit :
Le 28 juil. 2023 à 11:03, didier gaumet a écrit :
[...]
L'un des points qui me vient à l'esprit, c'est la dépendance:
- le fournisseur est-il fiable? Déjà, quelle est son honnêteté? Risque-t-il de
voler ou laisser voler par autrui les données de
> Le 28 juil. 2023 à 11:03, didier gaumet a écrit :
>
> Le 28/07/2023 à 03:56, RogerT a écrit :
>
>> Merci beaucoup pour ton retour très détaillé et illustré. Tu as vraiment
>> franchi le pas !
>> Je comprends pourquoi un utilisateur lambda (perso, prof libérale, etc.)
>> préférera
Le 2023-07-28 12:06, didier gaumet a écrit :
Tu n'es qu'un abject et cruel tortionnaire
Diantre, c'est bien la première fois qu'on me qualifie de la sorte, et
contre toute attente, je ne le prends même pas mal. ;)
tu l'anticipes et tu t'en vantes mais pourtant tu ne dévoiles ta
Le 28/07/2023 à 11:20, Sébastien Dinot a écrit :
[...]
J'ai écrit un article à ce sujet sur mon blog :
https://www.palabritudes.net/2020/11/21/quelques-reflexions-sur-la-sauvegarde.html
Tu n'es qu'un abject et cruel tortionnaire: tu l'anticipes et tu t'en
vantes mais pourtant tu ne dévoiles
Le 2023-07-28 11:02, didier gaumet a écrit :
- le fournisseur est-il fiable? Déjà, quelle est son honnêteté?
Risque-t-il de voler ou laisser voler par autrui les données de
l'utilisateur (pour compte propre ou celui de sa clientèle) (entre
autres, propriété intellectuelle, vie privée, etc...)
Bonjour
- Message de didier gaumet -
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 11:02:46 +0200
De: didier gaumet
Objet: Re: Intérêt d’un « NAS » commercial ou open source ?
À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
Le 28/07/2023 à 03:56, RogerT a écrit :
Merci beaucoup pour ton retour très
Le 28/07/2023 à 03:56, RogerT a écrit :
Merci beaucoup pour ton retour très détaillé et illustré. Tu as vraiment
franchi le pas !
Je comprends pourquoi un utilisateur lambda (perso, prof libérale, etc.)
préférera acheter un NAS commercial. Il le branche, installe un agent
sur son PC et peut
Le 2023-07-28 03:56, RogerT a écrit :
1/ Quel intérêt y a-t-il à avoir un NAS (un serveur avec du stockage
attaché, en RAID) chez soi; si on peut héberger l'équivalent chez son
hébergeur préféré ? (les services réseaux, dont la sauvegarde)
Si on considère les sauvegardes (sujet auquel
Le 7/27/23 à 23:24, Sébastien Dinot a écrit :
Bonsoir,
Sauf erreur de ma part, la question a déjà été débattue plusieurs fois
ici sous une perspective ou une autre. On doit trouver trace des
échanges dans les archives.
Bonsoir,
Oui, mais ça doit faire très longtemps.
Voici mon petit
Bonsoir,
Sauf erreur de ma part, la question a déjà été débattue plusieurs fois
ici sous une perspective ou une autre. On doit trouver trace des
échanges dans les archives.
Voici mon petit retour d'expérience personnelle.
Au boulot, j'utilise depuis une douzaine d'années des NAS Synology et
Le jeudi 27 juillet 2023 à 15:30:04 UTC+2, RogerT a écrit :
> > Le 27 juil. 2023 à 15:00, ptilou a écrit :
> >
> > Bonjour,
> >
> >> Le jeudi 27 juillet 2023 à 11:20:05 UTC+2, RogerT a écrit :
> >> Bonjour,
> >>
> >> J’ai eu l’occasion de manipuler quelques « NAS » commerciaux (un serveur
> Le 27 juil. 2023 à 15:00, ptilou a écrit :
>
> Bonjour,
>
>> Le jeudi 27 juillet 2023 à 11:20:05 UTC+2, RogerT a écrit :
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> J’ai eu l’occasion de manipuler quelques « NAS » commerciaux (un serveur
>> avec une baie…). Dont qnap et synology (basé sur debian).
>>
>> Le
Bonjour,
Le jeudi 27 juillet 2023 à 11:20:05 UTC+2, RogerT a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> J’ai eu l’occasion de manipuler quelques « NAS » commerciaux (un serveur avec
> une baie…). Dont qnap et synology (basé sur debian).
>
> Le matériel neuf fait bonne figure.
>
> Le GUI est censé simplifier
> Le 27 juil. 2023 à 11:47, Gaëtan Perrier a écrit :
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Je ne vais pas répondre à toutes tes interrogations mais juste partager ma
> toute petite expérience.
Bonjour,
Merci pour ton retour.
> J'ai un NAS Synology 4 baies (DS918+).
>
> Pourquoi avoir choisi un NAS tout
A mon domicile, j'ai un NAS avec Openmediavault (distribution basée sur
Debian).
J'ai récupéré une petite tour avec CM, cpu, alim, ...
j'y ai mis un petit ssd pour l'OS et 2 HD de 4To (miroring).
Certes, il faut faire la configuration mais c'est ce qui fait son intérêt.
Au travail tous nos NAS
Bonjour,
Je ne vais pas répondre à toutes tes interrogations mais juste partager ma
toute petite expérience.
J'ai un NAS Synology 4 baies (DS918+).
Pourquoi avoir choisi un NAS tout fait plutôt que d'en monter un à base d'une
debian ?
En premier pour l'intégration ! C'est tout petit ça ne
Bonjour,
J’ai eu l’occasion de manipuler quelques « NAS » commerciaux (un serveur avec
une baie…). Dont qnap et synology (basé sur debian).
Le matériel neuf fait bonne figure.
Le GUI est censé simplifier la vie de l’administrateur, mais de mon expérience
la lui complique et le ralentit,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:26:35PM +0200, the2nd wrote:
> i am developing an open source OTP authentication server and currently
> searching for someone to test it. I hope its okay to ask for this on this
> list.
>
> There is no documentation yet but i can write a step by step gui
Hi,
i am developing an open source OTP authentication server and currently
searching for someone to test it. I hope its okay to ask for this on
this list.
There is no documentation yet but i can write a step by step guide if
someone is interested in testing my project.
Installation
Hi all,
This Saturday and Sunday, Debian has a booth at the T-DOSE "Technical
Dutch Open Source Event" in Geldrop, The Netherlands.
Join us to discuss all things Debian, meet people from other projects, and
listen to interesting talks on many subjects. Entrance is free!
More i
On Thursday, September 15, 2022, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 9/15/2022 11:46 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:04:48PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>> > I am not against giving maintainers like Steve just compensation for the
>> > work they do fixing bugs, and by
On 9/16/22 12:05 AM, Maude Summerside wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-15 17:56, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 9/15/2022 11:46 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:04:48PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >>> I am not against giving maintainers like Steve just compensation
On 2022-09-15 17:56, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 9/15/2022 11:46 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:04:48PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>>> I am not against giving maintainers like Steve just compensation for the
>>> work they do fixing bugs, and by
On 9/15/22 6:29 PM, Lee wrote:
> On 9/15/22, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >
> > So I have to pay someone lots of money to fix a problem I already know how
> > to fix?
> > I don't think you really understand my use case very well.
>
> I surely don't. If you know how to fix whatever why haven't you
On 9/15/22 11:45 AM, Maude Summerside wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-14 23:23, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 9/14/2022 11:01 PM, Maude Summerside wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2022-09-14 21:45, Michael Stone wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:16:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'll be brutally honest:
On 9/15/22, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> So I have to pay someone lots of money to fix a problem I already know how
> to fix?
> I don't think you really understand my use case very well.
I surely don't. If you know how to fix whatever why haven't you fixed
it already?
Lee
On 9/15/2022 11:46 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:04:48PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > I am not against giving maintainers like Steve just compensation for the
> > work they do fixing bugs, and by compensation I mean money.
>
> It's a very tricky subject to
Maude Summerside wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-09-14 21:45, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:16:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> I'll be brutally honest: being accused of "possibly malicious"
> >> unwilligness is *not* a great way to convince overstretched volunteers
> >> to
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:04:48PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> I am not against giving maintainers like Steve just compensation for the
> work they do fixing bugs, and by compensation I mean money.
It's a very tricky subject to propose to start paying (some?) people
in what was
On 2022-09-14 23:23, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 9/14/2022 11:01 PM, Maude Summerside wrote:
>>
>> On 2022-09-14 21:45, Michael Stone wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:16:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I'll be brutally honest: being accused of "possibly malicious"
unwilligness
.
>
> Thanks Stefan, it's great to see that some people understand the
> issues.
>
> I'll be brutally honest: being accused of "possibly malicious"
> unwilligness is *not* a great way to convince overstretched volunteers
> to spend their time on issues.
>
>
I thi
On 9/14/2022 11:01 PM, Maude Summerside wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-14 21:45, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:16:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> I'll be brutally honest: being accused of "possibly malicious"
> >> unwilligness is *not* a great way to convince overstretched
On 2022-09-14 21:45, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:16:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I'll be brutally honest: being accused of "possibly malicious"
>> unwilligness is *not* a great way to convince overstretched volunteers
>> to spend their time on issues.
>
>
On 9/14/22 6:16 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Stefan wrote:
> In article you
> write:
> >> the interest of the user. These "volunteers" obviously have other,
> >> possibly malicious, interests if they prove themselves unwilling to
> >> apply fixes to bugs that are reported to them.
> >
> >I think
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:16:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I'll be brutally honest: being accused of "possibly malicious"
unwilligness is *not* a great way to convince overstretched volunteers
to spend their time on issues.
Especially when it's an ongoing pattern of discourse.
On 2022-09-14 17:06, Thiemo Kellner wrote:
> Am 14.09.22 um 18:39 schrieb Maude Summerside:
>> This is where intellectual shortcut starts...
>> Free/OSS doesn't mean GPL.
>> There's plenty of Free/OSS software that the copyright owner retains
>> right to commercial licensing. Just look at
Stefan wrote:
In article you write:
>> the interest of the user. These "volunteers" obviously have other,
>> possibly malicious, interests if they prove themselves unwilling to
>> apply fixes to bugs that are reported to them.
>
>I think there's a confusion here: these volunteers will also have
Am 14.09.22 um 18:39 schrieb Maude Summerside:
This is where intellectual shortcut starts...
Free/OSS doesn't mean GPL.
There's plenty of Free/OSS software that the copyright owner retains
right to commercial licensing. Just look at libraries, some of them will
be in such a licensing term that
On 2022-09-14 08:31, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>>> For example, most web
>>> browsers are based on chromium, a free oss project that comes in large part
>>> from
>>> Google, but some of the most-used browsers in the world based on chromium
>>> are proprietary, such as chrome and edge.
>> I am
People of debian-user :)
This thread does seem to be degenerating slightly into accusations and
name-calling, justified or not. Without prejudice to anyone: please may
I remind you that debian-user and all Debian lists and IRC channels are
subject to the Debian Code of Conduct.
It would be very
es. But on this thread, he also behaved like a troll and caused me to also
behave like a troll. That is a fact, if anyone wants to take the time to look at
what he said, the things he omitted in his replies, etc.
I especially noted his response to my introduction of the idea in this thread
that ope
On 9/13/2022 7:11 PM, Thiemo Kellner wrote:
> Am 13.09.22 um 23:55 schrieb Chuck Zmudzinski:
> >
>
> > I am fairly sure I was a victim of
> > the breach of Yahoo that affected hundreds of millions of its users.
> I am sorry for you. I do not know this case, so I cannot tell whether
> OSS or CSS
On 2022-09-14 at 08:51, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 9/14/2022 1:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 03:41:11PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Actually, someone already has shown us how to do it better. His name is
>>> Linus Torvalds [...]
>>
>> I don't
On 9/14/2022 1:03 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 03:41:11PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Actually, someone already has shown us how to do it better. His name is
> > Linus Torvalds [...]
>
> I don't know what your aim is.
>
> I have the impression that it's
On 9/14/2022 7:08 AM, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > On 9/13/2022 3:59 PM, err...@free.fr wrote:
> > > Please STOP!
> > >
> > > you are annoying, and if you want improve free softwares, is not
> > > like this. you will better contribute with your code or with your
> > > translations than by
ailed sometimes
> because I intend to create the perfect solution and thus not
> progressing, whereas in the work for money I am often forced to
> implement a working solution I can tell from the start, it will not be
> easily maintainable or extendable.
> > to think the situ
On 9/13/2022 6:47 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > If free/oss projects like Debian want to provide software with those
> > positive characteristics to their users, those projects must have in
> > place some level of oversight over what the persons who actually write
> > the software actually do, or
On 9/13/2022 4:38 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > The users. They stop using software or any product that does not work
> > well or is more trouble than it is worth. Then the entity, whether
> > a free/oss or proprietary provider ends up shutting down
> > the enterprise.
>
> But, being Free
> On 9/13/2022 3:59 PM, err...@free.fr wrote:
> > Please STOP!
> >
> > you are annoying, and if you want improve free softwares, is not
> > like this. you will better contribute with your code or with your
> > translations than by writing to this mailing-list
I agree with the sentiments of
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 03:41:11PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
[...]
> Actually, someone already has shown us how to do it better. His name is
> Linus Torvalds [...]
I don't know what your aim is.
I have the impression that it's just arguing for arguing's sake [1].
My time is too short to
to
implement a working solution I can tell from the start, it will not be
easily maintainable or extendable.
to think the situation might be better if either 1) open source projects
exercised more
oversight than they currently do over the persons who actually write the code
and
release
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 3:48 PM Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> > If free/oss projects like Debian want to provide software with those
> > positive characteristics to their users, those projects must have in
> > place some level of oversight over what the persons who actually write
> > the software
On 9/13/2022 4:31 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > the interest of the user. These "volunteers" obviously have other,
> > possibly malicious, interests if they prove themselves unwilling to
> > apply fixes to bugs that are reported to them.
>
> I think there's a confusion here: these volunteers will
On 9/13/2022 4:14 PM, Thiemo Kellner wrote:
> Am 12.09.22 um 19:47 schrieb Chuck Zmudzinski:
> > "Open Source Software is accessible to all means it can be used and
> > misused.
> > And, that’s where it turns unconstructive for us. With OSS, we can expect
> > ha
Am 12.09.22 um 19:47 schrieb Chuck Zmudzinski:
"Open Source Software is accessible to all means it can be used and
misused.
And, that’s where it turns unconstructive for us. With OSS, we can expect harm,
virus transfer, identity burglary, and many other malicious practices to
On 9/13/2022 3:59 PM, err...@free.fr wrote:
> Please STOP!
>
> you are annoying, and if you want improve free softwares, is not like this.
> you will better contribute with your code or with your translations than by
> writing to this mailing-list
The problem is, with all due respect, that I do
Please STOP!
you are annoying, and if you want improve free softwares, is not like this.
you will better contribute with your code or with your translations than by
writing to this mailing-list
I want you kicked from this list.
d advocates of free/oss software like
> >Debian
> >who think that it is good for free/oss software if the persons who volunteer
> >to develop and maintain free software like Debian can ignore bugs reported
> >to them
> >and refuse to fix them.
>
> Here's the thing
that there are supposed advocates of free/oss software like Debian
who think that it is good for free/oss software if the persons who volunteer
to develop and maintain free software like Debian can ignore bugs reported to
them
and refuse to fix them.
Here's the thing: it's open source. If you think it's
On 9/13/2022 2:02 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 12:42:12PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >Software projects today, IIUC, are communities. The "volunteers" should do
> >what the community
> >wants, not necessarily what you or I want. Do you think the free/oss
> >software
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 12:42:12PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
Software projects today, IIUC, are communities. The "volunteers" should do what
the community
wants, not necessarily what you or I want. Do you think the free/oss software
community wants
volunteers who ignore bugs or refuse to
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I agree with that. But the price-performance ratio could be even better if the
"volunteers"
in free/oss software projects were not free to ignore bugs reported to them.
Pretty much everything worked for this grub bug other than some
unfortunate
On 9/13/2022 12:36 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 12:25:40PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I agree with that. But the price-performance ratio could be even better if
> > the "volunteers"
> > in free/oss software projects were not free to ignore bugs
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 12:25:40PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
[...]
> I agree with that. But the price-performance ratio could be even better if
> the "volunteers"
> in free/oss software projects were not free to ignore bugs reported to them.
Hm. I doubt that. Perhaps they will do more
hether a free/oss or
proprietary
provider ends up shutting down the enterprise.
> You do realize that nobody enforces that on
> proprietary software either, right?
The users do, in the marketplace - and what is not used by enough users
eventually
disappears.
> THIS IS NOT A CH
On 9/13/2022 11:44 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:27:43AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > On 9/13/2022 12:36 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 03:32:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > >
> > > > [...] "I can't get personalized/dedicated support
alize that nobody enforces that on
proprietary software either, right? THIS IS NOT A CHARACTERISTIC THAT
DISTINGUISHES OPEN SOURCE AND CLOSED SOURCE SOFTWARE. Given that,
continuing this discussion seems silly. (Especially since it appears
that you'll simply to repeat your original assertion, mista
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:27:43AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 9/13/2022 12:36 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 03:32:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> >
> > > [...] "I can't get personalized/dedicated support with enforceable
> > > SLAs for free"
>
> If the
On 9/13/2022 12:36 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 03:32:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
>
> > [...] "I can't get personalized/dedicated support with enforceable
> > SLAs for free"
If the requirement that maintainers and developers of free/oss software must
actually
fix
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 03:32:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> [...] "I can't get personalized/dedicated support with enforceable
> SLAs for free"
Had I a printer, I'd print out this, frame it and hang it on the
wall. This makes the point very nicely :-)
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
often said about the
> >advantages
> >and disadvantages of free, open-source software that is maintained by
> >volunteers is
> >true:
>
> No, it's a misguided conclusion that isn't supported by facts. I can
> think of any number of bugs in closed source soft
is of grave or important
severity to
me is not necessarily of grave or critical severity to the official Debian
maintainers
and developers. I wish to merely point out that what is often said about the
advantages
and disadvantages of free, open-source software that is maintained by
volunteers is
true
On 2022-09-12 at 14:50, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 9/12/2022 1:58 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2022-09-12 at 13:47, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>>> I wish to merely point out that what is often said about the
>>> advantages and disadvantages of free, open-source s
Debian bug that affects me that
> > continues to be ignored, so I admit I have an attitude about that. I
> > accept that what is of grave or important severity to me is not
> > necessarily of grave or critical severity to the official Debian
> > maintainers and developers. I wish
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 01:47:49PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
[...]
> [...] A disadvantage is that often the priorities of the developers who
> release
> free, open source software are not always the same as the priorities of any
> particular
> user [...]
This might have
at is of grave or important severity to me is not
> necessarily of grave or critical severity to the official Debian
> maintainers and developers. I wish to merely point out that what is
> often said about the advantages and disadvantages of free,
> open-source software that is maintained by
maintainer is now on the case.
Still,
there is another Debian bug that affects me that continues to be ignored, so I
admit
I have an attitude about that. I accept that what is of grave or important
severity to
me is not necessarily of grave or critical severity to the official Debian
main
On 8/14/22, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2022 14 Aug 09:09 -0500, Lee wrote:
>> On 8/14/22, David Wright wrote:
>> > On Sat 13 Aug 2022 at 19:23:46 (+0100), piorunz wrote:
>> >> On 13/08/2022 18:30, Lee wrote:
>> >> > I just noticed that the netperf package is in the [non-free]
>> >> > repository
* On 2022 14 Aug 09:09 -0500, Lee wrote:
> On 8/14/22, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 13 Aug 2022 at 19:23:46 (+0100), piorunz wrote:
> >> On 13/08/2022 18:30, Lee wrote:
> >> > I just noticed that the netperf package is in the [non-free] repository
> >> >
On 8/14/22, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 13 Aug 2022 at 19:23:46 (+0100), piorunz wrote:
>> On 13/08/2022 18:30, Lee wrote:
>> > I just noticed that the netperf package is in the [non-free] repository
>> >https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/netperf
>> > which seems wrong.
<.. snip ..>
>> It
On 8/13/22, piorunz wrote:
> On 13/08/2022 18:30, Lee wrote:
>> I just noticed that the netperf package is in the [non-free] repository
>>https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/netperf
>> which seems wrong.
>>
>> Is the MIT license really not compatible with
On 14/08/2022 05:42, David Wright wrote:
The version in bullseye looks as if it was built on 15 November 2020 …
Perhaps package needs updating in Debian repository
… and has not yet needed upgrading for bookworm AFAICT (amd64).
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003833
MIT license really not compatible with open source or is the
> > netperf package using outdated licensing info or .. what?
>
> Very interesting. I don't know about this specific package, but MIT in
> general is allowed in DSFG.
>
> For example, this package is full MIT and it
On 13/08/2022 18:30, Lee wrote:
I just noticed that the netperf package is in the [non-free] repository
https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/netperf
which seems wrong.
Is the MIT license really not compatible with open source or is the
netperf package using outdated licensing info or .. what
I just noticed that the netperf package is in the [non-free] repository
https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/netperf
which seems wrong.
Is the MIT license really not compatible with open source or is the
netperf package using outdated licensing info or .. what?
The debian package copyright
Hallo,
Ik ben bezig met een site met WooCommerce, Wordpress, en betaalsystemen
zoals Ideal en creditcard-betalingen. Nu gebruik ik graag open source
software, waarmee ik bedoel dat de sourcecode te bestuderen is.
Mijn vraag is: die Wordpress plugins zijn toch PHP, dat is toch een
This is a bit old, but...
On 2021-04-24 15:37:28 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre composed on 2021-04-24 21:05 (UTC+0200):
>
> > Yes, very bad experience with the nouveau driver (I haven't tried
> > recently with the latest kernels, but my bug reports remained
> > unanswered), which
Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Clearly sent privately by mistake.
you are stupid asshole - I explicitly said I post in private
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Disregarding someone's request for privacy is rather disrespectful.
>
> When that happens for me, I reply with something that says, ~"keep it on
> the list, please"
Thank you
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021 08:00:27 PM Karen Lewellen wrote:
> For me personally, I have been through too many sex assault's
I am sorry to hear that.
Oh I can respect your stance, even if I do not fully resonate.
If one wants privacy, best to say so, at the top, not several pages down.
For me personally, I have been through too many sex assault's not to insure
my request not to be contacted off list gets ignored, even if I am the
only
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021 05:53:19 PM Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Clearly sent privately by mistake.
...
> > I send this in private, because of my private opinion here. I would
> > prefer we discuss this in private and perhaps you can convince me that
> > it is worth the effort. I do not know this
Clearly sent privately by mistake.
In context a bit.
On Tue, 18 May 2021, deloptes wrote:
No - they start and run it until government=tax payers money flows in
Really? Can you please point me to governmental funded Linux projects for
any disability population?
I will share your list with
Microsoft to makes its tts engine
eloquence, open source.
https://www.change.org/p/microsoft-open-source-eti-eloquence
If this resonates, please sign and circulate. its one of those ??situations
where adaptive technology and general technology can intersect in a
positive way.
It resonates a lot
deloptes wrote:
> It resonates a lot - as I wrote thesis on dialogue systems and I got very
> disappointed by the facts I came across. IMO all technologies that were
> financed with public money (i.e. DARPA) should be made publicly available.
> In fact AFAIK there is only one engine (the mother
1 - 100 of 1274 matches
Mail list logo
