Re: mac en rade

Oui ça revient au même, tu peux changer l'ancien par un autre et réinstallé os x. Tu peux réinstaller os x sans disque d'install ou autre clé USB en démarrant la machine et en restant appuyer sur Pomme+r (Cmd+r). Cette dernière démarrera un système de recovery qui permet de récupérer une image du

Re: Firefox lié à Google

> Le 03/02/2018 à 11:33, andre_deb...@numericable.fr a écrit : > > J'ai toujours le message : "en attente de www.google.com" > > bien que le site à afficher n'a rien à voir avec google, > > ni d'un clic dans la page google. On Saturday 03 February 2018 13:48:53 Éric Dégenètais wrote: > Custom

Re: mac en rade

Le 05/02/2018 à 10:40, didier gaumet a écrit : pour débroussailler un peu tu peux aussi essayer de démarrer SysytemrescueCD en mode: - Linux32 - Linux32 alternatif N'apparait pas dans le menu du grub de SystemRescueCD. J'ai pas compris pourquoi. - Linux64 - Linux64 alternatif Déjà

"Stopped (with error) /dev/dm-0"

Failed "Stopped (with error) /dev/dm-0" At every shutdown; looks like another oldie but goodie bug affecting those with encrypted swap (maybe some kind or race condition, if that is indeed the proper term). Having said that, filesystems are unmounted cleanly (no fsck at reboot, although the

Re: mac en rade

Le 05/02/2018 à 09:59, Belaïd a écrit : Essai de démarrer sur un disque externe avec une version Mac OS dessus,  c'est vraiment ça qui pourra te dire si ça vient d'autre chose que le disque dur J'ai un disque dur que je pourrai utiliser pour ca, mais pas de boitier dans lequel le mettre pour

Re: "Stopped (with error) /dev/dm-0"

On Mon, 05 Feb 2018, Curt wrote: > At every shutdown; looks like another oldie but goodie bug affecting > those with encrypted swap (maybe some kind or race condition, if that is > indeed the proper term). Incorrect sequencing, actually. But if this is ephemeral swap (or ephemeral *anything*),

Re: Firefox lié à Google

CSE : C'est juste le champ de recherche de la page d'acceuil de firefox. Switch a duckduckgo <--> Michel Memeteau - Directeur. Notre Boutique Ordinateurs

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 2018-02-04 08:22:23 -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:48:45AM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > > In which case, it should refuse to accept '4/2/2018' at all, right? > > It can't, that would break working scripts. This is the heart of the > problem: we know the parser is

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 2018-02-05 08:12:21 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 02:07:47PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2018-02-04 08:22:23 -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:48:45AM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > > > > In which case, it should refuse to accept

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 2018-02-05, Roberto C Sánchez wrote: >> >> It is not rare that the behavior of utilities change and break >> scripts. So, why not here, in particular for a good reason? >> > It is equally common, perhaps even more so, that buggy behavior is > retained (especially if it

XOR en php

re Bonjour, Ça marche sans problème avec les fonction ET et OU. Je n'arrive pas à afficher la valeur d'un ou exclusif, xor, en php. $val1 et $val2 viennent d'un formulaire et s'affichent bien : print ("$val1 $val2"); echo $val1 ^ $val2 (rien ne s'affiche). Si j'écris : $val1=12; $val2=9; echo

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 2018-02-05 at 08:58, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2018-02-05 08:40:27 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > >> On 2018-02-05 at 08:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> You should set up a "Mail-Followup-To:" for that. This is >>> entirely your problem. >> >> That does seem to be the trend and position of

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 2018-02-05 at 09:32, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 08:40:27 (-0500), The Wanderer wrote: > >> On 2018-02-05 at 08:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> You should set up a "Mail-Followup-To:" for that. This is >>> entirely your problem. >> >> That does seem to be the trend and

Re: mac en rade

Salut, Le moyen d’avoir un disque Mac OS X externe est possible via différentes voies : On clone le disque interne d’une mac sur un disque externe. C’est du « rsync » mais il y a quelques subtilités. Un outil comme « Carbon Copy Cloner » peut être très utile pour ça. On crée depuis un Mac une

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 2018-02-05 01:53:02 +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > On 05/02/18 01:44, Nicolas George wrote: > >> PS - please don't cc me; I'm on the list. > > Done this once, but I cannot promise I will think of it later. Document > > your preference in your mail mail header, the standard way, so that it > >

Re: Debian webhosting panel

Hoi Frans, Op 03-02-18 om 17:28 schreef Frans van Berckel: > Wie weet een webhosting panel, welke lekker integreert met Debian? Lees > voor services als mail, websites, dns en aanverwante zaken. Er zit er geen enkele in Debian, jammer genoeg. Maar kijk eens naar ISPconfig:

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 08:40:27 (-0500), The Wanderer wrote: > On 2018-02-05 at 08:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > On 2018-02-05 01:53:02 +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > > > >> On 05/02/18 01:44, Nicolas George wrote: > > >>> Done this once, but I cannot promise I will think of it later. > >>>

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:11:23AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > I assume (I know) that the license for date is some free / open source > license No need to guess. You can ask it. wooledg:~$ date --version date (GNU coreutils) 8.26 Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 02:07:47PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2018-02-04 08:22:23 -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:48:45AM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > > > In which case, it should refuse to accept '4/2/2018' at all, right? > > > > It can't, that would break

Re: "Stopped (with error) /dev/dm-0"

On 2018-02-05, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 05 Feb 2018, Curt wrote: >> At every shutdown; looks like another oldie but goodie bug affecting >> those with encrypted swap (maybe some kind or race condition, if that is >> indeed the proper term). > > Incorrect

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 2018-02-05 at 08:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2018-02-05 01:53:02 +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > >> On 05/02/18 01:44, Nicolas George wrote: >>> Done this once, but I cannot promise I will think of it later. >>> Document your preference in your mail mail header, the standard >>> way, so

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 2018-02-05 08:40:27 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2018-02-05 at 08:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2018-02-05 01:53:02 +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > >> My preference is for any personal replies addressed to me to go to > >> me, and I'd use the Reply-to header (as intended) if I needed it

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Monday, February 05, 2018 08:07:47 AM Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2018-02-04 08:22:23 -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:48:45AM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > > > In which case, it should refuse to accept '4/2/2018' at all, right? > > > > It can't, that would break

Re: XOR en php

Merci d'un tuyau. https://www.developpez.net/forums/f443/php/ ? f.

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 04:04:34PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > All you describe is convenience for programmatic use. As I explained, > this parser is meant for interactive use. What on EARTH made you think THAT? I promise you, people ARE using date -d '...' in shell scripts. LOTS of people.

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 2018-02-05 at 10:09, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:44:43AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > >> On 2018-02-05 at 09:32, David Wright wrote: > > [...] > >> > :0 Wh: $HOME/msgid.lock >> > | formail -D 19 $HOME/msgid.cache >> > >> > I used it for years. > >> I don't

Can't get my video card running

Hi, I fetched a new computer few days ago. The equipment are: Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350-Gaming CPU: Amd Ryzen 3 1300x RAM: 16Gb Video card: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Hard disk: WD green 240 Gb On this computer I installed Debian-9.3.0-amd64. I've first tried to install the video card. I found a

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 07:37 +0100, deloptes wrote: > Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > Can anyone give me some guidance in what I should be looking > > for?  It > > would be much appreciated. > > From my experience most probably inappropriate shutdown (no unmount > > when > > shutdown). > How do

Re: XOR en php

Le 05/02/2018 à 15:05, andre_deb...@numericable.fr a écrit : re Bonjour, Ça marche sans problème avec les fonction ET et OU. Je n'arrive pas à afficher la valeur d'un ou exclusif, xor, en php. $val1 et $val2 viennent d'un formulaire et s'affichent bien : print ("$val1 $val2"); echo $val1 ^

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On Sun, 2018-02-04 at 20:45 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 04 February 2018 15:49:36 Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > I am running Debian Stretch on am eight thread AMD GPU platform. > > Lately, it seems if I have been plagued by surfeit of orphaned > nodes. > > > > I have goggled the

Re: /lib/lsb/init-functions on LXC servers

Hi Reco, you mean this is a known issue??? Harri

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:11:23AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: I assume (I know) that the license for date is some free / open source license that would allow you to incorporate the old code into a new function (probably with appropriate citation / credit) and then add / modify / delete

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:44:43AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2018-02-05 at 09:32, David Wright wrote: [...] > > :0 Wh: $HOME/msgid.lock > > | formail -D 19 $HOME/msgid.cache > > > > I used it for years. > > I don't parse this well enough

Re: mac en rade

Personnellement le mode diagnostique (touche D) ne m'a jamais donné un résultat même dans le cas où il y'a eu panne, je me suis toujours demandé qu'est ce que ce mode vérifie et comment, car nombreux Mac que j'ai réparé (problème de disque, problème de nappe disque, problème de carte Wi-Fi,

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 08:03 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 03:49:36PM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > I am running Debian Stretch on am eight thread AMD GPU platform. > > Lately, it seems if I have been plagued by surfeit of orphaned > > nodes. > > > > I have goggled

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On Sun, 2018-02-04 at 23:06 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 04 Feb 2018, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > I am running Debian Stretch on am eight thread AMD GPU platform. > > Lately, it seems if I have been plagued by surfeit of orphaned > > nodes. > > That means: > > 1.

Re: mac en rade

Le 05/02/2018 à 16:51, steve a écrit : Quelqu'un m'appelle au secours a propos d'un mac qui démarre plus. J'ai loupé un truc ou quoi ? Heu… je vois pas ce que tu crains d'avoir loupé ?

Re : XOR en php

Le 05/02/2018 16:12:08, Odile Bénassy a écrit : > peut-être parce que ce sont des chaînes de caractères et pas des > nombres ? PHP fait la différence ? :-o nicolas patrois : pts noir asocial -- RÉALISME M : Qu'est-ce qu'il nous faudrait pour qu'on nous considère comme des humains ? Un

Re: mac en rade

Quelqu'un m'appelle au secours a propos d'un mac qui démarre plus. J'ai loupé un truc ou quoi ?

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 10:15 +1300, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > On 05/02/18 09:49, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > They seem to happen when I am > > running  four or more apps at the same time. > > I would never expect to see orphaned inodes except after a system > crash  > or kernel memory

Re: Can't get my video card running

Erkko Lahnajärvi schreef op 2018-02-05 15:49: Hi, I fetched a new computer few days ago. The equipment are: Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350-Gaming CPU: Amd Ryzen 3 1300x RAM: 16Gb Video card: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Hard disk: WD green 240 Gb On this computer I installed Debian-9.3.0-amd64. I've

Re: /lib/lsb/init-functions on LXC servers

Hi. On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 04:04:37PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi Reco, > > you mean this is a known issue??? Well, it's known to me (since then) at least as I merely read the contents of /lib/lsb/init-functions in my Debian system. Pinpointing the problem is easy, anyone who has

Re: XOR en php

On Monday 05 February 2018 16:12:08 Odile Bénassy wrote: > Le 05/02/2018 à 15:05, andre_deb...@numericable.fr a écrit : > > Ça marche sans problème avec les fonction ET et OU. > > Je n'arrive pas à afficher la valeur d'un ou exclusif, xor, en php. > > $val1 et $val2 viennent d'un formulaire et

Re: mac en rade

Le 05-02-2018, à 16:54:16 +0100, hamster a écrit : Le 05/02/2018 à 16:51, steve a écrit : Quelqu'un m'appelle au secours a propos d'un mac qui démarre plus. J'ai loupé un truc ou quoi ? Heu… je vois pas ce que tu crains d'avoir loupé ? … je dois avoir la berlue alors…  ;)

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On Mon, 05 Feb 2018, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > I installed memtest86+ and ran it with all of the defaults. It took > over an hour, but no errors were reported. Memtest86 and memtest86+ are not always that good at finding memory errors for some reason... Try a 24h/48h test over the weekend or

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

Stephen P. Molnar: > > I installed memtest86+ and ran it with all of the defaults. It took > over an hour, but no errors were reported. That's not long enough. From what I have read you should let it run for a day or so and even then you cannot be sure that there are no memory errors. > I am

Re: Firefox lié à Google

Le 03/02/2018 à 11:33, andre_deb...@numericable.fr a écrit : J'ai toujours le message : "en attente de www.google.com" bien que le site à afficher n'a rien à voir avec google, ni d'un clic dans la page google. Bonjour, ce message s'affiche quand tu fais quoi exactement? -- Cordialement,

Re: (deb-cat) Ethernet I219-LM em deixa de funcionar

$ sudo modinfo e1000e filename: /lib/modules/4.9.0-5-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000e.ko version:3.2.6-k license:GPL description:Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver (...) He provat traient i tornant a posar el controlador, sense èxit*:* === Failure

Re: mac en rade

Oui pardon. Effectivement je voulais dire le disque interne. Essai de démarrer sur un disque externe avec une version Mac OS dessus, c'est vraiment ça qui pourra te dire si ça vient d'autre chose que le disque dur (selon mes nombreuses expériences) Le 5 févr. 2018 08:57, "hamster"

Re: mac en rade

pour débroussailler un peu tu peux aussi essayer de démarrer SysytemrescueCD en mode: - Linux32 - Linux32 alternatif - Linux64 - Linux64 alternatif - Freedos et surtout ne pas oublier de démarrer en mode Memtest pour tester la RAM: une barrette mémoire défectueuse c'est un classique des plantages

Re: mac en rade

Le 05/02/2018 à 09:59, Belaïd a écrit : Essai de démarrer sur un disque externe avec une version Mac OS dessus,  c'est vraiment ça qui pourra te dire si ça vient d'autre chose que le disque dur (selon mes nombreuses expériences) OK, merci du conseil. Mais je n'y connais a peu près rien a

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

Michael Stone: Anyway, if there was a simple solution someone would have implemented it by now. Indeed, that is the case; and it has been around for almost as long as those 20 years that you have been watching people use the GNU tool. In 2001, Paul Jarc invented a fairly simple notation

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 15:45:54 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 20:26:46 (+), Brian wrote: > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 13:13:18 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 18:06:34 (+), Brian wrote: > > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 12:53:36 -0500, Greg

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 15:42:32 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 19:37:45 (+), Brian wrote: > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 13:12:45 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 18:01:08 (+), Brian wrote: > > > > > > > > Now you have problems (or could have).

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 17:07:35 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > Received: from david by alum with local (Exim 4.80) > > > (envelope-from ) > > > id 1eimCc-EV-Nv; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 13:13:18 -0600 > > > Is that meant to tell me something (as you wrote "but")? > >

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 13:12:45 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 18:01:08 (+), Brian wrote: > > > > Now you have problems (or could have). The first problem is that the > > "duplicates" are not duplicates because the headers are different. The > > second problem is - which

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 12:53:36 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:31:29PM +, Brian wrote: > > AfAIK. there isn't any way to determine whether a message posted to > > -user is from a non-subscriber. > > I believe some people are using the one of the X-Spam* headers > and

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On 2/4/18, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 04 Feb 2018, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: >> I am running Debian Stretch on am eight thread AMD GPU platform. >> Lately, it seems if I have been plagued by surfeit of orphaned nodes. > > That means: > > 1. "unlinked" files or

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 11:06:21PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 04 Feb 2018, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > I am running Debian Stretch on am eight thread AMD GPU platform. > > Lately, it seems if I have been plagued by surfeit of orphaned nodes. > > That means: > > 1.

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 19:40 +0100, Felipe Salvador wrote: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 11:06:21PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > wrote: > > On Sun, 04 Feb 2018, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > I am running Debian Stretch on am eight thread AMD GPU platform. > > > Lately, it seems if I have been

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 18:06:34 (+), Brian wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 12:53:36 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:31:29PM +, Brian wrote: > > > AfAIK. there isn't any way to determine whether a message posted to > > > -user is from a non-subscriber. > > > > I

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 19:00:16 (+), Brian wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 08:32:32 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > If it really worries you, the answer might be ~/.procmailrc and > > > > :0 Wh: $HOME/msgid.lock > > | formail -D 19 $HOME/msgid.cache > > > > I used it for years. > > So

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 13:18:29 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 19:00:16 (+), Brian wrote: > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 08:32:32 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > If it really worries you, the answer might be ~/.procmailrc and > > > > > > :0 Wh: $HOME/msgid.lock > > > |

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 09:41:20 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2018-02-05 at 08:58, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > On 2018-02-05 08:40:27 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > > > >> On 2018-02-05 at 08:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > >>> You should set up a "Mail-Followup-To:" for that. This is > >>>

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 14:45:17 (-0200), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 05 Feb 2018, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > I am rather hesitant about updating the BIOS/UFEI. In fact I can't > > seem to find an upgrade for the FX-8320 on the AMD web site. > > An update, if any are available,

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 10:24:14 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2018-02-05 at 10:09, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:44:43AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > > > >> On 2018-02-05 at 09:32, David Wright wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> > :0 Wh: $HOME/msgid.lock > >> > | formail

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Monday, February 05, 2018 10:02:50 AM Michael Stone wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:11:23AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > >I assume (I know) that the license for date is some free / open source > >license that would allow you to incorporate the old code into a new > >function (probably

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:31:29PM +, Brian wrote: > AfAIK. there isn't any way to determine whether a message posted to > -user is from a non-subscriber. I believe some people are using the one of the X-Spam* headers and looking for the LDOSUBSCRIBER substring. Which is extremely

Reply to sender, Reply to list (was: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag)

Richard Hector writes: > On 06/02/18 02:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2018-02-05 01:53:02 +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > > You should set up a "Mail-Followup-To:" for that. For reference, this refers to one of two proposed (but never standardised) fields

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 2018-02-05 at 13:47, Brian wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 10:24:14 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: >> If there's an ongoing discussion on that mailing list, and one of >> the participants wants to draw in a third person who also >> subscribes, it's entirely appropriate to CC a reply to that third

Corte de energia y DRBD

Estimados gusto en saludarles , escribo xq se que aquí en la lista hay personas que tienen mas experiencia en DRBD que la que yo tengo, por lo cual escribo sobre un gran percance que tuvimos en un par de servidores de correo , la version de drbd que estoy usando es la 8.4.X , hoy se nos presento

Re: BUG depuis deux versions du noyau de testing

Le Mon, 5 Feb 2018 23:22:37 +0100, BERTRAND Joël a écrit : > Bonjour à tous, > > Est-ce que je suis le seul à avoir des problèmes avec les > noyaux de testing ? J'ai assez souvent la charge de mon serveur de > test qui monte à plus de 500 (!) avec une

Re: [Was: Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 12:32:06PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: And for the far past, cal is superior; compare: $ cal -3 9 1752 August 1752 September 1752 October 1752 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 1 2 14 15

Re: [Was: Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 08:13:10PM -0600, David Wright wrote: But how would you deal with the simplest (to express) problem of all, that of $ date -d 1/2/18 Tue Jan 2 00:00:00 CST 2018 $ which would mean a battery of locale-specific rules. Yup. You'd need to accept something (probably

Re: [Was: Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:36:53PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: On 06/02/18 15:24, Michael Stone wrote: On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 12:32:06PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: And for the far past, cal is superior; compare: $ cal -3 9 1752    August 1752  September 1752 October

Re: [Was: Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 06/02/18 15:45, Michael Stone wrote: >> ... and how do you deal with locales that have changed definition over >> time? What was the country code for (eg) Prussia in 1752? It just gets >> painful ... > > Yes, this is more a novelty than anything. Even apart from changing > national borders,

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 23:20:13 (+), Brian wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 15:45:54 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 20:26:46 (+), Brian wrote: > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 13:13:18 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 18:06:34 (+), Brian

[Was: Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 05.02.18 09:39, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 04:04:34PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > > All you describe is convenience for programmatic use. As I explained, > > this parser is meant for interactive use. > > What on EARTH made you think THAT? The fuzzy grammar of the date

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 06/02/18 02:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2018-02-05 01:53:02 +1300, Richard Hector wrote: >> On 05/02/18 01:44, Nicolas George wrote: PS - please don't cc me; I'm on the list. >>> Done this once, but I cannot promise I will think of it later. Document >>> your preference in your mail

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 23:39:30 (+), Brian wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 15:42:32 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 19:37:45 (+), Brian wrote: > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 13:12:45 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 18:01:08 (+), Brian

Re: [Was: Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Tue 06 Feb 2018 at 12:32:06 (+1100), Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 05.02.18 09:39, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 04:04:34PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > > > All you describe is convenience for programmatic use. As I explained, > > > this parser is meant for interactive use.

Re: [Was: Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 06/02/18 15:24, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 12:32:06PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: >> And for the far past, cal is superior; compare: >> >> $ cal -3 9 1752 >>    August 1752  September 1752 October 1752 >> Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa  Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa  Su Mo

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 05.02.18 10:02, Michael Stone wrote: > IIRC it started out as a YACC function in the late 80s, and is now a Bison > (YACC+GNU extensions) library. In that case it has a precise grammar, expressed in BNF (Backus Naur Form), though the lexer (I've always used lex together with yacc/bison) could

Constatez vos déséquilibres métaboliques

_ _ Cliquez ici pour vous inscrire ou inviter vos amis à s'inscrire à la Newsletter de Bertrand Canavy en leur transférant cet email [http://links.learnymail.fr/c/i5_/F2Rb/T1rfnJt6dhPF0UBDkwI_Ey/mzY/LySD/60515edb Bonjour  Chère Lectrice, Cher Lecteur,   CONSTATEZ VOS DÉSÉQUILIBRES

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 20:26:46 (+), Brian wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 13:13:18 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 18:06:34 (+), Brian wrote: > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 12:53:36 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:31:29PM +,

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 19:37:45 (+), Brian wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 13:12:45 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 18:01:08 (+), Brian wrote: > > > > > > Now you have problems (or could have). The first problem is that the > > > "duplicates" are not duplicates

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

> > Received: from david by alum with local (Exim 4.80) > > (envelope-from ) > > id 1eimCc-EV-Nv; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 13:13:18 -0600 > Is that meant to tell me something (as you wrote "but")? Without knowing exactly what piece Brian was focusing on, I can at least

BUG depuis deux versions du noyau de testing

Bonjour à tous, Est-ce que je suis le seul à avoir des problèmes avec les noyaux de testing ? J'ai assez souvent la charge de mon serveur de test qui monte à plus de 500 (!) avec une occupation CPU de 0 et les logs remplis de : [226324.616534] BUG: Bad page map in process apache2

Re: Frustration over Debian naming

rhkramer: Intentionally cross posted. Aside: For those on the debian-user lists, the thread came from the debian-backports list, but my frustration should probably be expressed more to the debian-user list (or debian-developer list, assuming there is such a list (to which I am not

Re: (deb-cat) Ethernet I219-LM em deixa de funcionar

Gràcies per les referències; El dhclient el poso per quan es detecta que ifup no ha aconseguit que per sí mateix el sistema operatiu assoleixi la configuració ja establerta a /etc/network/interfaces Ara he afegit "ip link set ... up/down" al procediment, tot i que no sé si iproute (que prou antic

Re: Frustration over Debian naming

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: > Tangentially to that, it seems that someone needs to pick up the dropped > baton and update the pictures. Those are all copies of a diagram by Claudio Filho, if anyone updates it, please send him a pull request to update the

Re: [Was: Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

>> I promise you, people ARE using date -d '...' in shell scripts. >> LOTS of people. Hell, I've done it.(*) The Java Gregorian Calendar class was a delightful piece of software when I last used it (15 or so years ago). It does know the difference between the Julian and Gregorian calendars,

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On 06/02/18 18:38, Erik Christiansen wrote: > Perl is the quintessential write-only language, which with a bit of luck > will die out before it catches on Now you're getting to fighting talk ... :-) Richard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 16:09:11 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:44:43AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > > On 2018-02-05 at 09:32, David Wright wrote: > > [...] > > > > :0 Wh: $HOME/msgid.lock > > > | formail -D 19 $HOME/msgid.cache > > > > > > I used it for years. >

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

Thanks On Monday, February 05, 2018 09:46:54 AM Greg Wooledge wrote: > No need to guess. You can ask it. > > wooledg:~$ date --version

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 08:32:32 -0600, David Wright wrote: > If it really worries you, the answer might be ~/.procmailrc and > > :0 Wh: $HOME/msgid.lock > | formail -D 19 $HOME/msgid.cache > > I used it for years. So has Microsoft in Exchange. They use it to delete a user's mails silently.

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 18:01:08 (+), Brian wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 16:09:11 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:44:43AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: > > > On 2018-02-05 at 09:32, David Wright wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > :0 Wh: $HOME/msgid.lock > > > > |

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On 06/02/18 07:32, David Wright wrote: I'm not in the habit of upgrading BIOS/UEFI on my computers. (I do have {amd64,intel}-microcode installed.) What old or buggy code would I be running when booting a linux installation? (I accept that Grub has to run, and the kernel and initramfs be found,

Re: Causes, cures and prevention of orphaned inodes?

On 06/02/18 04:52, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: I installed memtest86+ and ran it with all of the defaults. It took over an hour, but no errors were reported. Please try parallel memtester and stress. These found memory errors for me that were not found by memtest86+. In *eight* terminal

Re: policy around 'wontfix' bug tag

On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 13:13:18 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 18:06:34 (+), Brian wrote: > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 12:53:36 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:31:29PM +, Brian wrote: > > > > AfAIK. there isn't any way to determine whether

  1   2   >